Books 'r Us

Best Seller Books

NEWS

News Headlines for Sunday Septemer 20, 2009

Posted by xbooks at 02:07 AM on September 20, 2009

Official: FCC to propose 'Net neutrality' rules

Tech gadgets can be addictive

 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Recent Articles

Official: FCC to propose 'Net neutrality' rules (AP)

Feds balk at Google book deal, hopes for changes (AP)

States send mixed message on texting and driving (AP)

Microsoft CEO Ballmer's salary up 4 percent in '09 (AP)

World's 2 most valuable brands: Coca-Cola, IBM (AP)

The head of the FCC plans to propose new rules that would prohibit Internet service providers from interfering with the free flow of information and certain applications over their networks, an official at the agency said Saturday.

The Federal Communications Commission chairman, Julius Genachowski, will announce the proposed rules in a speech Monday at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank, the official said on condition of anonymity because news of the announcement had not been formally released.

The proposals would uphold a pledge Barack Obama made during the presidential campaign to support Internet neutrality ? the equal treatment of Internet traffic. That would bar Internet service providers such as Verizon Communications Inc., Comcast Corp. or AT&T Inc., from slowing or blocking certain services or content flowing through their vast networks.

Without strict rules ensuring Net neutrality, consumer watchdogs fear the communications companies could interfere with the transmission of content, such as TV shows delivered over the Internet, that compete with services the ISPs offer, like cable television.

Internet providers have opposed regulations that would inhibit the way they control their networks, arguing they need to be able to make sure applications that consume a lot of bandwidth don't slow Internet access to other users.

"This is about whether I can turn off my cable TV and watch TV over the Internet," said Dave Burstein, editor of the DSL Prime broadband industry newsletter. "Comcast cares about this because they don't want people to turn off their cable TV."

The FCC adopted four principles on Internet policy in 2005. Two years later, it said it would study the business practices of high-speed Internet providers and consider whether a principle of nondiscrimination in traffic should be added.

Burstein thinks the FCC probably will adopt a fifth principle on nondiscrimination as part of the expected new rules.

The FCC's existing net neutrality principles have focused on high-speed Internet access delivered over wireline systems. But Google Inc. and other big technology companies, as well as consumer advocacy groups, have called for rules that would require wireless networks to be similarly open to all devices and applications.

UBS analyst John Hodulik said extending the principles to the wireless arena is going to be "a bit difficult because the regulation of wireless is very different than the regulation of the wireline networks, where the FCC has played a much stronger role."

"In wireless, these companies typically have paid billions of dollars to buy licenses ... and now operate in a very independent market with absolutely no government subsidies or government involvement," he said. "So it would be a new era of regulation for what is a very competitive market."

But the rules' effectiveness "really depends on the details," Hodulik added. "These could be just relatively vague rules that prevent obvious forms of discrimination, like blocking a Web site or mowing down the packets from a competitor's service."

The FCC official declined to elaborate on the new rules, but said the agency wants to create a baseline standard for all platforms that deliver the Internet.

The proposed new rules were reported earlier by The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.

"We are concerned about the unintended consequences that Net neutrality regulation would have on investments from the very industry that's helping to drive the U.S. economy," Chris Guttman-McCabe, a vice president at CTIA, a wireless trade group, told the Post.

The FCC began wading into the issue even before Genachowski became FCC chairman. Last year the FCC rebuked Comcast for blocking or delaying some forms of Internet file-sharing. Comcast agreed to stop the practice.

A spokeswoman for Philadelphia-based Comcast declined to comment on the FCC's planned announcement. A spokesman for Verizon of New York did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

Categories: None

Post a Comment

Already a member? Sign In

1 Comment

Reply Herman X
12:21 PM on September 20, 2009
Should the US split into 2 different countries?
I am having difficulty understanding why Americans do not wish for a split, a peaceful split. it already feels like the country is already split and the south has never accepted the union.

I personally feel that the us would be a greater and more long lasting empire if the progressive states set the agenda as opposed to the south.

i think the progressive part would thrive commercially, economically , socially , would be more welcomed by other countries and in return more attractive to other countries for investment tourism etc etc. where as the south presently and historically hasn't had much to offer the wide world or the us.

(i live in the south for approx 7 years)

my opinion is that its possible that the south would go back to some form of official segregation, no science poor education etc etc I think that the south would be worrying to the rest of the us and the world because of its tendency to want to fight ..warmongering. who would stop them?

what do you think how do you think the states would be ...do you think their is a fear of the south that prevents this conversation taking off. do you think the south would be regressive and ultimately become unimportant

do you think that the progressive part would benefit especially its politics not having to spend most of its time placating individuals who are ostensibly only interested in faith values.

i wonder if the republican party would become a serious party taking on serious issues if it wasn't beholden to the values of the south

i don't mean any offense to those of us who live in the south i just wonder why this is not on the agenda especially for progressives

Welcome

Recent Videos

Recent Blog Entries

by xbooks | 0 comments
by xbooks | 0 comments
by xbooks | 0 comments

Add to Cart

No featured products.

Recent Photos