Entertainment/Copyright LawLAW 734, § 1 -- Spring 2006 -- 3 Credits
|
|
|
|
Copyright Law:U.S. Office | Stanford | U. Texas || Entertainment Law: Cardozo | Hastings | UCLA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| CLASS #: DATE (2006) |
CASEBOOK PAGES |
TOPICS |
|---|---|---|
| #1: Mon. 9 January |
v-xii & 1-41 | The Subject Matter of Copyright |
| #2: Wed. 11 January |
41-86 | " |
| NO CLASS: Mon. 16 January |
. . . | . . . |
| #3: Wed. 18 January |
86-128 | " |
| #4: Mon. 23 January |
129-174 | Publication |
| #5: Wed. 25 January |
174-216 | Formalities |
| #6: Mon. 30 January |
216-263 | The Nature of Rights Protected by Copyright |
| #7: Wed. 1 February |
263-303 | The Duration of Copyright |
| #8: Mon. 6 February |
304-347 | " |
| #9: Wed. 8 February |
349-393 | Transfers of Copyright |
| #10: Mon. 13 February |
393-437 | Infringement Actions |
| #11: Wed. 15 February |
438-481 | " |
| #12: Mon. 20 February |
481-530 | " |
| #13 Wed. 22 February |
530-581 | Copyright Remedies |
| #14: Mon. 27 February |
581-614 | Federal Preemption of State Law |
| #15: Wed. 1 March |
614-660 | Authors' Moral Rights |
| NO CLASS: Mon. 6 March |
. . . | . . . |
| NO CLASS: Wed. 8 March |
. . . | . . . |
| #16: Mon. 13 March |
661-705 | Unfair Competition |
| #17: Wed. 15 March |
705-748 | The Protection of Ideas by Express or Implied Contract |
| #18: Mon. 20 March |
749-798 | Defamation |
| #19: Wed. 22 March |
798-838 | " |
| #20: Mon. 27 March |
838-879 | " |
| #21: Wed. 29 March |
879-923 | Right of Privacy--Public Disclosure of Private Facts |
| #22: Mon. 3 April |
924-967 | " |
| NO CLASS: Wed. 5 April |
. . . | . . . |
| #23: Mon. 10 April |
967-1012 | " |
| #24: Wed. 12 April |
1012-1066 | Right of Privacy--False Light |
| #25: Mon. 17 April |
1066-1101 | Right of Publicity |
| #26: Wed. 19 April |
1101-1144 | " |
| #27: Mon. 24 April |
950-990 | " |
| #28: Wed. 26 April |
990-1022 | " |
| Friday 5 May |
6:00 p.m. | FINAL EXAMINATION |
REQUIREMENTS: (1) Students should read the cases and statutes in the book according to the above schedule and should be prepared to recite oral briefs and answer questions in class. As time permits, students are encouraged to read the other textual material as well. (2) Students should check the course TWEN page periodically for announcements and other information posted by the instructor or by other students. (3) Students will take a traditional, in-class, closed-book final examination consisting of four essay questions, each weighted equally. The questions will be based on issues raised in the casebook and/or supplement and/or class discussion.
ATTENDANCE: The ABA and Widener University policy is that students must attend at least 80% of all classes without exception. No excuses can be accepted for failing to meet this residency requirement. This means that every student must attend a minimum of 22.0 classes. Any student who is absent for 6.1 or more classes will receive a course grade of "W" (Withdrawal); the instructor will endeavor, but does not guarantee, to notify students who are approaching this limit. Arriving late or leaving early is counted as a partial absence. A student who misses the roll call at the beginning of class is irrebuttably presumed to be absent unless he/she makes his/her presence known to the instructor immediately after class.
COMMUNICATION: Students are encouraged to contact the instructor at any time, either privately via email or phone, or publicly via the TWEN bulletin board for the course. Individual meetings can be arranged at a mutually convenient time and place.
GRADING: The course grade will be determined by the grade received on the final examination, which may be raised or lowered by one grade (e.g., from B+ to A-, or from C to C-) on the basis of the student's class participation. The instructor will be available over the summer to review the final exams with any student who is interested and to suggest means for improvement in writing successful essay answers.
![]()
|
MINIMUM FAULT STANDARD FOR EACH LIBEL ELEMENT |
At |
After New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) |
After Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974) |
After Dun & Bradstreet v. Greenmoss Builders (1985) |
After Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps (1986) |
|
Publication |
At least negligence |
At least negligence |
At least negligence |
At least negligence |
At least negligence |
|
Identification |
Strict liability |
Strict liability, but must actually identify |
Strict liability, but must actually identify |
Strict liability, but must actually identify |
Strict liability, but must actually identify |
|
Defamation |
Strict liability |
Strict liability |
Strict liability, but P who cannot prove actual malice (as to falsity) must prove actual injury |
Strict liability, but P who cannot prove actual malice (as to falsity) must prove actual injury |
Strict liability, but P who cannot prove actual malice (as to falsity) must prove actual injury |
|
Falsity |
Strict liability, with burden on D to prove truth |
Strict liability, with burden on D to prove truth; but if P is a public official being criticized for performance of official duties, then P must prove actual malice |
(Topic is of public concern): At least negligence, with burden on D to prove truth; if P is seeking presumed or punitive damages, or if P is a public figure seeking ANY damages, then P must prove actual malice |
(Topic is of private concern): Same as before, but as long as P is a private figure, then negligence is sufficient to receive presumed or punitive damages |
If there is a media D and the topic is of public concern, then P (public or private figure) must prove falsity
Wm. Martin Sloane |
This website is hosted for free by .
Get your own Free Website now!
|