Prove that no integer solution exists for x4 + y4 = z2 for x,y,z <> 0 We prove using the famous infinite descend method from Fermat
We assume that a smallest integer solution x1 , y1 , z1 does exist. Therefore (x1,y1,z1) = 1 and so (x1,y1)=1 , (x1,z1)=1 , (y1,z1) = 1 Because (x1,y1)=1 both x1 and y1 cannot be even. So either both x1 and y1 is uneven or x1 is odd and y1 is even. Lets consider the case for both x1 and y1 uneven. Now if x1 uneven then x1 = 2n+1 , so x14 = 4k + 1 and y1 = 2m+1 so that y14 = 4h+1 So then z12 = 4g + 2 = 2(2g+1) = 2h where h is uneven So z12 is then even and so must be z1. But z1 is the square root of 2h which is clearly irrational So x1 must be odd and y1 must be even and so z1 must be odd > 0 Therefore y14 = (z1 - x12)(z1 + x12) = AB --- parx Where z1-x12 = A and z1 + x12 = B Let e | r means e divides r Because y14 is even 4 | y14 and some odd prime t | y14 Now let us suppose that 4 divides both A and B Let == suffice for congruent to , so that r == s mod t means t | (r-s) We have then z1 == x12 mod 4 and we have that z1 == -x12 mod 4 So 2z1 == 0 mod 4 and 2x12 == 0 mod 4 But this cannot be as (x1,z1) = 1 The same argument follows for t | y14 We again get that 2z1 == 0 mod t and 2x12 == 0 mod t But this cannot be as (x1,z1) = 1 So we can say that because of the above and because A and B is even that (A,B) = 2 which means that [(z1 - x12) , (z1 + x12)] = 2 end parx So we can write y1 = 2ab where (a,b)=1 and a is odd > 0 and b may be odd or even. However because y1 is even we know that at least 16 | y14 , so for A and B one must have 2 as factor and the other one must have 8 as factor. So we have either that Case 1: A = 2a4 and B = 8b4 or Case2: that A = 8b4 and B = 2a4 Now lets consider the first case Here we have that z1-x12 = 2a4 and z1+x12 = 8b4 , so x12 = -a4 + 4b4 But x1 is odd , so we have that x1 == (1 or 3)mod4 So x12 == (1 or 9)mod4 , so x12 == 1 mod4 We see that 4b4==0mod4 and we have a odd so that a==(1 or 3)mod4 So a4 == (1 or 81)mod4 , so a4==(1 or 1)mod4 , so a4==1mod4 So -a4==-1mod4. Therefore 4b4 - a4 == -1mod4 but x12 = 4b4 - a4 So x12 ==-1mod4. We therefore have a contradiction as x12 cannot both be congruent to 1 and -1 mod4 Case two must therefore be correct and we have that z1-x12 = 8b4 and z1+x12 = 2a4 So 2z1 = 8b4 + 2a4 . Therefore z1 = 4b4 + a4 with a odd > 0 and (a,b)=1 and a<z1 We also have that 4b4 = (a2 - x1)(a2+x1) , now (a,b)=1 so that (a,x1)=1 Now going through the same arguments as in parx we get that [(a2-x1) , (a2+x1)] = 2 So we can write a2 - x1 = 2x24 and a2 + x1 = 2y24 So a4 - x12 = 4x24y24 = 4b4 Now z22 - x1 = 2x24 and z22 + x1 = 2y24 So z2 = x24 + y24 , but as a<z1 and thus z2<z1 we have a new smaller solution in that the solution (z1,x1,y1) > (z2,y2,x2) Therefore there is no integer solution to the equation z2 = x4 + y4 Done.
So b = x2y2
Let a=z2 as a is odd and so will z2 be
We see we have a contradiction as (z1,x1,y1) was assumed the smallest solution