The TommyGate Affair
   Smell The Red Leather Glove


 
The TommyGate Affair
NAVIGATION
Home
TommyGate News
From Saltire To Satire
Spanking MSP
"Fisting" Tommy
Imagine
Shrekage
Another One Bites The Dust
Links
Loony Left & Tommy
Scottish Socialist Party
Press Gang Up Oan Tam
The Herald
The Scotsman
Scotland On Sunday
Sunday Herald
The Trial






    
Sheridan libel jury considers a question of hypocrisy
The Herald

TOM GORDON, Scottish Political Correspondent

A jury was yesterday asked to decide whether Tommy Sheridan is a hypocrite, as the former leader of the Scottish Socialist Party began a £200,000 defamation case against a national newspaper over allegations about his private life.

In an opening speech to the jury of six men and six women in the civil action at the Court of Session, Alistair Clark, QC, for the News of the World, said the paper was proud of "exposing hypocrisy on the part of public figures".

Referring to the Glasgow MSP, he said: "He says he's not a hypocrite. We say that he is."
The hearing attracted so many people that some had to sit on the floor.

They heard lawyers for the News of the World allege that the MSP cheated on his wife, visited a swingers' club for casual sex, and took part in orgies.

The paper's lawyers also said they would show Mr Sheridan drank champagne while claiming to be teetotal, and that he was a hypocrite who abused his position of power as party leader.

Mr Sheridan is suing the News of the World after it claimed he had a four-year affair with Fiona McGuire, an SSP worker.

The paper also said he cheated on his wife with Anvar Khan, one of the tabloid's columnists, and other unnamed individuals. Mr Sheridan denies the claims.

News Group Newspapers, the defender, says that the articles, published in late 2004 and early 2005, are "substantially true".

Mr Clarke said the paper would present five "chapters" of evidence.

The first would tell how the paper investigated its story, and the second would present evidence that Mr Sheridan visited a swingers' club in Manchester called Cupid's with people other than his wife.

"These clubs are places where people go for casual sexual activity with others who like that sort of thing," Mr Clark said.

He said the third chapter would present evidence about alleged events in a suite at Glasgow's Moathouse Hotel in June 2002.

Mr Clark said that two witnesses saw Mr Sheridan having sex with a woman who was not his wife while another man was in the room.

The penultimate chapter would contend that Mr Sheridan committed adultery with "various other women".

The final chapter would deal with a meeting of the SSP executive committee on November 9, 2004, which resulted in Mr Sheridan resigning as leader.

While Mr Sheridan was on record saying he quit to spend more time with his pregnant wife Gail, there would be evidence, including a party minute, that in fact he was forced to step down because of his private life, Mr Clark said.

Later, the jury heard from Allison Kane, the SSP national treasurer.

Michael Jones, QC, for The News of The World, asked her about an article which the paper ran on October 31, 2004, in which Anvar Khan told of visiting Cupid's with an unnamed MSP.

"Do you know the married MSP who had admitted visiting Cupid's?" he asked. "Yes, I do . . . Tommy," she replied.

Asked if it was true the MSP's resignation had nothing to do with his private life, she said: "No, that is not true."

She said the SSP executive meeting of November 2004 had voted 19-0 to ask him to step down in the wake of the Anvar Khan story, although the party issued a statement that it was voluntary "to protect him".

The jury was then shown a minute of the meeting which recorded Mr Sheridan admitting visiting Cupid's in 1996 and 2002.

The minute also said Mr Sheridan admitted this had been "reckless" and "a mistake", but there was no proof he had visited the club and he would deny it if asked.

Ms Kane said the mood had been one of "shock", with some members in tears as they absorbed the implications.

Richard Keen, QC, for Mr Sheridan, then questioned the veracity of the minute, implying it had been concocted by a cabal of people trying to usurp Mr Sheridan, and that a different minute, which lacked any kind of confession, was in fact the genuine account.

He asked why six other executive members had a different recollection of the meeting.
Ms Kane said he would need to ask the people concerned.

Was it true, as the News of the World reported at the time, that a number of SSP members were trying to "knife Mr Sheridan in the back"? Mr Keen asked.

Ms Kane said it was not.

The hearing continues.


 


© TommyGate 2004


Create a free website at Webs.com