![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This page contains Marian, General and Biblical Cheat Sheets on Apologetics.
Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. (1 Peter 3:15) Listen to Strategies of Catholic Apologetics by John Martignoni
Click
..... We need not apologize for apologetic catechesis. Since its birth, Christianity has been subjected to attacks from which it has had to defend itself. Jesus had to answer early Christian errors, and charged His disciples to protect the faithful from them while keeping pure the Deposit of Faith. Apologetics has always been part of the pastoral and theological tradition of the Church. We must today be willing and able to defend out teachings in public fora, and we need to equip the faithful so that they can defend their faith. Parish priests must encourage and support the training of lay Catholic Faith Defenders. - PCPII: A Renewed Evangelization Paragraph 222 Marian Apologetics Click on links to view the article Mother of God Perpetual Virginity Mary's Assumption Mary the New Eve Mary's Sinless Life Mary's Intercession Virginal Conception and Birth of Jesus Christ
In Defense of Mary: Responding to Objections By Mark Miravalle In God's perfect providence, the Mother of Jesus is intended to be an instrument and symbol of profound unity. For along with the unity in grace that comes from sharing in the grace of Jesus Christ as our Brother, the Father also intended the universal (catholic) unity of all members of the human family by calling one woman, "Mother." And yet, because of her roles of being both Mother of God and Mother of the Church in its fullness, Mary has been perceived as an occasion for division. Nothing breaks the heart of a mother more than division among her children, especially when she herself is posed as one of the principal reasons for the disunity! But in truth, Mary in her doctrine and devotion is a cause for division only when she reflects her Son, the sign of contradiction to the world (cf. Lk 2:34), and the Body of her Son, the Church, which has been entrusted with safeguarding the revelation of Christ without compromise until He comes again in glory. Although it is not the intent of this particular article to give a comprehensive response to every objection of the role of the Blessed Virgin Mary, we would like to offer a basic response to ten of the more common objections to points of Marian doctrine and devotion. General Objections Objection 1: Objection to "Mariolatry" Objection: Catholics worship Mary in a manner that violates the First Commandment, offering adoration to her through her images and statues; an adoration due to God alone. Response: A distinction must be made between adoration (latria) and veneration (dulia). The Church has never taught that acts of adoration, the reverence and glory due to God alone, are to be given to Mary, but only an exceptional veneration (hyperdulia) because of her unique association with Jesus Christ in His work of redeeming humanity. We must avoid misunderstandings that can arise through the use of the term "worship." Traditionally, "worship" has been used for both adoration and veneration, and the word itself simply indicates a worthiness of some type of honor or dignity (from the Old English, weorthscipe). Although prudence may encourage reserving the term worship exclusively for adoration because of the potential misunderstandings of today, the classical use of the term refers to a broader kind of honor and, hence, cannot be viewed as an example of giving adoration to Mary when the expression "worship of Mary" is used. In regards to the "worshipping" of Marian statues and images, again we must distinguish. First of all, within the authentic Catholic Church there is no adoration given to Marian images (an act mistakenly perceived to model the pagan worship of idols). A painting or a statue of Mary serves the same purpose as a family photo on an office desk, or a statue of a public hero or statesman erected in a town square. The image serves as a reminder of the person the image represents, and thereby possesses a symbolic or representational value, not a true personal value in itself. As the father gazes upon the photograph of his family on his desk at work and feels the warming of his heart at the thought of his wife and children, so too, an image of Jesus' Mother can evoke similar feelings of filial love and devotion to her. But, as is true of the family photo and the public memorial statue, the Marian statue or image possesses no intrinsic power nor personhood; it only conveys an image of a heavenly Spiritual Mother most deserving of our earthly devotion and love. Objection 2: Objection Against Scriptural Bases of Marian Doctrine Objection: How can Catholics accept Marian doctrines like the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption when they are not explicitly revealed in the Bible? Response: This question implies a certain misunderstanding about the sources of Divine Revelation. The idea that all divinely revealed truths are explicitly contained in Scripture, is, in short, "unscriptural." Some will quote the Scripture passage of 2 Tim 3:16 to support the position known as sola scriptura (Scripture alone): "Everything in the scripture has been divinely inspired, and it has its uses: to instruct us, to expose our errors, to correct our faults, to educate in holy living." While this inspired passage describes the great fruits of Sacred Scripture, it nowhere even infers that Scripture is the only source of revelation. In fact, John Henry Newman, in his writing, Inspiration in its Relation to Revelation, explains: "This passage furnishes no argument whatever that the Sacred Scripture, without Tradition, is the sole rule of faith; for although Sacred Scripture is profitable for these four ends, still it is not said to be sufficient. The Apostle (Paul) requires the aid of Tradition" (2 Thes 2:15). (1) Moreover, it is explicitly taught in Scripture that the Bible is not the only source of Divine Revelation. The last Gospel ends with St. John telling us that everything Christ said and did is not recorded in Scripture (Jn 21:25), and St. Paul attests to much Christian teaching being handed down in the oral tradition of the Church (2 Thes 2:2). Historically, one must remember that for the first decades of the Church, there were no New Testament writings (since the first estimated New Testament writing was St. Paul's Letter to the Thessalonians in approximately 51 A.D.). But there was the oral tradition of the Church which handed down the saving Gospel and doctrine of Jesus Christ (cf. Acts 2:42; 2 Thes 2:15). Therefore, the proper question that should be asked regarding Marian doctrine is: "Can these Marian truths be found in the full sources of Divine Revelation, Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition, as safeguarded by the Magisterium?" To this question, one can answer an emphatic "yes." For every Marian doctrine, we have at least implicit (and some explicit) Scripture references containing the revealed seed of the doctrine (i.e., the Immaculate Conception (Gen 3:15, Lk 1:28); the Assumption (Gen 3:15; Ps 131:8; Rev 11:19; Rev 12:1)); copious references from Sacred Tradition, and the de fide teachings of the Church's Magisterium, including explicit papal infallible definitions. Objections to Marian Doctrines Objection 3: Objection to Mary as Intercessor and Spiritual Mother Objection: Mary's role as intercessor and Spiritual Mother assumes an ability of Mary, and of the saints in general, to intercede from Heaven, which presupposes the complete knowledge and power of God Himself, and this in itself is not scriptural. Response: The right and appropriateness both to venerate the saints and to seek their intercession are expressly taught by the Church (Council of Trent, D986, 984, 998 and Vatican II, Lumen Gentium, No. 51) and can be deduced from scriptural revelation, as in the case of the veneration of the angels (cf. Jos 5:l4;Dn 33:2; Tob 12:16). The angels have a supernatural dignity worthy of honor which comes from their intimate union with God (cf. Mt 18:10). Since the saints are also intimately united with God (1 Cor 13:12; 1 Jn 3:2), then they also deserve our honor and veneration. The Jewish people manifested faith in the intercession of saints as attested to by Judas the Maccabean (2 Mac 15:11-16), and in the ability of the angels and saints to offer prayers at the feet of God and support them with their intercession (cf. Tob 12:12; Rev 5:8, 8:3). St. Paul asked for prayerful intercession from many other disciples (Rom 15:30; Col 4:3; 1 Thes 5:25) and also referred to his prayers for them (2 Thes 1:11). And since Heaven is a state of God's living saints (Mk 12:26-27), St. Paul can certainly continue his prayers for his fellow members of the Body of Christ. Only a misconception about Heaven as a stagnant, isolated part of the Body of Christ, an assembly without concern or love for the rest of the Body still seeking the crown of heavenly glory, would lead to the conclusion that the saints do not continue their prayer and intercession for their beloved family on earth. And since Mary is Mother of the Head and of the Body, her maternal intercession rightfully has an exalted ability to bring her earthly children closer to Jesus Christ. We see scripturally that Mary's intercession starts on earth with the wedding of Cana (Jn 2). As for the need of having God's complete knowledge and power to hear prayers of the faithful on earth and to intercede, we must distinguish between having a divine nature and merely participating in providential acts through the power of God. As is the case with the life of sanctifying grace in general, God allows creatures to participate in aspects of His life, knowledge, and power, without the creature being God Himself. The saints in Heaven do not have the restrictions of time and space which we experience on earth, but participate in God's experience of events as "one great eternal present." The saints, therefore, have the privilege of being able to communicate with the faithful on earth, to hear our prayers and intercede on our behalf—all without being "gods," but by sharing in God's experience of reality. This is not so difficult to accept if we remember that the human ability to communicate intellectually and to pray for one another is also performed by the power of God's gifts of reason and grace. Once again, Mary, being the Spiritual Mother of all humanity (Jn 19:26), would have a particular sharing in the one mediation of Jesus Christ (1 Tim 2:5) for the spiritual benefit of the human family. As Vatican II describes: "Taken up to heaven, she did not lay aside this saving office but by her manifold intercession continues to bring us the gifts of eternal salvation" (Lumen Gentium, No. 62). Objection 4: Objection Against the Immaculate Conception Objection: How could Mary be immaculately conceived and remain sinless throughout her earthly life when St. Paul says, "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of Christ" (Rom 3:23)? Therefore all people need a savior and redeemer, including Mary. Response: In regards to Mary's need for a redeemer, the Church wholeheartedly agrees. As we see in the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception, Mary was redeemed by Christ precisely through her Immaculate Conception. Mary's reception of sanctifying grace at conception was an application of the graces merited by Jesus Christ on the Cross, and applied by God who, by nature, is out of time. Mary's conception in sanctifying grace was a unique form of redemption, in fact a higher form of redemption, since through the merits of her Son she never had to receive a fallen human nature. Hence, Mary needed to be redeemed and was redeemed through a "preservative redemption," a redemption brought about through the merits of her Son on Calvary and applied to her at the moment of her conception. This unique act of God made Mary the fitting Mother of the Word made flesh, giving Him an immaculate human nature in a fully maternal way, and meriting the title given to her by Gabriel, "full of grace" (Lk 1:28). As to the words of St. Paul that "all have sinned" (Rom 3:23), the Church rightfully interprets this passage as a divinely revealed truth about the general masses that make up humanity. But since the teachings of St. Paul were primarily directed to spreading the Good News which had to precede an accurate understanding of Marian doctrine (Mary is who she is because of her Son), then clearly it would be inappropriate for St. Paul to make an explicit, exceptional clause about the Mother of Jesus in his teaching of the universal need for Redemption. This would be inappropriate before the people of the time had fundamental, doctrinal clarity about the basic message of the Gospel. Clearly, St. Paul's intention in this passage of Romans was not a teaching on Marian doctrine, but a general instruction on the universal sin of humanity, and thereby the universal need for a redeemer. Also, St. Paul's statement that "all have sinned" does not include infants before the age of reason who are incapable of sinning (since the children cannot yet choose in reason and freedom). The statement of St. Paul need not be all-inclusive to convey the divine truth that the sinning masses have unquestionable need for Our Lord, the one Redeemer of the world. Objection 5: Objection Against the Perpetual Virginity of Mary Objection: Mary could not have remained virginal after the birth of Christ for several reasons: a) because there are scriptural references to the "brethren of the Lord" (Mt 12:46; Mk 3:31; Lk 8:19); b) because it would negate the true marriage between Mary and Joseph if it were never consummated; c) because Scripture speaks of Mary being found with child before she and Joseph came together: "When his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child" (Mt 1:18), which infers that they "came together" after the birth of Jesus; and d) Scripture says Jesus was the first-born Son of Mary (Lk 2:7; Mt 1:25), which infers that additional children were born later. Response: a) The Greek word for brother, "adelphos," is often used in the Bible to mean brother, cousin, or near relative. In fact, there are several instances in the Bible where the word "adelphos" is used and, by examining the context, we know that it could not possibly refer to a relation of biological brother. For example, in Genesis 13:8, Lot is called Abraham's "brother" (adelphos), although Lot was Abraham's cousin (Gen 12:5). In Genesis 29:15, Jacob is referred to as the "brother" (adelphos) of Laban, although Jacob was actually Laban's nephew (Gen 29:10). Hence the term "brothers of the Lord" could refer to Jesus' cousins, His near relatives, or even His disciples, as Christians today refer to themselves as "brothers and sisters of the Lord." The term "brothers of the Lord" does not create a valid scriptural objection to Mary's perpetual virginity. b) The perpetual virginity of Mary does not constitute an impediment to a true marriage between Mary and Joseph. The essence of marriage consists in the vow of a total gift to other which includes the marital right of conjugal relations. The validity of the marriage bond lies not in the exercise of this right, but rather, in the true gift of self to the spouse. To agree mutually to offer even the material exercise of the marital rights of relations as a gift to God does not violate or prevent the essence of an authentic and valid marriage vow. Therefore, Mary and Joseph experienced a true marriage with the total gift of self to other, even though they did not exercise the marital gift of conjugal relations. c) The biblical words "before" and "until" state merely what has not yet taken place; it does not establish that it will take place afterwards. Let us look at other passages of the Bible where these words are used. In 2 Samuel 6:23, it says: "Michal, that daughter of Saul, had no child until the day of death." Does this establish, therefore, that Michal had a child after the day of death? Obviously not. Psalm 110:1 prophesies about the reign of Christ the King: "Sit then at my right hand, until I make thy enemies thy footstool." Does this establish that after the defeat of the enemies of Christ that Jesus will no longer sit at the right hand of the Father? This obviously could not be the case. Even in terms of present usage, if one were to say, "the thief refused to give back the stolen goods before he died," does this mean that he gave back the stolen goods after he died? Therefore, the scriptural passages that state that Mary and Joseph did not come together before Mary was with child, in no sense establishes the fact that they did so after the birth of Christ, but simply that their coming together had not taken place before Christ's birth. d) The term "first-born Son" neither infers nor establishes that other children were born later. In the Mosaic law the term "first-born" was applied to the child whose birth had not been preceded by another, regardless of whether other children followed or not. According to the Law, every mother was required to go through certain rituals after the birth of her first child (whether followed by other children or not). Moreover, Jesus is rightly called "first-born of the Father" and "first-born of Mary." Does this infer that the Father, too, had other divine sons? Certainly not. According to accurate scriptural exegesis and Church teaching, the perpetual virginity of Mary remains a firmly grounded doctrine. Objection 6: Objection to the Assumption of Mary Objection: Mary had to remain in the grave after her death since death is a result of the sin that all humanity experiences (cf. Rom 3:23, 5-8; Heb 2:14-15). Therefore, Mary's bodily assumption is a human impossibility, due to her human and therefore sinful condition. Response: As Pope Pius XII explained in the infallible definition of the Assumption in 1950, Genesis 3:15 reveals Mary, the woman and mother of the seed of victory (Jesus Christ) over Satan, as sharing in the same absolute victory in her complete opposition or "enmity" to sin. As St. Paul states, the effects of the seed of Satan (evil) are twofold: sin and death. Mary, sharing in the same enmity as her Son towards Satan's seed of evil, triumphs over sin in her Immaculate Conception and over the corruption of death in her glorious Assumption of body and soul into Heaven at the end of her earthly life. A further distinction needs to be made regarding an accurate understanding of "death" as it results from sin. The death that takes place as a result of sin is associated with the corruption of the body. Jesus Christ, for example, also experienced death, but not as a result of the corruption of the body due to sin. Rather the death of Jesus consisted of a separation of soul from body on the Cross. In regards to Mary, the Church has never officially defined the fact of her earthly death, but it remains a strong secondary tradition in the Church. What we do know is that if Mary died, it was not as a result of the corruption of the body due to sin (in light of her Immaculate Conception and sinless earthly life), but rather, as a willed acceptance of a temporary separation of soul and body in imitation of her Son as Jesus' perfect disciple. In short, the bodily Assumption of Mary is the effect of her Immaculate Conception and a fitting close of that earthly life that ended in the same sinless state that it began, by God's unique gift and privilege. Moreover, there is nothing in Sacred Scripture that would forbid a bodily assumption by God's power before His second coming. In fact the Gospel reference in Matthew 27:52-53 affirms its possibility: "...and the graves were opened, and many bodies arose out of them, bodies of holy men gone to their rest" (Mt 27:52). Mary's bodily Assumption is, therefore, the appropriate conclusion of her Immaculate Conception, her sinlessness, her participation in man's redemption, and her share in Christ's glorious triumph over sin and death. It is the fitting tribute of Christ to Mary in the fulfillment of the Fourth Commandment to "honor your mother." Objection 7: Objection to Mary as Mediatrix of All Graces Objection: How can it be said that all graces of Christ come to humanity through Mary, if we consider a) the saving graces of Christ applied to humanity before the time of the Redemption; and b) the sanctifying grace which, according to the infallible teaching of the Church, is produced automatically in the souls of those who properly receive the sacraments? Response: a) After the Redemption of Christ Mary distributes the graces of her Son at least as a "secondary moral cause," by her willed acts which are always subordinate and in conformity with Jesus the Redeemer and Mediator of grace. As for those people living before the Redemption of Christ, they received graces through Mary's mediation with Mary as a "final cause." In other words, in view of the future merits and intercession of Mary by virtue of her participation with her Son in the world's Redemption, Mary also mediated graces to those living before the Redemption. Because Mary had an exalted participation in the Incarnation and Redemption of Jesus, which merited the graces of Redemption, she can be seen as having a secondary mediating effect in all those who receive the saving graces of Jesus, which necessarily include the saved of the Old Testament. b) As for the sanctifying grace which the sacraments automatically confer, Mary nonetheless mediates it in several ways. First, Mary mediates the grace of the sacraments by being Mother of Jesus, the Author of Grace and the First Sacrament to the world. Secondly, Mary mediates the grace of the sacraments by her role as Co-redemptrix. By Mary's direct and meritorious participation in the Redemption of the world by Jesus Christ, she shares in the acquisition of the graces of Calvary which are distributed through the sacraments of the Church. So in this foundational and pivotal manner, Mary mediates the grace of the sacraments through her association with Christ. Thirdly, it is through Mary's direct mediation that we receive the actual graces to desire the reception of the sacraments and to prepare us for worthy reception of the sacraments. Through Mary's direct distribution of actual graces, we receive a temporary enlightening of the mind and strengthening of the will to perform the meritorious acts of receiving the sacraments, which constitute the spiritual backbone of the Christian life. Mary's mediating presence is at every baptismal font, leading people by actual graces into the sacramental life of Jesus Christ and the Church. Moreover, Mary's profound union with the Holy Spirit, the Sanctifier, leads to her role as Mediatrix of every grace bestowed to the human family. As St. Maximilian Kolbe taught, the Holy Spirit is so deeply united to Mary in the work of sanctification, that their inexpressible spousal union resembles (without fully reaching it) the union of the divine nature and human nature in the one person of Christ. And since the Holy Spirit always acts through the Virgin Mary in His sanctifying action, then all graces must come through Mary as Mediatrix of all graces. As St. Maximilian Kolbe describes: The union between the Immaculata and the Holy Spirit is so inexpressible, yet so perfect, that the Holy Spirit acts only by the Most Blessed Virgin, His spouse. This is why she is the Mediatrix of all grace given by the Holy Spirit. (2) Again, many prominent mariologists of the twentieth century (Garrigou-LaGrange, O.P., Roschini, O.S.M., Cardinal Lepicier, O.S.M., Hugan, O.P., etc.) propose Mary's physical instrumentality in the distribution of graces. One author explains Mary's mediation of the grace of the sacraments in this more proximate and direct way: "Grace begins in the Divine Nature (of Jesus), passes through the Sacred Humanity of Christ (a physical instrument), passes through Mary (also a physical instrument), and finally passes through the sacrament (also a physical instrument)." (3) Through her foundational role as Mother of the Redeemer and Co-redemptrix, Mary's role as Mediatrix of all graces inclusively extends to the precious graces of the sacraments of the Church. Objections to Marian Devotion Objection 8: Objection to the Rosary Objection: The repetitious nature of the Rosary is condemned by Jesus in the Gospel where He said, "And in praying do not heap up empty phrases as the Gentiles do; for they think they will be heard for their many words" (Mt 6:7). Response: The false type of prayer that Jesus condemns in the gospels is the heaping of "empty phrases." Surely, no Christian would consider the Our Father or the scriptural salutation of the Hail Mary (Lk 1:28, 42) as "empty phrases," without meaning or content. And the legitimacy of repetitious prayer is obvious by its unquestionable presence in Sacred Scripture. For example, Psalm 117 is completely structured upon the frequently repeated phrase: "His mercy endures for ever." So, too, is repetitious prayer an integral part of the canticle of Daniel 3:52-88, which is built upon the constantly repeated phrase, "praise and exalt him above all forever." Also, the angels give unceasing praise in the account of Heaven in the book of Revelation (cf. Rev 4:8). The repetitious nature of the Rosary prayer (as discussed in Chapter 4) is a means of entering more deeply into the revealed Gospel mysteries of Jesus Christ thereby promoting Christian meditation. Far from being an empty repetitional structure, the peaceful repetition of Hail Marys is an incarnational way of keeping the body focused on the disposition of the soul in order to penetrate the mysteries of Christian salvation. What Our Lord condemns in the Gospel passage is the "empty" repetition and quantity of words that are bereft of the attention of the mind and devotion of the heart. The Rosary is vocal and mental prayer form that utilizes a prayerful repetition of the Gospel-based Our Father and Hail Mary and has no intrinsic connection with the "heaping of empty phrases" condemned by Christ. But it is important to remember that every prayer form can be abused by a type of formalism that practices the external act without the proper internal intention of the heart to "communicate with the One whom you know loves you," in the words of St. Teresa. When the Rosary is used as an authentic form of Christian vocal prayer and meditation and is prayer with the proper internal disposition of love of God, necessary for any true Christian prayer form, it is then a litany-like succession of Hail Marys that, in the words of Pope Paul VI, "becomes in itself an unceasing praise of Christ." Objection 9: Objection Against Consecration to Jesus Through Mary Objection: The act of Marian consecration involves a) giving oneself entirely to Mary, and this constitutes an act of adoration; now a Christian is only permitted to give himself entirely to God and never to a creature; and b) giving all our merits and good works to Jesus through Mary will make us spiritually incapable of helping the souls of our parents, relatives and friends. Response: a) Here again a distinction must be made between acts of "latria" and "dulia." Consecration to God, for example, to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, is an act in the order of latria, which is the worship paid exclusively to God, and in which a person is given directly and completely to God. Consecration to Mary (for example, to her Immaculate Heart) is an analogous act in the order of hyperdulia, that exalted devotion which the Mother of God properly deserves. Here a person gives himself entirely to Mary as a means of union with Jesus Christ. Giving oneself entirely to Mary does not mean that Mary is the goal or final recipient of the self-gift; but rather, that it is a Christ-designated means of consecrating oneself to Jesus and renewing one's baptismal vows. One's gift of self to Mary in the order of hyperdulia, or exalted veneration, is the best means to a complete and total gift of self to Christ in the order of adoration, which is proper only for Our Lord. b) To the objection that through Marian consecration we lose our spiritual ability to aid the souls of our parents, relatives, and friends, St. Louis Marie de Montfort offers the following clear and succinct answer: It is not credible that our parents, friends and benefactors should suffer from the fact of our being devoted and consecrated without exception to the service of Our Lord and His Holy Mother. To think this would be to think unworthily of the goodness and power of Jesus and Mary, who know well how to assist our parents, friends and benefactors, out of our own little spiritual revenue or by others. (4) De Montfort's response reflects the spiritual humility all Christians should have in regards to their limited ability to dispense properly their own spiritual benefits, in contrast to the best and perfect distribution of graces made by Jesus and Mary. Further, we must remain assured that total consecration to Jesus through Mary will result only in a greater obedience to the commandments of God, including the Fourth Commandment to "honor your father and mother" and the Gospel command to "love your neighbor." Objection 10: Objection Against Marian Private Revelation Objection: How can any human being, including Mary, appear after death in a way only possible by God Himself? Response: Again, we return to the distinction between "being God" and "participating in the power of God." Mary, especially since she is not bound by the limits of time and space, as she is in Heaven, can participate in God's power to become visible to a person on earth, to communicate, and even to be present in her assumed body in a type of three dimensional apparition. Scripture attests to a vision or apparition by persons who have died and have risen in Christ; this is recorded in Matthew 27:52-53: "...and the graves were opened and many bodies arose out of them, bodies of holy men gone to their rest; who, after his rising again, left their graves and went into the holy city, where they were seen by many." If the dead who rise in Christ can appear in bodily form to others, certainly the Mother of Jesus, whose body is gloriously assumed into Heaven, can appear to her earthly children with Gospel messages encouraging greater faith, prayer, penance, conversion and peace. Conclusion It is our hope that the explanations provided in this article have provided some theological and reasonable grounds for a full acceptance and appreciation of Mary's role in God's drama of human salvation, a maternal role that hopefully will evoke a sincere filial Christian love on the part of her earthly children. We end with the words that ended the Second Vatican Council's profound treatment on Mary. It is a prayer of petition that beseeches the most powerful intercession of the Mother of God for the unity of all her earthly children into the one Church of Christ: The entire body of the faithful pours forth urgent supplications to the Mother of God and of men that she, who aided the beginnings of the Church by her prayers, may now, exalted as she is above all the angels and saints, intercede before her Son in the fellowship of all the saints, until all families of people, whether they are honored with the title of Christian or whether they still do not know the Savior, may be happily gathered together in peace and harmony into one People of God, for the glory of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity (Lumen Gentium, No. 69).
Notes (1) Henry Cardinal Newman, Inspiration in its Relation to Revelation, 1884; cf. Karl Keating, Catholicism and Fundamentalism, (San Francisco: Ignatius Press) Ch. 10. (2) Fr. H. M. Manteau-Bonamy, O.P., Immaculate Conception and the Holy Spirit: The Marian Teachings of Fr. Kolbe, (Kenosha, WI: Franciscan Marytown Press, 1977). Letter to Father Mikolajczyk, July 28, 1935, p. 99. (3) William Most, Mary in Our Life, (New York: Kenedy and Sons, 1954) p. 38. (4) De Montfort, True Devotion, I. art. 2, No. 132.
General Apologetics
Catholic Apologetics Biblical Cheat Sheet
Roman Catholic Church is Apostolic,
Instituted by Christ Himself, with Peter as the first Pope (appointed
head):
|
© Copyright The Image Family Online 2007, All Rights Reserved.
This site is hosted for FREE by |