Survival of the Species
Chapter Thirty
The next step for the Nationalists was to make White Australia into a reality, thereby protecting the Australian people from destruction by liberal-internationalists.
Of course, the White Australia Policy had already existed from 1901 to 1966 (not to forget that it had operated in the Australian colonies prior to Federation in 1901), but that past policy was a product of the then British-Australian Establishment, and so had - in many ways - been a British Australia Policy. Following World War Two, the entire policy had been eaten away, "thin edge of the wedge" style, by both sides of the political establishment - the Labor Party, Liberal Party, and even the National Party (ex-Country Party) - until the Liberal Party announced major changes in 1966, and the Labor Party abolished it completely in 1972.
The new White Australia Policy was quite different to the old one. It was pan-European, rather than mainly British; it was totally Australian in its outlook and encouragement; and it was aimed towards an ecologically-sustainable population - thus not encouraging mass immigration (although some immigration was allowed: for people with hard-to-get skills, to enable genuine marriages, as well as some general immigration - usually of people who were politically "tuned in").
Aside from ecological considerations, there were also cultural reasons for a policy of low immigration. While, in the past, Australia had been happy to take in any and all White people, they had not realised the cultural implications - that it normally took two or three generations for people to become fully Australian; that it was usual for the children - and often grandchildren - of immigrants to consider the homeland of their parents or grandparents to be their "Home Country", or to have feelings of attachment to it, such that affected their Australianness; and, with such large numbers of immigrants and their offspring present in this country, this stunted the development of Australia's own culture. This fact was hard for many children and grandchildren of immigrants to accept; but it was a reality, and one that was obvious if only they would observe the offspring of immigrants closely - of course, like all generalisations, it didn't necessarily apply to all such people, but did actually apply to most of them.
The post World War Two mass immigration programme that brought so many people into Australia had created such a large pool of non-Australians (even though they were mostly Whites) that it had led to ethnic groupings, which inevitably led to the policy of multiculturalism, which itself had unavoidably led to multiracialism - in this case, culminating in a downward spiral towards the Asianisation of Australia. Thus, for cultural, ecological, and political reasons, the new White Australia Policy included only limited immigration.
One thing that both the old and new White Australia Policies did agree upon was that the Policy should be paramount in all decision making, in all areas. Thus, the White Australia Policy would determine considerations of policy in regards to defence, trade, economy, foreign affairs, and in all other fields. As far as the new Nationalist government was concerned, what was in the interests of the White Australia Policy was in the national interest, and the national interests of Australia came first and foremost. In all matters, national policy was "Australia First" (and, of course, that meant White Australia above and beyond everything else).
* * * * * * *
The major difference between the old White Australia Policy and the new was the question of repatriation.
The older policy did not repatriate anyone - with the exception of the small Japanese population in Australia who were sent to Japan after World War Two; and not counting the illegal immigrants (and those who overstayed their visas) who were returned to their country of origin (although, unlike the post-WW2 Japs, this wouldn't be considered as repatriation). The old policy was content to rely on getting rid of its non-White population by simple attrition - basically, allowing any of them to leave the country, but not letting any new ones in; in this way, Australia's non-White population (excluding the Aborigines) had dropped to 29,226 (0.439%) by 1933.
However, the new White Australia Policy was to make full use of repatriation as a national policy. There were so many non-Whites within Australia that the homogeneity of the nation was already severely damaged. Even though mass Asian immigration had been halted by the new Nationalist government, because of the high ethnic-Asian birthrate it was a dead cert that it wouldn't take too long for Australia to be 80 - 90% Asian (and if that isn't Asianisation, then what is?). The fact was that as far back as 1990, Asians comprised about 10% of the Australian population, a figure which was close to the Negro percentage of the American population (which was then 12%) - in both cases, the proportion was large enough, and increasing fast enough, to eventually outnumber the White majority within three to four generations (by 2065 to 2080, Whites would be a minority in both countries). Faced with such a scenario, repatriation was not an option - it was a vital necessity.
Those Australian "patriots" who were anti-immigration but who opposed repatriation were either deluding themselves or were subversive multiracialists (whether consciously or subconsciously). There were, in fact, many conservatives who opposed immigration but who were multiracialists; many of them wanted a predominantly White Australia, but couldn't support the harsh reality of repatriation, couldn't conceive of being "not nice" to the non-Whites in Australia - they sometimes prattled on about the various "nice" and "conservative" Asians that they had met. Had they missed the entire point?!? Everyone knew that there were many "nice" Asians (as well as many scummy ones); but the fact was that they were such a large minority that, with their higher birthrate (let alone mass immigration, if - god forbid - that should ever recommence again), they would eventually outnumber the Whites, and would turn Australia into a polyglot, mongrelised country - and that was only the last stage before becoming fully Asianised.
Were they not aware of these facts? Could these conservatives not see the demise of Australia before their very own eyes? Or was it that these "conservative patriots" wanted to keep Australia predominantly White for just as long as they were alive? All this, even though they knew that their children and grandchildren would suffer if they were part of an Asianised Australia? This was simply the generational equivalent of "Not In My Backyard". These conservatives were either sick or stupid (or traitors?). God help us if the future of our People was ever put into their hands.
The Nationalist government was not going to idly stand by and watch the racial disintegration of the Australian People. It was blatantly obvious that liberal-internationalism was so far gone amongst White societies the world over, that all White countries were letting in hordes of non-Whites on a continuing basis, so much so that the mud races formed not only substantial minorities but it had become only a question of time until - in every country - Whites became a minority, and would then later become extinct altogether.
Genocide via immigration, ethnic growth, and miscegenation was even more effective than genocide via bullets. The White peoples of the world faced extinction - but the Australian Nationalists were determined not to let their People be wiped out.
* * * * * * *
So it was, that one year after the Canberra bombing, after the Nationalists had consolidated their power and felt that they were in full control, they passed into law the Repatriation Act. The repatriation scheme was quite simple. Over the next three years, all non-Whites would be required to leave the country (excluding Aborigines). Repatriation notices would be sent out in alphabetical order, and each notice was to be complied with within three months of it been sent (all receivers of notices were required to register with their local police station, under threat of fines); all of the Asians would be transported by plane or ship (at government expense), they could take all of their possessions with them (at their own expense), and could take whatever finances they had (including proceeds from sales of shops, houses, etc) - except that export of gold, precious metals, and gems was banned (excepting a limited amount of personal jewellery). In the repatriation orders, it was clearly spelt out that any troublemakers would be repatriated immediately, and without personal possessions or money - this measure seemed harsh enough to stop the bulk of Asians from sabotage, rioting, or other troublemaking.
Although there was a great deal of cost involved with large scale repatriation, it was considered well worth it. Even though there were many troubles had with replacing the Asians in many parts of the workforce (a limited number of repatriation postponements were allowed in special cases), there were many more benefits that arose for the general population: many job vacancies, business opportunities, cheaper housing, and - in the long term - a less overcrowded nation, free from the cultural and social problems of multiculturalism and Asianisation.
Obviously, most Asians and other non-Whites weren't too happy with the repatriation scheme (although it was good news for those who wanted to leave Australia anyway, as they received free passage). However, no great troubles were had from the Asiatics; the announcement about the penalties for troublemakers had largely done the trick, as did the fact that they could take their money and possessions with them (in the Third World countries of Asia, many would be immediately rich), as well as which the CMF and Army kept up large-scale patrols throughout Asian areas (and they had carte blanche powers to prevent, contain, and squash trouble - powers which they used without hesitation).
Many bleeding heart liberal-internationalists protested at the repatriation scheme; although no public demonstrations were held - the traitorous globalists remembered all too well the Bourke Street Massacre. The internationalists spoke of individual rights and "human rights", drawing attention to the plight of individual Asians. Such tactics may have worked well in the dismantling of the White Australia Policy, but this time - especially as the globalists didn't have a compliant media - their tricks were just not going to work.
In speaking about the "rights" of the Asians, the globalists had missed what Nationalists considered to be the relevant point - the rights of Australians. The Australian People had never asked for Asianisation, indeed, it had been surreptitiously foisted upon them by the cohorts of globalism (the "New Class") who had over the years worked their way into the Establishment - into the media, education system, and politics; this New Class - more pointedly called the Traitor Class - had instituted liberalistic internationalism as the new ideology or lingua franca of Australia (later culminating in the oppressive wave of "political correctness" so prevalent in the 1980s and 1990s), and had sneakily begun to Asianise Australia by the "thin edge of the wedge" method; bringing in just a few Asian "professionals" at first, then a lot more "semi-skilled" Asians, then utilising the refugee crisis to tug at the heart strings of Australians in ordrer to let in thousands of Asian "refugees", and then finally opening the flood gates to the Yellow Peril - the hordes of Asians that would swamp Australia.
It was the Australian People who had lost their rights - their right to live in a homogeneous society, their right to decide the composition of their national population, their right to be free from racial unrest, their right to exist as a people, their right to survive, and their right to not be subjected to racial genocide.
The multiracial mess that Australia had become wasn't the fault of the Asians themselves, they were just taking advantage of a good deal offered to them - to live in Australia, to escape from Third World poverty and distress. No, the fault lay fairly and squarely on the shoulders of the insidious globalists, it was they who had been deliberately Asianising Australia - and they deserved to pay for their evil crime of attempted genocide, this crime against humanity.
But, in the meantime, it was - unfortunately - the Asians who had to be uprooted from their homes and repatriated overseas. This was a terrible thing to have to do to people, it would cause agony and heartbreak to many Asians - indeed, it was this very factor that the globalists had counted upon; they believed that once they had swamped Australia with Asians, that it would be too difficult to get rid of them all, that it would be a fait accompli carried out against the wishes of the Australian People; but they were wrong, dead wrong - the Nationalists would deport all of the Asians, in order to protect White Australia, and they had the guts and determination to do so.
Some people had said that the reintroduction of the White Australia Policy was an impossibility, but now it was actually being put into place. The return of White Australia had indeed seemed impossible, but so had the overthrow of communism in the Soviet Union, and so had the dream of space flight and landing men on the moon. The "impossible" was actually happening; and the Movement would make sure that the dream of a new White Australia was achieved.
Once the non-Whites had been dealt with, then the attention of the Nationalists would eventually turn towards the globalist traitors - and they would pay for their crimes against White Australia.
Previous Chapter - - - Next Chapter
Contents