Links to Reviews

Jurassic Park
Fahrenheit 451
Atlas Shrugged
The Fountainhead (Stephanie)
The Fountainhead (Robert)
We The Living
Those Who Trespass

Reviews in red are by Robert and blue are by Stephanie.



Jurassic Park

Large, Stomping animals. A glass of water trembles in the car. Either Ted Kennedy is around or there's a dinosaur looking to make you a snack. Actually Ted Kennedy would probably be looking to do the same. When one thinks of Jurassic Park one usually envisions a clean shaven Sam Neil, older Laura Dern, and Jeff Goldblum dressed in all black. When one reads the book, however, things are quite different.

In the book Dr. Grant is a "great barrel of a man" and has a beard. Dr. Sattler is in her 20's and quite attractive with no attachment to Dr. Grant. The other characters are mostly the same with Jeff Goldblum and Newman being perfect for the characters of Ian Malcolm and Dennis. The book is also much more detailed about the science of dinosaurs, genetics and chaos theory. Reading the book helps you understand the movie more and even see where Jurassic Park III came from.

The book starts with a raptor mauling. A fantastic way to start a book, in my opinion. The suspense is built using minor characters which are rarely, if ever mentioned again (as seems to be common in this author's books). Finally when the suspense is enough to keep you reading the book straight through without stopping, the plot of the movie comes into play. The action is fierce and Crichton's descriptions of vomit and maulings is par for the course. Every page of the book makes you wonder what will happen next and just when you think everything is settling down the excitement starts back up again. The raptors are the main "villian" in the book but the T-Rex does get it's time in the spotlight. If you think you know the end of the book based on the end of the movie you are sorely mistaken. Sufice it to say you never know who will die at Jurassic Park!




Fahrenheit 451

Burning books- a favorite past time of Nazis and Communists. In the future, reading books is outlawed and thus all books must be destroyed- at all cost. Fire men start fires to complete this objective. It is a bleak minority run future. The thesis of this book is what can happen if the government decided to stop people from thinking. Although supposedly started when people themselves stopped reading, the government soon picks up on the benefits of having a population of automatons which they can program by outlawing freedom and restricting what the populas reads or views- thus controling thought. This was what the soviets were good at.

This book about a fire man's struggle with his occupation and his desire to understand books and what was in them that could not be read. He is helped by and old professor, a young girl, and hindered by his wife. The government is perfectly summed up as the villian by the mechanical hound. Interestingly enough this book is banned from school libraries. Ironic isn't quite the word. The government is already following the same path as outlined on the book topped off by banning a book about the government banning books. Bradbury's masterpiece disturbs our governors and for a good reason- it calls people to actions to think and learn.




Atlas Shrugged

While I've been re-reading the classic "Atlas Shrugged" I realized that my earlier review did not do the book justice (ealier review is about a sentence and on the blog here. However many people I know are saying they intend (or already have) a copy of the book and intend to read it because of what I've said about it. Thus I will try to not spoil it for you but I do intend to review some of the characters and their motivations. So, read on at your own risk (By the way there will be a blog about my day and Sosa leaving tonight for all you Cub fans).

To start with let me say that this book is so powerful to me because it shines the spotlight on the very evil that's existed for so long without being checked by Americans. Socialism is evil and destroys the rights of man. Only people who have no idea how the Soivets, Red China, or Cuba treated (treats in the last case) their people (and I mean you know, killing them to submit) would believe Socialism is good. Through my job and my brother's girlfriend I've found that immigrants came here to get away from that idea and here the liberals are trying to make no land in this world safe from it.

Anyway back to the book. That characters are amazing, Hank Rearden being my favorite (and his court room speech being my favorite quote of any). Dagney is the kind of woman I'd like to find in this world: head strong, unrelenting, and ambitious. She is a bit naive but it adds to her character and in the end she's pretty darn near pure (see also Dominique in "The Fountainhead"). Franciso kinda rubbed me the wrong way at points in my first reading but in my rereading I really like him and he's competing with Hank for my favorite character this time. Jim and Lillian are good as far as evil characters bent on selflessness (the non-existence of the self for the benefit of everyone else) and quite frankly Lillian still reminds me of a girl I used to like and Jim reminds me of Nick. Heck he even debates like Nick! The government is shown as it truly is: a hindrance. Like I said this book exposes all of the evil I've known.

In the re-reading it's like a whole new book cause this time you know who's evil and who's good and you can trace some of the surprises at the end to foreshadowing in the beginning. The story is amazing and well any book that has a gun battle is cool and pirates. Again there's sex and a good chunk of it but it's more toned down that "Stranger in a Strange Land" and it seems more purposeful. The economic logic and the views on government are everything I've ever thought was right in the world with perfect arguments that even a liberal would be shut up by. The story is mostly action packed and the second read through increases the action feeling because you know what'd going to happen and you want to get there. The characters are described in perfect detail right down to Dagney's skirts and Hank's hair. There are a few characters I feel for in the book that aren't huge characters like Eddie and Jim's wife. If you want to know you can ask me for more info on this, I don't want to spoil the book, but I thought Eddie would have been more pivotal in the book and he frankly wasn't. I originally thought he was the character most like me and in the reread I realize it's Hank. The other characters are amazing and I won't go into much more detail about them to save you some surprises. In short this book has a bit of everything: romance, action, logic, and some cool speeches and awesome quotes (see the last blog). So if you haven't already, pick this book up for an awesome time. For you liberals who don't want to cause you want to act like ostriches, I'm sure soon you'll be screaming "Who is John Galt?"




The Fountainhead (Stephanie)

The Fountainhead, much like all of Rand’s books, is delightfully scintillating and entertaining, keeping you on the edge of your seat so to speak, all the while messaging the underlying tones of capitalism and conservatism. They make you think, however if you aren’t fully able to comprehend the philosophical depth of the material, you may not be quite sure what to draw out of her literature. As I see it, The Fountainhead is about the oppression of free thinkers. It’s about the way totalitarians try to crush any who could push the boundaries of common knowledge and even improve upon principles accepted as common practice. It is about penalizing one for daring to imply that what governing parties build up and what society accepts is somehow imperfect.

Though certain political aspects such as Marxism, Fascism and Socialism are personified through the characters, this books underlying theme is far less political than that of her masterpiece, Atlas Shrugged. To me the book expresses a view of the domination of the public and the persecution of those in any way against it or who would question it. It demonstrates the social oppression set upon free-thinkers by the blind conformists of our world in both society and its corporate and governing bodies.

This book as a whole challenges people to lead, not follow, because while the path is not the easiest to walk, the goal is attainable. The goal here, I believe, is self-gratification through putting yourself and your system of beliefs above the common beliefs of others to stand for what you know is true. This is, in a way, selfishness. Not the Webster defined selfishness but a far more philosophical definition given to the word by Ayn Rand who uses it to characterize a far more broadminded theory that selfishness is a trait causing man to be so consumed with his own love, beliefs and convictions that even things he does that appear selfless are, in actuality, in his own best interest.

Rand uses perfectly molded characters in each of her novels to try and impress upon the mind various things she held to be true. Things such as that selfishness is perfect, capitalism must prevail but government as it is must die for it to do so and that man is imperfect and doomed to repeat horrible mistakes of the past if he does not learn these things and take them to heart. It is in these brilliant reflections of her own mind that I find the one lingering question. Why does she personify women the way she does?

I have come to the conclusion that Ayn Rand was, in fact, deep down, a feminist. She seems to always, in every novel, characterize women as whorish creatures that have sex indiscriminately with whoever and wherever they please with multiple men justifying her actions by saying that she is in love with each man. She objectifies women as powerful, giving them careers and titles only held by women of great stature, all the while making them promiscuous and ‘free’ to do as they wish. They also always seem to toss men to the wayside and the men do not seem to care that its been done to them, a very feministic hope for the nature of men.

Sadly, I abhor this aspect of her books as I believe in true love and one love, (yes I am talking about you Robert), and I could never fathom hurting one I love in the ways Rand allows her characters to hurt those they love. And yes I truly believe Rand believed these things because the poster child for my theory was Dagny Taggart, the character that was supposedly the fictional embodiment of Rand herself. Where it is not mine to say it is definite, I do believe my thesis on Rand would prove correct. Rand was, perhaps not openly or even self-admitted, a feminist.




The Fountainhead (Robert)

(From the blog on November 23, 2005) Stayed up late finishing The Fountainhead. Overall it is truly a great book. The use of logic and reason mixed with a wonderful and somewhat epic story make this book something everyone should read (or see the 1949 movie if you like). Calling this book my second favorite behind Atlas Shrugged is like calling a perfect diamond that is only slightly smaller than another perfect diamond "less perfect." This book truly declares exactly why forces like socialism, communism and Nazism are evil. The use of collective governments to destroy the rights of individuals is villainous, yet this is exactly what most liberals are fighting for today. Many do not wish you to think for yourself but to work for others and remove the existence of "self." Ayn Rand is possibly the greatest writer of the 20th century. No wonder so many people have found her books.




We The Living

The story of "We the Living" is set entirely in Soviet Russia. The book starts right after the fall of the White Army to the Reds and throughout goes into more and more detail on how the White Army fell and how the Reds took over. It explains and examines the prejudices that the Reds had for any members of the "new" societ that were sympathetic to the Whites or who had been people of talent in the old Russian Kingdom. It is quite literally a fictional story set in a non-fictional senario. What Ayn Rand lived through she describes in brutal detail.

While the explaination and examination of the beginnings of the Soviet Union and the people who endured it was wonderful and a must read for anyone who truly wants to know what socialism leads to. The story, however, is quite upsetting. Here on in I may have a few spoilers. Nothing too critical, at least I don't think they are, but you've been warned. The main female "hero" is named Kira and at the beginning it goes through her life with her family as they move out of their house following the fall of the Czar. The description of the transformation of her family from that of a hard working, talented, rich family into a poor family like all the others is quite astonishing. Throughout the book starvation and cold are described that it makes you want to take a nice hot shower and eat like you've never eaten before.

The story begins to take a turn as she meets two men, Leo and Andei. Andei is another student at Kira's Institute and is a Party Communist. Leo is quite literally the type of man that she most wants in the world and after a failed attempt to escape the canabalistic country they decide to live together but not marry. It was both of their idea to not marry but we can see, yet again, a female hero in an Ayn Rand book not taking the man she loves last name. The story then goes through the trials they face together as relatives of previously wealthy men as people who do not work or work poorly are given everything by the party because their parents were poor and because they have connections. In this we can see the current Democratic party's stance.

Here's where the spoilers start but read on if you want to know what I really didn't like. Leo eventually falls ill with a deadly illness. being the proud man he does not want charity and after several failed attempts to get the money another way Kira literally whores herself out to Andei who wants her more than anything. In return for what he believes is her love Andei gives her his pay for, what he believes is, her family. Leo is then sent away to get better and Kira continues to see Andei. When Leo comes back, the visits do not stop. While Leo has changed, Kira doesn't really seem to make an attempt to deal with the new Leo. If Leo says he's going somewhere and her protests fail, then she sees Andei, instead of trying to plan things for them to do or really trying to talk to him about it when he gets home. Realize of course that Leo is a very hard man to talk to, but I know my friends and I know Stephanie and if I changed drastically and made them feel like they didn't matter as much anymore, you can be sure they'd stick by me even then and try to understand what was going on. There are people in life one knows they will never lose by there side no matter what they do or say and quite frankly Kira is not. In my opinion she tends to falter, although the counter argument could be made skillfully, and gives up on her true love.

While she did what she had to do to save Leo, the fact that the visits continued shows that there was something more to them. Perhaps, as some of the ending suggests, Andei was touching her how she wanted to be touched by Leo who now had little time for such things. Perhaps there were elements of Andei she loved. However Leo is still a more perfect man in his beliefs and convictions and Andei is still a Communist in belief and actions. Kira continues to lie to Leo about Andei and to Andei about Leo and this is where Ms. Rand justifies lieing. When one loves to someone they love they become smaller in every sense of the word. I should know, considering my relationship in High School ending with her cheating on me. Perhaps this book hits too close to home since, like Kira, she was seeing both him and I at the same time near the end of the relationship, and I was lied to about where she was and whom she was with. Only a slip up by her mother revealed the truth.

Lieing cannot be justified when it is to someone you love. Under torture- yes. To save someone you love's life- yes. But to see someone else when your love is well- no. Perhaps Kira continued it because she wanted a backup plan in case Leo got caught running his business but I highly doubt it considering the speech she gives Andei after Leo is captured which again ends with her submitting to Andei. Only at the very end are we ever really sure who she loved more and I'll leave that for you to find out. Overall I would say this is a must read to understand communism and how the Soviet Union began but as far the story goes, be ready to discuss many things with your love.

"She wondered why the words: "But he's going to die," meant so little to them and the words: "But he isn't a registered worker," meant so little to her and why it seemed so hard to explain" -from Ayn Rand's "We the Living"




Those Who Trespass

"Those Who Trespass" by Bill O'Reilly is a good light read. The mystery kinda comes apart towards the end, some characters are kinda cliché, but it has all the action of a major action movie and again killing someone with a spoon wins a special place in my heart (just kidding, in case some liberals want to not get a joke 10 years from now). If you have a weekend with not much to do check it out. If you want to use your brain to vote and not let others think for you (and loot you while doing so) check out "Atlas Shrugged", "Treason" and "Slander"





This website is hosted for free by Freewebs.com - free website. Get your own Free Website now!