First we couldn't stereotype them as the people by and large who have aids. Second, they are allowed to have flamboyant festivals marching down crowded city streets. Next, they fought to be kept in Boy Scouts of America, a private club which can deny admission of anyone they wish to because they are PRIVATE, you fags. Now, it is seeming more and more evident, as per the dipshit supreme court's decision (this and affirmative action renewed, way to go assholes) to overturn Bowers v. Hardwick, that same sex marriages will become part of the norm. What the hell are we doing? Have we sacrificed everything we ever stood for in this country and just laying down to let a bunch of leaping Liberaces prance all over us and force their views upon us? The supreme court, which needs a complete revamping, just upheld not only affirmative action, which is the most ass backwards law ever made, and overturned a law that "…took away the humanity of gay people, and this decision gives it back." WHAT THE HELL? When did we rob these people of their humanity? When we told them not to make the choice to fudge pack like wildebeest in a nature film? What is wrong with these people (yes, these people meaning the fags) (I can call them fags if I want, I'm considered an oppressive conservative, they can damn well be called fags) and them demanding more and more rights? I wouldn't have such a problem with this is homosexuality was the norm, but IT ISN'T. It never will be, I'm sorry to let any of you optimists for equality down, but partaking in homosexuality will never ever be the way most people choose to live their lives. What's this you say? Gays are people too? Sure they are, but here's my whole deal I suppose. I'm not sure when exactly what this happened, but since when did the "dehumanized" minority in this country become the majority? Just because the rest of us choose to lead a relatively normal life, why does that mean that we give Ru Paul (yeah, it's a he) the right to marry Garth Brooks (yeah, he's gay) and filthy the minds of our much impressionable youth? You may note the fact that I keep italicizing the word choice. Why is that? If you can't gather that, you're retarded. If you have, its because I'm slowly trying to get those of you who think homosexuality is a born trait to realize that it's as much of a choice of how I do my hair (if it weren't for the gay brainwashing, I wouldn't have said do my hair). Susan Goldberg, a hag who studied law at Rutgers (such a waste of a fine mind) says that this case is groundbreaking for gay rights and acceptance. "It removes the reflexive assumption of gay people's inferiority," said Professor Goldberg. Um…no…it strengthened mine. Am I closed-minded? Not to people choosing to live an "alternative life-style," aka be really, really gay and live with another gay person. If you want to do that, I'm all for it. But I believe the human species is too precious a commodity to waste on slowly phasing out a sense of morality that I think goes with heterosexuality. Is immorality inherent in gays? Of course not. I'm positive, absolutely positive that there are gays out there who deserve to live unbothered because they have done nothing at all wrong and won't. What I'm worried about is the immoral group, and they are out there, don't kid yourselves. It is obvious to anyone that the decision in this case will lead to 100% legalization of gay adoption. That is, gays adopting kids, not kids adopting homosexuality. Cause that would just be gay. Let's hear what you think, send some mail with your views attached.