Psychologically Significant Movies

Home

 

by Aleksandar Novakovic   


L - M

L’Avventura (1960, Italy)                          Psychological significance:  ****  [out of  ****]
Directed by Michelangelo Antonioni.           Cinematic value:                  ****  [out of  ****]
Young woman (Lea Massari) suddenly disappears during a boating trip on an inhabited island. Shortly afterwards, her boyfriend (Gabriele Ferzetti) and her best friend (Monica Vitti) became attracted to each other. However, don’t expect the mystery. This is a study of emotional isolation, moral decay, lack of the communication and emptiness of rich people in contemporary (then) society. You can easily be bored by the slow pace and the lack of dramatics of this movie unless you capture its true purpose. This is “state of mind” or experience film rather than conventional plot film. Antonioni practically discovered the new movie language in L’Avventura. By using formal instruments he is expressing emotions of the characters (loneliness, boredom, emptiness and emotional detachment) and the viewer is forced rather to feel this same emotions himself than to be involved in the story and its events. These formal instruments are: slow rhythm, real-time events, long takes, visual metaphors like inhabited island(s), fog, extreme long shots (small characters in panorama) and puting protagonists on inhabited streets or large buildings and landscapes. Great cinematography. Forms trilogy with La Notte (1961) and L’Eclisse (1962).

   L'Avventura  from the  Rotten Tomatoes   Internet Movie Database 





L’Eclisse
(1962, Italy)             Psychological significance: ****  [out of ****]

[aka The Eclipse]                   Cinematic value:              ***1/2  [out of ****]
Directed by Michelangelo Antonioni.
Third film in Antonioni’s trilogy of alienation following L’Avventura (1960) and La Notte (1961) about a young woman (Monica Vitti) and her brief affair with handsome Alain Delon. Like in his other movies, Antonioni uses specific techniques not to tell the story but rather to express the lack of communication among the characters, their alienation and incapableness to make a strong and meaningful relation. May this be because of their shallow characters or as a result of living in a modern society marked with the superficial values like prestigious and run-for-the-money – it’s up to the viewer to decide. Anyway, long cadres, real time events, visual metaphors and visual contrasts between the characters on the one side and landscapes and/or modern day creations like buildings, streets (usually empty) on the other is what makes this rather experience than a plot-movie (intentionally) but nevertheless effective in their purpose (which is to express and transmit this same feelings of alienation to the viewer). So, if you’re looking for an entertainment, you better skip this one. Final scene is great in concluding the movie. A bit weaker of great L'Avventura.

  
L'Eclisse   from the   Rotten Tomatoes    Internet Movie Database    All Movie Guide





Lost in Translation (2003, US)      Psychological significance:  ****  [out of  ****]
Directed by Sofia Coppola.             Cinematic value:               ****  [out of  ****]
Bill Murray stars as famous American actor coming to Tokyo to film some commercials for their television. There he meets a young female American (Scarlett Johansson) and they develop a superficial friendship. Some people misunderstood it as boring “style over substance”, but this is more style FOR substance. This is movie about cultural, age and individual differences and most important – about alienation in a modern society. Coppola displays tremendous talent and delicacy in crafting this film by clever use of formal elements, like visual metaphors, slow rhythm, contrasts between large buildings, lights and cheap fun on the one side and the bored and empty characters on the other. This form in addition with great acting efficiently express emotional detachment, boredom, senselessness and alienation of the protagonists. Film is well worthy of comparison with the best films of great Italian director Michelangelo Antonioni who explored the same topics. Major virtue of this movie is directing. Nevertheless, Oscar for Best Director went to Return of the King and Sofia received Oscar for Best Screenplay.

   Lost in Translation  from the  Rotten Tomatoes    Internet Movie Database   All Movie Guide





My Big Fat Greek Wedding
(2002, US)       Psychological significance:  **1/2    [out of  ****]

Directed by Joel Zwick.                                Cinematic value:                  **1/2    [out of  ****]
Nia Vardalos stars as a 30-year-old Greek-American woman trying to ‘’break the rules’’ of her family. Well, what starts as a very fine and fresh comedy after 30 minutes turns out to be a stereotypical and predictable romance. Of course, it’s nothing bad in comedy/romance itself but there is in the approach which is, lets say – ‘’too familiar’’ and certainly not bringing some new perspectives or ideas (except being Greek). So, after the well start film is like running out of ideas (repeating the same ones on and on, like Vartex joke, Greek word origin jokes or translation jokes) and becoming an average ‘’forbidden love’’ story full of ‘’yes, we saw that million times’’ situations. Nia Vardalos also wrote a script which earned an Oscar Nomination (?!) for this box office smash. Leave your high expectations behind, but worth watching and somehow enjoyable.

   My Big Fat Greek Wedding  from the  Rotten Tomatoes    Internet Movie Database 




 
© 2005 Aleksandar Novakovic   

Create a free website at Webs.com