Phone Tree - To support court litigants facing legal abuse. Don't go into court alone!

To all:

In the effort to spread some truth around (for once) about my situation, and what's been done to me, and in an effort to rebuild trust among the people working toward Judicial Reform (judidicial accountability, legal reform, etc.), I am sending these communications to openly share this information about my experience with other so-called "freedom/legal abuse fighters" (take your pick). I have heard enough about what I have allegedly done; ie. setting fires to people's property, stealing thousands of dollars from people, etc., and all these lies must stop! I've had enough!

This is an effort to clear my name and I know others will not believe it, but I am an honest and decent person!

suzanne

suz <icsn2202@yahoo.com> wrote:

Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: suz
Subject: re: Miss Linda Kennedy being kicked off the Virginia state bar assoc
To: AMOJ@yahoogroups.com, icsn2202@yahoo.com
CC: WBFLegal@aol.com

Jacob, here is what I wrote to Miss Linda Kennedy about her revoked license from the VA State Bar; I only removed a few lines I wrote to Ron and Barbie at J4J's -- suz

suz <icsn2202@yahoo.com> wrote:
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: suz
Subject: Fwd: Re: Kennedy case WBFLegal-- Topics To Report ABout ---
To: icsn2202@yahoo.com, WBFLegal@aol.com, suzannesfreedomlaw@yahoogroups.com
CC: VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org, suzsresources@yahoogroups.com

Dear Miss Linda Kennedy,

Why is it that you still use my letters on your website about legal reform? Isn't this enough proof that you are a problem to not only me but to Jacob Roginsky at AMOJ? He told me you tried to take over his non-profit, since you were named Executive Director .. He told me that you tried to make him do something unethical, and that he refused to do it. He also did not tell me specifically what it was, although I never asked him to tell me, either.

You are a shit of an attorney who is full of it! You owe me $160.00 AT LEAST, for two-day's work at $8.00/hr. you promised me, then you and Joyce turned around and charged me a list of things you never told me about; this, a month or more AFTER the FACT of my knowing about this list. You guys must have come up with this at the last minute after I phoned Joyce Riley about my pay; she said she had an argument with you about it but you were to pay me; she left it to you and you never did handle it, did you Linda?? You are a liar and a cheat, and now I know why you must have been kicked off the VA State Bar. I hope you rot for the problems you have caused me and created in my life.

Here when I trusted you to leave my home-state of California; the only state I know, and to leave my post as Assoc. JIC for JAIL4Judges.org, and now to tell all on some list about Joyce's personal marriage details; I don't know what your sick mind is about, Linda, but you are a thief.

I hope this hits the public fan so that more people know about who you really are.

Sincerely,

Suzanne LeBoeuf, M.A.

p.s. - any decent woman would also take my endorcement letter off their site after you have ripped me off !

suz <icsn2202@yahoo.com> wrote:

Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: suz
Subject: Re: Kennedy case WBFLegal-- Topics To Report ABout ---
To: icsn2202@yahoo.com

http://www.vsb.org/disciplinary_orders/kennedy_opinion.html

VIRGINIA:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH

VIRGINIA STATE BAR, EX REL

SECOND DISTRICT - SECTION I SUBCOMMITTEE

Complainant,

v. Chancery No. 02-48

LINDA LEA KENNEDY

Respondent.

ORDER

Having been certified for hearing by the Second District Committee - Section I, and the Respondent, Linda Lea Kennedy, having requested a hearing before a three-judge panel pursuant to Virginia Code ß 54.1-3935, this matter came on for hearing on July 15 and July 16, 2002, before a three-judge panel consisting of the Honorable John E. Clarkson, William L. Winston and Glen A. Tyler, Chief Judge. The Virginia State Bar appeared through its Assistant Bar Counsel Paul D. Georgiadis. The Respondent attorney appeared pro se.

Upon due consideration of the testimony and documentary evidence, the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that material facts in dispute, including issues of credibility, are resolved in favor of the Virginia State Bar. The Court finds that Respondent's evidence and testimony on disputed facts are not credible in view of the documentary evidence presented, much of which consists of Respondent's own documents.

The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent has violated DR 2-105(A) by charging her client for admission to the U.S. District Court and for a copy of the court rules, which are overhead items not billable to a client. The Court also finds that Respondent failed to adequately explain to her client the co-counsel fee of $18,750 paid to Lanis Karnes on April 19, 1999, and failed to obtain client's consent to such. The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the Respondent and her client agreed that Karnes' co-counsel fees would be paid by the Respondent from any contingency fee due to the Respondent, not money due to the client.

The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent has violated DR 7-102 (A)(1) and DR 7-102 (A)(2). On January 19, 1999, Respondent was found by the U.S. District Court magistrate to have made an argument in Sherry M. Grayson v. Milcom Systems Corporation for an improper purpose and without merit. Respondent not only failed to challenge that finding in subsequent proceedings before the U.S. District Court but sought to have the finding upheld in the settlement of the case. The evidence is clear and convincing that the U.S. magistrate had a basis in fact for the finding.

The Court further finds by clear and convincing evidence that the Respondent has violated DR 9-102(A)(2) by disbursing funds from her trust account to herself and others, the entitlement to which was the subject of disputes between Respondent and her client. Respondent disbursed such disputed funds to herself and others to the extent that she appropriated to herself and others all of the money recovered in the settlement, including that money due her client.

WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED that:

Respondent is hereby REPRIMANDED for her violations of DR 2-105(A) arising from billing her client for office overhead;

Respondent's license to practice law is hereby SUSPENDED for a period of one year from the date of this order for her violations of DR 2-105(A) for her payment of co-counsel fees without adequate explanation or agreement;

Respondent is hereby REPRIMANDED for her violations of DR 7-102 (A)(1) and DR 7-102 (A)(2); and

Respondent's license to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby REVOKED for her violations of DR 9-102(A)(2).

It is further ORDERED that:

Pursuant to the provisions of Part Six, Section IV, Paragraph 13(K)(1) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, the Respondent shall forthwith give Notice by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, of the suspension and revocation of her license to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia, to all clients for whom she is currently handling matters and to all opposing attorneys and presiding judges in pending litigation. The Respondent shall also make appropriate arrangements for the disposition of matters then in her care in conformity with the wishes of her client. The Respondent shall give such notice within fourteen (14) days of the effective date of this order, and make such arrangements as are required herein within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of this order.

Respondent shall also furnish proof to the Clerk of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary System within sixty (60) days of the effective date of this order that such notices have been timely given and such arrangement for the disposition of matters made. Issues concerning the adequacy of the notice and arrangements required herein shall be determined by the Disciplinary

Board, which may impose a sanction of revocation or suspension for failure to comply with the requirements of this subparagraph.

Pursuant to Part Six, §IV, ¶13(K)(10) of the Rules of the Supreme Court, the Clerk of the Disciplinary System shall assess costs.

Pursuant to Rule 1:13, Respondent's endorsement is dispensed with.

A copy teste of this Order shall be mailed by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to the Respondent, Linda Lea Kennedy, at her last address of record with the Virginia State Bar, 416 London Place, Portsmouth, Virginia, 23704, and mailed via First Class Mail to Assistant Bar Counsel Paul D. Georgiadis, Eighth & Main Building, Suite 1500, 707 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219-2800.

The court reporter for the hearing was Stefania Smith at Ronald Graham and Associates, Inc., Court Reporters, 5344 Hickory Ridge, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23455-6680 [telephone - (757) 490-1100].

ENTER: / /

Glen A. Tyler

Chief Judge Designate

John E. Clarkson

Judge Designate

William L. Winston

Judge Designate

I Ask For This:

Virginia State Bar

By:

Paul D. Georgiadis, VSB # 26340

Assistant Bar Counsel

Virginia State Bar

707 E. Main Street, Suite 1500

Richmond, Virginia 23219

804.775.0520

Telecopy: 804.775.0501
suz <icsn2202@yahoo.com> wrote:

Ron and Barbie;

<snip>I enjoyed reading your latest J4J's News Journal about how you are to lead the nation. I only wish I could help more. -- suz

http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/sclaid/research.html

low income legal research

http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/downloads/sclaid/agendaforaccess.pdf

1996, ILL Bar Assoc.: Legal Access report --- small portion of legal problems are served by bar and public funding ... more needs to be done by the courts in order to have equal justice ... greater simplicity needed in civil cases ... lack of legal access to courts and to legal needs ... we're getting ripped off ... more flexibility is needed by courts ... 11 step "agenda for access" by courts ...

suz <icsn2202@yahoo.com> wrote:

http://www.harp.org/links.htm

links - legal, etc.

http://www.harp.org/links.htm#probono

legal aid and pro bono links

http://public.findlaw.com/divorce/

fed child support link, etc.

August 23, 2002*

Linda Lea Kennedy, 416 London Place, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704

VSB Docket No. 99-021-2654, Chancery No. 02-48

Effective August 12, 2002, a panel of three circuit court judges sitting in the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth revoked Linda Lea Kennedy's license to practice law in Virginia. The three judge panel found that Ms. Kennedy disbursed settlement proceeds from her trust account to herself and third parties although her client disputed their rights to receive the funds.

The three judge panel also suspended Ms. Kennedy's law license for one year for paying fees to co-counsel without adequately explaining what she had done and obtaining her client's consent. The three judge panel also reprimanded Ms. Kennedy for billing her client for office overhead and for filing a frivolous motion in the federal district court in Norfolk.

go to opinion

http://www.vsb.org/profguides/actions_jul02-dec02.html

*On June 27, 2003, the Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the three-judge court to revoke Ms. Kennedy’s license to practice law.

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th