Kennedy Updates: Honest VA attorney kicked off bar ... Friends of Justice

(Update re Kennedy's case)

RESULTS OF KENNEDY PUTTING SUPREMES ON TRIAL


From: WBFLegal@aol.com
To: WBFLegal@aol.com
Subject: RESULTS OF KENNEDY PUTTING SUPREMES ON TRIAL
Date sent: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:13:00 EDT
Copies to: trusts@vallnet.com

The results are in! --And every single American is affected if this
holding is allowed to stand. The Virginia Supremes tried to hide their
ruling by not addressing any of the issues in writing, but what they are
saying is that they can review an openly fraudulent record, knowing it is
fraudulent and decide that ---Yes, you can re-write the record of the
lower court proceedings to justify a Kangaroo ruling--if you are the judge
and prosecutor. Yes, you can get the head of the bar to perjure himself
in order to get the conviction--if you are the prosecutor and judge. Yes,
it is true that you can be prosecuted for and convicted of thought crimes.
Yes, it is true that the law and facts really don't matter to our crooks
in office. See the results of Kennedy's putting the Virginia Supreme
Court on trial at

http://hometown.aol.com/wbflegal/page10.html

Be assurred that this case is not yet over,
although the Supremes would love for you all to just let it go.
But the people of America have been challenged. Are we going
to let the Courts deceive the public by hiding the real issues that were
presented?

It is up to you folks. See the website listed above and take
action. Thanks. Kennedy

 

******************************************

 

FROM FRIENDS OF KENNEDY:

The "Commentary" section is the one section that The Washington Times does not put on the web, so there is no Washington Times web link to my article about the Virginia Bar railroading attorney Linda Kennedy for whistleblowing on corruption.

But I have attached here a .pdf file of the photocopied article, and I pasted its actual text below with introductory comments by Dr. Stephen Baskerville.

By all means, post the .pdf and the text in suitable places on the web for reference and encourage sending letters to The Washington Times editor at:
letters@washingtontimes.com .

Also, special thanks to Dr. Charles Corry who included a web link to Linda ennedy's outstanding writings exposing "Holodeck Law" and the "Litigation Vortex"              ( http://www.ejfi.org/Courts/Courts-4.htm ), and also a link to Zed McLarnon's well-documented case from Massachusetts(http://www.ejfi.org/Courts/Courts-9.htm ).

Also, please check our "Defending Holy Matrimony" website to see what we are doing to wake up churches, so Protestants and Catholics will unite in the name
of Jesus Christ and break the back of the Divorce Regime, beginning the stampede through the rest of the corrupt judiciary and its Bar Associations:

http://www.DefendingHolyMatrimony.org

I will be away from e-mail for a few days. See you next week.

Best Regards!

Ed

Edward Truncellito, JD
Director of Development
Defending Holy Matrimony
http://www.DefendingHolyMatrimony.org
PursueJustice@CatholicExchange.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: Dr. Charles E. Corry
To: comments@ejfi.org
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 9:34 AM
Subject: Fwd: Washington Times: Crooked Courts Punish Honest Attorneys

Ed Truncellito's piece on judicial corruption in Virginia (and by implication, nationwide) was published in today's [June 22, 2003] Washington Times. Charles
Corry has identified attorneys in other states who face similar disbarment proceedings for their work on behalf of families and fathers. As indicated below, the fabrication and doctoring of evidence, including falsifying hearing tapes and transcripts, is also becoming a pattern throughout the country. We
have documented cases in Massachusetts, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and no doubt elsewhere.

One father has suggested the Times should assign an investigative reporter to this, saying it could win them a Pulitzer Prize. This could do for the Washington Times what Watergate did for the Washington Post, but do they see it...?

To send a letter to the editor in response to this column, write to: letters@washingtontimes.com . You might also urge them to start posting this section on their Internet site (it is the only feature not posted).

Stephen Baskerville

***************************

Putting the justices on trial
The Washington Times, Sunday, June 22, 2003, Section B, Commentary, Page B5,
Forum
Reproduced under the Fair Use exception of 17 USC 107 for noncommercial, nonprofit or educational use.

Last week seven Justices of the Virginia Supreme Court were put on trial in their own court by attorney Linda Kennedy - who was disbarred last year.


The justices had the spotlight turned around on them when Ms. Kennedy addressed them from the podium. Ms. Kennedy was there to appeal her disbarment for
violating the unwritten First Commandment of Virginia Legal Ethics: Thou Shalt Not embarrass the Virginia Bar by blowing the whistle on white-collar crimes
they commit against an unwitting Virginia public.


Ms. Kennedy began by throwing Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell Sr. off guard. She complimented him, saying she heard him preach the Gospel of Jesus
Christ at Regent University. Maybe he momentarily forgot that a similar tactic was used by the Apostle Paul to subdue King Agrippa.


The justice straightened up and beamed with pride as he was reminded of the distinction that Regent bestowed upon him in the eyes of his black community by
honoring him as a professor of law and theology.


Next Ms. Kennedy quoted a second one of the justices, a woman, who was published as stating that legal process must always be above suspicion. Ms. Kennedy thanked her for the statement but added that the message apparently has not yet reached the Virginia Bar.


--------------------------------------------


On the Internet, it is now an open secret that court records are being falsified routinely in cases all over the state and all over the country while the high courts hear it with a deaf ear.


--------------------------------------------


Ms. Kennedy silenced a third justice by interrupting his question and asking that the justices not ask her any more questions. She said they had a copy of her written brief, and she wanted to use her entire 15 minutes to explain to them in person how their legal system has become disgracefully corrupt.

And if that did not convince them, then nothing ever would.

Nonetheless, a moment later a fourth justice, another woman, interrupted to ask if she understood correctly that Ms. Kennedy did not want to answer their questions, perhaps implying that Ms. Kennedy had something to hide. But Ms. Kennedy rebuked her. Ms. Kennedy said it could not have been made any plainer: "No questions." The justice pushed herself back in her chair showing
consternation, but she had nothing more to say.

These justices are the senior officers overseeing the Virginia Bar whose lawyers are trying to cover up the fact that Ms. Kennedy caught them red-handed falsifying the very court record that these justices had sitting right there under their noses on the bench. The legal process that brought them the case record was not merely suspicious - it was blatantly fraudulent.


Ms. Kennedy fished through trash cans and found court transcripts with handwritten notes clearly showing falsifications proposed by the Bar Prosecutor and approved by the trial judge to cover up perjury by the lawyer who heads the Virginia Bar's Ethics Department.


Ms. Kennedy has audiotapes that prove what the Ethics leader really said, in
his own recorded voice. But the trial court record is cut out at the part where
the trial judge refused to allow those audiotapes to be played. Ironically, the
trial judge's comments were falsified in the record, claiming he said he would
have exonerated Ms. Kennedy if only she could have proved what the audiotapes
in fact do prove.


Talk about smoking guns. But this is just one of the more glaring cases. On the
Internet, it is now an open secret that court records are being falsified
routinely in cases all over the state and all over the country while the high
courts hear it with a deaf ear. Zed McLarnon, a forensic audiovisual expert,
has documented that transcripts in Massachusetts courts are altered with the
knowledge of court personnel. In Indiana, Rebecca Rohrs has conclusively
documented literally thousands of alterations in hearing transcripts in a child
custody case.


"This is criminal misconduct," attorney Eugene Wrona says of similar practices
in Pennsylvania, "and these people belong in jail."


Further, it is notorious among lawyers that lawyer whistleblowers can all expect to share Ms. Kennedy's fate. Law students are misled like the public, being told in law school that law is an honorable profession. Not until they begin practicing do they discover how money really changes hands. Only after they have invested years in their law school education are they taught that they must maintain an unwritten code of secrecy. Then they shut up - or they are disbarred.

The justices in this case will pronounce a verdict on themselves. If they order a full investigation and a new trial of Ms. Kennedy's disbarment, then the justices will have pronounced their innocence. Otherwise, Regent ought to reconsider whom they allow to preach to our youth, and maybe it ought to be Linda Kennedy.

ED TRUNCELLITO
Mr. Truncellito is an attorney and director of development for Defending Holy Matrimony.