Elizabeth Robillard

Elizabeth Robillard

1989 with Stained Glass Work

Image and video hosting by TinyPic


powered by FreeFind




contd...As  a very small child I was partying with my mum, neighbours and friends including;


The Nice, Eric Burdon (The Animals), David O'list and sisters Suzanne and Pauline, were friends of the family (my mum had been friends with Reg O'List since the days of the war they were both entertainers, his Spanish guitar style resonates with me now, he was wonderful, so was the O'List pasta parties!) and post war her club, the New Chez Moi) Suzanne introducing me as a flower-munching toddler to a bewildered knife-throwing  Keith Emerson in a South Kensington bedsit. . A band called King Crimson lived  in the basement of our apartment block. My favourite neighbour was Sarah Chruchill, daughter of Sir Winston, who often kindly babysat me when my mother had to work at the club. She also worked with my brother when she played 'Peter Pan'.as well as Sharon Arden (now Osborne), whom introduced us to a band called Skip Bifferty whom her dad, Don Arden,  I think, was agent.  Another great neighbour was Salina Jones, a really good singer and a great babysitter and friend.

. One of these guys took me to the last Rolling Stones concert in Hyde Park, I was so tiny but it ws great fun.. People watched from the trees, it was fun and  exciting.

 When Iggy Pop (Jim) was over a group of us used to hang out in Fulham, generally at their house in a Fulham mews or at Blakes Hotel and the still great Serpetine in Hyde Park. We made him laugh by throwing things at him. He was one of the nicest and funniest guys I ever met and also very psychic; he guessed a roomful of peoples' zodiac sun signs and left us all in shock, and despite my Humanist beliefs, has left me with remnants of belief in the Zodiac. I am a fan of Rob Breszney the guy who wrote about 'Pronoia' (way good)

 

My life was made whole when I saw my baby Jamie

 

 

 

 song for you from mummy darling - bit off xx (my son Jamie)

Janet Suzman

Elizabeth Robillard

Alan Bates (played dad in 'Day In The Death Of Jo Egg') remained a very good friend throughout my life, he's sorely missed.

 (Sorry for picture quality)

Janet Suzman (above Alan) played my mum, is still fabulous and in contact.

 

Elizabeth Robillard was an actress and entertainer for many years. Google has some details and other sites.

 

'A day In the Death of Joe Egg'

'The movie centers on a British couple who are struggling to save their marriage whislt trying to raise their only child, a small girl suffering Cerebral Palsy. She is wheelchair bound and unable to communicate. Taking care of her has occupied nearly every moment of her parent's lives since her birth, and this has taken a heavy toll on their marriage.

Sheila, her mother, gives Josephine as much of a life as she can while Bri wants the child institutionalised and has begun to entertain chilling fantasies of killing himself and Josephine

Alan Bates played Brian the monstrous hallucinating father, Janet Suzman played the upbeat mum' < Article from Wiki

Elizabeth says;

Playing Jo in the movie 'A Day In The Death Of Joe Egg' had a profound effect on me;

 I didn't want to do the film but Peter Medak persuaded me - wanted me so badly
for the part as I was a good little actress and looked right, so they took me to some
very gruesome hospital's full of terribly disabled and disfigured abandoned children.
 
I was very traumatised to see people could be so incredulously heartless to abandon
these poor little kids, they all needed a thorough cleaning, love and company.
 
My mother tried desperately to talk me out of doing the film, but she hadn't seen those
children whom I'll always remember with horror, sorrow and thanks.
 
There was one nurse to a ward of approx 100 children.
 
 They all screamed as I walked toward the nurses desk at the end of the ward,
 where she was smoking and doing a crossword puzzle.
 
I asked her why they were screaming, she replied 'they are pleased to see you,
 it's the only way they can show it' .  
 
Finding this piece of my stage-school brat-hair from having my hair cut off
 to play the part of Jo, made me feel very grateful for my life. As does my own
lovely son, Jamie, who suffers from a rare form of autism. I feel very
grateful to have known such courage as these children have to have.

Elizabeths' family are the Lucy and Robillard families, the Lucys' date back to pre 1066 in the UK whilst the Robillards' (though also coming originally from (Champagne family) in France) were settled at first mainly in Ireland before travelling to (mainly French) Canada and New Orleans, USA.

Champagne: Robillard de Champagne, a noble family in Saintonge, several of whom took refuge in England and Ireland. The children of Josias de Robillard, chavalier of Champagne, under charge of their mother, escaped from La Rochelle, concealed in empty wine casks, and arrived safe at Plymouth, England. Their father went into Holland and took service with the Prince of Orange; on his way to join his regiment, he died at Belfast. Madame de Champagne settled at Portarlington with her family. One of Champagne's sons, Josias, was an ensign in La Melonniere's regiment of French infantry, and fought at the Boyne; he afterwards became Major in the 14th Foot.

http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~jamesdow/s056/f189196.htm

 

http://books.google.com/books?id=YdIKAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA234&lpg=PA234&dq=josias+robillard&source=web&ots=qBCpiYaa1N&sig=U7bHzuDoEcAbexDrLVmCSBsRF-w

 

Richard de Lucy
Birth: About 1089 in Of, Dunmow, Essex, England
Death: 14 Jul 1179

Henry Lucy (see De Lucey)

http://www.uoregon.edu/~rbear/r3.html

'For he declared then, that king Edward was neuer lawfully maried, vnto the quene, but was before god, husband vnto dame Elizabeth Lucye, & so his children bastardes. '
 
The Duchesse with these wordes nothyng appeased, and seing the king so set thereon that she coulde not pull him backe, so hyghelye she dysdained it, that vnder pretect of her duetye to Godwarde, shee deuised to disturbe this mariage, and rather to help that he shold mary one dame
Elizabeth Lucy
Elizabeth Lucy, whom the king had also not long before gotten with child. Wherefor the kinges mother obiected openly against his mariage, as it were in discharge of her conscience, that the kinge was sure to dame Elizabeth Lucy and her husband before god. By reson of which wordes, such obstacle was made in the mater, that either the Bishoppes durst not, or the king would not, procede to the solempnisacion of this weding, til these same wer clerely purged, & the trouth wel & openly testified. Wherupon dame Elysabeth Lucy was sent for. And albeit that she was by the kinges mother & many other put in good comfort, to affirme that she was ensure vnto the king: yet when she was solempnely sworne to say the trouth, she confessed that they were neuer ensured. Howbeit she sayed his grace spake so louing wordes vnto her, that she verely hopid he wold have maried her. And that if it had not ben for such kind wordes, she would never have shewed such kindenes to him, to let him so kindly get her with childe. This examinacion sole[m]pnly taken, when it was clerely perceiued that there was none impediment:
The kinges mariage
the king with gret feast & honorable solempnite, maried dame Elisabeth Grai and her crowned quene that was hys enemies wife, & many time had praied full hartly for his losse. In which god loued her better, then to graunt her her bone.
     But when the Erle of Warwick vnderstode of this mariage, he tooke it so highly that his embasiate was deluded, that for very angre & disdaine,
The king fledde
he at his retourne assembled a gret puisaunce against the king, and came so fast vppon him or he could be able to resist, that he was faine to voide the realme & fle into hollaund for succour.
The prince borne
King Kenry the .vi. set vp
Of the Erle of warwik
Wher he remayned for the space of .ii. yeres, leuing hys new wife in westminster in sanctuary, wher she was deliuered of Edward the prince, of whom we before haue spoken. In which mene time the Erle of warwik toke out of prison and set vp againe Henry the .vi. which was before by king Edward deposed and that much what by the power of the Erle of warwike: which was a wiseman & a couragiouse warriour, & of such strength, what for his landes his alliaunce and fauer with al the people, that he made kinges and put down kinges almost at his pleasure, & not impossible to haue attained it himselfe, if he had not rekened it a greater thing to make a king then to be a king. But nothing
Therle of warwik slain
lasteth alway, for in conclusion king Edwarde returned, and with much lesse number then he had, at Barnet on thestre daye felde, slewe the Erle of wawik with many other great estates of that partie, & so stably attained the crowne againe, that he peassybly enioyed it vntil his dieng day: and in such plight left it, that it could not be lost, but by the discorde of his verye frendes, or falshed of his fained frendes.
I haue rehersed this busines about this mariage somwhat the more at lenght, because it might therby the better appere how slipper a grounde the protector builded his colour, by which he pretended king Edwardes children to be bastardes. But that inuencion simple as it was, it liked them to whom it suffised to haue somwhat to say, while they wer sure to be compelled to no larger proofe then themselfe list to make.
Doctoure Shawes sermon
Now then as I began to shew you, it was by the protectour & his counsaile concluded, that this doctour Sha should in a sermon at Poules Crosse, sygnifie to the people, that neither king Edward himself, nor the Duke of Clarence, were lawfully begotten, nor were not the very children of the duke of Yorke, but gotten vnlawfully by other parsons by thaduoutry of the duches their mother. And that also dame Elisabeth Lucy was verely the wife of king Edward, and so the prince and all his children bastardes that were gotten vpon the quene.'
 
 
What have we got from this? That Arthur was known as Arthur Waite, may give
an indication that his mother was Elizabeth Waite/Wayte. Elizabeth Hallam's
book makes this Elizabeth Waite a Mrs. Elizabeth Lucy. The Complete Peerage
makes this Mrs. Elizabeth a Lady Elizabeth Lucy. "Blood Royal" makes Lady
Elizabeth Lucy also mother of Elizabeth (Lumley).

Elizabeth Hallam indicates as years of possible birth of the child(ren) of
Edward IV by Elizabeth Waite as about 1461 till 1464/5. "Blood Royal"
guesses that Arthur was born about 1470 and Richardson guesses "say 1475".
Richardson wants him to be as young as possible, because Arthur didn't marry
until 1511.

If Arthur was born in 1463 he would have been about 48 when marrying,
if he was born in 1470 he would have been 41, if born in 1475 he would have
been about 36.

However, we most not forget that he was in 1511 "only" the bastard brother
of the Queen, and also he married the widow of a disgraced man, disgraced
enough to be decapitated. And this, in my opinion, makes the age of Arthur,
when marrying, irrelevant, he could well have been 48 as easy as only 36.

For the children of Thomas Lumley and Elizabeth "Plantagenet", Richardson
seems to follow Burke's Extinct Peerage,
one son, Richard (Lord Lumley)
and three daughters
Anne (wife of Robert Ogle)
Sibyl (wife of William Hilton
Elizabeth (wife of Robert Cresswell)

Then follows a weird observation "Descendants (not traced)". Whose
descendants? Or, not traced by whom? Especially as earlier in his message he
notes that Gary Boyd Roberts indicated that there are American descendants
of Elizabeth Lumley.

Cahiers de Saint Louis, which Richardson has learned to appreciate, gives
the same three daughters but instead of one son, gives four sons. The last
son, Roger, is important as he is an ancestor of Prince Charles (See Paget
O24907).

That Richardson's remark "Descendants (not traced)" is ludicrous can also be
shown by the known acestry of just three of the children of Thomas and
Elizabeth Lumley (let's skip Roger, he has been shown to have descendants
till the present):

Richard Lumley
he is an ancestor of the later Earls of Scarborough, HRH Richard, Duke of
Gloucester, Dukes of Buccleuch, Dukes of Northumberland, Marquess of
Exeter, Marquess of Linlithgow, Marquess of Zetland

Anne Lumley
she is ancestor of HM the Queen, Lady Diana Spencer, Sarah Ferguson, Dukes
of Atholl, Bedford, Northumberland, Richmond, Earls of Harewood and Warwick

Sybil Lumley
she is ancestor of HM the Queen, Lady Diana Spencer, Dukes of Abercorn,
Buccleuch, Devonshire, Marlborough, Westminster, Northumberland and the last
Duke of Leeds.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9A0DE7DB1631E233A25755C1A9639C946997D6CF

 

Elizabeth Robillard. 


powered by FreeFind

Weekends happy in Brighton with the family

Grandad Lucy

 

What did the Narcissistic magician say?

'Here's my latest delusion' BOOM BOOM original artwork by

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I've always been interested in our ancestry and especially, the Lady Elizabeth Lucy, whom apparently was the legitimate wife of Kind Edward the 1V - there is much heated debate on this topic

More on the Lady Elizabeth Lucy 

'The source of Shakespeare's representation of King Edward IV's precontracts and "bigamy" was Sir Thomas More's History of King Richard III (pub. 1557) (Candido, "More" 139). More originally wrote this work in Latin and English in or near 1513, when he was still strongly supportive of Henry VIII. Ironically, a book written by an advocate of Henry VIII would one day become the source of a stage depiction potentially critical by analogy of the king and embarrassing to his daughter. Analysis of More's History sharpens the critical commentary on Henry VIII latent in Shakespeare's dramaturgy. More emphasizes Elizabeth Grey's widowhood as the basis for the Duchess of York's claim that marriage to her would be bigamous: More's Duchess tells Edward, "`wheras ye only widowhed of Elizabeth Gray though she wer in al other thinges conuenient for you, shold yet suffice as me semeth to refrain you from her mariage, sith it is an vnsitting thing, & a veri blemish, & highe disparagement, to the sacre magesty of a prince, yt ought as nigh to approche priesthode in clenes as he doth in dignitie, to be defouled wt bigamy in his first mariage"' (62). In canon law, bigamy included marriage to a widow, especially by ecclesiastical clerks. "`And as for ye bigamy,' More reports Edward as replying, 'let ye Bishop hardely lay it in my wai, when I come to take orders. For I vnderstand it is forbidden a prieste, but I never wiste it yet yt it was forbidden a prince"' (64). Edward had sired at least two illegitimate children-a son, Arthur Plantagenet, definitely by Elizabeth Lucy, and a daughter, Elizabeth, perhaps by Elizabeth Lucy. The girl was born about the time of Edward's marriage to Elizabeth Woodville Grey. More's Edward boasts to his mother, "`That she is a widow and hath alredy children, by gods blessed Ladye I am a batcheler & have some to: & so eche of vs hath a profe yt neither of vs is lyke to be barain"' (64) . Because of the story of Edward's precontract with Elizabeth Lucy and the Duchess's accusations, the bishops refused to marry Edward and the widow. They relented only after Elizabeth Lucy publicly equivocated on the matter of the precontract. '

Elizabeth Robillard
 

BBC - Hospital infections cause

Hospital infections caused by doctors?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/actionnetwork/A27875866

Overuse of various antibiotics and prescribing them- not all the correct reasons in some cases, leads to susceptible bacteria being surpressed (unkillable).

The bacteria that are resistent to antibiotics survive because of the menacing speed in which the nature of bacteria divide and spread. In general, such bacteria becomes resistant and populate and breed at a very frightening pace. Moreover, these bacteria can transfer further and this is not being monitored properly. VERY strangely, superbugs appear confined to hospitals, dont they?

Health professionals depend on antibiotics to treat infection caused by bacteria, from tonsilitis to meningistis and many life-threatening bacterial infections. The efficacy of many antibiotics has begun to wane dramatically in the UK, this being the legacy of many years of erronous prescribing (especially when given without an absolute and positive diagnosis of a bacterial illness) and overuse in both human medicine and agricultural worlds.

It is plainly wrong and far too easy to blame vulnerable nurses and cleaners for specific strains of virri killing people!

It MUST be time to investigate the role of the antibiotic, and how it is precribed, precisely when and why it's given, and whether the course has been completed- THAT does require rigid focused attendence to detail to help avoid obvious mutation and resistance to unique killer-bugs-uniquely (?) placed now, in hospitals.

If these bugs are so virulent, they would be possibly airborne and easily spead from hand-to-hand as colds are- to the oustide, not confined to hospitals, they would spread to the streets, other countries - may well be the next disaster we will face if antibiotic use is not curbed now.

These drugs work only against infections caused by bacteria, not virri. Or is there a strange virus we dont know about here?

However, many GP's mollify their patients' demands that they 'give me something' by prescribing antibiotics for viral infections such as colds, flu and other common complaints, easily dealt with by a pharmacist.

They may also prescribe the drugs for other infections, such as sore throat, that are sometimes caused by bacteria, but without having swabbed for bacteria- surely a necessity nowadays- how do they KNOW they are not mis-prescribing and risking 'super-bug' mutations?

If it's a virus, the GP/docor is well aware he's causing a possible mutated dangerous killer-virus outbreak by prescribing antibiotics.


Taking antibiotics for anything other than particular PROVEN bacterial illness, not only can't work, but can have a killer side effect: in due course, this practice helps create bacteria that cannot be killed and can only become an out-of-control disaster.

Scientists have indeed found bacteria that are resistant to some of the most powerful antibiotics in the world, this has to be due prescribing them, VERY wrongly, by doctors.

Elizabeth Robillard

http://www.elizabethrobillard.co.uk

BBC ARTICLES AND NOTICES

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/actionnetwork/U1756626 BBC ARTICLES AND NOTICES BY ELIZABETH LUCY ROBILLARD

IF -RUDYARD KIPLING

- POEM BY RUDYARD KIPLING

If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you
But make allowance for their doubting too,
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream--and not make dreams your master,
If you can think--and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:

If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it all on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breath a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: "Hold on!"

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with kings--nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you;
If all men count with you, but none too much,
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And--which is more--you'll be a Man, my son!


--Rudyard Kipling

Elizabeth Robillard

www.elizabethrobillard.co.uk

 

Liverpool Airport was closed today for 8 hours due to the discovery of a
suspicious car.

It apparently was taxed, insured and the radio was still in it

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Family Law: Vulnerable

The fact that social workers and employees involved with any local authority, such as those permanent employees at Adoption and Permanancy panels globally are given training in matters pertaining to family law prior to any proceedings. That's illegal isn't it? Isn't that a bias before a case is begun and therefore a violation of a fair hearing [Article 6 ECHR]?

This Leaves a vulnerable, hapless parent [target] violated by professional bullies whom are legally-trained (and trained in the latest 'psych techniques' too! Aren't we modern? Please see article 'psychiatry is redundant' with refs) .

Not to mention the childrens' wishes completely unheard.

Nobody has mentioned the children who die on the streets fleeing care-homes- have they? Who cares about them? Shelter probably.

They (targets) do not stand a chance, especially once the parent has employed a family solicitor, all parties (except the parent-client-target) then these professionals collaborate regarding timing, payment, likely outcome of case and SO much more - all without the 'client' [ target parent] knowing about it. These professionals have access to all records, letters and every type of detail of your life.

Privacy of family courts? There's no privacy, there is for the courts.

They snort at the profits, in a joyful way.

This legal training for social workers ( Cafcass, etc) makes it a plain case of violation of Article 6 of the Human Rights' Act before any case has even reached court. Doesn't it?

Thank you for reading.

Elizabeth Robillard



Psychiatry metaphysical and redundant

Psychiatry appears to be redundant (by it's own non-verbal admission) in the prescribing of drugs for mental illness to 'balance out chemical imbalances' well yes.

They know mental illness causes the body and neurotransmitters in the brain to act wrong. Stuff like cortisol a natural 'stress' hormone can get much worse over time if it's malfunction is not understood and treated. It can cause lots of physical disease like heart disease or more rarely, Cushings' Syndrome, and psychiatric drugs can cause Parkinsons etc.

Physical illness can manifest from mental illness and vice-versa.

Dopamine is implicated in the pathology of most mental illness, as is seratonin etc (natural chemicals) .

Hands up how many previously mentally ill folks are completely cured (now drug - free) by psychotherapy or drug therapy? None.

Apparently there are no psychiatrists whom will admit to having cured anyone, because they haven't. They can't. They can treat symptoms chemically.

There is still a blame-culture in these professions. Great. You get really ill, are often made to grovel for help (some NHS) and then get blamed for not having 'what it takes' [] to overcome the problem.

Stigmatised - probably for being hurt by some bully/ narcissist [your label here- you are all in a diagnostic text-book created by some guy] and further injured and stigmatised by this profession (not bullying narcissists at all...) whom often appear to delight in the humiliation of it's patients when clients are at their most vulnerable.

It also appears to be a profession terrified of individuals or of being individual or indeed of not being part of a 'team' (Stalinism? Hitler youth?!)

Psychiatry romanticizes it's 'heroes' like 'cutting edge' Orgone therapy martyr Wilhelm Reich, whom tragically died in the slammer -
the therapy is kinda the same as ancient religions and philosopies of Asia etc taught thousands of years ago - that if possible, a good relaxed sex life [tantric?] and meditation are probably the best things to help you focus and relax. It's really that simple sometimes. Too many expectations cause too much cortisol = mental illness & variants.


Behavioural modification/psychology, now often sadly misused on learning- disabled children (someone should tell them Behaviourists that learning-disabled kids aren't acting 'odd' to annoy people, it's their chromosomes) should be used in the mental health (big) industry to help patients understand why their thoughts trigger certain chemicals, why thoughts can turn irrational and illogical etc = Chemicals firing off in the body making the brain scared= firing off more chemicals.

Most psychologists will tell you that the biggest part of overcoming a problem is admitting you have one. So let's hear it from the psychiatrists and their allied professions?

Why do some people cope so much better than others? It's in the genes and chemistry.

Psychiatrists would be more successful referring patients to behavioural psychologists whom can teach people WHY they are ill or suffering the effects of mental illness and to nutritionists for natural remedies to complement the therapy (in non-dangerous cases).

For the record I am not a scientologist, but I'm thinking about it, ET was very nice.

(anon quote: '' 'NORMAL' is a setting on a washing machine '' (mine says 'Spin' 'Silk' 'Rinse' 'Cotton' but no 'normal'...))

Elizabeth Robillard

Welcome

Recent Videos