
My life was made whole when I saw my baby Jamie

song for you from mummy darling - bit off xx (my son Jamie)

Alan Bates (played dad in 'Day In The Death Of Jo Egg') remained a very good friend throughout my life, he's sorely missed.
(Sorry for picture quality)
Janet Suzman (above Alan) played my mum, is still fabulous and in contact.
Elizabeth Robillard was an actress and entertainer for many years. Google has some details and other sites.
'A day In the Death of Joe Egg'
'The movie centers on a British couple who are struggling to save their marriage whislt trying to raise their only child, a small girl suffering Cerebral Palsy. She is wheelchair bound and unable to communicate. Taking care of her has occupied nearly every moment of her parent's lives since her birth, and this has taken a heavy toll on their marriage.
Sheila, her mother, gives Josephine as much of a life as she can while Bri wants the child institutionalised and has begun to entertain chilling fantasies of killing himself and Josephine
Alan Bates played Brian the monstrous hallucinating father, Janet Suzman played the upbeat mum' < Article from Wiki
Elizabeth says;
Playing Jo in the movie 'A Day In The Death Of Joe Egg' had a profound effect on me;



Elizabeths' family are the Lucy and Robillard families, the Lucys' date back to pre 1066 in the UK whilst the Robillards' (though also coming originally from (Champagne family) in France) were settled at first mainly in Ireland before travelling to (mainly French) Canada and New Orleans, USA.

Champagne: Robillard de Champagne, a noble family in Saintonge, several of whom took refuge in England and Ireland. The children of Josias de Robillard, chavalier of Champagne, under charge of their mother, escaped from La Rochelle, concealed in empty wine casks, and arrived safe at Plymouth, England. Their father went into Holland and took service with the Prince of Orange; on his way to join his regiment, he died at Belfast. Madame de Champagne settled at Portarlington with her family. One of Champagne's sons, Josias, was an ensign in La Melonniere's regiment of French infantry, and fought at the Boyne; he afterwards became Major in the 14th Foot.
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~jamesdow/s056/f189196.htm

| Richard de Lucy |
|
Henry Lucy (see De Lucey)
http://www.uoregon.edu/~rbear/r3.html
| Elizabeth Lucy |
| The kinges mariage |
| The king fledde |
| The prince borne King Kenry the .vi. set vp Of the Erle of warwik |
| Therle of warwik slain |
| Doctoure Shawes sermon |
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9A0DE7DB1631E233A25755C1A9639C946997D6CF
Elizabeth Robillard.
What did the Narcissistic magician say?
'Here's my latest delusion' BOOM BOOM original artwork by
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've always been interested in our ancestry and especially, the Lady Elizabeth Lucy, whom apparently was the legitimate wife of Kind Edward the 1V - there is much heated debate on this topic
More on the Lady Elizabeth Lucy
'The source of Shakespeare's representation of King Edward IV's precontracts and "bigamy" was Sir Thomas More's History of King Richard III (pub. 1557) (Candido, "More" 139). More originally wrote this work in Latin and English in or near 1513, when he was still strongly supportive of Henry VIII. Ironically, a book written by an advocate of Henry VIII would one day become the source of a stage depiction potentially critical by analogy of the king and embarrassing to his daughter. Analysis of More's History sharpens the critical commentary on Henry VIII latent in Shakespeare's dramaturgy. More emphasizes Elizabeth Grey's widowhood as the basis for the Duchess of York's claim that marriage to her would be bigamous: More's Duchess tells Edward, "`wheras ye only widowhed of Elizabeth Gray though she wer in al other thinges conuenient for you, shold yet suffice as me semeth to refrain you from her mariage, sith it is an vnsitting thing, & a veri blemish, & highe disparagement, to the sacre magesty of a prince, yt ought as nigh to approche priesthode in clenes as he doth in dignitie, to be defouled wt bigamy in his first mariage"' (62). In canon law, bigamy included marriage to a widow, especially by ecclesiastical clerks. "`And as for ye bigamy,' More reports Edward as replying, 'let ye Bishop hardely lay it in my wai, when I come to take orders. For I vnderstand it is forbidden a prieste, but I never wiste it yet yt it was forbidden a prince"' (64). Edward had sired at least two illegitimate children-a son, Arthur Plantagenet, definitely by Elizabeth Lucy, and a daughter, Elizabeth, perhaps by Elizabeth Lucy. The girl was born about the time of Edward's marriage to Elizabeth Woodville Grey. More's Edward boasts to his mother, "`That she is a widow and hath alredy children, by gods blessed Ladye I am a batcheler & have some to: & so eche of vs hath a profe yt neither of vs is lyke to be barain"' (64) . Because of the story of Edward's precontract with Elizabeth Lucy and the Duchess's accusations, the bishops refused to marry Edward and the widow. They relented only after Elizabeth Lucy publicly equivocated on the matter of the precontract. '
Elizabeth Robillard
Hospital infections caused by doctors?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/actionnetwork/A27875866
Overuse of various antibiotics and prescribing them- not all the correct reasons in some cases, leads to susceptible bacteria being surpressed (unkillable).
The bacteria that are resistent to antibiotics survive because of the menacing speed in which the nature of bacteria divide and spread. In general, such bacteria becomes resistant and populate and breed at a very frightening pace. Moreover, these bacteria can transfer further and this is not being monitored properly. VERY strangely, superbugs appear confined to hospitals, dont they?
Health professionals depend on antibiotics to treat infection caused by bacteria, from tonsilitis to meningistis and many life-threatening bacterial infections. The efficacy of many antibiotics has begun to wane dramatically in the UK, this being the legacy of many years of erronous prescribing (especially when given without an absolute and positive diagnosis of a bacterial illness) and overuse in both human medicine and agricultural worlds.
It is plainly wrong and far too easy to blame vulnerable nurses and cleaners for specific strains of virri killing people!
It MUST be time to investigate the role of the antibiotic, and how it is precribed, precisely when and why it's given, and whether the course has been completed- THAT does require rigid focused attendence to detail to help avoid obvious mutation and resistance to unique killer-bugs-uniquely (?) placed now, in hospitals.
If these bugs are so virulent, they would be possibly airborne and easily spead from hand-to-hand as colds are- to the oustide, not confined to hospitals, they would spread to the streets, other countries - may well be the next disaster we will face if antibiotic use is not curbed now.
These drugs work only against infections caused by bacteria, not virri. Or is there a strange virus we dont know about here?
However, many GP's mollify their patients' demands that they 'give me something' by prescribing antibiotics for viral infections such as colds, flu and other common complaints, easily dealt with by a pharmacist.
They may also prescribe the drugs for other infections, such as sore throat, that are sometimes caused by bacteria, but without having swabbed for bacteria- surely a necessity nowadays- how do they KNOW they are not mis-prescribing and risking 'super-bug' mutations?
If it's a virus, the GP/docor is well aware he's causing a possible mutated dangerous killer-virus outbreak by prescribing antibiotics.
Taking antibiotics for anything other than particular PROVEN bacterial illness, not only can't work, but can have a killer side effect: in due course, this practice helps create bacteria that cannot be killed and can only become an out-of-control disaster.
Scientists have indeed found bacteria that are resistant to some of the most powerful antibiotics in the world, this has to be due prescribing them, VERY wrongly, by doctors.
Elizabeth Robillard
http://www.elizabethrobillard.co.uk
- POEM BY RUDYARD KIPLING
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you
But make allowance for their doubting too,
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream--and not make dreams your master,
If you can think--and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:
If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it all on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breath a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: "Hold on!"
If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with kings--nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you;
If all men count with you, but none too much,
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And--which is more--you'll be a Man, my son!
--Rudyard Kipling
Liverpool Airport was closed today for 8 hours due to the discovery of a
suspicious car.
It apparently was taxed, insured and the radio was still in it
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Law: Vulnerable
The fact that social workers and employees involved with any local authority, such as those permanent employees at Adoption and Permanancy panels globally are given training in matters pertaining to family law prior to any proceedings. That's illegal isn't it? Isn't that a bias before a case is begun and therefore a violation of a fair hearing [Article 6 ECHR]?
This Leaves a vulnerable, hapless parent [target] violated by professional bullies whom are legally-trained (and trained in the latest 'psych techniques' too! Aren't we modern? Please see article 'psychiatry is redundant' with refs) .
Not to mention the childrens' wishes completely unheard.
Nobody has mentioned the children who die on the streets fleeing care-homes- have they? Who cares about them? Shelter probably.
They (targets) do not stand a chance, especially once the parent has employed a family solicitor, all parties (except the parent-client-target) then these professionals collaborate regarding timing, payment, likely outcome of case and SO much more - all without the 'client' [ target parent] knowing about it. These professionals have access to all records, letters and every type of detail of your life.
Privacy of family courts? There's no privacy, there is for the courts.
They snort at the profits, in a joyful way.
This legal training for social workers ( Cafcass, etc) makes it a plain case of violation of Article 6 of the Human Rights' Act before any case has even reached court. Doesn't it?
Thank you for reading.
Elizabeth Robillard