Paranormal History

The History behind the Haunting

Articles / Blog

Sarah Siddons & The Grande Theatre, Lancaster

Posted by Paranormal History / CJ Linton on May 5, 2009 at 9:37 AM Comments comments (2)

I recently wrote the following for a paranormal group wishing to investigate Lancaster Grand Theatre, I soon found out that the main resident spirit is none other than Sarah Siddon, who may not be a name well known today, in the 1780's she really was a superstar of the theatre.

 

Sarah Siddons 1755-1831

 

Sarah Siddons. Born Sarah Kemble on the 5th of July 1755 she was raised in a very theatrical family setting, the eldest child of six (John, Charles, Stephen, Ann, Elizabeth). A native of Brecon, Wales, her father, Roger Kemble, was an actor-manager of a travelling show in which all of his children played a part in. Despite this however her parents disagreed with her choice to become a professional actor, it was only just becoming respectful for women to be seen on stage at this time. In 1773 she was working as a maid to Lady Greathead, of Guys Cliff House (another haunted location open to investigation) in Warks. At the age of 18 she met her husband, William Siddons, ironically an actor. They had seven children (she outlived five of them) and her marriage was not the best, relations with her husband often broke down.

 

In 1774 she got her big break when playing Belvidera in Thomas Otway’s “Venice Preserved”, so good was her performance that she was given a bigger part in another play, that of Calista in Nicholas Rowe’s “Fair Penitent”. During one of the shows a scout for Drury Lane manager David Garrick spotted her and she was given a chance to play at the famous London theatre, however she slumped and was quickly replaced, in her own words she was “Banished from Drury Lane, as a worthless candidate of fame and fortune”.

 

On the 10th October 1782 she was back at Drury lane, having spent six years touring the country. This time she won over the critics in David Garrick’s adaptation of Thomas Southerne’s “Isabella or the fatal marriage”. It was however as none other than Lady Macbeth that she found her true calling, her tall figure and pronounced features gave her an air of authority and it was in this role that she reached her zenith, she did play other parts (Queen Catherine for example) but as Lady Macbeth she found her best form. Coming to see her performances at Drury Lane would be the worlds elite of the 1780's, world leaders, politicians, kings and queens. She was, and remains, one of the best actors this country has ever produced.

 

In 1802 she left Drury Lane to work periodically for their counterparts, Covent Garden Theatre. It was at Covent Garden, on the 29th June 1812 that she gave her final performance, in her most famous role as Lady Macbeth. The crowd’s applause at the end would not stop until she had come back on stage, which she did, dressed in her own clothes. She then gave a farewell speech for eight minutes, left the stage and only returned a few times to play bit-parts, to which she received massive applause, sometimes causing friction with the leading characters of plays. Her last appearance was on the 9th June 1819 in John Homes play “Douglas”. In June 1831 Sarah Siddons died in London, and was buried in Saint Mary’s Cemetery, Paddington Green.

 

There are many paintings done by famous artists of the day of Sarah Siddons, her fame has continued in London, so much so that there is an Underground train named after her.

 

Lancaster Grand Theatre

 

The Lancaster Grand Theatre hold claim to being one of the three oldest Theatres in the entire Country, it has seen many acts pass through its doors and many owners come and go. I must confess the following is only a short synopsis of the Grand’s history, for a much better overview the guide book is a must-buy item, should you wish to see a play, or a poltergeist, at the Lancaster Grand Theatre.

 

The Theatre opened in 1782 under the simple name of “The Theatre, Lancaster”. Its first owners and overseers were the double act of Joseph Austin and Charles Edward Whitlock, Charles being married to one of Sarah Siddon’s sister gave promise to her appearing in many acts, most notably Lady Macbeth in 1795. Just over a hundred years after its foundations were laid, in 1884, the Theatre was renamed to the Athenaeum, in response to the then fashionable age of classical remembrance, just a few years later in 1897 re-developed the site into pretty much the same theatre which is in place today. The man behind this drastic, but much needed change was Frank Matcham, who is described by many as THE architect behind the Theatre. Sadly his interior design literally went up in smoke in 1908 as a serious fire gutted much of the building, again extensive repairs and modifications were carried out, upon its re-opening in the same year the old theatre was again given a new name, again reflecting the time period, the change of monarch and the change of fashion. The new name became “The Grand Theatre” and up until the 1940's it saw steady crowd numbers, however as with most theatres in the early 1950's times changed, peoples fashion changed, pop music, pubs and clubs became everyone’s favourite night out. ABC Cinema’s owned The Grand Theatre and put in plans for demolition, something needed to be done, a saviour had to be found. In stepped (pardon the pun) the Lancaster Footlights, who had been performing at the theatre from the 1920's. They bought the theatre and are still the current proprietors, though they have had their darker days, most notably when the old Emergency Lighting needed replacing, this may not sound much of a problem, new light bulbs you might think, however the old Emergency Lighting system ran on Gas, not electric. Subsequent fundraising and Covenant scheme have provided Lancaster Grand Theatre with enough money to survive, and indeed thrive.

 

Paranormal Reports

The main spirit at the Grand Theatre is of course Sarah Siddons, which is why I have written the preceding article. It may be that during any form of communication you may need to ask questions to ascertain whether or not you are genuinly in touch with Mrs Siddons, therefore questions about her siblings names could be put forward, her roled in plays, dates and place names. When during a seance and in contact with someone I know information about I always ask a question and give three possible answers, sometimes all answers could be correct, at other times just one. I have never ended a seance in the belief that I have been communicating with a ghost, not after some fo the strange answers I have recieved.

 

Other forms of communication could be done via Dictaphone, EVP's are getting good press right now, mostly because no episode of Ghosthunters is complete without some kind of EVP, whether genuine or not (they are trying to make a tv show after all). I myself have heard very interesting recordings, most notably at Nottingham's Galleries of Justice and Bolton Castle in North Yorkshire. Therefore I have added a short selection of Lady Macbeth quotes, I suggest reading these out whilst on stage at the Grand Theatre, should you be willing to investigate the location. I would be most appreciative if you could let me know if any of the following get any responses as I would find it fascinating.

 

The Sticking Place...

 

Macbeth:

If we should fail?

Lady Macbeth:

We fail?

But screw your courage to the sticking place,

And we'll not fail.

 

Macbeth Act 1, scene 7, 59–61

 

Out Damn'd Spot!...

 

Lady Macbeth:

Out, damn'd spot! out, I say!—One; two: why, then

'tis time to do't.—Hell is murky.—Fie, my lord, fie, a soldier, and

afeard? What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our

pow'r to accompt?—Yet who would have thought the old man to

have had so much blood in him?

 

Macbeth Act 5, scene 1, 26–40

 

Infirm of Purpose...

Lady Macbeth:

Why did you bring these daggers from the place?

They must lie there. Go carry them, and smear

The sleepy grooms with blood.

Macbeth:

I'll go no more.

I am afraid to think what I have done;

Look on't again I dare not.

Lady Macbeth:

Infirm of purpose!

Give me the daggers. The sleeping and the dead

Are but as pictures; 'tis the eye of childhood

That fears a painted devil.

 

Macbeth Act 2, scene 2, 45–52

 

CJ Linton.

 

The full history of the Grand theatre is available in the book

"The Grand Theatre Lancaster : Into the Third Century"

by A.G. Betjemann

Available from Box office: 01524 64695

£7.50 + Postage and Packaging.

Lord Tennyson and Farringford

Posted by Paranormal History / CJ Linton on January 4, 2009 at 10:46 AM Comments comments (0)

Tennyson and Farringford

 

 

... take it and come to the Isle of Wight:

where, far from the noise of smoke and town,

I watch the twilight falling brown.

All around a careless ordered garden,

close to the ridge of a noble down.

You’ll have no scandal while you dine,

but honest talk and wholesome wine.

And only hear the magpie gossip

garrulous under a roof of pine:

For groves of pine on either hand,

to break the blast of winter stand;

And further on the hoary channel

tumbles a billow, on chalk, and sand.

 

This is how Tennyson describes his life at Farringford, written in a poem to his friend Reverend Maurice in January 1854.

Alfred Lord Tennyson first came to the Isle of Wight in 1846 to visit James White of Bonchurch, accompanying him was his friend from London Edward Moxon. Whilst rowing around the Needles he found the views unforgettable, he came back three years later and again in 1853, looking for a house for his fledgling family. Being told of Farringford he was given permission to look at the property and he was so taken aback by the view from the drawing room (I wonder if he walked into the glass too?) that he sent for his wife, named Emily, to come and see what she thought of the place, her diary records her first impressions:

‘The Railway did not go further than Brockhurst then, and then the steamer, when there was one, from Lymington felt itself in no way bound to wait for the omnibus which brought as many of the passengers as it could from the train. We crossed in a rowing boat. It was a still November evening. One dark Heron flew over the Solant backed by a daffodil sky... the next day we visited Farringford and looking from the drawing room window I thought to myself "I must have that view", and I said so to my husband when alone to which he replied "we will go no further, this must be our home".

 

The rent Tennyson paid on a three year lease, fully furnished was £2 per week! This lease came with an option to buy. On the 25th November 1853 Alfred, Emily and their first son Hallam Arthur moved in, along with a small army of servants including: Housekeeper, Butler, Cook, Page, Ladies maid, Parlour Maid, Kitchen Maid, Gardeners, Grooms and a Coachman. Along with all of these people Emily Tennyson carried another son in her Womb, Lionel Tennyson being born in March of 1854. Tennyson’s income from his writing’s was over £2000 per year and he bought the house, park and farmland in 1856 for a sum of £6,900. During his time at Farringford Tennyson wrote many of his best poems and received visits from the most famous people in the world, the Italian Garibaldi, who helped to unify the many Italian states in the late 1800's visited and planted a Wellingtonia tree. Tennyson’s most distinguished visitor must have been Queen Victoria, however his first Royal visitor came as quite a surprise. On 13th May 1856 Tennyson received the last of his belongings from the old home in Twickenham, along with furniture, pictures and boxes of books came Prince Albert, Queen Victoria’s husband. So flustered was Alfred that he completely forgot to offer the regent a chair, Albert remained standing, talking pleasantly and took some cowslips home for the Queen (who would have been at her residence on the Island, Osborne House).

 

Tennyson did not meet the Queen until 1863, her own diary records the event: ‘I went to see Tennyson, who is very peculiar looking, tall and dark.’ Alfred was overcome with emotion at the event and could not stand still, nor could he see as his eyes were filled with tears. He was also unable to remember what the queen had said and wrote in his diary ‘I only remember what I said to the Queen, big fool that I was!... why what an excellent King Prince Albert would have made.’ Queen Victoria however was most impressed and asked Tennyson and his family to visit her. Hallam Tennyson however was not so impressed, writing in his diary ‘ Observations: you must always say "maam" when in Her Majesty’s presence. You must stand until the queen asks you to sit down. Her Majesty does not often tell you to sit down...’

 

You may think Hallam is a strange name for a child (I quite like it though) however he is named after Alfred’s most trusted of friends. Arthur Hallam of London ran Drury Lane theatre and was Alfred’s inspiration for one of his best poems, in Memoriam (1850). Tennyson had written many poems by the age of 15. At the age of 21 in 1830 he published his first book of poems, Chiefly Lyrical and two years later he published his second volume, Poems. Alfred struggled with finances in his early life, he lost most of his early earnings on a failed woodworking business scheme but in 1850 his life turned around, with the creation of In Memoriam he won worldwide acclaim and was created Poet Laureate of Britain upon the death of William Wordsworth. In this year he married his long time sweetheart Emily Sarah Sellwood. Tennyson took his lordship late in life, and only when asked by Queen Victoria... he had turned the offer down when asked by Prime Ministers Disraeli and Gladstone. In 1883 he became First Baron of Aldworth and Freshwater, taking his seat at the house of Lords in March 1884. In 1892 at the age of 83 Alfred died and is buried in Westminster Abbey. His wife Emily is buried at the All Saints Church close to their Isle of Wight Home, also there is the body of Lionel Tennyson. (I couldn’t find where Hallam was buried unfortunately).

 

The history of Farringford before Tennyson moved there is shady at best, the area was first settled upon in the Stone Age, as Palaeolithic and Neolithic tools have been found have been found nearby, as well as Bronze Age weapons (more than likely from France). The Earliest find on the grounds of Farringford is a hoard of third century (Roman) coins, during Early Saxon times the Jutes landed and settled in this region, lordship of the island being split between two Saxon Chiefs. It was not until around 600-700ad that Christianity returned to the island, along with farmers making crops for the Saxon ships berthed in the Solant. In the Middle Ages the area was owned by the Abbey of Lyre and was the site of the Prior Manor. In the 14th Century the Estate was owned by Walter de Farringford. In 1806 the present house’s first foundations were laid, built as a Georgian House. In 1810 it was enlarged and embellished in the Gothic Style of the times, Alfred describes the house’s decor as ‘it is like a blank verse, it will suit the humblest cottage and the grandest cathedral. It has more mystery than the classic.’

CJ Linton

Mary, Queen of Scots

Posted by Paranormal History / CJ Linton on January 4, 2009 at 10:34 AM Comments comments (0)

O my Lord and my God I have trusted in thee

 

O my dear Jesus now Liberate me.

 

In shackle and chain, in torture and pain, I long for thee.

 

In weakness and sighing, in kneeling and crying.

 

I adore and implore thee to liberate me.

 

 

Mary, Queen of Scots Wednesday 8th February 1587

 

 

On the 7th of December 1542 a child was born to the King of Scotland James V, his wife, Mary of Guise had given birth to a girl. She was named after her mother, and just six days later her father died, leaving Mary as Queen of Scots.

 

 

The death of James V caused a panic in Europe as two of the most powerful countries vied for control over the infant Queen. England and France both sent delegations offering the Scots their control over the country until the Queen had come of age, naturally Scotland’s leaders said no and so Mary’s mother was named as Regent. She belonged to the French Royal family and so the young Queen of Scotland was sent for education in France, it was hoped she would find a marriage partner whilst on the continent too. In this task she was successful, in April 1558 she was wed to the French Dauphin Francis and in a secret agreement France was to control Scotland should Mary die without a son and heir. Not only being Queen of Scotland she then became Queen of England, or would have done had the Catholics had their way after the death of Mary I and the ascension of Elizabeth I who was not only protestant but was the daughter of Anne Boleyn and Henry VIII, a marriage the Catholics declared null and void. However perhaps if Mary I had ruled a more enlightened country, instead of killing most of the protestant clergy and anyone who denounced her rule, then perhaps Mary Queen of Scots would have been welcomed with open arms, but as it was the Protestants had their way instead, despite them hating Anne Boleyn, her daughter Elizabeth would prove to become one of the finest monarchs this country ever had, but like all still ruled with a little blood on her hands. Mary Queen of Scots’ claim to the English throne was based upon the fact that Henry VIII’s sister Margaret just happened to be Mary’s grandmother, making Elizabeth and Mary distant cousins.

 

 

In July 1559 Francis became King Francis II of France and so Mary Queen of Scots also became Mary, Queen of the French. However 17 months later King Francis II had died and so Mary was left with a possible dilemma, either go to Scotland, a country which seemed alien to her, or stay in France and be under the constant scrutiny of her over bearing and aggressive mother in law, Catherine-de-Medici. Mary choose Scotland, and on the 19th August 1565 she landed at Leith, Scotland however was not the Catholic haven she hoped it to be, Protestant Presbyterianism had taken hold over the years and now she took sound advice from her half-brother the Earl of Moray, James Stuart and William Maitland of Lethington. They advised her to give the Presbyterian Church a modest endowment, Mary had seen religious turmoil in her youth in France and did not want to see the same conflicts arise in Scotland, but she still not give it a full establishment within her country, this however still kept Calvinist radicals like John Knox on her side. Over the next few years Mary tried the impossible, both to find a new Catholic husband and to placate her Protestant cousin south of the border.

 

 

In 1565 she married a different cousin, Henry, Lord Darnley, this upset Elizabeth as she had not been consulted about the marriage of two of her relatives. Mary however was trying to change Scotland which also upset many Scots; she dismissed her half brother the Earl of Moray from court along with many other Scottish nobles, in their stead came foreign dignitaries, one of which was David Rizzio, who many suspected of being her lover. When news of this possible affair reached the ears of Darnley he flew into a rage and had Rizzio killed, in full view of not just Mary, but the entire court. Mary soon became pregnant with a son and heir, however she was deeply unhappy with her husband, on 19th June 1566 Mary gave birth to a boy and named him James, he would go on to become King James VI of Scotland, as well as King James I of England.

 

 

Mary’s marriage was spiralling out of control, then some relief came when Lord Darnley became ill whilst in Edinburgh, he was not at Holyrood Castle but at a private address, probably to ensure that whatever his illness would not spread to the household, and the infant James. On February 9th 1567, Mary and Darnley were at a house called Kirk O'Field. Late in the evening she remembered that she had to see some friends and rode off. Then for some reason the house he was in blew up! No one really knows how, or why, if Mary had wanted to get rid of Darnley then there less explosive ways of doing so, however she was still implicated in his death along with the Earl of Bothwell, many believe he was Rizzio’s replacement as Mary’s lover, however Mary claims that after the death of Darnley, Bothwell raped her to try and force her to marry him, either way it set the country of Scotland against Mary, the vast majority of Scottish Lords and Ministers now disliked this French woman, even John Knox called her a Whore.

 

 

On 24th July 1567 she was forced to abdicate, her infant son James became King with her old half brother, James Stuart named as Regent. Mary was imprisoned in Loch Leven Castle, she did still have a few supporters however, one of which was the Earl of Douglas, he was a marcher lord, who held lands close to the border of England, and in fact the Douglas’ and their English equivalents the Percy’s of Northumberland had been in some kind of warfare for around 500 years! Douglas and Mary gathered a large force of mainly Catholic nobles and they met the Protestant Lords Army at Langside. Mary had been on her way to take Dumbarton Castle, this would have given her a sea route to France, but more importantly it would have given the French the means to support her armed resistance to the Earl of Moray, who in turn learned of her plan and moved his forces to block her route somewhere near Glasgow. Both sides met at Langside, which was just a small village. On 16th May 1568 a Protestant Army faced a Catholic Army on Scottish soil, the religious turmoil seen in France had followed Mary to Scotland. Moray’s main force occupied good ground to the west of the village, yet he left 400 men in Langside itself to stop Douglas’ troops from attacking his flank, Douglas had around 5500 men at his disposal, Moray had a little more. As Douglas’ force entered the battlefield they saw to their horror that their way to Dumbarton was blocked, Douglas quickly got his men into defensive positions on a small hill, however with both sides now occupying good defensive positions it would seem neither side would dare attack the other. His was not good for either side, Mary needed to get to Dumbarton, and Moray needed to crush the enemy army and take Mary back as captive. One side had to give way first, either by running away in panic, or charging into the enemies well laid defence. In the end the latter happened, Catholic infantry in Douglas’ vanguard charged headlong into the cannon and infantry of Moray, they had no Cavalry support, though Douglas did have a large contingent of Cavalry at his disposal, neither did they have the advantage of their own artillery firing in support. The result was a massacre as the Catholics charged into an immovable block of Moray’s spearmen, with Moray’s cannon firing bloody swathes through the oncoming horde. It was all over in less than 45 minutes, the Catholic forces of Mary had been beaten back with 300 dead men left on the ground, the rest fled, leaving Mary to her fate. Moray’s entire army lost just one man killed, such was their good defensive position and sound use of their artillery.

 

 

After the battle Mary fled too, first to Dunrennan Abbey and then by boat to throw herself upon the mercy of not the French, but instead went to England, to seek help from Elizabeth, the Protestant Queen of England. Mary had never met Elizabeth, however both had communicated with one another in the past, both had been very cordial with one another, Elizabeth had even given Mary a ring, which Elizabeth had told Mary she should send back to Elizabeth should Mary need her help. Many in England saw this as a Catholic Queen brining the wars of Europe into England, although Elizabeth tried to rule over all in the same way, both Protestant and Catholic alike, she was mistrustful of Mary and so had confined, or rather, imprisoned the Queen of Scots in various castles in England for a total of nineteen years. If Mary had wanted to appease Elizabeth then she went about it in a strange way, as to anyone who would listen she would tell them she felt as though she was the legitimate heir to the English throne, she even sent to the Pope for papal blessing, in which he did in 1570. England’s spy network, overseen by Sir Francis Walsingham, kept a close eye on Mary, more importantly he was able to read every letter Mary had sent or received, no matter how covertly she tried to get messages out to her supporters.

 

 

Mary’s time on English soil is one of constant movement followed by long periods of inactivity, her first night was spent at Workington Hall, where she wrote to Elizabeth asking for her help in the form of an army to go back into Scotland and reinstate her on the throne of Scotland, Elizabeth had a tricky choice, send a Protestant English Army into Scotland to fight a Protestant Scottish Army, if only to reinstate a Catholic Queen. Of course the answer was no, even if she had agreed to it there was no way England would see another Catholic English Army on its soil, this force would easily turn on Elizabeth and see Mary as both Queen of Scotland, but also England. After a single night in Workington, Mary then went to Carlisle Castle, where she wrote numerous letters to Elizabeth, and indeed to anyone who would listen to her plight. Elizabeth sent her a reply saying that Mary would not be received in her court in London until Mary had been cleared of implications in the Darnley Murder. Mary was upset by this but still had many supporters in Scotland, because of Carlisle’s closeness to the border Mary was moved on the 13th July 1568 to Bolton Castle in Yorkshire, amidst fields of gold and hills of green Mary brought with her 51 servants and maids to wait upon her whilst she stayed in residence there. Whilst at Bolton Castle Mary decided to acquiesce to the pleas of some of her supporters, they felt that if Mary were put on trial for the murder of Darnely then the world would see her as innocent. And so at York the first of Mary’s trials was held, this in truth was one of biggest legal aberrations of English history. James Stuart, Earl of Moray produced condemning letters which implicated Mary in the murder plot, these were the Casket Letters and were purely false documents, this was followed by the Conference of Westminster in which Mary was not allowed to defend herself, or to ever view the letters which could sentence her to death. Mary’s only argument was that she was a foreign Queen to England and so could not be tried under English law, this kept her imprisoned, but not go to the executioner.

 

 

At Carlisle and Bolton Castles Mary had been free to wander the grounds and countryside, an activity she loved to do, however her next place of incarceration was Tutbury Castle, this belonged to the Earl of Shrewbury at the time but it was not ready for her arrival. Travelling in the winter of England was a very cold ordeal and Mary came down with an illness whilst en route from Bolton Castle in Yorkshire to Tutbury Castle in Staffordshire. She did not go straight to the castle however but stayed at the home of the Earl of Shrewsbury until the Castle was made fit for her imprisonment, and this was a real imprisonment as she was not given the freedom which she had been allowed before, no walks in the immediate countryside, her only activities were now embroidery, playing cards or reading. She was only 26 at the time of her stay at Tutbury, and despite the damp and dankness of the location she still kept herself looking her best; her faith in not only her god, but also her own self belief had never been as strong. On 20th April 1569, just two and a half months after arriving at Tutbury Mary and her massive entourage were moved to more luxurious surroundings at Wingfield Manor, this was mainly because she was complaining of being ill whilst at Tutbury. After a brief stay she went to Chatsworth from 15th May to 21st September before returning to Wingfield in better health. Mary during this time had an idea that she could appease Elizabeth by marrying one of her noble subjects, in this endeavour she and the Duke of Norfolk engaged in a courtship by correspondence in which both sent letters of love and gifts, though they never met one another, Mary was given a gold ring by Norfolk, who in turn received an embroidered pillow from Mary. However rather than make Elizabeth happy this infuriated her as she saw it as a plot to gain English support behind her back, locking up Norfolk in the Tower of London Elizabeth sent Mary back to the horrible Tutbury Castle, a place she loathed.

 

 

In November 1569 Mary had to be moved once again, this time to Coventry. This was because there had been a Catholic uprising, which had wanted to replace Elizabeth with Mary. The English queen’s supporters and advisors were now in open arms as to the question of what to do with the Queen of Scots; many wanted her killed, for the safety of the English peace. Elizabeth defied them all and had actually started negotiations by which to get Mary back on the throne of Scotland. In May 1570 Mary was taken again to Chatsworth, and in the August of that year Norfolk was released from the Tower, his name however was now tarnished and he was implicated in plots to replace Elizabeth, whether he was guilty or not. One proposal that Elizabeth made to the Scottish nobles was that Mary should be restored as Queen of Scotland, but to ensure the safety of the young King James he should come to England and be put under the protection of the English, the Scots of course rejected this, but at least Elizabeth did try to help, or be seen as trying to help, she may have known it would fail anyway (she was very much a genius, not only of her age).

 

 

Then came the Ridolfi Plot. Mary’s main ambassador in England was Leslie Bishop of Ross, he had been given financial backing by Mary to attempt to gain support from abroad for a foreign invasion of England, and this he did so with the aid of an Italian Banker named Roberto Ridolfi. He was in contact with the Spanish court and also the Spanish forces who were occupying the Netherlands at the time. The plan was for a Spanish Armada to sail from Spain with 10’000 men, land on the Dutch Coast and load on board another 15’000 troops then sail for England, all of this would be supported by a Catholic rising in England with Mary at its head. During this period Mary was moved between Sheffield and Chatsworth on numerous occasions, meanwhile her ambassador Leslie had been captured, and tortured to give the names of people involved in the plot, Norfolk was one such name given, whether he took an active part is hard to say, perhaps all he is guilty of is trying to find love. Nevertheless Norfolk was tried for high treason and executed in June 1572. Mary admitted she had given financial backing to Leslie and Ridolfi, but she claimed she knew nothing of their intentions. Mary’s health began to suffer from stress, as well as periods of confinement and inactivity, in August 1573 Mary was given a gift, a five week stay at Buxton Baths to take the waters and replenish her health. In Scotland however events took a different turn, Moray had died to be replaced as Regent by Morton, he though was implicated in the death of Darnley and so was executed, King James VI of Scotland now ruled, his mother Mary believed they should rule together, however at this Elizabeth interjected and made an alliance with the young King, thereby giving rule of Scotland to James and James alone, with a strong ally on his southern border in the form of Elizabeth, he did not need Mary for anything and so left her to her fate.

 

 

Francis Walsingham was now placed as the chief minister to Elizabeth in matters concerning Catholic rebels, of which Mary was seen as their main source of inspiration. Again at Tutbury Mary was now given a new jailer, Sir Amayas Paulet, a most devout Puritan was not taken in by Mary’s charms, or her illnesses. Instead she was put under stricter controls than she had become accustomed to, no correspondence with the outside world, she was not allowed to leave her rooms nor do any kind of activity. Her health plummeted to such an extent she was taken to Chartley Hall, it was here that Walsingham created false schemes to make her Queen of England, trying to get her implicated beyond all reasonable doubt that she wanted Elizabeth dead. When Elizabeth heard of his plans she was mortified, with the help of the brewer who delivered the ale to Chartley, Walsingham devised a scheme of carrying letters within a stopper of a barrel, Paulet was informed to search the barrels and found Mary’s letters with not only the French Ambassador but also with a young Catholic idealist called Sir Anthony Babington. The letters were decoded and copies made, then the letters were sent on to their destinations, with Mary and her conspirators never knowing that Walsingham knew every detail of her correspondence. One of the letters from Babington to Mary contained an ambiguous reference to replacing Elizabeth, Walsingham took this letter and drew on it a gallows then sent it on to Mary, who was now upset with so many years of imprisonment and the fact that her son had thrown her to the dogs that she replied with relish that she gave full consent to his plans. Walsingham had his plot to kill Elizabeth with Mary’s approval.

 

 

Mary was taken to Tixall for two weeks and then returned to Chartley Hall. Then on the 21st September 1586 she and her servants were taken to an unknown location (some people believe Mary and Elizabeth met during this time, but I doubt it) and then she was taken to Fotheringhay Castle. Her trial started on the 15th October 1586, in the Great Hall at Fotherighay, she was tried without representation, in other words no one would speak on her behalf. She addressed the court calmly and with enough dignity to make some of the people present break into tears. Her only defence was that she was a foreign Queen and could not be tried under English Law, even if she had been trying to kill the English Queen and replace her. Elizabeth did not even want Mary to go on trial, she had sent a letter Paulet asking him to murder Mary before any trail could come about, Paulet refused as he tried to keep an overall code of honour, despite his loathing for the woman. Elizabeth did not want to sign Mary’s death warrant, she was after all not only her cousin, but her equal too, and in the end Elizabeth did sign the warrant, on the 1st February 1587.

 

 

Mary learned of her fate on the evening of the 7th February 1587, she was refused her Catholic Priest Chaplin De Preau for her final confession but offered the Protestant Dean of Peterborough instead. In this she refused, then demanded and early supper. She ate calmly and serenely amongst the crying and wailing of her now depleted number of servants. After eating she distributed her possessions amongst her servants and others. Then she set down to write a will to provide for the welfare of those she was leaving behind, she then wrote letters to her Chaplain and her brother in law, Henri III King of France. By the time she was finished it was nearly two o’clock in the morning and so she went to bed, fully dressed, and did not attempt to go to sleep. At around eight-thirty in the morning she was brought to Great Hall where she was to be executed, but only after some of her servants were allowed to be with her at the end. Sir John Melville, her Secretary, Bougoing, her physician, Jacques Gervais, her Surgeon, Didier, her Porter and two of her maids, Elizabeth Curle and Jane Kennedy were all allowed to stay. She entered the Hall dressed in a black satin dress, embroidered with black velvet and black acorn buttons of jet trimmed with purple, on her head she wore a white veil which flowed down her back. Her stockings were edged in silver and she wore Spanish shoes, her garters were of green silk but her petticoat was of crimson, blood red. In her hands she held her crucifix and prayer book, while around her neck hung a pomander chain as well as her Agnus Dei.

 

 

Mary walked the three steps of the execution stage and said nothing as she was read the accusations against her, she only spoke when the Protestant Dean of Peterborough started to read his version of the Bible, at which Mary began reading the Latin version out loud, drowning out the Dean. The executioner then stepped forward and asked for her forgiveness, which was customary at the time; Mary replied “I forgive you with all my heart, for now I hope you make an end to all my troubles”. Kennedy and Curle now came forward to help Mary remove some of her garments as well as her Agnus Dei and Rosary, leaving Mary stood in the colours of martyrdom of the Catholic Church, blood red.

 

 

Kennedy then placed a white silk cloth embroidered with gold around Mary’s eyes, who then placed her own neck on the block and spoke her last words, “Into thy hands O lord I commend my spirit”. The executioner then swung his axe, the first swing cut into the back of her head at which she was heard to whisper “sweet Jesus”, the second swing killed her and practically decapitated her, but a third swing was needed to free the neck sinews from the body, as the executioner raised up the head by grasping her hair he found to his horror that she wore a wig, and her grey balding head rolled from his grasp onto the floor. All of her relics were burned and the blood washed away, her Skye Terrier refused to leave her body, hiding within the folds of her skirt however her body was then removed to where her heart and organs were removed and hidden in the stonework of Fotherghay Castle, the remains were then embalmed and placed in a lead coffin and kept unburied within the castle for a few months, this caused much unrest with the Catholics within the country and it was thought that  her martyrdom might give cause to a Catholic rebellion and so in the middle of the night on the 30th July 1587 her body was taken to Peterborough Cathedral and buried.

 

 

When Elizabeth of England heard of the execution she tried to claim she knew nothing of the Warrant of execution she had signed, this was purely to try and save face however. Eventually James VI of Scotland became James I of England he had Mary’s coffin exhumed and buried in its final resting place at Westminster Cathedral.

 

 

CJ Linton.

 

Dick Turpin

Posted by Paranormal History / CJ Linton on January 4, 2009 at 10:31 AM Comments comments (0)

Richard Turpin, man, myth, legend

 

Everyone has heard of Dick Turpin, films of highwaymen from the 1940-1980 period often show Turpin, replete with black handkerchief across his face, dressed in black coat, tricorn hat, trousers and riding boots, wielding two flintlock pistols riding his beloved horse Black Bess. So is this true? Almost. Yes he wore dark clothes, even though his main work was done during the daytime hours, at night he would be holed up in a safe house, and when they became scarce he even made his own "cave" in Epping Forest. So why does this man have such a legend behind him, some of the stories about him are undoubtedly false, he didn’t ride from Essex to Yorkshire in one massive chase, only for Black Bess to die on York city’s Knavesmire (now a horse racing track!), although a similar true story surrounds another fugitive called Swift Nick who robbed someone near London then rode to York to play bowls with the Mayor of York the same night, this is probably where history mingles with fiction, one thing is for sure, around 80% of public houses between Epping Forest and York say that Turpin stopped off there on his epic ride, if that were true it would take him years to reach York. Most of his myths actually came from a book called Rookwood written nearly 100 years after his death!

 

So who was Dick Turpin, was he a malevolent man, a murderer, or just someone who had to steal to survive like so many people have had to do down the years. Richard Turpin was born in Hempstead, near Saffron Waldon in Essex, his father John Turpin was a holy man and he saw his son as nothing of the sort, possibly he was something of a trouble child, he was apprenticed as a butcher in Whitechapel, East London, where he again got into trouble during his apprenticeship, it is more than likely he was under strict rules whist learning his trade, no alcohol, women or gambling, three things Dick Turpin seemed to have been fond of sadly. During his apprenticeship it is debatable wether he found his real niche as a thief stealing cows, sheep, pigs and Lambs. Of course with his new found skills as a butcher he had no problems disposing of the produce, as soon as he passed his apprenticeship he married and moved back to Essex. Turpin may have learned how to butcher animals in London, but he did not want to become a Butcher, or not one of any respectability. Turpins run in with the authorities started almost immediately after he reached Essex, after stealing two Oxen from a Mr Giles at Plaistow he had to sell the hides, which could be recognised by Mr Giles or his servants, these servants found out where Turpin sold the hides at Waltham Abbey, after finding the two hides and recognising them they then rode to Turpins house to apprehend the man in question, Turpin saw them coming, jumped from a window and fled, a close call for the young man who would grow into one of the most notorious criminals in British History.

 

Seeing the error of his ways Turpin decided cattle thieving was not for him and became determined to become a smuggler, unfortunately the gang he joined were not smugglers, they, at first, were dear thieves, but they soon spread out into more heinous crimes. The Gang was known as the Gregory Gang, named after its leader it included men with the names of Rose, Wheeler, Fielder and now Turpin. Most historians have said it was Turpins idea to turn into nocturnal house breakers, the idea behind the crime was simple, find a house which looked like it held valuables, knock on the door and as soon as the door was opened the gang all rush in pushing the door wide open, tie up the occupants and take their valuables. It Sounds easy, and indeed it worked for the first couple of times, Mr Strype ran a Chandler shop in Watford, he was the first victim in 1734, they performed this attack with text book fashion, no one was hurt and the gang fled with the little money Mr Strype held in his house, most of his money was in his shop. The next target was an old woman in Loughton, Turpin was sure there must be eight hundred pounds in the house, with no chance of it being somewhere else the other gang members were convinced and burst into the ladies home, tying up her son and two servants they then asked her where the money was, she refused. And so they tortured her, taking the metal grate out of the fire it would still have been red hot, Turpin said he would sit her on the grate if she did not tell them where the money was, time was ticking, the men grew restless, it was all taking too long, the old woman refused, and so they sat her on the grate. They must have taken her clothes off her for she would have burst into flames otherwise (the top two killers of women in history have been Childbirth and catching fire accidentally). Her screams, the smell and the agony must have been horrific, it is surprising she did not die through the ordeal, yet live she did, only because she told them where her savings were. Half of what Turpin had thought was in the house, but still a good amount of money.

 

January 1735 and the Gang were back in business, "visiting" a man called Mr Sheldon in Croydon, seeing a light shining from the stables they went to investigate and found Mr Sheldon’s Coachman, the man resisted being tied up and Mr Sheldon came out to see what was happening, ambushed, Mr Sheldon was forced back into the house where he gave the gang several pieces of Jewellery, some silver plate and eleven guineas, oddly Turpin gave Mr Sheldon back two guineas, apologised for the crime and bid him goodnight! More than likely this was to appease public sentiment following the horrible acts performed whilst robbing the old lady of Loughton. On the 4th February the gang were at work once more, breaking into the house of Mr Lawrence of Edgewarebury near Stanmore, this time taking £26 in money, as well as silver plate and some other possessions, however it was now that the gang members turned against one another, Wheeler, who had been detailed to keep watch, was not told the right amount of money which had been pilfered, therefore he got a lower share of only three guineas, three days later a similar thing happened in their next robbery, Turpin, Fielder, Rose, Walker, Bush, Wheeler and Gregory met in the White Bear tavern on Drury Lane, all having a pint or two before setting off to rob the house of Mr Francis, a Marylebone Farmer, Gregory stood guard over Mrs Francis, her daughter and their maid, whilst Turpin and Bush stood guard over Mr Francis and two menservants, worse for the drink it is thought Gregory raped the maid infront of Mrs Francis and her daughter, yet again the gang members pocketing the valuables did not tell the truth about how much they had pocketed and the fractions emerged more evidently than they had before. As well as this the rape of the maid and the torture of the old lady meant that the public had lost any affection for them, either hating them for their heinous crimes or fearing them.

 

The King himself issued a warrant for the capture of the gang, £100 would be paid for anyone apprehending any member of the gang. Of course the gang members heard of this, and became wary of anyone who poked their nose into their business, but they became even more wary of each other. Whilst drinking in an Ale-house in Westminster the law finally caught up with the gang, Officers of the law burst into the public house and in the struggle that followed Fielder, Wheeler and Rose were taken prisoner, the rest, including Turpin, fled by jumping from a window down to his horse. Turpin had seen the last of the Gregory gang, those captured were hung for their crimes, whilst Dick Turpin thought he might find the grass a little greener in Cambridgeshire, on the journey there he thought he might delve into the ways of a highwayman, seeing his first victim approaching him he saw a well dressed man, well mounted on a fine horse, Turpin blocked his path and ordered him to "stand and deliver", the man laughed and said "What, dog eat dog? Come, come Brother Turpin, if you don’t know me, I know of you and should be glad of your company!" the man Turpin had been holding up was named King and had been working as a highwayman in Cambridgeshire but was now heading for London where he thought the grass may be a little greener too, this chance meeting brought together the two biggest thieves of the day, they swore loyalty to one another and became determined to get up to some mischief together, and get rich doing it.

 

Just a couple of hours later Turpin and King committed their first crime together, the first in a series of highway robberies which lasted three years. Both of them were well known figures, so much so that no safe-house could be guaranteed as no one wanted them, just knowing them might be enough for the gallows, let alone giving them bed and board. And so they decided to make their own shelter, choosing a place in a dense thicket between Loughton Road and Kings Oak Road in Epping Forest they built what was known as a cave, but really was more of an improvised shelter for both them and their horses, they lived mainly off the land, ever watching the roads from their vantage point, Mrs Turpin sometimes bringing food and drink to them, ever the dutiful wife. Sometimes pickings were bad and they forayed out to other hamlets and towns in the area, Bungay in Suffolk became the scene of their first falling out, they both witnessed two young women taking thirteen pounds of Corn, Turpin wished to rob them, King was against it, however Turpin did it anyway, quarrelling over this they still worked together on their way home from Bungay, when they robbed Mr Bradele in his carriage along with his two children.

 

Turpin and King were then joined by another man named Potter, the threesome were riding through Epping forest one day when Turpins horse began to tire, they overtook a man called Mr Major who had a fine mount, although being very close to civilisation, within ear shot of the Green Man inn, Turpin robbed Mr Major, or rather exchanged horses (and accoutrements) with him at gunpoint. Turpin, King and Potter rode on to London, Major went into the Green Man where he was informed by the landlord Mr Bayes that it had been Turpin himself who he had changed horses with! Major’s horse must have had some kind of distinguishing feature to it for a few days later Bayes heard that a horse matching the same description had been seen outside the Red Lion inn in Whitechapel, Major found the pub and saw that it was indeed his horse, he waited with some other men to see who would collect the horse, sure enough King’s brother came for it at about eleven o’clock, the men jumped him and took him into a nearby house, Kings brother at first claimed it was his own horse, then when Bayes said they should go to the police Kings brother confessed all, the men holding Kings brother knew the man had not committed any crime to them but that he was probably forced into helping his brother out, Kings brother said that a "lusty" (?) Man in a white duffel coat was waiting for the horse in Red Lion Street, sure enough Major, Bayes and a couple of other men saw the man and decided to attack him from behind, the man in the white duffel coat was King himself, Turpin was nearby and heard the commotion, running he pulled out two flintlock pistols and aimed the towards the men who held King, who in turn shouted "Dick, shoot him or we are taken, by god!" Turpin pulled the triggers, two balls flew through the nights air, both hitting the same man and killing him before he hit the ground, the man they hit was King.

 

Historians will always argue wether Turpin killed King intentionally, or wether it was accidental, if King had been taken prisoner then he knew things about Turpin which would see Turpin hung long before his time, he also knew where Turpins home was, and who Turpins wife was. Put that together with his treatment of the old lady of Loughton and he would not have thought twice about pulling the triggers on his pistols, perhaps it was for the better for King too, who would have been captured anyway, then tortured for the information about Turpin, and then hung for his crimes. Dick Turpin remained in Epping Forest for a short while, keeping low and using his cave less frequently than he used to, then one day whilst making his way from his own home to the cave he found it had been overturned by the authorities, it was then that Dick Turpin choose to leave the area, though not a wild over night chase from London to York as Rookwood would have us believe, his first stopping point was Long Sutton in Lincolnshire where he lived mainly off the land, or stole sheep or lambs to survive. He adopted the name John Palmer whilst moving northwards, entering Yorkshire he found the landscape as easy pickings for any hunter, both of animal and man. Perhaps wishing to settle down a little bit he acquired jobs as a huntsman, taking groups of shooting parties from the local gentry out into the wilds to hunt game birds and deer, however he still had the impetuous streak running though his soul which caused him to commit another crime, in October 1638 he was returning from one of the many shooting parties he had been part of when he saw his landlords cockerel in street, his gun already loaded he took aim and shot it dead, his neighbour, named Hall, saw him do it and told him he should not have done it, to which Turpin replied "If you’ll stay while I charge my piece (reload my gun) I’ll shoot you too" at this Hall ran like the wind and informed on Turpin to the landlord who went straight to the justice of the peace for the area, Justice Crowley issued a warrant for Turpins (Palmers) arrest. It was unlucky for Turpin that the local Justices were passing through nearby Beverley, and so he could be tried for his crime, the justices demanded he provide a surety for his good behaviour or they would have no other choice but to send him to prison, Turpin had no choice, he was an unpopular figure in the part of Yorkshire and no one would help him, and so to await his trial at a later date he was sent to the local House of Correction.

 

The residents of Brough and Welton, where Turpin had stayed whilst in Yorkshire said that they had seen Turpin many times ride towards Lincolnshire and return with more horses than he set out with, they thought he must surely be a highwayman or horse-thief, yet they had no proof, indeed they still thought he was John Palmer. The justices asked Palmer about his life, where had he come from, what was his occupation, he claimed he had always been a Butcher in Long Sutton, taking over his fathers trade, yet he had let his sister keep the family home when their father had died and so John had left to find a new place to live, he had said he had also left because he had got into some debt over a few sheep he had sold to someone which had turned out to be rotten with disease and so he had left Long Sutton because of that too. It was a risky, but very convincing lie, not convincing enough because the justices in York sent a messenger to the Justice in Long Sutton, Mr Delamore, to ask if he knew of the Palmer family of Butchers. Mr Delamore’s reply came as no shock to the Justices of York, he informed them that John Palmer had only lived in Long Sutton for about nine months and was a wanted man there for stealing sheep and horses. This on its own was enough to see Dick Turpin hung, or at least transported to the colonies, Mr Justice Crowley sent John Palmer to York Castle Prison on 16th October 1638, it was here about four months later that the true identity of John Palmer became known, not the small time Sheep and Horse thief, murderer of nothing more than a Cockerel, but he was Richard "Dick" Turpin, murderer of his own accomplice in crime and the infamous Highwayman!

 

Turpin was tried on the 22nd March 1739 for the crime of horse stealing in Long Sutton, for this crime he was condemned to be hung from the neck until he was dead (not for highway robbery it should be noted). For some reason the court then tried to prove he was Dick Turpin, two witnesses were brought forward, one man called James Smith said he had known Turpin from childhood and he had been born in Hempstead in Essex, wether true or not is debatable, the other witness was named Edward Seward who had also known him since childhood, in fact some historians say he was Turpins brother in law, this witness was more credible in that he knew Dick Turpins father was called John Turpin who owned The Bell public house in Hempstead. Dick Turpin was then convicted of killing his friend King, although already headed for the scaffold perhaps this way he would go with a clearer conscience, for his demeanor changed completely after his trial, he became light hearted and jovial, as though a great weight had been lifted from his head. As word reached the south that Dick Turpin was to be hung in York hundreds if not thousands flocked to the city to see him hung, he gave ten shillings for five men to be his mourners, following his cart as he passed through the city streets, stopping off at a public house for a drink, the last "one for the road", dressed in a fine white suite he spoke loudly and clearly to the crowds gathering to see him, he also left a gold ring and two pairs of shoes and clogs to a married woman that he knew in Brough, though he acknowledged that he still had a wife and child of his own in Essex. Alongside him on his cart was his coffin, bowing to the people around it was one of the most theatrical performances anyone has ever given whilst on the way to their own death, perhaps this was his plan after all, to die in such a way that people for centuries after still remember his name, after all how many remember his accomplices?

 

As was the fashion at the time Turpin had to climb a ladder up to the noose, he did so admirably, though as he stood at the bottom looking upwards his right leg began to shake, he stamped it hard on the ground a few times and the shaking stopped, as befitted his entire performance that day, he climbed the steps to the noose and put his head through, he then chatted to the hangman (a fellow Highwayman who was released by volunteering to be hangman for the day) for around half an hour before he stepped off the ladder and struggled for five minutes, thrashing and urinating, staining his white suit, yellow at the front and brown at the rear, he died after five minutes, the fact he was covered in his own faeces and urine is not remembered, his performance of the day gave rise to his renown, yet had he gone to his death a crying gibbering wreck like most did would we still know his name?  And would his ghost now supposedly haunt so many places?

CJ Linton.