The Great Planet Debate: Perverting the Scientific Process

Background and Objective:

The public debate over the status of pluto refuses to  dissipate despite the fact that the overwhelming scientific consensus  is that pluto is a trivial member of a belt of material that represents  the dregs of Solar System formation.  Like global warming, cigarettes causing cancer, and intelligent design before, this longevity is  caused by a very small group of fundamentalists and malcontents who are using the distortion of scientific facts to further their own personal aims.  In this meeting we will take an unbiased look at pluto's place in the Solar System and show beyond any reasonable doubt that pluto should only be considered a member of the Kuiper belt.

Invited Talks:

  • Although planets orbit stars, dynamics is irrelevant.
  • Planets are round!
  • Marbles as planets.
  • Everything I need to know about 'planet' I learned in 3rd grade.
  • The IAU has no right to define the term 'planet', only I do.
  • Are apples round enough to be planets?
  • Pluto's Outward Migration: Puttin' It Where the Sun Don't Shine
  • Why Trojans mean that Jupiter is not very massive.
  • Astronomers' egg-shaped heads: Practical limits to roundness.
  • My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us Nine.   Zen koan or gibberish?
  • God told me that pluto is a planet - here is his 1-900 number.

Funded through the inappropriate use of YOUR tax dollars.
{ParagraphsSidebar}