Cells

Leukocytes may be seen under low- and high-power magnification (Figure 1). Men normally have fewer than two white blood cells (WBCs) per HPF; women normally have fewer than five WBCs per HPF.

Epithelial cells often are present in the urinary sediment. Squamous epithelial cells are large and irregularly shaped, with a small nucleus and fine granular cytoplasm; their presence suggests contamination. The presence of transitional epithelial cells is normal. These cells are smaller and rounder than squamous cells, and they have larger nuclei. The presence of renal tubule cells indicates significant renal pathology (Figure 2). Erythrocytes are best visualized under high-power magnification. Dysmorphic erythrocytes, which have odd shapes because of their passage through an abnormal glomerulus, suggest glomerular disease.


TABLE 6

Urinary Casts and Associated Pathologic Conditions


Type of cast

Composition

Associated conditions

Hyaline

Mucoproteins

Pyelonephritis, chronic renal disease

May be a normal finding

Erythrocyte

Red blood
cells

Glomerulonephritis

May be a normal finding in patients who play contact sports

Leukocyte

White blood
cells

Pyelonephritis, glomerulonephritis, interstitial nephritis, renal inflammatory processes

Epithelial

Renal tubule
cells

Acute tubular necrosis, interstitial nephritis, eclampsia, nephritic syndrome, allograft rejection, heavy metal ingestion, renal disease

Granular

Various cell
types

Advanced renal disease

Waxy

Various cell
types

Advanced renal disease

Fatty

Lipid-laden
renal tubule
cells

Nephrotic syndrome, renal disease, hypothyroidism

Broad

Various cell
types

End-stage renal disease


Information from reference 38.



Casts

Casts in the urinary sediment may be used to localize disease to a specific location in the genitourinary tract (Table 6).38 Casts, which are a coagulum of Tamm- Horsfall mucoprotein and the trapped contents of tubule lumen, originate from the distal convoluted tubule or collecting duct during periods of urinary concentration or stasis, or when urinary pH is very low. Their cylindrical shape reflects the tubule in which they were formed and is retained when the casts are washed away. The predominant cellular elements determine the type of cast: hyaline, erythrocyte, leukocyte, epithelial, granular, waxy, fatty, or broad (Figure 3).




Figure 4. Urinary crystals. (A) Calcium oxalate crystals (arrows; 100 X); (B) uric acid crystals (100 X); (C) triple phosphate crystals with amorphous phosphates (400 X); (D) cystine crystals (100 X).

Crystals

Crystals may be seen in the urinary sediment of healthy patients (Figure 4). Calcium oxalate crystals have a refractile square "envelope" shape that can vary in size. Uric acid crystals are yellow to orange-brown and may be diamond- or barrel-shaped. Triple phosphate crystals may be normal but often are associated with alkaline urine and UTI (typically associated with Proteus species). These crystals are colorless and have a characteristic "coffin lid" appearance. Cystine crystals are colorless, have a hexagonal shape, and are present in acidic urine, which is diagnostic of cystinuria.



Figure 4. Urinary crystals. (A) Calcium oxalate crystals (arrows; 100 X); (B) uric acid crystals (100 X); (C) triple phosphate crystals with amorphous phosphates (400 X); (D) cystine crystals (100 X).


Bacteriuria

Gram-negative streptococci and staphylococci can be distinguished by their characteristic appearance under high-powered magnification.

Gram staining can help guide antibiotic therapy, but it is not indicated in routine outpatient practice. Clean-catch specimens from female patients frequently are contaminated by vaginal flora. In these patients, five bacteria per HPF represents roughly 100,000 colony-forming units (CFU) per mL, the classic diagnostic criterion for asymptomatic bacteriuria and certainly compatible with a UTI. In symptomatic patients, a colony count as low as 100 CFU per mL suggests UTI, and antibiotics should be considered. The presence of bacteria in a properly collected male urine specimen is suggestive of infection, and a culture should be obtained.

The authors indicate that they do not have any conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: none reported.

Figures 1 through 4 reprinted from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center Department of Laboratory Medicine, Bethesda, Md.


The Authors

JEFF A. SIMERVILLE, M.D., is a fifth-year resident in urology at Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C. He received his medical degree from Georgetown University School of Medicine.

WILLIAM C. MAXTED, M.D., is professor of urology at Georgetown University School of Medicine, where he received his medical degree and completed a residency in urology.

JOHN J. PAHIRA, M.D., is professor of urology at Georgetown University School of Medicine. He received his medical degree from Pennsylvania State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center College of Medicine, Hershey, and a residency in urology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Address correspondence to Jeff A. Simerville, M.D., 6641 Wakefield Dr., #411, Alexandria, VA 22307 (e-mail: jsimerville@cox.net). Reprints are not available from the authors.

References

1. Lifshitz E, Kramer L. Outpatient urine culture: does collection technique matter? Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2537-40.

2. Rabinovitch A. Urinalysis and collection, transportation, and preservation of urine specimens: approved guideline. 2d ed. Wayne, Pa.: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2001. NCCLS document GP16-A2.

3. Hanno PM, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB. Clinical manual of urology. 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.

4. Woolhandler S, Pels RJ, Bor DH, Himmelstein DU, Lawrence RS. Dipstick urinalysis screening of asymptomatic adults for urinary tract disorders. I. Hematuria and proteinuria. JAMA 1989;262:1214-9.

5. Agarwal R, Panesar A, Lewis RR. Dipstick proteinuria: can it guide hypertension management? Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:1190-5.

6. Pels RJ, Bor DH, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, Lawrence RS. Dipstick urinalysis screening of asymptomatic adults for urinary tract disorders. II. Bacteriuria. JAMA 1989;262:1221-4.

7. Sultana RV, Zalstein S, Cameron P, Campbell D. Dipstick urinalysis and the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of urinary tract infection. J Emerg Med 2001;20:13-9.

8. Smith P, Morris A, Reller LB. Predicting urine culture results by dipstick testing and phase contrast microscopy. Pathology 2003;35:161-5.

9. Van Nostrand JD, Junkins AD, Bartholdi RK. Poor predictive ability of urinalysis and microscopic examination to detect urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;113:709-13.

10. Eidelman Y, Raveh D, Yinnon AM, Ballin J, Rudensky B, Gottehrer NP. Reagent strip diagnosis of UTI in a high-risk population. Am J Emerg Med 2002;20:112-3.

11. Lammers RL, Gibson S, Kovacs D, Sears W, Strachan G. Comparison of test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:505-12.

12. Semeniuk H, Church D. Evaluation of the leukocyte esterase and nitrite urine dipstick screening tests for detection of bacteriuria in women with suspected uncomplicated urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:3051-2.

13. Leman P. Validity of urinalysis and microscopy for detecting urinary tract infection in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 2002;9:141-7.

14. Kavouras SA. Assessing hydration status. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2002;5:519-24.

15. Sheets C, Lyman JL. Urinalysis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1986;4:
263-80.

16. Kiel DP, Moskowitz MA. The urinalysis: a critical appraisal. Med Clin North Am 1987;71:607-24.

17. Benejam R, Narayana AS. Urinalysis: the physician's responsibility. Am Fam Physician 1985;31:103-11.

18. Mariani AJ, Mariani MC, Macchioni C, Stams UK, Hariharan A, Moriera A. The significance of adult hematuria: 1,000 hematuria evaluations including a risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Urol 1989;141:350-5.

19. Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS, Hricak H, Shuler CL, Agerter DC, et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy-part I: definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology. Urology 2001;57:599-603.

20. Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS Jr, Hricak H, Shuler CL, Agerter DC, et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy-part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up. Urology 2001;57:604-10.

21. Ahmed Z, Lee J. Asymptomatic urinary abnormalities. Hematuria and proteinuria. Med Clin North Am 1997;81:641-52.

22. Fassett RG, Horgan BA, Mathew TH. Detection of glomerular bleeding by phase-contrast microscopy. Lancet 1982;1:1432-4.

23. Brendler, CB. Evaluation of the urologic patient: history, physical examination and urinalysis. In: Campbell MF, Walsh PC. Campbell's Urology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1998:144-56.

24. Sutton JM. Evaluation of hematuria in adults. JAMA 1990;263:2475-80.

25. Mohr DN, Offord KP, Owen RA, Melton LJ 3d. Asymptomatic microhematuria and urologic disease. A population-based study. JAMA 1986;256:224-9.

26. Khan MA, Shaw G, Paris AM. Is microscopic haematuria a urological emergency? BJU Int 2002;90:355-7.

27. Mohr DN, Offord KP, Melton LJ 3d. Isolated asymptomatic microhematuria: a cross-sectional analysis of test-positive and test-negative patients. J Gen Intern Med 1987;2:318-24.

28. Messing EM, Young TB, Hunt VB, Emoto SE, Wehbie JM. The significance of asymptomatic microhematuria in men 50 or more years old: findings of a home screening study using urinary dipsticks. J Urol 1987;137:919-22.

29. Khadra MH, Pickard RS, Charlton M, Powell PH, Neal DE. A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice. J Urol 2000;163:524-7.

30. Siegel AJ, Hennekens CH, Solomon HS, Van Boeckel B. Exercise-related hematuria. Findings in a group of marathon runners. JAMA 1979;241:391-2.

31. House AA, Cattran DC. Nephrology: 2. Evaluation of asymptomatic hematuria and proteinuria in adult primary care. CMAJ 2002;166:
348-53.

32. Carroll MF, Temte JL. Proteinuria in adults: a diagnostic approach. Am Fam Physician 2000;62:1333-40.

33. Von Bonsdorff M, Koskenvuo K, Salmi HA, Pasternack A. Prevalence and causes of proteinuria in 20-year old Finnish men. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1981;15:285-90.

34. Springberg PD, Garrett LE Jr, Thompson AL Jr, Collins NF, Lordon RE, Robinson RR. Fixed and reproducible orthostatic proteinuria: results of a 20-year follow-up study. Ann Intern Med 1982;97:516-9.

35. Rytand DA, Spreiter S. Prognosis in postural (orthostatic) proteinuria: forty to fifty-year follow-up of six patients after diagnosis by Thomas Addis. N Engl J Med 1981;305:618-21.

36. Gallagher EJ, Schwartz E, Weinstein RS. Performance characteristics
of urine dipsticks stored in open containers. Am J Emerg Med 1990;8:
121-3.

37. Fogazzi GB, Garigali G. The clinical art and science of urine microscopy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2003;12:625-32.

38. Graham JC, Galloway A. ACP best practice no. 167: the laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:911-9.





<<<<Back to Page 1


Copyright 2006;Medical-Technology;AllRights Reserved.

This website is hosted for free by Freewebs.com - free website. Get your own Free Website now!