. Click here to get your own Free Website!
|
| Indian graves (as viewed from 1913)
The following is my translation of an article
called: Indianergräbe von Prof Dr K Weide, Leipzig. It appeared in a
German popular science magazine, Kosmos Handweiser für Naturfreunde 1913, Heft 1,
Seiten 19-24. The original article was accompanied by a number of illustrations, but
they've presently got appointments elsewhere.
Indian graves by Prof Dr K Weide, Leipzig
That the Indian is extremely pious towards their departed loved ones is not to be
denied, and this contradicts the images of rawness and violence that are called up by
our impressions of the red man. Their original and ethically lowest way of handling
the dead is simply setting the body out, the uncourageous and unemotional disposal of
the deceased into the bush, on the prairie, for the dogs and carnivores to eat. Only
a few tribes in North America practice this; for example the Tinneh or Athapascans,
the northern language group of the Indians, and the Assiniboian, a branch of the large
Dakota family. In each of these cases, their apparently so raw method has its cause
in the Arctic climatic conditions that make a burial, in our sense, that of the body of
the deceased being placed beneath the surface of the Earth, simply not possible due to
the constantly rock hard frozen ground; with the Assiniboian, however, it would be
thought insulting to the brave to have placed them on some raised scaffolding, as was
usual with 'scaffold burials', as, it is thought, they are capable of protecting
themselves even when dead. It is this, more than the harsh climatic conditions, which
forbids the Tinneh, and also the Eskimos, from any real grave. In the winter, the dead
are taken out into the snow where they will soon fall to wild animals; in summer, they
are placed in very shallow pits covered by small stones and plates, but this covering
is mostly so light that a fox can removed it without difficulty.
These shallow graves are also generally the rule for the Indians east and west of the
Mississippi, but the sites were surrounded by fences or bits of wood or covered with
genuine roofs, or covered by significant heaps formed from earth or stones. The bones
in so called bone pits end up a bit deeper in the ground, mass graves for bones,
relocated from individual graves, to lie in company. However, these bone pits were
certainly not deep, barely 80cm; and the uppermost layer of bones was almost exposed
to daylight. The reason for this secondary communal assemblage of skeletal remains a
certain time after the first disposal lies in the Indian philosophy; as the members
of the tribe lived tightly knit lives with one another on Earth prior to their entry
into the eternal hunting grounds, then the same needs would also exist after their
deaths. A 'fest of the souls' was seen as part of one's duty in order to suitably
fulfil the wish for unity among the dead.
A similarly very appealing and favourable trait of North American Indians is their
dependence upon their homeland. The Kalapuya in the Willamette Valley have themselves
been brought back to the tribal ceremony from any distance, and the Nadowessi, known
from Schiller's poem, brought their dead from the previous year near to a cave by the
Saint Anthony Falls in the spring, so as to give them their final resting place. "So
that your body will not remain lying on the fields for the animals", as it states in a
eulogy written down by Carver, "so we want to bring you to lie with the bodies of your
ancestors, in the hope that your spirit will feed with their spirits, and will be ready
to receive ours, when we also arrive in the land of the souls."
A double burial was very common. In the widespread area of the Mounds, variously formed
hills of earth which cover the whole east of the United States to the Mississippi and
beyond, there are many bone mounds, hills which often contain the remains of hundreds
of dead laid together and piled up and, as for further to the northeast, there was also
a fest of the souls. The peoples on the eastern side of the Rocky Mountains, such as
the Cheyenne, Sioux, Arapaho and Minitari and the Mandan of the upper Missouri and the
Objibway, left bodies to decompose on high trees and scaffolding, and the bones were
then taken to a convenient burial place or carried to the long used tribal cemetery.
For the Iroquois, this final resting place was the earlier house of the deceased or a
small bark house next to it, which have been erected for this purpose. The bones of
many generations were stored in them. If one were forced to leave the old place,
through whichever circumstances, or if times were uncertain, then the skeletons of the
whole community were collected and taken to a common third grave.
It was often similar in southern North America. The Tschoktah appointed a
particular man, the bone-picker, who would clean the bones from flesh remains with
his finger nails 2-4 months after the death of a tribal member. The meat went to a
fire, the bones were then first taken to a bone house and later, in accordance with
the rank of the departed, after a year or more, finally buried. By the Natchez, the
body was dried in a closed container on high posts, so that the dried bones could later
be taken in a casket and placed with the others in the temple of the tribe. The
highest ranking victims, who had been strangled at the death of the tribal chief, had
the flesh stripped from their arms and waist bones, the remains were dried in a kind
of ditch, and they were then transported in a basket to the temple, so that they could
rest alongside the remains of their ruler.
The most fascinating custom is the impermanent 'scaffold burial', as it is so far
removed from our customs; this was practiced by many tribes in North America to the
west and east of the Mississippi, and only varied in that some tribes preferred placing
the coffin in trees whereas other tribes built scaffolds. The latter had to occur
wherever tree growth was absent, such as the prairies; that had the advantage that
the beloved deceased could be kept as near as possible to the camp, whereas the tree
grave was dependant upon the availability of forests and trees. The illustrations
(not available!) 1, 2 and 3 lead us through the stages of the construction of such a
scaffold grave of the Sioux, and come from the German Prince Max. zu Wied* and the
American Yarrow**; illustrations 4 and 5 show a couple of tree graves. The scaffolds
usually consisted of four, often forked poles rammed into the ground, and these held
the weight of the coffin and body. The scaffolds could reach 3m in height for the
(* Prince Maximilian zu Wied, Reise in das innere Nordamerika in den Jahren 1832
bis 1834, Koblenz, 1839-41, 2 Textbände und 1 Atlas.
Of ethnopsychological interest is our Illustration 3, which shows the female family
members and relatives of a Dakota chief at a recent scaffold grave. They are mourning
in accordance with local custom, in that they are walking on the stony ground without
the protection of their moccasins and leggings, as they sing their sorrowful songs of
mourning. Here, beneath the encased remains of the departed, they are cutting off their
hair, often down to the roots, which was otherwise not done under any circumstances,
they are cutting at their breasts and hurting their heads against the ground. The men
also cut and beat themselves in a similar manner, sank into loneliness and fasted for
2-3 days. Theodor Preuß*** plausibly showed that such self-mutilations have to do with
the idea, that that these self-inflicted wounds bring purity in the eyes of the
dead, and demonstrates that they are innocent of causing the death. Preuß recognised
a moderating trend in the infliction of self-mutilation, in that it had originally
apparently gone far enough to end in suicide. A transitional stage is the frequently
encountered custom of cutting off finger bones; the final link in the chain of
self-mutilation as a comparatively insignificant attack, as shown in our picture.
(*** Th. Preuß, Menschenopfer und Selbstverstümmlung in Amerika, Bastianzeitschrift,
Berlin, 1896.)
The very opposite of the high scaffold burials are the earth burials and caves. Graves,
in our usual sense of the word, are found only in the southern half of the American
continent, and the most common form of this method is the burial of the deceased below
the ground of their own hut. In many cases, the bereaved carry on living as normal
despite the body resting, perhaps only shallowly, beneath the surface.
Cave graves are found in almost all parts of the North American landmass, but they
appear to reach their maximum density in the west, in California and the neighbouring
areas to the south. Heinrich Schurtz sees this way of laying the dead to rest as not
being something primary, original, as one may well be tempted to assume but rather, it
is more of a kind of hangover: the people would have originally have lived in the
caves, but they later settled in the free nature. It has only remained conservative
for the dead: one at least gives them their final home, which one had otherwise long
since vacated.
Two further types of conservation for the body of the departed are smoking and
mummification. The limestone caves of Tennessee and Kentucky provide conditions for
dehydration themselves, but many tribes from Louisiana, Florida and Virginia did dry
out the corpse over fire or used artificial techniques, like the Ancient Egyptians,
by removal of the inner organs, the injection of liquids into the body system and
comparable things. According to Preuß+, the treatment of kings and chiefs in Virginia
was unique. One first cut the skin along the back and, if possible, pulled it completely
off. Then, one separated the meat from the bones without injuring the cartilage, so
that the limbs could be kept intact. After a short drying period of the remains by
the sun, one placed them back into the skin, filled any empty spaces with sand, and
sewed the tear together again until nothing appeared amiss with the body. The meat
would be thoroughly dried and then laid at the feet of the corpse.
(+ Th. Preuß, Die Begräbnisarten der Amerikaner und Nordasiaten, Königsberg,
1894.)
Cremation of the dead has also been practiced by the Indians of North America. The
rulers of the Aztec and the Tschitschimek were taken to the flames in the court
of the temple. The Tlingit of the northwest coast soaked a pyre with oil for their
chiefs, while the poor laid the ashes of their dead into an isolated sound, so as to
spare the high costs of an official cremation. One burned the houses of dead priests
over their bodies in Florida; the Yuma dug a precise hole of a person-width and length,
filled it with thin wood, and laid the deceased upon it. A pile of wood was erected
over them reaching a metre in height, and openings were for draughts were made with a
club. Elsewhere, as with the Tolkotin in our Illustration 6, one built a simpler pyre
for the dead as in the Indian subcontinent. A complete cremation by such an arrangement
would naturally not be achieved, but that was not the sought objective. With the
Tolkotin, for example, the widow had to be able to collect up the large bones, so as
to roll them into a covering of tree bark and carry them with her on her back for a few
years. The ashes were laid in a grave that she had to keep free of weeds. The
Californians are supposed to have danced around the fire making devilish noises, and
to have stabbed the burning body with sticks in order to allow the soul to leave.
With the Kokopa, an old man used a stick to remove the eyes of the flame-licked corpse,
and held them up for the fortune of the soul of the deceased person, as he prayed to
the Sun.
A rare type of funeral in North America is the water grave. The Cherokee more commonly
threw their dead into the river than they buried them. In Skull Valley in Utah, the
Goshute sank corpses with the help of stones into springs, or they held them under
with sticks. According to Ovido, chieftains of the Chibcha were laid in gold platted
coffins and then sunk into the water.
There was something reminiscent of the funeral style of the old Vikings, where the
deceased was sat in a boat, or the likeness of one, and sent out to the sea or onto
another body of water. For the Indians of Oregon and Washington, the funeral shown
in Illustration 7 was typical. One provided the deceased with all his goods and
possessions, and also killed the slaves so that they could serve their master in the
beyond. A chapter of maternal tragedy is finally depicted in Illustration 8. The
child of the young Chinook mother is dead. She does not want to separate it from its
cradle, in which it was destined to travel towards the future, and yet the sides below
are sharpened into a keel and make the cradle look more like a boat, and she watches
in pain and sorrow as her dead darling is swept out onto the holy lake.
North America provides only a few parallels with our burial customs; the 'gravestones',
in as far as this term is appropriate for the wooden posts made by the Dakota and
western Chippewa, were set at the feet of chiefs at their final graves, after tribal
members had taken them there from the scaffolds. These posts are named adjedati
and were made from cedar or other wood, and they bore an inscription which looked much
like the one shown in Illustration 9. If the deceased was a warrior, then the script
would mainly depict his totem, the symbolic animal of his clan from which, they
believed, they were descended or in some way related; there would also be numbers and
further symbols, information about the individual's journey along the war path, and
the number of scalps they had carried away from successful fights. Eagle or falcon
feathers were attached to the top of the posts, and also the gained scalps themselves
along with various other offerings. Since the brave tribes have been driven from the
prairies into demarcated reservations, flags from the factories of business-minded
Yankees flutter above the graves in the stead of falcon feathers and scalps. There
is no room left today for heroic deeds and heroic cults.
An index of more of my translations of old Kosmos articles can be found at:
A number of Mesozoic (and post-Mesozoic) location summaries can be found at
Localities.
http://home.arcor.de/ktdykes/meseucaz.htm |