AGAIN I STATE BRING ON THE CONTROVERSY

ACTUALLY U KNOW WHAT NEVERMIND ON THE "AGAIN" PART BECAUSE THIS PAGE IS TECHNICALLY BEFORE THE OTHER ONE. OH WELL WHOOPS

The only unforgivable sins are rejecting Christ (Mark 16:16) and blaspheming the Holy Spirit. [bible.com]

• LUKE 12:10, "And everyone that says a word against the Son of Man, that will be forgiven; But he that blasphemes against The Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.
• MARK 3:29, "Whoever blasphemes against The Holy Spirit will never have forgiveness, but is guilty of everlasting sin."
• MATTHEW 12: 31-32 "Therefore I say to you, any sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven men, but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven. And whoever shall speak a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever shall speak against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this age, or in the age to come".[from the actual bible, not those failures at bible.com]

well then i guess i wont be getting into heaven

i never really understood the concept of venial versus mortal sins, i mean i get that somethings that you do wrong are worse then other things. but i never understood whos decision it was how bad what you did was? like if i said i cleaned my room when i didnt was that as bad as like if said i didnt go rob a bank but i did? or all lies basically judged that same? i never really understood.

and i certainly dont understand unforgivable sins. and i dont understand why bible.com says theres 2 unforgivable sins and the actual real bible says theres only one. i dont understand the purpose of the holy spirit. like basically what im getting is well lets just say one time i knocked baby jesus over then whew thats ok but if i say like the holy spirit is a failure then im automatically going to hell? sorry i know we learned about the holy spirit, and i mean ive been confirmed so i now have the holy spirit in me or something like that i really wasnt listening to the bishop. but noone ever really told me why the holy spirit is so important. i think and most likely im wrong but i think the holy spirit is sort of supposed to be like a teacher and guide us sort of down the right path and thats why the holy spirit is within us but i dont understand still whats so important about that, or what is blasphemy toward the holy spirit? is it really like i hate you holy spirit or is it like not following what the holy spirit wants. and what does the holy spirit want? gosh to much thinking my head hurts

as u all can see from the above picture, the pope is indeed wearing a yamaka, and he seems to be performing a religious ceremony. the catholic church may call it a hat, or a holy hat, or something to protect his bald spot when hes out in the sun but whatever they choose to call it, its still a yamaka. now one might ask themselves, why is the leader of the catholic church wearing a yamaka? well there could be several reasons, none of them very important so we wont go into it. the important thing is that its just wrong, i mean it would be like if george bush wore ties with french flags on them. if ur going to be the leader of something stick to it pope jp2.

im sure this has a point somewhere, and once i figure that out ill be sure to tell you guys. im so sad JP2 died[thats what i called him btw, we had nicknames and secret handshakes well they werent really secret handshakes, you know it was more the sign of the cross but its like the same thing.] anyways i cant get over this. he was our pope. this our first pope death you guys. gosh i really thought this would be easy but man its john paul 2. man i wish i was born during pope john paul uno, i think i could have gotten over a pope 'in office' [is that what its called, maybe in session? in pope mode?] for somewhere under 2 months. man i always wanted to run up to the pope sometime and take his hat from him, and then run away giggling cuz you know he couldnt chase me or anything, but now i cant do that can i? NO! i cant. gosh. and like everyones like this pope was so conservative. and how? i mean no other pope in history[that i know of] said birth control was ok, and women can be on altars etc. so why is he any different? maybe because hes the coolest pope ever. in his little pope mobile. that was so cool gosh. the first thing that i was pondering, is that as i was reading the newspaper the other day someone stated like pope jp2 messed up with the whole catholic church and the holocaust situation. like he never came out and said pope pius XII was a failure and should have been beaten with like a chain saw and thrown to the lions liek daniel. and he really should have too. he was a failure. but like i was wondering could [im just going to call him john, because im getting bored already and i dont feel like typing out pope john paul II everytime.] i dont think john[how bout better yet johnny?] i dont think johnny could have said that about pope pius numero 12, not only because of like that one reason but also because i mean were talking about a man who went and visited the man who shot him and told that man it was ok, and he was forgiven, do you really think he would say something like that about a fellow pontiff?

most people i think were kind of mad because pope john paul dose[is that how you spell 2 in spanish?] never said women could be allowed on the altar[not just as priests but as altar girls or somethnig] well our diocese is the only diocese that doesnt allow altar girls in america, and you know im all for womens rights and blah blah blah, but its kind of nice being like the only ones. it makes us special. some people might say being special for something like that, isnt special, but their just jealous. anyways the whole reason this is an issue i guess is because priests are supposed to be like jesus-men, and unmarried. but men arent half divine like jesus, and should men over the age of 30 not be allowed to be priests because jesus never lived while he was actually alive over the age of 30. i mean come on you guys we need to be accurate. and if you think i havent written many bishops and priests[including my uncle] with these thoughts, youve obviously never met me. my mom after reading the book the da vinci code[the worst book ever btw, dont read it, you get to the epilogue and find out the whole book was a dream after sacrificing many a hour reading it.] anyways the book presented the idea that jesus was married to mary magdalene, and my mom after reading all this said "so what if jesus was married?" SO WHAT IF HE WAS MARRIED? the whole basis for priesthood would be a lie! personally i dont think priests should be married because they really do so much, and like if they had kids or something i dont think it would be fair for that kid because you know the kid would have to be like "daddy i dont want you to go give last rights to that little 6 year old girl whos dying, your supposed to teach me how to ride a bike today". i really dont think being a man makes you more like jesus, most of jesus's male disciples abandoned him, and his mother and mary magdalene and that other mary whats her face were the only ones to really stand by jesus,  so really if priests are supposed to be kind of disciples, spreading jesus's word, based on the bible, women are obviously better disciples. i mean really we dont want to go against the bible do we?

well today i was watching this jesus movie. and it really was a jesus movie. it was called the life of jesus for children. it really i think should have been called how to hate a jew for children. it was these like 4 kids i think 2 were christians and 2 were jewish. this is like 150 years after jesus died and the 2 jesus lovers were telling the jewish kids that jesus was real and whatnot. now while i may attack christianity, specifically the catholic faith a lot, i am catholic, i have been baptized, i have made my first communion, i have made confession countless times, mainly cuz i love it so, and i have done confirmation. Adjutor is my confirmation name. its such a sexy name. the bishop laughed at me at my confirmation for choosing that name. i think its sexy though. plus like i have said a few times i have been through 9 years of jesus school. so really i do believe that i am at least somewhat informed on the catholic faith, and maybe somewhat informed that a lot of what i was taught and studied was total bs. however i  have never attacked another religion. and i have never tried to get someone to not believe in god. the reason i started this site to begin with , because i started it out as fully just biblical stuff, and i started it because people told me that i needed to believe in god and that i was a sinner and stuff, so this was my response to that. i will defend what i believe but i couldnt care less what you all believe. i may say on here at some point that i think its stupid to believe that or something, but really thats too like incredibly extremist groups and to people i believe are ignorant. but anyways back to the movie these two kids were preaching to these 2 other kids and DOING WHAT PEOPLE DO TO ME. PEOPLE SIT THERE AND TELL ME THE STORY OF JESUS. WELL HAVE YOU HEARD THE STORY OF THIS ROMAN GOD WHO WAS BELIEVED BEFORE JESUS BUT BEARS INCREDIBLE RESEMBLENCES TO JESUS, AND WAS BORN ON DECEMBER 25TH AND LIKE I SAID WAS BELIEVED A LONG TIME BEFORE JESUS? anyways though the movie pointed the jewish people in such a horrible light. the little jewish boys dad was like beating him cuz he was hanging out with jesus lovers and kept saying that those jesus lovers were sinners, and it was so awful like the jesus lovers seemed to be caring open people and the jewish people were pinned as terrible narrowminded condemned people. it was awful. and honestly i think really out of all the religions i really have the highest respects for judaism. their not the type of people that preach in the streets or that send missionarys places and destroy continents or really want any new members, and none of their holidays are comercial like ours. hello christmas? that is the most comercial holiday ever. and saint nicks day is actually december 6th, so why we celebrate him on jesus's birthday, which should be like the most holy day is beyond me. and i also think they really stick to the scriptures. like we go out and say gay marriage is wrong, and they say everything god told us not to do is wrong, not just being gay. the movie was awful its horrible to think that kids are being taught these things like thats how jewish people are.

THE DA VINCI CODE

many of you are probaly like me, which is a scary thought i know. but many of you like me probaly watch the real world philidalphia. and i cant spell that city, so w/e. but you might remember sarahs little remarks at mj one time about the bible, and she made some remarks that like christianity wasnt actually founded til like 400 years after the death of jesus and "the bible/torah is flawed because man wrote it not god" and the other housemates were saying like sarah is so u know smart and she really knows these things. every thing that she said came straight out of the da vinci code. i think she said she learned it at what was it berkely? sike more like she probaly read the da vinci code while at berkley, or maybe she took a course and was required to read that book, but she did directly quote it. i really dont think it makes someone informed or smart to read one book and recite passages from it. half of america has read that book. anyways for those who havent read this book its kind of interesting it talks about corruption in the catholic church[hehe] and i think the only thing that bothered me in this book was that he focused so much on mary magdalene and not on the fact that there really may not have been a jesus at all, that it may have just been a corrulation of things from that time. anyways though you know mary magdalene is interesting, and i think i included below the only like 5 times shes mentioned in the bible, so its weird that shes framed as a prostitute turned jesus lover. but to be totally honest i really dont think it matters. yes it does show that the church has always had a very low apreciation for woman, but you know what mary magdalene isnt the one who was pointed as being divine. now if she and jesus were married well thats interesting but so what. now woman would be able to become priests? ok great, and first of all jesus says that he is in fact the son of man [when judas gives him a kiss, after the last supper the night before hes crucified] the thing that bothers me about this book is that he used these texts that are ancient texts but not really legitimate ones. he doesnt use actual inconsistencies in the bible. and he does point out that many catholic symbols and traditions come from pagans. but he mentioned that in like a paragraph, there is so much more. and also dan brown didnt really say anything new, i mean most people were not aware of what he was saying, but he was not the first to publish it. what he left out i think though was the fact that so many religions have like same exact stupid stories, like theres a million other noah stories a million other why evil is in the world stories etc. and there really is so much he left out, even about jesus. i mean where was jesus for about 16 years? what happened? i really think he could have been more maybe extreme in what he was saying, becacause like i said there have been other books like his and i think he kind of pulled an ann coulter and just stuck to one point that really isnt even nessacarily legitimite, which he states, he also says nothing in the church is really legitimite. so why didnt he just put everything out on the table not just mary magdalene? i think he also leaves out the fact that the french guy whats her faces grandfather who was stabbed and a member of that group or w/e, is actually a real person. he died in i think 1848 and left the secrets to his maid or something, and unfortunately she died too, so the secret might be lost but who knows. anyways thats just if your thinking dan brown came up with this story all on his own he in fact didnt.

Mary Called Magdalene

i thought this book was good. the reason i thought it was good was because it kind of showed mary as a person. it also showed what dan brown forgot to mention in his book, and that was the fact that jesus removed i think 7 demons from her. so that was kind of interesting to see and a lot of it made sense and focused less in an intense way on mary i mean the whole book was about mary but it showed her as a real person it showed that she would have struggled against her own family even to follow jesus, it said she would have quite possibly have been married and had a kid and in order to remove the demons she was sent to various places, eventually into a cave in which she was all alone with her demons and tried to commit suicide and she was somewhere near where john the baptist baptised people and she saw jesus there and then he went into desert for 40 days and came back and they started up the whole society thing. it also says that its quite possible that mary and jesus may have had sort of romantic feelings for each other, and then it threw in that judas had romantic feelings for mary, which i thought that was kind of weird because it made it look like judas's decision to turn jesus in was based on the fact that mary loved jesus and not him you know. and i think thats really trivializing judas's decision. it also states that judas quite possibly was a strong believer in the jewish faith, and the reason he turned jesus in, was because he believed jesus was sort of a menace to society and might in fact hurt their beliefs, and that he thought jesus would be imprisoned or something not killed really. who knows though. its interesting that judas killed himself though. i mean i dont think he would have killed himself if his intention was for jesus to die.

holy grail holy blood

this book is the one well lets be honest dan brown got a lot of the basis for his book on. anyways the most important thing from this book is the fact that if you take the word sangreal you can separate that into either holy grail, like people believe it is, or holy blood. that its just a matter of how you separate the word. who knows. this book is interesting, it does use symbols, it also says that jesus dying on the cross didnt actually happen, that thats just a symbol as well or something. it was interesting but very radical.

do u ever think maybe jesus missed the point of the whole god thing? jesus calls god merciful and says he loves everyone but really god didnt. he killed moses because moses disobeyed him, he killed sodom for being gay, he wasnt fair or just in his whole decision to pick abel over cain, he destroyed noahs world because they were "sinners" he turned gideons army into one that was about 10,000 men to one of about 300 men because he wanted to show that they beat the stronger more populated army because of him, he told abram to kill his son, it was ok for israel to have sex with like 8 woman. it just seems to me like maybe jesus doesnt get it? call me crazy but none of those things really sound "merciful" or "loving"

hehe this is too great. its just because i dont think a lot of you realize that it says not to be homosexual but it says like a million other things, it says u cant tattoo urself, that making u unclean and whatnot. thats one of the reasons they burned the numbers into jewish people at concentration camps in world war 2[that and because the nazis were failures] it says to eat pork is a sin, it says a million and a half things but we only focus on the dont be homosexual one and like 98% of u have never even read what it actually says there. and i have. ive read almost all of the old testament like 90% and ive read mathew and john of the new testament because mark and john are just kind of the same thing over again. plus i was in jesus school for 9 years. so what notw.half of you have never been to church or cracked open a bible and try to take me on. dont even try it loser

gay rights. whew. put your bibles down losers. gosh or better yet put your bibles down and read them losers. i like calling people losers btw. it makes me feel good about myself. this is the stupidest battle ever. what the frick? i like saying that too. anyways the thing is people are so stupid gosh. losers. ok the thing is theres like 400 million things in the bible that "god" says you should or should not do. I HATE BIBLE.COM btw. that really has nothing to do with what im talking about in any way, but i hate them. i send them strongly worded e-mail's all the time. ill put up on here the next on i send them it always starts off with "dear losers...". anyways the point is god says in the bible so many things that we dont follow today. how many of you eat shellfish? sinners your going to hell gosh. and you know what like 98 percent[made up percentage] have broken commandment numero seven. and you all should know what that one is. but to save time and make a point im going to tell you thats the "thou shalt not commit adultery" you know for confirmation i had to memorize all of those so dont even try to question my skills on that. anyways THATS A COMMANDMENT AND PEOPLE BREAK IT, BEING GAY IS NOT AGAINST THE 10 COMMANDMENTS. leviticus is such crap anyways i hate that chapter gosh. how many people make a concious effort to be straight? not many so do you really think people make a concious effort to be gay? you can have your stupid opinions, but when your stupid opinions deny other people things, is that right? if you can sleep with yourself at night knowing you denied a group of people a basic right well i sure hope god gives you a medal for being such a devout follower someday.

abortion. alright, this is mainly in response to this hardcore dude that came to jesus school like 2 or 3 or soemthing like that months ago. he was so cool he was like "JESUS IS MY SAVIOR" and he'd yell this and then like throw something on the ground. he was like i was trippin on lsd and i saw jesus. he was one cool cat. anyways this man talked to us about abortion. well first i want to bring up a good point of his. i know some people that are so against abortion that they would never vote for a democratic nominee in a presidential race[or any race really but just for the point of making a point presidential] and look where its getting our country? anyways his point was its not the president thats going to change the w/e that 1984? law that states abortion is legal. i mean gosh people need to turn on their noggins, obviously no republican president is going to change this so go sit on a stove gosh. and you know we had to go to a different church in like the end of october for some strange reason and the priest said "VOTING FOR A DEMOCRAT IS A SIN" thanks for blowing the election for us buddy. i understand that some people believe very strongly that abortion is wrong, and im not trying to hard to offend anyone but first of all men really shouldnt be the ones deciding whether or not its wrong or right, especially a priest, and i shouldnt either because ive never been in that situation, which is why for the first time im life i havent actually stated an actual certain position, except that i hate george bush and  i think most were aware of that long before reading this, anyways my concern with this situation is more for the women that have to experience that, that are in that position over the lives these people are trying to protect, and i think also this is a really touchy subject and people have bumper stickers and stuff that practically say "hey buddy your a sinner and your going to hell, and you know i have the power to make that decision and judgement" why is it ok to ridicule these [most of the time young] women for their decision that they probaly already arent so proud of?

Original sin is passed through the father; Jesus had no human father and thus was born sinless. Jesus received His human nature from Mary, but He received His divine nature through God the Holy Spirit. We inherit sin from the father because of Adam and not Eve. "Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned." (Rom. 5:12)

Biblical support of our sinful nature passed down through the father. Heb. 7:9-10, "And, so to speak, through Abraham even Levi, who received tithes, paid tithes, for he was still in the loins of his father when Melchizedek met him." Original sin is not a physical corruption, but a moral and spiritual corruption.

ok im NOT a feminist. i dont honestly care if eve ate the stupid pice of fruit or if adam did or if jeremiah did or if the snake ate it and threw it at eve. really does it matter who ate the fruit? does it matter if they were male or female? this one guy says about the beloved disciple that people are so outraged that the church has kept under wraps that the bible was changed to keep the identity of the beloved disciple a secret. and that the church says without much evidence the disciple whom jesus loved was john. but really  people only care becuz its a woman. i mean i dont think i would even care that much if it might have been matthew or paul or some guy with a goat that was the beloved disciple. but i think in this case it really doesnt matter. the church has taught me that eve brought original sin into the world. and that we all have to suffer becuz of original sin. but the bible also says that u cant inherit sin, and that children are pure and innocent. so my point really is just that the bible has been changed a lot. and that at one point men used to almost worship woman, they thought it was amazing that women carried and had children. they didnt think it was womans curse or something. but as times changed so did the bible. why do u think the 12 tribes of israel are only the men he has? only 2 of his daughters are mentioned. one only becuz she was raped. and her brothers wanted to kill the man that did that to her. so my point is just that at the point when these people lived woman were seen as somewhat inferior. so the people who wrote the bible were men who viewed the world in that way, becuz thats how life was then. so i mean more the likely there was no original sin. maybe there was someone who was the first to do something wrong. but religion didnt even come into play until the neanderthals i do believe so there was a lot of people before that. my mpoint also is that it wasnt a bad thing for a while for man and man to be together. that was later on. the bible was written by man and man isnt perfect. so neither is the bible

OLD TESTAMENT

if no one was there in the beginning how do we know what happened?

The first thing interesting in the bible comes from genesis chapters 1-3 on evolution. Now in here it says that god created HEAVEN and EARTH and all the creatures in it, in of course 6 days and rested on the 7th day, which is now reserved as the day of rest for us today. Notice how he created heaven and earth first off, not one thing there says that god created the sun, the moon, any other planets, stars, moons, etc or even hell, meaning if there is a hell, god has no reign over it. So don’t tell me god created space, and the bible says that because it doesn’t. Also scientists have proven that for the first 3 million years the most complex creature was a jellyfish. No creature even ventured out of the water till later creatures developed more, and developed arms, legs, and could breathe on land, but this took long periods of time. Also the first humans did not speak a certain language. They used sign language and their heads were much longer then ours. The bible fails to mention this, and they seem to be able to communicate well.

Now lets focus our attention to the Garden of Eden. First off the snake goes to Eve, and tells her basically that god is trying to trick her, that she should eat a piece of FRUIT [not necessarily an apple] out of the tree. Lets stop there for one moment. Since when do snakes talk? I have never heard a snake talk before? Is this some power it once had? I think not. Either the snake was evil and somehow could talk, but that cant be, because there was supposed to be no evil in the garden of Eden, or it was ADAM telling eve to get the apple, or it was another human god had made [ill get back to that concept later]

Then Eve goes and takes some and gives some to Adam, then the bible says their eyes are opened, and they realize they are naked. Well first if they didn’t see that they were naked b4, then they were really dumb, because hello if your walking around naked don’t u realize that? So maybe that’s alluding to the fact that they didn’t have free will at first[and if they didnt have free will then why would they have chosen to eat the fruit?]. Then god gets mad at them. Well first off if god is all knowing why did he have to ask them about the fruit couldn’t he just figure it out? And it also said they could hear god moving around In the garden, well u know I thought god was supposed to be everywhere at all times, so how did he just ARRIVE there, and how can he make noise? I’ve never heard him.

Then god goes on to say that because EVE took the apples, and she and Adam ate them that he will punish them. God says to Eve, that because she ate the apple, and gave into temptation from the snake, he will put enmity, between she and the snake. Enmity is mutual deep loathing. Well how can god “put” that between them? Shouldn’t they “choose” to hate each other? Isn’t everyone supposed to get along? and not all people hate snakes, so is anyone that loves a snake a "sinner?"

Next god says to eve, that he will intensify the pain of childbirth. That’s interesting, so now every woman has to be in pain during childbirth? Doesn’t god want life? Or is he trying to discourage people from having kids? Also why is god not forgiving towards her, or why is god trying to make every single person that comes after her, be cursed by original sin, from one person?

Here is the part where it gets very confusing, god tells Adam, that “because you listened to your wife, and ate from the tree of which I have forbid you to eat, cursed be the ground because of you, in toil shall you eat its yield all the days of your life,” god goes on to say more harsh things [genesis 2, 17-20]. But that to me seems confusing. The bible gives the opinion that Adam was innocent throughout this whole process, that Adam did NOTHING wrong. His wife brought him dinner and he ate it, what is so wrong with that? So that seems to represent that the bible is somehow changed, and that Adam did more wrong then just eat a meal. So why is god so mad? Why would god punish an innocent person? Think about that one.[and also remember that there was a point a long time ago where men actually worshipped woman in a sense. becuz they didnt understand that sexual intercourse, was the cause of woman to become pregnant, they believed woman had some supernatural ability, and worshipped them for this, scientists, and historians can prove this, can u prove adam and eve?] 

Next after Cain kills Abel and what not, Cain somehow has a wife, and has a kid named Enoch. Well the bible never said that Adam and eve had any more children, so where are all these people coming from? Aren’t we all supposed to come from Adam and eve, and that’s why we ALL have to bear original sin? Next Cain founds a city, which he names after his son, whoah whoah whoah whoah whoah. Slow down we go from a 2 people to 4. Then 3, to 4 again, then 5, then a whole city, how is this happening so fast?

Type your title here. Lets skip ahead a little in the old testament. Genesis 11: 27-30 "Terah became the father of Abram, Nahor, and Haran...Nahors wife was milcah daughter of HARAN!!! eww Haran dies, and Nahor Horans brother married Harans  daughterr. ewww thats Nahors niece he married. and abrams brother, and mind u christianity, islam, and judaism all give credit to abram as starting their religion, and his brother married his niece omg that is really wrong. Scientists have proven that back then people lived shorter lives. Apparently the bible didnt get the memo. ~rew lived 2 hundred years and 7 years after the birth of serug ~Serug lived 200 years after the birth of Nahor ~Nahor lived 119 years after the birth of Terah Wow these people were amazing if they live 7 billion years ago, give or take a few hundred years, and could live longer then people today, some people even lived past 500, how many of us, with todays medicine, and technology, will live that long? it seemed as though it was normal back then to live that long, cuz this was after the world was wiped out by the flood with noah so the world was starting over again with people. so a few people could have been the whole world

Type your title here. Genesis 21: 9-12 Sarah noticed the son of whom hago the egyptian had borne to abraham playing with her son Isaac. So she demanded of Abraham:"drive out that slave and her son, no son of that SLAVE is going to share the inheritance w/my great son Isaac."  Abraham was greatly distressed especially on account of his son ishael. God said to abraham do not be distressed about the boy or about YOUR SLAVE WOMAN[whom he slept with, and then with his own wife] Heed the demands of Sarah. NO MATTER WHAT SHE IS ASKING OF YOU, 4 it is through ISAAC that descendants shall bear ur name whoah whoah whoah whoah whoah. first off abraham is married to sarah, and they have a son named isaac. Then apparently Jacob commits adultry by sleeping with hago, whom is his slave. And Hago has a son named ishmael. Sarah doesnt like this, and thinks her sons so great, and no slave will ever be as great as him. thats understandable in a way, i mean its like her husband cheats on her, and she doesnt the other kid, because it stole him from her. Abrahams distressed about this. And then god says dont worry about the slave woman, only about ur wife sarah, basically screw the other girl, and just worry about ur wife. Next god says do whatever it is sarah asks of u, no matter what it is. whoah so now hes kind of there to serve only sarah. and that means that Adam should of done nothing wrong, by listening to his wife tell him to eat something. i mean hes supposed to listen to her right? So why again was adam punished? Also god says through isaac and only isaac, his descendants shall bear ur name. well what about ishmael? doesnt ishmael deserve a father too? i mean sarahs saying basically forget about him, and god says listen to her, and then ishmael doesnt even get a name sake, its like he doesnt exsist. i smell a coverup

Type your title here. god tells abraham to bring his son up to the mountain, and kill him. abraham loves his son isaac but he does as god says. Its supposed to be a sacrifice to god. But then as abraham is about to kill his only son isaac, an angel comes down from heaven and tells abraham he passed the test. this is the dumbest thing i have ever heard. are we now a cult? the "destructive doomsday cult" founded by James Warren  Jones who was a devoted christian. He called this cult the peoples temple. it seemed like a good idea at first, they helped the poor, sick, homeless, preached about equality. then in the 70's James Warren Jones became very paranoid and started becoming a bit unhinged. finally he and 4 other members were shot and killed. Now James started this idea called Translation. Where he and all his members would die together, and leave this world 4 another world in bliss. so when he died his members committed suicide. 914 people commited suicide by drinking poison. 276 of these people were children! These people feared a nucleur end to the world, and listened to a man already unhinged using drugs. they killed their children, those innocent kids with poison they put in kool-aid The Peoples temple was a horrible group noone should argue with that. They killed their own children, basically to satisfy some sort of "god" we all look at them as horrible people. how could they of been that stupid as to do that. any person even willing to kill their own child i dont care what voices in ur head its for, is an absolute horrible person. Yet why do u look at abraham thinking hes a great person who founded our religion. and look how great he is for being willing to kill his child whom he loved so much. he showed great courage. how dumb are u people. Abraham was ready to kill his son because he heard voices, he did not hear god. i sure as hell have never heard god speak to me, and have never met anyone who has. Abraham should not be glorified, he commited adultry, basically screwed over his son, then tried to kill the other one, what makes him so special?   New TESTAMENT

but for now lets focus on the New Testament The New Testament is filled with all these amazing things Jesus did like walk on water, and heal all these people and even bring people back from the dead, including him. Now Jesus is said to be a man that believed all people, men and woman alike were equal. Lets look at his 12 apostles. Now its fine that Jesus has no men in there, because he had other people that spread his word, but why aren’t woman ever mentioned? This brings us to of course Mary Magdalene of course.

It is my belief that the book of john is really the book of Mary. First lets look at something in the bible. There is a disciple known only as the “beloved disciple”. You people can’t be that dumb, the bible is so exact in pretty much everything it says, how can it fail to know the identity of one disciple if this disciple was the “disciple Jesus loved”? If they were so sure Jesus loved this disciple I’m positive they would be sure who the disciple is. If u disagree with that statement then you’re really dumb to challenge that. Obviously, someone is trying to hide whom the “beloved disciple is”

but first lets take a moment out. There is not much known about Mary Magdalene, she is not mentioned many times in the bible. We know she was there when Jesus was crucified, Jesus cast 7 demons from her[remember that as i will come back to it later!] She was the one who saw that the tomb of Jesus was empty, and she was the first to see Jesus risen. However most people don’t know that she was any of those people most people know Mary Magdalene as a prostitute, whom then Jesus saved, and Jesus was great for befriending a whore. Well that’s interesting that everyone sees Mary Magdalene in that light, because it never says once in any part of the bible that Mary Magdalene is or ever was a prostitute. I swear if u can show me where it says that in the bible I will personally write a retraction on this, and become the best god/Jesus worshiper ever! But alas that wont happen, because the bible does not say that. So why does everyone think it says that? And who is the beloved disciple really?

Well first were going to take a look at some inconsistent parts in the bible. The first one John 19:25-28~ Standing by the cross of Jesus were his mother and his mothers sister, Mary the wife of clopas, and Mary of Magdala [Mary Magdalene]. Now lets stop 4 a minute. Right there is mentioned four women. No one else is mentioned as u see Remember that. Lets move on. When Jesus saw his mother, and the disciple whom he loved. Whoah lets stop right there. Where did this disciple all of a sudden come from? One second its four WOMAN, the next moment there’s someone else, someone we don’t know who it is, but why wasn’t this person mentioned before? Or were they? But lets take a look at the last part. He said his mother, woman behold your son. Then to the disciple he said, behold your mother, and from that hour on the disciple took her into his home. You all might say well that doesn’t prove anything that could just be a mistake they forgot to mention someone. Well no dip Sherlock of course it’s a mistake, someone obviously, changed the identity of someone, and along with that, had to go back through and make other slight changes to the bible, so that it made sense and obviously that person made a mistake.

 Look it over again if u want, in fact here it is w/out my little interruptions:

 Standing by the cross of Jesus, were his mother, and his mother’s sister Mary the wife of Clopas, and MARY OF MAGDALA. When Jesus saw his mother, and the DISCIPLE WHOM HE LOVED, he said to his mother, woman behold your SON. Then to the disciple, behold your mother. And from that hour the disciple took her into his home.

You can argue with that all you want but oh wait I have more John 20:1-10 On the first day of the week [which would be Sunday, following Hebrew] Mary of Magdala came to the tomb early in the morning, while it was still dark, and saw the stone removed from the tomb. So she ran and went to Simon Peter and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved, and told them they have taken the lord from the tomb and we don’t know where they put him. So peter and the other disciple went out of the tomb, but the other disciple ran faster than peter and arrived at the tomb first: he bent down and saw the burial cloths there, but DID NOT GO IN, when Simon peter arrived after him, he went into the tomb and saw the burial cloths there and the cloth that had covered his head, not with the burial cloths, but rolled up in a separate place. Then the other disciple also went in. the ONE who had arrived at the tomb first, and he saw and believed. For they did not yet understand the scripture that he had to rise from the dead. Then the disciples went home. BUT MARY STAYED OUTSIDE THE TOMB WEEPING.

 First off Simon Peter, and the disciple whom Jesus loved go to the tomb after Mary Magdalene tells them Jesus is gone. We don’t know where Mary Magdalene is we assume that she has stayed behind, but we know she doesn’t go with Simon peter or the other disciple. Then they arrive at the tomb, and the disciple the one who arrived at the tomb first went in, and saw and believed, and understood what Jesus had said about rising from the dead. Well that could have two meanings, it could be the disciple whom Jesus loved, who had arrived b4 Simon peter, or it could mean that Mary Magdalene because she saw the tomb first. But of course my opinion is that it doesn’t matter cause I think their both the same people, but lets say for a moment that there is some “anonymous disciple” well next it says that after the disciples left Mary stayed outside the tomb weeping. Well how did Mary Magdalene get there? It never says she was with them when she left, or that she arrived at another time. So couldn’t it be that SHE was the beloved disciple SHE arrived first at the tomb before Simon peter, SHE saw and believed and understood what Jesus had said? Tell me in what way that it is not her that their mentioning, tell me how did she just appear out of thin air there? And also wouldn’t she of wanted to go back with Simon peter, and the disciple whom Jesus loved, to see if they could find out where Jesus was?

in the passion ch. in the gospel of john, as judas, goes over to kiss jesus, when jesus says why do u betray the SON OF MAN with a kiss. now u all really seem to be missing my point in this whole thing, that jesus never actually claims he isdivine he never really says i am the son of christ. when they ask him before he is executed, are u the king of heaven, are u the son of god, he never really gives a direct answer, he says i am whatever u say i am[so does eminem wow what a kooinkidink]. now there was a person that critizied the book "the da vinci code" for talking about jesus being married to mary magdalene, and that jesus may have had a daughter named sarah, and this person says, that if jesus is half divine, then what would his kid be quarte divine? sorry but whoever said that w/e becuz jesus doesnt say he is divine, and since when are we using fractions here? if jesus is half divine, then is he really god? i mean that makes him only half as good as god right? and really if were all made in gods likeness, dont u think we should have some bit of divinity in us? people decided long after jesus's death that he is divine, in the niacine conventions, they decided how long jesus fasted for, when days should be if jesus was the son of god...yet jesus states right there in the bible that he is the son of man. that means he is human, he doesnt state i am the son of woman, becuz we already know that, so by saying i am the son of man, he is saying that joseph or someone else for all we know is his father, but his father is a man. jesus may have been a prophet or he may have been unhinged but he never claims that he is gods son, and if he does, u can bet its been changed and it doesnt say that in the original texts, like ive tried to show this whole time about how the bible has been changed and it is not a reliable, or the only source of truth in the world

 did anyone take the time to notice that in jesus's time, a time where the most worldly goods they has was a goat and jesus sandals, that there were many exorcisms. mary magdalene had 7 demons, "legions"" had many, and there were many more. . jesus warns us the more worldly items we have, the more chance we have of being influenced by satan, he also says the more holy we are the more chance we have of being influenced by satan. jesus wasnt a very direct person was he? anyways today we livein a world were almost anything we have is a worldly good. and there is no way i will ever give up my santa clause pillow, no matter how close giving it up will bring me to "god". many religous people however say that today in a time where there are so many worldly goods, that exorcisms are very rare. in fact any religious figure ive talked to has claimed theyve never even heard of an excorcism. dont u find that a little strange? jesus seems to fear above all else that worldly goods will lead us farther and farther away from god yet in the time of jesus when he was trying to show how divine he was, it seems every other person was possesed. wow who new a goat could lead u to such evil?

my experiment:

now the way that people claim to have demons enter ur body[which btw what are demons? it never really states that] is to touch something evil, or bring something bad or some false idol into ur home or worship it or give it some sort of power. of course i couldnt pass up this oppourtunity to brave like the brave little toaster[i love that movie] and i had to try this out  to see if it really worked. so i have this little tiki man that someone brought me back from hawaii, and i thought it looked to plain so i put silver nail polish all over it. but anyways i took the tiki placed it in my hand, and asked it to grant me a wish. then i danced around my room asking it for snow so that i didnt have to take a math test the next day. no snow and my wish didnt come true. now one month later i am still officially demon free. whew that was a close one i really thought that demons would come out of that little piece of carved wood. boy am i relieve now.

update: almost 5 months later i am here to anounce in front of everyone that i am still demon free its a miracle

why am i a horrible person for not believing in jesus or god? why should i go to hell when i dont believe in it? why am i an evil person for not believing in someone who never claims to be what he is believed to be. u know what my church told the whole congregation to pray for jewish people, that their hearts will be opened, and they will realize how stupid they are for not believing that jesus the son of man is divine. and my church told the whole congregation not to vote for the democratic candidate because they believed in abortion. why am i such an evil person because i believe that is wrong, what i believe is my choice, and if people have plenty of sites out there, to show how great jesus and all of his saints and all these religous people are, then why cant i have this site?

COMING SOON  COMING SOON NICINE CONVENTION AND SYMOLS OF THE CHURCH AND MORE ON THE OLD TESTAMENT AND BOOK REVIEWS If u have any problems with my page, and would like to tell me that e-mail me at kellysrcool@lycos.com I will personally answer anything you write. ****CONTEST**** if u can find out where it says in the BIBLE that mary magdalene was a prostitute, whore, sinner, etc. i will post it on here with ur name and w/e else u want. but i bet u cant find it  

NEW

in all this time trying to find a reason to hate god, a reason to prove that he is in fact corrupt i may have just found one. in the garden of eden there was no original sin until AFTER eve ate the apple right? and GOD didnt create evil in this world right? well hello people. it says in the bible god created hate. god put EMNITY between eve and the snake, there was none before, god created hate end of story. there is no god

most of my point in this section is showing how modern religion is sort of a mixture of many old beliefs of many different religions. the main reason people used to have religions was to explain how things worked and how the world came to be. now we basically know better. we know the world wasnt created in 6th days, we cant find any trace of eden, we cant figure out how adam and eve got to be so damn smart, if they were technically being the first humans, either hominids, or homo habilis. so i guess today religion is to feel like we are somehow protected, or to give us some feeling of immortality. but really religion sets people apart, and makes people hate, and even kill others because their religion is not ours, so my point with this section is to show kind of how people came to believe modern things

biblical definitions: god created the earth and heaven and all the plants and animals in 6 days and rested on the 7th.

scientific definitions: earth is thought to have been formed about 4.6 billion years ago. a bunch of chemical reactions happened[ill get back to that later] and about 3.9 billion years ago the oceans were made, the first living organism is thought to have formed about 3.5 billion years ago.

ERA's~

the first era is the precambrian era which started about 3.5 billion years ago. this is when its suggested the first living organism, an organism that is like todays cynabacteria. this age started with prokaryotic organisms. 2 billion years later the ocean had the first eukaryotic organisms, about 544 million years ago the ocean was full of these

the paleozoic era lasted from about 545 million to about 248 million years ago. this era started with many invertabraes including worms, and primitive anthropods. in the first half of this era, fishes apeared, then in the middle there was ampibians, and finnally reptiles apeared.

the mesozoic era started about 248 million years ago and is split into 3 parts the triassc, the jurasic, and the cretaceous. mammals first appeared in the triassic. the jurasic was the time of dinosaurs. the cretaceous period, had to do with the evolution of flowering plants. during the mesozoic era, also is the theory of plateonics, where continents started drifting, and still do today. in an average lifetime, north america is believed to move about 4 feet.

the cenozoic era, is the modern era. in this era mammals evolved, eventually leading to humans.

now some people say, well of course theres a god, because how did organisms just "pop" up. thank u again to all of u who ask me, how do i think i go here? well first of all organisms dont just "pop" up. there is the belief[the big bang theory]. alexander oparin states that energy from the sun, and lightning, made chemical reactions that produced simple organic compounds.  this theory was tested by stanly miller and harold urey.  they believe that the chemicals that may have been on earth were ammonia, methane, and hydrogen. they sparked these chemicals, much like lightning, and after a week found several amino acids, sugars and organic compounds. the amino acids probaly linked together to form proteins, because they do that when there is no oxygen. scientists believe this originated in water. and that cells were anaerobic because the earth had no oxygen.  with the apperance of aerobic respiration, lightning converted that into the ozone layer.

biblical: god created humans but also gave them free will. eve disobeyed ate the fruit and brought with that original sin, and everything bad, all doom, destruction, pain, sorrow, grief, sickness, etc into the world

Greek: pandoras box. zeus, made pandora, a beautiful girl, who was kind of the original "dumb blonde" and also he gave her a box, and said never open it, but he also made her very curious, so that she would open the box. pandora opened the box and brought all death, pain, sorrow, sickness, etc into the world

lets test ur mad skills, do u see any similarities between those 2 beliefs?

biblical:moses was born to a woman who was israelite[of the 12 tribes of israel/jacob] moses's mother put him into a basket and he went down the crocodile infested river til he was somehow found by a worker at the pharoahs place, and raised by pharoah and his wife. wow isnt it great that even though pharoah ordered all those babies to be killed, he still was nice enough to raise one himself?

roman:romulus and remus were born to a woman who could not take care of them, so she set them in a basket[well 2 baskets] and they sailed on down the river til they arrived at a tiger who raised them, even though they were different

wow those are really different

biblical:god told noah that there will be a flood all throughout the world destroying everything yadda yadda yadda, and for noah to build a boat, and on this boat he should put two animals of every species[did he realize how many species of animals there actually are and i wondered if he had animals such as crocodiles or alligators] and that he would be saved throughout this flood

ancient egypt~the sun god ra i believe his name was[correct me if im wrong and it may not have been the sun god] but anyways this god was sitting by the nile, and a fish told him that there was going to be a major flood, and he should prepare a boat with 2 animals of every species so they could be saved

again test your skills. do u see the similarities?

in the middle ages, saints were drawn with "halos" around their heads, halos that looked suspiciously identical to the sun sphere that is depicted around the head of the greek god helios

human evolution

homo=human well someone told me that homo=same, but doesnt homeo=same, like in homeostasis anyways though its not really important

~homonids were humanlike creatures from around about 4.4 million years ago. these were the first human like creatures, and they were discovered in west africa, were there are monkeys, so humans could of evolved from monkeys

~homo habilis~person with ability, from about 1.5 million years ago to about 200 thousand years ago

~homo erectus~person who walks upright from about 200,000 to about 100,000 years ago

~homo sapiens~ the neanderthals, person who thinks from about 100,000 years ago to present day

~homo sapien sapiens~cro mangons~modern humans

Time

biblical says that god made the earth in 6 days and rested on the 7th. the jewish people made the first calendars in this way. but they used a lunar scale and so the year was only 154 days, thats why some years they have an extra month. julius caesar[not jewish] in 46 BC made the months adjust to fit the solar year, and declared january 1st as new years day. Pope gregory XIII declared leap years to fix the problem in AD 1582

space

it says in the bible that god created heaven and earth no mention of space. and the church didnt like it to much that uh people would kind of go against what they were saying, in saying the earth wasnt the center of the solar system etc. so these people were silenced. what was the church so afraid of?