Gu-Edinna;Kisad Edini
The ancient name of the alluvial plain of Babylonia was Gu-Edinna or Kisad Edina,although some archeologists believe the name was properly restricted to "the plain" on the western bank of the river where the Bedouins pastured the flocks of their Babylonian masters. This "bank" or kisad, together with the corresponding western bank of the Tigris (according to Hommel the modern Shatt el-Uai), gave its name to the land of Chesed, hence the Kasdim/Kasdin of the Old Testament. In the early inscriptions of Lagash the whole district is known as Gu-Edinna, the Sumerian equivalent of the Semitic Kisad Edini. The coast land was similarly known as Gu-gbba (Semitic Kisad tamtim), the "bank of the sea." The Sumerian cities of Lagash and Umma were approximately 20 miles apart.Inscriptions from Gu-Edinna mention a king Entemena,who's headless statue was also discovered,and stolen in 2003 when the Bagdad Museum was looted.It was later recovered and returned to the people of Iraq in 2006.Bearing the cuneiform inscription, "Entemena Whom the God Enlil Loves," the statue is one of the most significant and historic artifacts returned to the Iraqi National Museum in Baghdad.It is the oldest known representation of a Mesopotamian king.The inscription recorded a treaty with Lagash and the recovery of boundaries.The names mentioned in the inscription come from the area Biblical evidence gives for pre flood Genesis.Kish is the Biblical kingdom of Cush.The Gutians are believed to have retained the name of Gu-Edinna.

Document I
“By the immutable word of Enlil, king of the lands, father of the gods,
Ningirsu and Shara set a boundary to their lands.
Mesilim, King of Kish, at the command of his deity Kadi,
set up a stele [a boundary marker] in the plantation of that field.
Ush, ruler of Umma, formed a plan to seize it.
That stele he broke in pieces, into the plain of Lagash he advanced.
Ningirsu, the hero of Enlil, by his just command, made war upon Umma.
At the command of Enlil, his great net ensnared them.
He erected their burial mound on the plain in that place.”

Document II
“Eannatum, ruler of Lagash, brother of the father of Entemena [who put up this inscription] ...
for Enakalli, ruler of Umma, set the border to the land.
He carried a canal from the great river to Guedin .
He opened the field of Ningirsu on its border for 210 spans to the power of Umma.
He ordered the royal field not to be seized. At the canal he inscribed a stele.
He returned the stele of Mesilim to its place.
He did not encroach on the plain of Mesilim.
At the boundary-line of Ningirsu, as a protecting structure,
he built the sanctuary of Enlil, the sanctuary of Ninkhursag .... By harvesting,
the men of Umma had eaten one storehouse-full of the grain of Nina [goddess of Oracles],
the grain of Ningirsu; he caused them to bear a penalty.
They brought 144,000 gur,, a great storehouse full, [as repayment].
The taking of this grain was not to be repeated in the future.
Urlumma, ruler of Umma drained the boundary canal of Ningirsu,
the boundary canal of Nina; those steles he threw into the fire, he broke [them] in pieces;
he destroyed the sanctuaries, the dwellings of the gods, the protecting shrines, the buildings that had been made.
He was as puffed up as the mountains; he crossed over the boundary canal of Ningirsu.
Enannatum, ruler of Lagash, went into battle in the field of Ugigga, the irrigated field of Ningirsu.
Entemena, the beloved son of Enannatum, completely overthrew him.
Urlumma fled. In the midst of Umma he killed him.
He left behind 60 soldiers of his force [dead] on the bank of the canal
"Meadow- recognized-as-holy-from-the-great-dagger."
He left these men-their bones on the plain.
He heaped up mounds for them in 5 places.
Then Ili Priest of Ininni of Esh in Girsu, he established as a vassal ruler over Umma.”

Document III
“Ili, took the ruler of Umma into his hand.
He drained the boundary canal of Ningirsu, a great protecting structure of Ningirsu,
unto the bank of the Tigris above from the banks of Girsu.
He took the grain of Lagash, a storehouse of 3600 gur .
Entemena, ruler of Lagash declared hostilities on Ili, whom for a vassal he had set up.
Ili, ruler of Umma, wickedly flooded the dyked and irrigated field;
he commanded that the boundary canal of Ningirsu;
the boundary canal of Nina be ruined.... Enlil and Ninkhursag did not permit [this to happen].
Entemena, ruler of Lagash, whose name was spoken by Ningirsu,
restored their canal to its place according to the righteous word of Enlil,
according to the righteous word of Nina,
their canal which he had constructed from the river Tigris to the great river,
the protecting structure, its foundation he had made of stone ....”
John Simmons, July 26, 2006
The name of King Ili was also the name of the god,”Ili,”who was known as the one god,and creator of all the other gods.That would indicate that the knowledge of one God was handed down,rather than being fabricated by Biblical scholors.It is most likely the source of the Canaanite and early Hebrew god “El.”
Kadi was a goddess of justice.The Anunaki were the Biblical Ananikim,or the people of Anunaki.In Sumerrian legend they were the seven judges of the underworld.In the Gingamesh epic,they were watchers and the the children of the god of heaven.Edin is also mentioned in the tale of “Inana and Bilulu.”Edin-Lila indicates the plain,or bank,”of Ili the Creator.
“Then the son of old woman Bilulu, matriarch and her own mistress, --
Jirjire, a man on his own, fit for the fields and a knowledgeable man --
was filling pen and fold with his captured cattle, and was stacking his stacks and piles of grain.
He left scattered in the fields his victims struck down with the mace.
Sirru of Edin-lila, no one's child and no one's friend, sat before him and held converse with him.”
“My lady went to Bilulu in Edin-lila.
Her son Jirjire like the wind there did ......
Sirru of Edin-lila, no one's child and no one's friend, .......”
If Ili can accurately be equated with El,which appears to be the case,it is among other evidence that the Genesis stories were handed down from more ancient sources,and not fabricated by later scribes:
“Like mankind, when first created,
They knew not the eating of bread,
Knew not the dressing of garments,
Ate plants with their mouths like sheep,
Drank water from the ditch.”
That inscription mirrors the two Biblical scriptures that indicate early man ate “plants” only.
Genesis 2:29:
“And God said,Behold I have given you every herb bearing seed,
which is upon the face of the earth,and every tree,
in which is the fruit of a tree yeilding seed,to you shall it be for meat.”
Genesis 9:3:
“Every living thing that liveth shall be meat for you ,
even as the green herb have i given you all things.”
Until Adam ate from the tree of knowledge,He “knew not the dressing of garments.” He certainly knew not how to cook bread,or meat.According to the Bible,man didn't eat meat until after the flood.The inscription.like the Bible,hints at the process of evolution,although not from one species to another,which is only scientific theory.
   The inscription helps to verify that the Biblical garden of Eden was not a Scribal fabrication.That belief is based,in part,on the difficulty in identifying the rivers mentioned in the Bible.Place names,however,have a way of being changed over thousands of years,and archeologists know that much of the land over 6,000 years ago is now covered in silt.The land area of the Tigres-Euphrates valley has been extended farther south,giving the possibility of some rivers and streams being filled in with silt.Archeology knows that there is a layer of silt eight feet thick in some areas,with no evidence of activity.There is evidence of human activity above and below the layer,indicating that a flood had once covered the area.They may one day discover evidence of ancient rivers under the silt.The important thing is that the evidence shows the critics lack of evidence and knowledge of history.When faced with actual historical events,they lose credibility.That's not to say that science is wrong,but that interpreters of scientific evidence can be wrong.Coupled with the habit of leaving out crucial pieces that may not fortify the critique,by the time the interpretation reaches the reader it may not say what the scientists intended.Science is not anti-Biblical,although that is the picture painted by Bible critics and some Bible scholors.The Bible is not anti Scientific,one being the study of Creation and the other the study of the Creator.Contradictions between the Bible and science are for the most part, man made,and do not always reflect reality. The fact that the Bible may have been handed down from more ancient written and oral sources does not take away the validity of the Bible.The Bible doesn't state that

the knowledge of Creation,the Flood and the Patriarchs was given specifically to Abraham or Moses,only that they were confronted by the true God.The Bible doesn't tell us how long that knowledge had been available to man.The important thing is that Abraham and His decendents were aware of what their ancestors had written down.

Back