HADCORP

Home

Implant Research

Dr Ostermeyer's Research

Neoplasms & Implants

Platinum Testing

Children and Silicone

About Breast Implants

Alternative Implants

Suicide and Implants

Implants and the FDA

Implants in the UK

Silicone Immune Protocol

Biotoxins

MCS

Implant Identification

Implant Photos

Orthopaedic Implants

Board of Directors

Medical Device News

Glossary

Implant Resources

Contact Us

Members
 

Knowledge Empowers   


Atypical Chest Pain Syndrome in Patients With Breast Implants

LEE B. LU, BS, BRITTA OSTERMEYER SHOAIB, MD, and BERNARD M. PATTEN, MD, Houston, Tex

ABSTRACT: Eleven patients, aged 36 to 55 years, with silicone breast implants had episodes of severe chest pain similar to heart attacks 6 weeks to 7 years after breast implantation; one patient had a severe attack 1 month after explantation. The chest pain, which was not related to physical exertion, lasted from 15 minutes to 4 days, and descriptions of it varied from a "pressing" type of pain to "stabbing" pain with radiation to the shoulders, left arm, and jaw. The associated symptoms were diaphoresis, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, and palpitations. All of the patients had a normal electrocardiogram (ECG) with the exception of one, whose ECG showed nonspecific ST changes. Ten had cardiac evaluations, all of which yielded normal results. All had implant removal, and five were found to have at least one ruptured implant. Nine had an implant capsule biopsy; all had chronic inflammatory rinds, and five had free silicone in tissue whether or not the implants were ruptured. All eight who had a pectoralis major muscle biopsy had abnormal results: (neurogenic atrophy [six], fasciitis [three], myositis [one], chronic inflammation [one], free silicone [one], and neuroma [one]). We concluded that silicone breast implants may cause an atypical chest pain syndrome, probably due to local inflammatory reactions and neuroma formation.


 

Reprinted from the Southern Medical Journal, Journal of the Southern Medical Association, Volume 87, Number 10,
October 1994, Pages 978-984, Copyright © 1994 by Southern Medical Association, Birmingham, Alabama

 

 

AUGMENTATION MAMMAPLASTY was first practiced in Japan during World War II, when Japanese women enlarged their breasts by direct injections of paraffin or silicone.1 In the United States, since the silicone envelope-type prosthesis was introduced by Cronin and Gerow2 in 1962, breast implants have been widely used. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), approximately 1 million women in the United States have received silicone breast implants.3 Silicone breast implants have been associated with many complications, including fibrous capsule contracture,4,5 implant rupture,6,7 gel bleed,8-10 silicone migration,8,11-13 human carcinogenicity,14-16 (degradation of polyurethane  into  2,4  diaminotoluene,  a  known  carcinogen), 17-21 autoimmune  and  connective  tissue  diseases, 22-29 and  neurologic   problems.30-32 As a consequence of these reported complications and the failure of breast implant manufacturers to provide the FDA with sufficient safety and efficacy data, the FDA ordered a moratorium on January 6, 1992, on the further distribution of the silicone gel implants.3

      From 1985 to the present, almost 1,500 patients have been referred to us for the management of neurologic symptoms occurring after insertion of silicone breast implants. While evaluating their cases, we discovered that some of the patients had had episodes of severe chest pain with associated symptoms of nausea, vomiting, diaphoresis, and dyspnea resembling the symptoms of heart attack and requiring evaluation for possible myocardial infarction. Despite the initial workup for a possible infarct, these women were eventually determined to have had noncardiac chest pain. In this article, we describe the clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in the cases of 11 patients with an atypical chest pain syndrome and silicone breast implants; all of the patients were referred to us for evaluation of neurologic symptoms occurring after implantation of silicone breast implants.

METHODS

 

The study subjects were 11 patients referred to us for evaluation of neurologic symptoms occurring after implantation of silicone breast implants. Each gave a history and had a physical examination, completed a questionnaire about implants and symptoms, and received laboratory testing, including a complete blood count, urinalysis, SMA-15, and serum protein electrophoresis. The subjects were also tested for quantitative immunoglobulins, complements C3 and C4, antinuclear antibodies (ANA), antimyelin associated glycoprotein antibodies (anti-MAG), rheumatoid factor, antiganglioside GM1 antibodies (anti-GM1) and antisulfatide antibodies. All patients had implant removal. At time of removal, 9 patients had an implant capsule biopsy, and 8 had a pectoralis major muscle biopsy. Formalin sections obtained from the implant capsule biopsy were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and read by a pathologist at the Methodist Hospital. Frozen sections of muscle tissue were stained with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)- tetrazolium reductase, myofibrillar adenosinetriphosphatase at a pH of 9.4, and modified Gomori's trichrome.

In addition, we reviewed any available cardiac evaluation done by other physicians and medical records of previous emergency department admissions. All patients were interviewed personally at the time of presentation and again at a later date via telephone. They were all asked to describe the attack of chest pain and were questioned regarding risk factors for coronary artery disease and possible noncardiac causes of chest pain such as peptic ulcer, indigestion, esophageal reflux, hiatal hernia, esophageal diseases, trauma to the chest and psychosomatic disorders.

CASE REPORTS

 

Patient 1. A 44-year-old woman was referred to us by her family physician in Indiana for evaluation of breast implant problems. In 1977 she had a saline breast implant on the left for Poland's syndrome. Within the same year, she had a closed capsulotomy to release capsular contracture. In 1979 she had a mastopexy on the right with insertion of a saline breast implant. In 1985 both of the saline implants were replaced by polyurethane-coated silicone gel implants made by Surgitek (Racine, Wis).

Six months after the first implantation, muscle pain, burning and discomfort developed in the shoulders, hips, and knees. Extreme fatigability also developed, to the point that she could not dress herself, as well as joint pain, joint swelling and stiffness, dry eye syndrome, skin rash, Raynaud's phenomenon, numbness of arms, hands, and fingers, and memory deficits. In 1991 Graves' disease developed, and in 1992 she sought treatment for local chest problems, including tenderness, itching, a burning sensation, and swelling in both breasts. She was admitted for evaluation of these symptoms. The implants were removed but revealed no evidence of rupture. Biopsy specimens of the implant capsules showed chronic inflammatory cells with numerous foamy histiocytes and refractile translucent foreign material consistent with silicone. Pectoralis major muscle biopsy showed neurogenic atrophy.

On December 19, 1992, while sitting in her living room watching television, the patient experienced acute onset of severe chest pain associated with diaphoresis, shortness of breath, nausea, and vomiting. The pain was described as "pressurelike" and radiated bilaterally to the shoulders and to the left arm. She thought she was having a heart attack but could not identify any relieving or aggravating factor.
     After the chest pain persisted for 3 hours, she went to the Methodist Hospital emergency department. According to the patient, she had often had chest pain since receiving the breast implants, but it had never been as severe and intense as this episode. She had had heart catheterization to investigate the chest pain, and the results were normal. She had no psychologic problems, hypertension, or diabetes. Even though she had no previous history of gastrointestinal disease, she had an upper gastric endoscopy, which yielded normal results. The family history was significant in that her father had died of myocardial infarction at the age of 62. She did not smoke. She had been taking conjugated estrogens (Premarin), 2.5 mg daily, since having a hysterectomy in 1978. On admission to the emergency department, blood pressure was 130/80 mm Hg, and other vital signs were stable. The chest was clear on auscultation. The heart rate and rhythm were regular, and S1 and S2 were normal, without any murmur or gallop. Nitroglycerin was administered immediately but with no observable relief of symptoms. Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus tachycardia with no acute changes. Testing for total levels of creatine kinase, creatine kinase MB, and lactate dehydrogenase was done serially over 3 days; all tests yielded normal results. A normal two-dimensional echocardiogram was obtained with an ejection fraction of 55%. The chest pain had resolved by itself within 24 hours after admission. Since the December 1992 admission for chest pain, the patient has had no recurrence of any similar chest pain.

Patient 2. A 55-year-old woman came to our clinic in February 1992 for evaluation of symptoms related to breast implants. The patient had had a right modified mastectomy in November 1987 and a left total mastectomy in July 1988 for intraductal carcinoma of both breasts. Subsequently, in November 1988, bilateral breast reconstruction was done using polyurethane-covered silicone gel breast implants made by Surgitek. In January 1989 she had a left capsular contracture release by closed capsulotomy. In spring 1989 local problems, such as breast tenderness, pain, and tightness bilaterally, began to develop, and she had an open capsulectomy for capsular release in the left breast in October 1989. In 1990 muscle aches and pain, muscle weakness and fatigability, joint pain and stiffness, headache, dry eyes, dry mouth and dry vagina (sicca complex), memory problems, and elevated temperatures developed.

     In the same year, while working as a bank teller, she had an attack of severe chest pain. The pain lasted 3 days and was described as a "feeling of tightness" in the midchest that radiated to the left shoulder and back. Accompanying symptoms included diaphoresis and a "smothering" feeling. She could not identify any relieving or aggravating factor. She went directly to the emergency department. Her cholesterol level was 234 mg/dL; otherwise, she had no risk factors for coronary artery disease. She did not smoke and had no history of hypertension or diabetes. The family history was negative for coronary artery disease. She had no history of gastrointestinal problems, psychologic problems, or trauma to the chest. On admission to the emergency department, her systolic blood pressure was in the 200s; all other vital signs were normal. On physical examination, lungs were clear to auscultation, heart rate and rhythm were regular, and S1 and S2 were normal, without murmur or gallop. Nitroglycerin gave no relief of pain. ECG was normal, and cardiac enzyme levels were all within normal ranges. Heart catheterization yielded normal studies of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and the thoracic aorta; there was no evidence of inducible coronary vasospasm. She was discharged, and nifedipine was prescribed for blood pressure control. Since discharge, she has had no recurrent severe chest pain but has continued to have persistent local tenderness and pain in both breasts.

In 1991 the Surgitek implants were removed, and both implants were found to be ruptured. She received replacement silicone gel implants made by Dow Corning (Midland, Mich) but continued to have chest pain and systemic symptoms. She was then referred to us for further evaluation of her problems. She had bilateral breast implant removal with left axillary lymph node excision. The implants were found to be intact, and the lymph nodes showed varying degrees of sinus histiocytosis. Biopsy of the implant capsule showed chronic inflammation. Biopsy of the pectoralis major muscle showed neurogenic atrophy.

RESULTS

Patient Demographics

 

The patients ranged in age from 36 to 55 years. The mean age at time of first implantation was 36 years (range 29 to 52) (Table 1). The mean age at onset of the chest pain was 40 years (range 34 to 53). The median latency period between implantation and development of the chest pain was 4 years. The types of breast implants our patients had received and the reasons for implantation are summarized in Table 1. Five patients received more than one pair of implants due to local complications with the implants.

Local and Systemic Symptoms

 

All patients had local problems with their breasts, including capsular contracture, tenderness, soreness or pain, heat and swelling, infections, and discharge or numbness of the nipples. They all had chest pain, thought to be due to a possible myocardial infarction. Implant capsule biopsy specimens showed chronic inflammation consisting of foamy histiocytes and plasma cells in all patients who had a biopsy and foreign body giant cells and foreign material consistent with silicone in some (Table 1). Pectoralis biopsy specimens were abnormal for all eight patients who had biopsies (Table 1).

In all cases, systemic symptoms developed, including myalgia, muscle weakness and fatigue, arthralgia, joint swelling and stiffness, skin rash, headache, dry mouth, dry eyes, memory problems, hair loss, sensitivity to sunlight, and numbness and a tingling sensation in the extremities. All patients were admitted to the hospital for investigation of their systemic symptoms and were found to have peripheral or central nervous system disease and circulating antibodies such as ANA, anti-GM1, anti-MAG, or antisulfatide. Six patients had been admitted to the hospital previously for evaluation of chest pain.

Chest Pain and Evaluation of Chest Pain

 

The time of onset of the chest pain varied from 6 weeks to 7 years after breast implantation; one patient had a severe attack 1 month after explantation (Table 2). In all cases, the chest pain came on suddenly when the patients were not physically exerting themselves. The type of pain varied from a "pressing" type of pain to "stabbing" pain. The pain was located mostly in the midchest with radiation to the shoulders, left arm, back, and jaw and lasted 15 minutes to 4 days. Associated symptoms included diaphoresis, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, and palpitations. Five of the six patients who were admitted to the hospital for evaluation of possible myocardial infarction got no relief of chest pain from nitroglycerin. Patient 11 reported mild improvement in the chest pain after using a nitroglycerin patch and massaging her breasts. Her cardiologist told her that she did not need the patch. The other five patients never received nitroglycerin.

 

All patients had cardiac evaluations, except for patient 4, who had only an EGG because her physician believed that her chest pain was not of cardiac origin. In her case, physical evaluation just before breast implantation showed that her heart was in excellent condition because she was able to participate in water sports and exercise strenuously without any problems. As a 34-year-old woman with no family history of cardiac disease and a low cholesterol level, she was in a low-risk group for cardiac disease. All patients had normal ECGs during and after the attack of chest pain, except for patient 11; at one point her EGG showed nonspecific ST changes, but two dobutamine thallium 201 perfusion scintigraphy tests yielded normal results. Her cardiologist did not think the changes were of clinical significance and did not indicate ischemic disease. Five patients had exercise treadmill tests; all five yielded normal results. Six patients had two-dimensional echocardiograms with ejection fractions of 55% to 70% and no abnormal findings, except for patient 8, who was found to have mild mitral valve prolapse. Four patients had a dobutamine thallium 201 perfusion scintigraphy study with normal results. Patient 9 had 24-hour Holter monitoring with negative results. Patient 5 had a multiple gate acquisition analysis (MUGA) showing a left ventricular ejection fraction of 74% and normal wall motion. Three patients had heart catheterization with normal results. The four patients who went to the emergency department had normal levels of cardiac enzymes; the studies, done serially over 3 days, included creatine kinase, creatine kinase MB, and lactate dehydrogenase. After tests for heart disease yielded negative results, our patients' cardiologists classified their chest pain as "noncardiac."

 

After implant removal, the symptoms lessened considerably in nine patients and subsided in two (Table 3). Only patient 1 had another attack shortly after having explantation, but her symptoms subsequently improved as well.

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease and Possible Sources of Noncardiac Chest Pain

 

None of the patients had a history of angina pectoris, dyspnea on exertion, or myocardial infarction before breast implantation. None had diabetes mellitus. Four patients were found to have elevated cholesterol levels (Table 3). Three patients smoked cigarettes (5 to 12 pack-years). Four had a family history of coronary artery disease. Six patients had a history of surgical menopause; however, all of them had been receiving hormone replacement therapy. Of the five patients who had upper gastric endoscopy, one had reflux and hiatal hernia, one had mild esophagitis, two had a hiatal hernia, and one had normal results (Table 3). The remaining six patients had no history of gastrointestinal problems. None of the patients had a history of chest trauma or psychosomatic disorders.



DISCUSSION

 

Typical angina pectoris is described as a squeezing or pressing type of pain that comes on during exertion, usually lasts less than 5 minutes, and may radiate to the left shoulder, left arm, and neck. It is usually relieved with nitroglycerin and rest.33 Atypical angina pectoris manifests unusually with regard to location, duration of pain, and relationship with exertion or stress. A diagnosis of nonspecific chest pain should be considered when the pain is primarily unrelated to stress or exertion, although the location, quality, or radiation of the pain often bear some resemblance to typical angina pectoris.34 When patients seek treatment with chest pain, it is essential to exclude cardiac causes before evaluating for possible noncardiac sources. The initial cardiac work-up should include a history and physical examination followed by diagnostic tests that may vary from patient to patient, depending on the clinical presentation and cardiac risk factors.  These tests include ECG, treadmill exercise test, two-dimensional echocardiogram, MUGA, thallium perfusion scintigraphy, positron emission tomography, Holter monitoring, and, finally, coronary angiography.33 Once cardiac causes are excluded, the pain can be classified as "noncardiac" chest pain.35 However, the description "chest pain of undetermined origin" is currently preferred because it encompasses both noncardiac causes, such as esophageal diseases and psychologic disorders, and obscure cardiac causes, such as microvascular angina and syndrome X, that may be present even though the patient has a normal coronary angiogram.35-38

The chest pain described by our patients was atypical in terms of duration (lasting from minutes to days), setting (not associated with physical exertion, no relief with rest), and lack of response to nitroglycerin. All had normal cardiac studies; consequently, their pain was classified as "non-cardiac" chest pain or "chest pain of undetermined origin." Four patients had minor esophageal findings. None of the patients had chest trauma or psychosomatic/psychologic disorders.

In addition to the above causes of noncardiac chest pain, microvascular angina must also be considered in the differential diagnosis. Microvascular angina is defined as chest pain associated with abnormal vasoconstriction of coronary vessels too small to be visualized by coronary angiography.36 In 1983 Cannon et al36 proposed that the mechanism responsible for this phenomenon is inappropriate coronary vasodilator reserve. However, microvascular angina is usually not considered until the patients meet all of the following criteria: an associated heritable musculoskeletal or neuromuscular disease, cardiomegaly, arrhythmias, and widespread T wave inversion on the electrocardiogram.34 None of our patients satisfied the criteria. Our patients did not have syndrome X, a condition associated with typical chest pain, a positive exercise test, an abnormal coronary arteriogram, or reduced arterial dilatory capacity after dipyridamole stimulation in the absence of organic heart disease.38 Thus, we have described the cases of 11 patients who had severe chest pain with the associated symptoms of heart attack, none of which proved to be of cardiac or established non-cardiac cause. Therefore, we suggest that chest pain in such cases be reclassified; rather than "chest pain of undetermined origin," it should be designated "atypical chest pain associated with breast implants."

In all cases in our study, chest pain developed some time after the patient received breast implants, except for one case in which the patient had a severe attack 1 month after explantation. All patients had explantation and reported improvement or even resolution of the chest pain. Five patients were found to have at least one set of ruptured implants. Surgical pathology reports of the implant capsules showed chronic inflammatory changes in all capsules and foreign body giant cells and refractile translucent foreign material consistent with silicone in some (Table 1). Pectoralis muscle biopsy specimens showed neurogenic atrophy, inflammatory changes, or a neuroma. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the silicone breast implants were responsible for the atypical chest pain syndrome in these patients. The proposed mechanism responsible for the chest pain in our patients is a chronic local inflammatory process stimulated by the breast implants and free silicone (gel bleed, implant rupture) in tissue.

In 1987 Kossovsky et al39 studied the bioreactivity of silicone and showed that the physical presence of the silicone product, associated with a disruption of the contiguity of tissue structure, evokes a chronic inflammatory response, leading to wound healing by second intention. The microscopic sequelae included fibrous tissue encapsulation and contraction, inflammatory cell infiltration, and granuloma formation.39 In the latter part of the same year, the same authors did a study that showed that the inflammatory reaction to silicone is immunologically mediated.40 A chronic inflammatory process induced by silicone may account for the local chest pain and affect the same dermatome as the referred pain from the heart in these patients. In addition, one of our patients had a neuroma found on a pectoralis muscle biopsy specimen. The neuroma could also have been responsible for the chest pain because spontaneous discharges from the terminating axons in a neuroma tend to occur in nociceptive axons (A and C fibers), and it has been proposed that this activity may cause the pain associated with neuroma.41 In patients with implants placed in the retropectoral position, the surgical dissection of the pectoralis muscle itself can contribute to the formation of neuromas.

We suggest that there is an association between breast implants and the development of an atypical chest pain syndrome. Therefore, breast implants should be added to the list of possible noncardiac causes of chest pain. However, the cases of all patients with chest pain should be evaluated for both cardiac and known noncardiac causes of chest pain. If those tests yield normal results, the possibility that the breast implants are the cause of the chest pain should be considered.

Acknowledgment. This study was funded by Mr. George Lindler, a retired Houston builder. Neither Mr. Lindler nor any of the authors have any financial interest in the cases for or against breast implants.

 

TABLE 1. Patients' Implant History and Results of Capsule and Pectoralis Major Muscle Biopsies

TABLE 2. Characteristics of Chest Pain

TABLE 3. Evaluation of Chest Pain

 

References

1. Varga J, Schumacher HR, Jimenez SA: Systemic sclerosis after augmentation mammoplasty with silicone implants. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111:377-383

2. Cronin T, Gerow F: Augmentation mammoplasty, a new natural feel prothesis. Transaction of the 3rd International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amsterdam. Excerpta Medica 1964; 66:41

3. Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations: the FDA's regulation of silicone breast implants. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1993

4. Gayou R, Rudolph R: Capsular contraction around silicone mammary protheses. Ann Plast Surg 1979; 2:62-71

5. Vinnik CA: Spherical contracture of fibrous capsules around breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58:555-560

6. Schmidt GH: Mammary implant shell failure. Ann Plast Surg 1980; 5:369-371

7. Argenta LC: Migration of silicone gel into breast parenchyma following mammary prosthesis rupture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1983; 7:253-254

8. Barker DE, Retsky MI, Schultz S: Bleeding of silicone from bag-gel breast implants, and its clinical relation to fibrous capsule reaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61:836-841

9. Bergman RB, van der Ende AE: Exudation of silicone through the envelope of gel filled breast prostheses: an in vitro study. Br J Plast Surg 1979; 32:31-34

10. Cocke WM, Sampson HW: Silicone bleed associated with double lumen breast prostheses. Ann Plast Surg 1987; 18:524-526

11. Huang TT, Blackwell SJ, Lewis SR: Migration of silicone gel after the "squeeze technique" to rupture a contracted breast capsule. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61:277-283

12. Mason J, Apisarnthanarox P: Migratory silicone granuloma. Arch Dermatol 1981; 117:366-367

13. Delage C, Shane JJ, Johnson FB: Mammary silicone granuloma: migration of silicone fluid to abdominal wall and inguinal region. Arch Dermatol 1978; 108:104-107

14. Snyderman RK, Lizardo JG: Statistical study of malignancies found before, during or after routine breast plastic operation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1960; 25:253-256

15. Morgenstern L, Gleischman SH, Michel SL, et al: Relation of free silicone to human breast carcinoma. Arch Surg 1985;

120:573-577

16. McGrath MH, Burkhardt BR: The safety and efficacy of breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;

74:550-560

17. Hueper WC: Experimental production of cancer by means of implanted polyurethane plastic. Am J Clin Pathol 1960; 34:328-333

18. Autian J, Singh AR, Turner JE, et al: Carcinogenesis from polyurethanes. Cancer Res 1975; 35:1591-1596

19. Hueper WC: Cancer induction by polyurethane and polysilicone plastics. J Natl Cancer Inst 1964; 33:1005-1027

20. Guthrie JL, McKinney RW: Determination of 2,4 and 2,6 diaminotoluene in flexible urethane foam. Anal Chem 1977; 49:1676-1680

21. National Cancer Institute and National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Technical Report. Bioassay of 2,4 diaminotoluene for possible carcinogenicity. CAS No. 95-80-7, NCI-CG-TR-162. Maryland, US Department of Health and Human Services Report 162, 1979

22. Sergott TJ, Baldwin CM, Laub DR: Human adjuvant disease, possible autoimmune disease after silicone implantation: a review of literature, case studies, and speculation for the future. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 78:104-114

23. Baldwin CM, Kaplan EN: Silicone induced human adjuvant disease? Ann Plast Surg 1983; 10:270-273

24. Spiera H: Scleroderma after silicone augmentation mammoplasty. JAMA 1988; 260:236-238

25. Kumagai Y, Shiokawa Y, Medsger TA, et al: Clinical spectrum of connective tissue disease after cosmetic surgery. Arthritis Rheum
1984; 27:1-12

26. Fock KM, Feng PH, Tey BH: Autoimmune disease developing after augmentation mammoplasty: report of 3 cases. J Rheumatol 1984; 11:98-100

27. Varga J, Jimenez S: Augmentation mammoplasty and scleroderma. Arch Dermatol 1990; 126:1220-1222

28. Varga J, Schumacher HR, Jimenez SA: Systemic sclerosis after augmentation mammoplasty with silicone implants. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111:377-383

29. Kaiser W, Biesenback G, Stuby U, et al: Human adjuvant disease: remission of silicone-induced autoimmune disease after explantation of breast augmentation. Ann Rheum Dis 1990; 49:937-938

30. Ostermeyer Shoaib B, Patten BM: Silicone adjuvant breast disease: more neurologic cases. Ann Neurol 1992; 32:254

31. Ostermeyer Shoaib B, Patten BM: An atypical multiple sclerosis syndrome in women with silicone breast implants or silicone fluid injections into breast. Can J Neural Sci 1993; 20:156

32. Ostermeyer Shoaib B, Patten BM: The development of a motor neuron disease syndrome following the insertion of silicone breast implants. South Med J 1993; 86:53

33. Haikshaw BT: Excluding heart disease in the patient with chest pain. Am J Med 1992; 92:46s-51s

34. Waxler EB, Kimbiris D, Dreifus LS: The fate of women with normal coronary arteriograms and chest pain resembling angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1971; 28:25-32

35. Donald CO: Chest pain of undetermined origin: overview of pathophysiology. Am J Med 1992; 92:2s-4s

36. Cannon RO, Watson RM, Rosing DR, et al: Angina caused by reduced vasodilator reserve of the small coronary arteries.

Am J Cardiol 1983; 1:1359-1373

37. Benjamin SB: Microvascular angina and the sensitive heart: historical perspective. Am J Med 1992; 92:52s-55s

38. Vantrappen G: Critique of the session on diagnostic testing. Am J Med 1992; 92:81s-83s

39. Kossovsky N, Heggers JP, Robson MC: The bioreactivity of silicone. CRC Crit Rev Biochem 1987; 3:53-83

40. Kossovsky N, Heggers JP, Robson MC: Experimental demonstration of the immunogenicity of silicone-protein complexes. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21:1125-1133

41. Burchiel KJ, Russell LC: Has the amount of spontaneous electrical activity in experimental neuromas been overestimated? Somatosens Mot Res 1987; 5:63-75

 

Britta Ostermeyer, M.D.

Health Sciences Consult Grp.

3960 Broadway, 3rd Floor

New York, NY 10032

 





<<Back

The information on this website is presented for educational purposes by the Human Adjuvant Disease Corp.