Rants (mostly) and Raves
Worst ideas of the last hundred years
"Hard" plastic packaging - is there any way to open this package without destroying it?
The use of perfectly good songs in TV commercials
Aluminum bats - should be universally banned. They're dangerous; they sound terrible; and they were originally supposed to save money! The laugh track - if you have to tell me when to laugh, it's not funny
Greatest Scams of the last century
Reagonomics - "trickle-down" economics- proposed by an alleged fiscal conservative, no less! (see also: "voodoo economics")
Breakfast Cereal - "just part of a balanced breakfast!"
Cigarettes - why are those 7 tobacco executives not in jail for perjury?
Microsoft Windows - (in particular, Microsoft Word) now there's an evil empire!Every diet except "eating less" and/or "exercising more"
Bottled Water - just proving that we can be talked into buying anything
Clearly, federal legislation is needed to:Require that the "fold" in your credit card statement matches up with the perforation.
Other bad ideas:
* Who decided that fans in hotel room bathrooms were no longer necessary? What changed?
Everyone complains about the weather..
Here in State College, PA, we have all four seasons; they're just not evenly distributed. Roughly speaking..
Spring: April 21 - June 20
Summer: June 21 - August 20
Fall: August 21 - October 20
Winter: October 21 - April 20

Thanks to the late Charles Schultz
If Penn State was subject to truth in advertising, the
two primary semesters would be "Fall" and "Winter".
(If you wanted to
get fancy, the first Intercession (May 20- June 29) could be "Spring";
the second (July 1 - August 18) could be "Summer".)
I have been here
during "Spring" semesters during which the sun did not shine once.
I learned recently that the Native Americans were a lot smarter than we are: they all had the good sense to go south for the winter.
HISTORICAL RANTS
Dec. 02, 2002: Bah, humbug!
A modest proposal (with an assist from Andy Rooney): a ban on public
Christmas displays and music (on the radio, and especially, in stores)
prior to the fourth Friday in November. Thanksgiving is the best
holiday we have; let's give it some respect.
Nov. 14, 2002: Helpful hint
Today's helpful hint from the Penn State Daily Collegian-
Ways to save heat this winter:
1) Keep windows and doors closed.
Sept. 24, 2002: Yet more Dear Old State -
Water-bottle ban (Bruce
E. Helms, Warriors Mark)
I read the Sept. 26 article, "PSU hopes to subdue rowdy fans," with
some concern and an equal amount of frustration. The article quoted
Penn State police Supervisor Clifford Lutz as saying, "The worst and
most dangerous behavior is the throwing of water bottles." No one will
argue that this is a sizeable problem, but, I humbly submit, it is one
the university itself is perpetuating.
I have been a gateman at the stadium for the past 10 years. I was
trained that cans and bottles are not allowed in the stadium. Those of
us assigned to "liquor control" were authorized to search to intercept
such contraband. In the past, water bottles fell into a gray area; we
were often told to allow them, especially on hot days.
Under the new standards, reinforced each week, fans are no longer
allowed to bring water bottles through the gates, period. But once
inside the stadium, anyone can readily purchase a bottle of water.
As an employee responsible for enforcing the policy, I find this
contradiction confusing and frustrating, and I know firsthand that the
fans are equally perturbed by the double standard. If we intend to
eliminate water bottles from the stadium, then why do we sell them
inside? Enquiring minds want to know.
Anyone with half a brain realizes that banning water bottles won't
eliminate bad behavior. But if the "worst and most dangerous behavior"
is indeed the throwing of water bottles, then we can make a substantial
dent in that problem by consistently enforcing the long-existing
no-bottles policy and stopping the sale of bottled water inside the
stadium.
Nov. 19, 2002 Bridge for Sale in Brooklyn
Edy's ice cream is quiety replacing its standard 1/2 gallon container
with ones that hold 1 3/4 quarts. The new and old cartons can be found
side-by-side during the transition, identical in shape, design and
price.
According to their spokesperson, "We'd like to keep the cost at a price
that's more affordable for folks."
Sept. 19, 2002: Quitting while you're ahead
This from Allan Sloan (Newsweek).. who pointed out that Martha Stewart
saved about $55,000 from her insider trading adventure (whether legal
or not). Which in turn cost her MILLIONS when the ensuing scandal
tanked the value of her company. Greed really is counter-productive.
Is this the person to whom I am speaking?
Kudos to Richard Roeper, who recently addressed one of
my pet peeves: the ubiquitous use of the "555" telephone exchange in
movies and tv shows. I have exactly the same reaction when I hear it:
my temporary suspension of belief is abruptly shattered and I am
reminded that I am only watching a movie. As he ingeniously suggested,
$100 could certainly be found in a $50 million budget to buy an actual
phone number, and use it for promotion.
Another good idea from Roeper: the Academy Awards ought to have a
separate category for comedies.
Nov. 13, 2001: And I still can't see
Why aren't the top surfaces of car dashboards covered with a
non-relfective material? Surely every driver has experienced the
anxiety of attempting to drive while squinting through a windshield
that is reflecting the sun off a hard-plastic colored dashboard. Quite
a few years ago I wrote to one of the major automobile manufacturers
with this concern, and they brushed it off with a standard legalise
non-answer form letter. Still, I'm somewhat surprised that no one has
followed up on it. I have found that a piece of black cloth taped to
the dashboard vastly improves visibility. To me, this is a fundamental
issue of safety.
April 24, 2001: Penny-wise...
Here at Dear Old State, they have spent many thousands of dollars
installing new paper dispensers (of both kinds) in the rest rooms. In
order to save money, no doubt, the paper towel dispensers are of the
type that eject about 4 inches of towel each time you pull down on the
lever. This means that you have to depress the lever 6 or 7 times to
get a sufficient amount. (Unless, of course, the machine jams, in which
case you have to press 10 or 12 times in order to get it unstuck.)
Cleverly, these have all been placed at about eye-level, so that in the
time it takes to get enough paper towel to come out, water has run down
to your elbow. ... Now a cynic might suggest that this was the original
plan; by completely discouraging the use of paper towels, eventually
they would make back their investment. ... But I think not, when I
consider the other new dispenser. The advantage of the new tissue
dispensers is that they hold a much larger roll of paper. This means
that many minutes of janitorial time are saved each week because the
roll doesn't have to be changed as often. (I'm sure an expensive cost
analysis came to this conclusion.) Just one problem: in this
new-fangled contraption, the roll is no longer exposed; it is inside
the dispenser. Which means that when the paper invariably sticks to the
roll, one must reach up inside the dispenser to retrieve it. Failing
that, the dispenser must be forced open. I wonder just how long these
are expected to last?
Dec. 6, 2000: The Department of Nothing Better to Do
On Monday, the State College Borough Council passed an ordinance that
demonstrates why I would never choose to live within the Borough
limits. They have now increased to $10 the fine for leaving a recyling
container at the curb beyond its proscribed time. Never mind the lunacy
of even having such an ordinance, Borough staff proposed the increase
because "they now need more time to process the violations."
Dec. 5, 2000: Turn Down that TV!
Once upon a time, the FCC had a rule prohibiting commmercials from
being louder than the TV program in which they are inbedded. Can anyone
explain why for thirty years the FCC has neglected to enforce this
rule? I believe advertisers get around this by playing the entire
commercial at the program's maximum volume. Wouldn't it be a simple
matter to change the regulation so that the average volume of the
commmerical cannot be greater than the average volume of the program?
Who would be against that? Write your Congressperson today.
Nov. 28,2000: "Open Seseme" or "Be sure to eat your spinach"
For many years, one of the benefits of American technology is that
packages have become easier to open. (Is not the flip-top can one of
the great inventions of the 20th century?) Now, we appear to be going
in the opposite direction - you need tools open almost anything. This
is not just an "old people" problem, either. I just watched a college
student pull out a knife to remove the cellophane wrapper from a blank
videotape.
Nov. 20, 2000: Adult Onset Amnesia and Homework
How did we come to believe that homework was such a great idea? As it
is, the typical high school student leaves for school at 7:30 am,
doesn't get home until 3:30 (with a half-hour lunch if they're lucky).
That's pretty close to an 8 hour day, not counting extra-curricular
activities - a schedule that would make many adults insist on overtime
pay. When are kids supposed to have a life? In many households, typical
"family" time has become helping the kids with the homework.
This phenomena is party caused by "adult onset amnesia". That is,
once they have children of their own, most adults have no recollection
of anything in their life that occured before the age of 21. It is also
fueled by the American belief that more is always "better". And
finally, there is "teacher myopia", the belief of many instructors that
at any given time, students are enrolled in only one course - the one
they are teaching. If a student is enrolled in 6 courses, and has a
modest 30 minutes of homework in each one, that adds up to three hours.
I would like to see the evidence that suggests that anything more than
an hour or two of homework per day is productive.
Fourth Ammendment Rights
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and
seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon
probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be
seized."
Nov. 7, 2000:
It amazes me
that more people do not see DUI checkpoints as a blatant violation of
the fourth amendment. Where is the probable cause? In a recent local
newspaper article, a detective made the standard argument, "if you're
not committing a crime you have nothing to worry about". By this logic,
why not have the police go door-to-door searching for illegal drugs,
zoning violations and unauthorized cable TV hook-ups?
I am grateful for the change in the public perception of DUI. Behavior
that was winked at
thirty years ago is now seen as the public danger that it is. But I am
thankful that the Founding Fathers made it so difficult to amend the
Constitution. Otherwise - for many good reasons - by now we would have
repealed the Bill of Rights several times over.
Nov. 6, 2000: Economics 101
To anyone
who questions whether Microsoft is a monopoly which has unfairly
stifled competition, I say two words: "Microsoft Word". Is this the
best word processing software that a free market can produce?
Sept. 20, 2000: More.. too much of a good thing
Drivers in our little town of State College are too polite - to the
point of dangerous. It is never a good idea to "allow" another driver
to do something illegal or dangerous. This point was demonstrated to me
years ago as I traveled south, in the right lane of un-divided
four-lane North Atherton Street (West 322, for those unfamiliar with
area). A line of cars were stopped in the left lane. Apparently, the
lead driver of the line was giving permission to a car traveling
northbound to make a left turn across two lanes of traffic - one of
which was the lane I was in. Needless to say, both of us tried to
occupy the same space at the same time. I can't tell you how many times
I have been cheerfully waved on to do something similar. Thanks, but
no; there are times when I'm glad that I learned to drive in New York.
Speaking of which, this comment (rant) is in response to a recent
discussion on "Car Talk". What is the appropriate point to begin
merging in the face of upcoming road work? This came up years ago
during the construction for the bypass at the intersection with East
College Ave. People would start to get in the right lane a full two
miles before they had to; it drove me crazy. I agree with the caller;
it is much more efficient if everyone waits 'till the end. That way, no
one "cuts in". New Yorkers understand this intuitively.
Sept. 19, 2000: From the perspective of a (former) impatient New Yorker..
No one should be issued a driver's licence in this town until they have
first demonstrated that they know how to make a left turn on a green
arrow. You are not the only person in line to make this turn.
February 22, 2000:
I hope this isn't a local
phenomena, but I haven't noticed it anywhere else. Why are
intersections -even major intersections- so seldom properly plowed? A
snowplow going down one street dumps a trail of snow onto the
intersecting street, but no one ever goes back to clean it up.
Shouldn't intersections be the most important place to keep clear?
February 17, 2000: Too much of a good thing
Here's an opinion that certain to make me unpopular: there are too many
handicap parking spaces. You've seen it - drivers circling a 500 space
parking lot, hoping to be at the right place and time when someone
pulls out. Meanwhile, nine out of ten handicap spaces are available.
All ten of those spaces are not necessary!
Don't misunderstand. Handicap parking is a good thing - as are ramps,
automatic doors, etc. Anyone who has spent any time delivering packages
or equipment knows this benefits the rest of us, too. I think its a
good thing that a handicap space is available for someone who needs it,
but wouldn't 98% of the time be good enough?
January 29, 2000: To See, or Not
It probably shouldn't, but it still amazes me how many people drive in the rain, snow or fog with their headlights off. Clearly (ha), these drivers don't realize that the reason to turn on one's headlights is so that we can see them,
not the other way around. Wouldn't it be great if one rainy day a year,
the police would spend the entire day handing out warnings?