(Article
written by Hidden History - The former dwellers of the
Earth)
http://www.freewebs.com/hiddenhistory
Intro
What you are about to read can be
disturbing and can make you go insane, this is not a joke, so
if you think that you're not ready to tread these waters then
I suggest you don't read any further. For those that want to
know more, you are certifying that you have good control over
your emotions. For those that will read in disbelief, you are
the best readers.
These informations are being made
available because there's something very important that
everyone should know. There is strong evidence to change
everything that is currently accepted about the Earth and its
past inhabitants. I've been completely disturbed by this ever
since it became clear to my eyes. Should I let others know? Am
I meant to do this at all? Will I risk being thought of as a
fool, nutcase, paranoid? Maybe, therefore I encourage you to
verify every single sentence that was written here, and decide
if it makes sense or not.
What I found has always been
there for all to see, all I did was to connect the dots with
lines to form the figure, so the credit goes to all the
researchers that came before me and left their dots. My work
is just another dot, and
hopefully it will inspire others to form the bigger
picture.
Background
Extinguished ancient
civilizations are known to have possessed incredible
technological knowledge, undeniable astronomical, agricultural
and mathematical skills, and perhaps the most impressive and
tangible legacy of their long lost past are the astonishing,
complex gigantic structures made of carved stones that can be
found scattered all over the globe, usually dated to at least
4.000 years ago, the Megaliths.
(For more
info: Ale's Stones; Burnt Hill; Cromeleque dos
Almendres; Pedra Montada; Carnac Stones; Khakassia)
Megalithic monuments can have
stones of weighs varying from 10 tons to more than 150 tons,
and heights that can reach up to 14 feet each.
(For more info: Mnajdra; Hagar Qim; Stonehenge; Ggantija)
Enormous blocks of stone are so
precisely fitted together that even today with our modern
technology it would be impossible to replicate such an
everlasting feat.
For more info:
Kheops Pyramid;
Baalbek; Tiahuanaco; Sacsayhuamán)
It has been proposed in the book
'The World Without Us' by Alan Weisman, that if the whole
humanity suddenly disappeared from the face of the planet, all
the great cities in the world would soon start to crumble due
to natural phenomena and lack of maintenance. Roads would give
way to forests, and skyscrapers would fall in a period of
decades.
Who were the people that built these
magnificent structures? They seemingly knew things that only
now we're starting to grasp. If we look back to the scriptures
of the very first civilization known, the Sumerians (5.000
BC), we find stories about a race called Anunnaki, who
"descended" to Earth and established their cities on the
alluvial plain of Mesopotamia. They supposedly created and
instructed the human race, and in the scriptures, the Anunnaki
are said to have been giants. Roman and Greek's texts speak
about Titans, a race of godlike giants who ruled the Earth
before the Olympians overthrew them.
If these ancient
stories are true, that would explain the largeness of the
constructions, but what does Archeology have to say? Has any
Archeological proof for giants been found besides the
monuments and legends?
The concise answer is yes, tombs,
mummies and bones have appeared and disappeared here and
there, however, no academic register of that nature has ever
been made public.
It has been reported that there were
larger animals, like mammoths, elephant birds that were over 3
meters (10 feet) tall and weighed almost half a tonne, great
lizards and reptiles like the dinosaurs. Ocean creatures were
larger and more numerous, like giant squids, and even a giant
water scorpion that lived 330 million years ago.
Historians and Archeologists tell us that our
ancestors were taller, stronger, but they won't tell us that
they were giants, and for many obvious reasons. Among all
those reasons, likely to be the most important, is that we
simply don't know what happened to them.
The stones
Some of the stones used in the
megalithic monuments were carried from distant places by
methods not clearly understood yet, for instance, the nearest
source of stones of the size represented by the large sarsens
at Stonehenge is on the Marlborough Downs, about 30 km (18mi)
to the NE, and the 'blue-stones' were transported from over
100 miles away. Granite stones for Sacsayhuaman, of weighs
between 361 tons - 440 tons, were transported 20 miles over
mountains terrain. The source of other stones like the Carnac
Stones, Cromeleque dos Almendres, and Pedra Montada, remains
unkown. Could they have been carried from places much farther
than what is believed? What would it mean if we discovered
similar structures on other planets?
Speculations of a
connection between the pyramids in Egypt and planet Mars have
arisen when a humanoid face was photographed among pyramidal
sructures in a region of Mars called Cydonia
Mensae, in a picture taken by
Viking 1 on July 25, 1976. Debates around the uncanny
formation seemed to have settled after new higher-resolution
images suggested that it was just an optical illusion. But
still there is something significant to know: Is there any correlation whatsoever between the
soil and rocks on Mars and the stones of the quarries and
pyramids in Egypt?
Egypt
Egypt is
a country rich in stone and was sometimes even referred to as
the "state of stone". There was an abundance in Egypt both in
quantity and variety of stones, from soft limestone and
alabaster through harder sandstone to granite and basalt. From
the Third Dynasty (about 2700 BC), stone was used extensively
in construction. Most of the material used was fairly rough,
low grade limestone used to build the pyramid core, while fine
white limestone was often employed for the outer casing as
well as to cover interior walls, though pink granite was also
often used on inner walls. Basalt or alabaster was not
uncommon for floors, particularly in the mortuary temples and
as was mudbricks to build walls within the temples (though
often as not they had limestone walls).
The ancient
basalt quarries of Widan Al-Faras (Ears of the Horse), so
named after two hills which stand as a prominent geological
feature at Gabal Qatrani, lie in the north of Fayoum about
80km southwest of Cairo. Not only do they form the best
preserved ancient geological landscape from ancient Egypt, but
this is also the oldest and most extensively-used basalt
outcrop. There are no known archaeologically preserved
equivalents anywhere else in the world.
(sources: material;
Fayoum's ancient quarry under
threat)
Pyramids:
Using ion beams, Demortier
analyzed pieces of material from the pyramid, dated between
2551 and 2528 BC. His collaborators have determined alumino-silicate compounds. “In the
1970s, Josephs Davidovits studied chemical composition of
polymers, with the aim of finding a fire-proof material. He
discovered geo-polymer and some years later found out that the
pyramid blocks have nearly the same composition. Upon his
initiative I analyzed the matterial and found out that it is
synthetic, not natural, especially because of the lixivial
stone.” Said in a much-simplified way, Guy Demortier asserts
that the Egyptians built pyramids on the left bank of Nile
from a kind of concrete, composed of 85
percent of limestone and of 15 percent of binder, containing
water and natron; the latter is an alkaline sodium
compound occurring in this area.
(source: Demortier)
The pyramid samples contained microconstituents
(μc’s) with appreciable amounts
of Si (silicon) in combination with
elements, such as Ca (calcium) and Mg (magnesium), in ratios
that do not exist in any of the potential limestone
sources. The intimate
proximity of the μc’s suggests that at some time these
elements had been together in a solution. Furthermore, between the natural limestone aggregates, the
μc’s with chemistries reminiscent of calcite and dolomite—not
known to hydrate in nature—were hydrated. The ubiquity
of Si and the presence of submicron silica-based spheres in
some of the micrographs strongly suggest that the solution was
basic. Transmission electron microscope confirmed that some of
these Si-containing μc’s were either amorphous or
nanocrystalline, which is consistent with a relatively rapid
precipitation reaction. The sophistication and endurance of
this ancient concrete technology is simply
astounding.
(source:
geopolymer traces in the pyramid)
Samples from six different
sites at the traditionally associated quarries of Turah and
Mokattam have been studied using thin-section, chemical X-Ray
analysis and X-Ray diffraction. The results were compared with
pyramid casing stones of Cheops, Teti and
Seneferu. The quarry
samples are pure limestone consisting of 96-99% Calcite,
0.5-2.5% Quartz, and very small amount of dolomite, gypsum and
iron-alumino-silicate. On the other
hand the Cheops and
Teti casing stones are limestone consisting of: calcite 85-90%
and a high amount of special minerals such as Opal CT,
hydroxy-apatite, a silico-aluminate, which are not found in
the quarries. The pyramid casing
stones are light in density and contain numerous trapped air
bubbles, unlike the quarry samples which are uniformly dense.
If the casing stones were natural limestone, quarries
different from those traditionally associated with the pyramid
sites must be found, but where? X-Ray diffraction of a red
casing stone coating is the first proof to demonstrate the
fact that a complicated man-made geopolymeric system was
produced in Egypt 4,700 years ago.
(source:
http://www.world-mysteries.com/pex_7.htm)
Mars:
Using
atmospherically-corrected TES emissivity spectra, [1] and [2]
identified two major surface types on Mars: basalt and andesite.
From low-resolution (1 ppd) global maps of
the distributions of the two surface types, [1] concluded that
the basalt is restricted to the cratered terrain, and andesite
is concentrated primarily in the northern lowlands, but also
has significant concentrations throughout the cratered
highlands.
(source:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AGUSM.P31A..06R)
Close inspection reveals a
host of rock types, from primitive volcanic material like
olivine-rich basalts to highly processed silica-rich rocks
such as granite, the study found.
The diversity implies that the surface rocks have been
reconstituted many times over an extended period of time,
perhaps into the present era.
Christensen explained:
"You melt the mantle and you get olivine basalts; you melt
them again and you get basalt; you melt that and you make
andesite; you melt that and you make dacite; you melt that and
you make granite."
Mars is "a very complex world
underneath that veneer of basalt," Christensen
said.
(source:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/050706_mars_diverse.html)
The analyzed rocks were partially covered
by dust but otherwise compositionally similar to each other.
They are unexpectedly high in silica and potassium, but low in magnesium compared to martian soils
and martian meteorites.
(source:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/278/5344/1771)
Although the first APXS soil analysis
(A-2) was reported to be almost identical to Viking soils,
ssubsequent analyses demonstrate some variability and a few
significant differences from Viking analyses.
Specifically, soils at
the Pathfinder site generally have higher aluminum and
magnesium, and lower iron, chlorine,
and sulfur. Scooby Doo, which appears to be a sedimentary rock
composed primarily of compacted soil, also exhibits a few
chemical differences form the surrounding soils.
(source:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/MPF/science/mineralogy.html)
NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Spirit has
found a patch of bright-toned soil so rich in silica that scientists propose water must have been
involved in concentrating it.
The silica-rich patch,
informally named "Gertrude Weise" after a player in the
All-American Girls Professional Baseball League, was exposed
when Spirit drove over it during the 1,150th Martian day, or
sol, of Spirit's Mars surface mission (March 29, 2007). One of
Spirit's six wheels no longer rotates, so it leaves a deep
track as it drags through soil. Most patches of disturbed,
bright soil that Spirit had investigated previously are rich
in sulfur, but this one has very little sulfur and
is about 90 percent
silica.
Silica commonly
occurs on Earth as the crystalline mineral quartz and is
the main ingredient in window glass. The Martian silica at the Gertrude Weise patch
is non-crystalline, with no detectable quartz.
(source:
http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20070521a.html)
Conclusion
Basalt and granite are a commom for both Mars and
Egypt, but no limestone was ever found on Mars. Limestone is a
sedimentary rock, its presence would indicate that there were
once oceans or large lakes there. Egypt is rich in limestone
because it was covered by the sea during the Cretaceous
Period.
Silica, aluminum, and magnesium are also found
on both the Martian soil and on the composition of the
pyramids. This would be of little significance, if not for the
Opal CT, a relatively rare substance on Earth, found in
considerable amounts on the Egyptian pyramids.
Silica
is silicon dioxide, non-crystalline silica like Gertrude Weise
on Mars when hydrated is known as Opal-A, it's an amorphous
silica and a necessary ingredient to produce Opal CT. Under
atmospheric conditions of temperature and pressure, Opal-A
would over time turn into Opal CT, and then microquartz.
Silica will also combine with aluminum in the presence of
magnesium or calcium, thus forming alumino-silicate compounds,
and that's also what Demortier collaborators have found on the
pyramids.
Joseph Davidovits, who analyzed the stones
of the pyramids wrote "High amount of Silica exists in the
casing stone of Cheops and Teti, yet, in the associated
quarries there is only quartz and no presence of Opal CT. The
presence of Opal CT in the casing stone of Cheops does not
indicate that it is naturally occuring, since Opal CT is not
found in the quarries."
My question is where did the
Egyptians get the amorphous (non-crystalline) silica in high
amounts to produce their pyramids, when that substance doesn't
commonly occur on Earth?
. . .
Now, what
if part of the raw material used to build the pyramids were
brought from Mars?
I know, that's crazy, but
here's the list:
*2.4 million blocks, weighing 2.5 tons
each, cut, carried and and put together with millimetric
precision by 'people using simple instruments';
*They
were fitted together so perfectly that the tip of a knife
cannot be inserted between the joints even to this
day;
*Granite quarried nearly 800 km away in
Aswan with blocks weighing as much as 60-80 tonnes, was
used for the King's Chamber and relieving
chambers;
*The casing stones of the Great Pyramid and
Khafre's Pyramid (constructed directly beside it) were cut to
such optical precision as to be off true plane over their
entire surface area by only 0.5 mm;
And the list goes
on and on...
John Anthony West writes in reference to
Egypt in particular: "How does a complex civilization spring
full blown into being? Look at a 1905 automobile and compare
it to a modern one. There is no mistaking the process of
'development'. But in Egypt there are no parallels. Everything
is right there from the start."
An interesting thing about Aswan is that it is one of
the driest inhabited places in the world; as of early 2001,
the last rain there was 6 years earlier. As of 18 May 2007,
the last rainfall was a thunderstorm on May 13, 2006. In
Nubian settlements, they generally do not bother to roof all
of the rooms in their houses.
Is it possible that the whole city of Aswan
stands on the soil brought from Mars?
Pictures of Aswan:
No blue light penetrates the
martian atmosphere, as it is absorbed by dust, giving the sky
its red color.
The real
quarry
What would have happened
if the former dwellers of the Earth started using earthly
resources to build their gigantic temples here? The Earth
would most certainly be full of gigantic holes, sort of like
these:
Those are accepted
today as 'meteor impact holes'. Are most of them impact
craters? I don't know. Are all of them meteor impact holes?
Definitely not.
The first thing to ask is: If the soil
was soft enough to absorb the impact and create holes, how
could have the meteors exploded and disappeared?
Not
that they can't desintegrate in an explosion, but if they did
explode there's something crucial to be asked...
The
second thing to ask is: Why the nearly perfect spherical
holes? What does it take for an object to crash and make a
spheral hole? The first indispensable requirement is a perfect
spherical object, meteors and asteroids tend to have irregular
shapes, but let's suppose that all of them are perfect round
structures. For that round structure to make a perfect hole it
has to move on a perfect vertical line towards a surface,
otherwise the hole would be egg-shaped, wider than deeper. The
next thing needed after we have a perfect round object falling
on a perfect vertical line, is for the object to hit a surface
that is softer than itself, so that it can imprint its mark,
and then mysteriously disappear. If the object exploded it
would generate a disorder of particles and ruin all the
previous perfect conditions.
Asteroid 253 Mathilde,
discovered in 1885 by Johann Palisa, has an area of 52 km²
(32mi), and 2 of its largest 'impact craters' are respectively
29.3 km (18mi) and 33.4 km (20mi) wide. They are wider than
the asteroid's average radius! Mathilde has at least 5 craters
larger than 20 km (12mi) in diameter on the roughly 60% of the
body viewed by the NEAR spacecraft in 1997.
Phobos,
the Martian Moon, with an area of 22 km² (13.6mi), bears
a crater that is 10 km (6.2mi) wide, Stickney Crater, almost
as wide as its radius.
It is obvious that craters of
such magnitudes, if really caused by impacts, should have
completely shattered Mathilde and Phobos.
How could
those immense, successive, devastating 'impacts' not have
completely destroyed that fragile asteroid? How are they still
in their gravitational fields, both Phobos and Mathilde? There
are two possible explanations, either some extremely strange
force held them in place and steady, or that what we call
impact craters may be a totally different
thing.
The pattern on Mars:
Mercury -
holes found: zillions, meteors found: 0?
This next
picture is a very peculiar and strong proof that not only has
intelligent life visited Mars before us, but that scientists
are well informed of that. Here you can see two triangular
shaped rocks that had their upper parts sliced off. They were
carefully positioned in the center of the image taken by the
probe, two of a kind side by side among thousands of other
ordinary rocks:
(click
to enlarge)
The name of that previous picture is Twin
Peaks...
A
message?
As strange as it may sound I'm
not interested in conspiracies, ufos, and I don't believe in
reptilians, what I know now is that something very important
happened in the past, and that story is not being told in
school books. So, what's the meaning of all this? The stones,
the temples, the legends, the marks on other planets, us, what
is it all about? One thing is clear, those that lived long
before us were very careful with the places that they've
chosen to settle their civilizations, and with the materials
that they used to build their cities. They were so diligent
with their work that they left their unmistakable traces in
all parts of the world to be found thousands of years later,
and these traces would lead to a serious implication, that we
were invited to take part in this creation.
One could
picture the human race as fishes in an aquarium, but I think
that what time has shown is that we are co-authors of a
masterpiece, and we are just beginning. The question is now
upon us, what honourable everlasting legacy are we leaving
behind for the generations in the future?
