The Hidden Code at the Scale of 1/16
(See article: The Great Pyramid and the Earth's Axis to see how the following is related).
In English 'Feet' measurements, it has been established that the Great Pyramid is 481 feet high and 756 feet wide at the base, while the sides slope at an angle of 51.84 degrees.
As an aid to some of my own research, I created a scale drawing of the pyramid using decimal points – i.e., 481 x 756 pt – each point or unit representing an English foot. For a more accurate figure, the Great Pyramid has been calculated at 481.0909 feet high and the four bases measure between 755 and 756 ft wide. The base measurements of the Great Pyramid are:
North: 755.43 ft.
East: 755.88 ft.
West: 755.77 ft.
South: 756.08 ft.
I am now going to show how we can work with contemporary measuring systems to find the position of the King’s Chamber on a cross-section drawing of the GP (SHOWING NO INTERNAL FEATURES) looking towards the west. Although what I am about to reveal is very simple, it is quite difficult to convey, so please bear with me.
Taking the overall figures of 756 feet wide by 481 feet high for the Great Pyramid, we will draw a rectangle using the same values in DECIMAL POINTS – each point or unit representing a foot.

Figure 1: Rectangle measuring 756 x 481pts.
We find that the sloping side of the Great Pyramid of 51.84 degrees (51.51 in minutes of arc) fits quite well from corner to corner.

Figure 2: Adding the sloping sides of 51.84 degrees and in ‘minutes of arc’, 51º51’
The code I am about to reveal is all within the 'southern half' of the Great Pyramid. I am going to show this code through using a two dimensional cross-sectioned drawing of the Great Pyramid looking towards the west, and so in these drawings the code is entirely in the left half. I found that this code is hidden within the geometry of the Great Pyramid by a factor of 16 to 1.
If we halve the Great Pyramid we will have a rectangle of 481 x 378 pts, and so dividing 481 by 16 we get 30.0625.
If we divide 378 by 16 we get 23.625.
However, I am going to use drawings of the whole pyramid because this is what people are familiar with, and so dividing 756 by 32 - being twice times 16 - we still get 23.625. [3]
Taking our 481 x 756 pt rectangle which represents the Great Pyramid in two dimensions, we find that a rectangle of 30.0625 x 23.625 pt - being half the large rectangle - fits 32 times along the length of the base and 16 times from the bottom to top. This would mean that a rectangle encompassing the whole image of the Great Pyramid fits 16 times along the base and 16 times from bottom to top and at this scale it would fit 256 times inside the large rectangle. (See figure 3).

Figure 3: Scale drawing of the Great Pyramid 756 x 481pts.
Sides 51.84 degrees and in ‘minutes of arc’, 51º51’
Again, if we were to work with just one half of the large rectangle - the left half - this rectangle of 30.0625 x 23.625 would fit 16 along the base and 16 times from bottom to top. This one half would also fit inside the whole rectangle 512 times. We will come back to these figures - 256 and 512 - later to see how they relate to the precessional cycle of 25920 years.
We have the first two values being 30.0625 and 23.625.
The third value emerges when we subtract 23.625 from 30.0625. The result is 6.4375, and this number is equally important as we will see.
Now taking the 23.625 number first, WE APPLY THE SAME NUMBER IN DEGREE ANGLES and drawing a line of 23.625º, we begin this line from the bottom left-hand corner point or south edge of the pyramid.

Figure 4: The 23.625º angle from the bottom left corner
We then take the 6.4375 number which we arrived at by subtracting 23.625 from 30.0625, and again applying the same value in degrees we make a line of 6.4375º. We begin this line from the apex of the pyramid and have the line leaning inward to the left so that both the 23.625º and 6.4375º lines cross each other within the left half of our image of the Great Pyramid.

Figure 5: The 6.4375º angle from the Apex
Ok, so what is the real result of this?
Well now if we superimpose a scale-drawing of the GP in cross-section showing all the internal features over the simple drawing above along with these two lines, we find that THE POINT WHERE THESE TWO LINES INTERSECT EACH OTHER IS THE EXACT POINT ON WHICH THE KING'S CHAMBER IS CENTRED.

Figure 6: The position of the King’s Chamber!
To recap, using decimal points, this position is taken from . . .
1,) the 1/16th measurements of 23.625 and 30.0625 pts.
2,) subtracting 23.525 from 30.0625 by which we get 6.4375 pts.
3,) using these same values by translating them into degree angles.
4,) applying these angles to this scaled drawing of the Great Pyramid by beginning the 6.4375º angle from the apex and the 23.625º angle from the bottom left hand corner or southern edge.
We have simply pinpointed the location of the King’s Chamber by using measurement systems that were NOT KNOWN by the Ancient Egyptians, which is quite amazing in its implications.
OK, this gives us the position of the King’s Chamber – it being offset from the centre of the pyramid, but what is the meaning behind this position of the KC?
Well, it must all be related to the earth’s geophysics related to the tilt of the earth’s axis as I have already revealed here.
Incidentally, if we want to be really precise, about the height of the GP, which is said to be 481.0909 feet high, we can divide 481.0909 by 16 and get 30.06818125. And if we then subtract 23.625 from 30.06818125 we get 6.44318125.
But let’s now shorten and round-off these values to the figures . . . 30º . . . 23.6º and . . . 6.4º.
If we now draw a vertical line through the centre of the King’s Chamber to represent the Ecliptic Plane, and then a horizontal line through the centre of the King’s Chamber to represent the Ecliptic Pole – and in accord with the GP’s N and S orientation – then from here we will see how this encoded information about the earth emerges and how the apex is actually pointing to the location of the Great Pyramid on the earth . . . (see fig 4 on this page).
As said, the angle that runs from the south-corner edge of the GP and through the centre of the King’s Chamber is 23.6º. This represents the earth’s Axis.
We will now add another 23.6º line perpendicular (90º) to the Axis line to represent the Equator and we find that it runs through both the King’s Chamber and the Queen’s Chamber. This line exits the top of the GP on the left and 23.6-degrees from the vertical line running through the King’s Chamber which represents the Ecliptic.
The Great Pyramid is almost 30º N from the 23.5º (now 23.43º) equator (being 23.6º in the GP), and the Great Pyramid (represented by its apex) is shown as 6.4º from the Ecliptic Plane (being the closest the GP comes to the ecliptic plane as the earth rotates).
When we place all these lines on the centre of the King’s Chamber, which appears to symbolise the ‘core-centre of the earth’, we find that the apex would mark the location of the Great Pyramid on the earth – again 6.4º from the ecliptic and some 30 degrees from the equator.
As we know the capstone or apex is missing – but this appears to be for a specific reason which I won’t go into here.
Again, the values of 23.6 + 6.4 = 30 which are hidden within the geometry of the Great Pyramid by a factor of 16 to 1 becomes meaningful in the context of these coordinates relating to the earth’s Axis, Equator and Ecliptic – the GP’s position from the Ecliptic and the Equator as represented by the apex, being the concluding factor.

We have already seen in my article The Great Pyramid and the Earth’s Axis, that if we were to take a text-book diagram of the tilted earth in relation to the ecliptic plane and size it and orientate it the right way, it would fit the Great Pyramid and its internal features exactly – especially if before-hand we were to draw a small pyramid on the surface of the earth and at the location where the GP is from the equator.
We would find that when we superimpose this diagram the right way over the GP with the axis and equator lines and the ecliptic plane all intersecting the King’s Chamber which represents the core centre of the earth, then we would find that the small pyramid we have drawn on the earth would align with the apex exactly.
Could this be the reason why the Great Pyramid was built 30 degrees from the equator?
If the Great Pyramid had been built exactly on the equator, it would be difficult to see how this clever design would have been implemented.
Again, the King’s Chamber is not only in the ideal symbolic position for the core centre of the earth but it’s also aligned symbolically with the ecliptic plane of the sun, which again - symbolically - would be perfect.
As many of us will know, the location of the Great Pyramid is on the 30th parallel – almost 30 degrees north from the equator. It is actually 29º 58’ 51” N – being only 2,125 metres short of exactly 30 degrees north latitude. One could take issue with this of course, but this relatively small discrepancy could be explained by the GP having been constructed on the closest suitable site to this 30º N location and perhaps because it was built over an existing great mound or bedrock which was already worshipped as the ‘primordial mound’ of creation.
Again, in its geometrical structure it is a fact that the GP contains encoded information about the obliquity of the earth’s axis. We could of course argue whether it was intentionally encoded or not – being just a coincidence, but it appears that a lot of people throughout history already knew this because they have encoded the angles 23.5º (23.6º) 30º . . . 6.5º (6.4º) and 52º in many different sources. We find these angles in 17th century paintings over and over again – especially those on the Vanitas theme - see here.
So if we now take the 755 ft measurement which is dominant in three of the base sides instead of the 756 measurement, which is only relevant to the south side, and if we halve 755, we get 377.5. If we divide 377.5 by 16 we get 23.59375. The 375 on the end is significant as 100 subtract 375 = 625.
As I will explain in a moment, one could interpret this to mean that in ‘minutes of arc’ the earth’s axis was 23º 59’ at the time it was built and that we are being told this which is mind-boggling. This is interesting as it has been calculated that the earth’s axis during the epoch of 2,450 BC was 23.96 degrees and in minutes of arc was 23º 58’, so it’s close enough to today’s estimates.
But the question is, if the ancient Egyptians employed Royal Cubits for straight measurement and Seked for angles, [4] then how is it that we can come to these ‘unexpected’ conclusions by using the English ‘feet’, the ‘degrees’ and ‘angle’ systems?
And why is it that by reducing to 16, which brings us to the sexigesimal system, and then subtracting the side measurements from the height measurements, we can use the same numbers expressed in degree measurements – to not only pinpoint the location of the King’s Chamber, which is offset from the centre – but also to discover that the capstone is pointing to the location of the Great Pyramid on the earth – being 30º from the equator and 6.4º from the ecliptic – the earth’s equator then, being almost 24º (23.98º) from the horizontal?
There is more . . .
One coincidence is that we find that the 0.625 is related to the sexigesimal system of ‘minutes of arc’ – i.e., 60 minutes to a degree instead of 100 units to a degree in the decimal system:
10 divided by 6 is 1.6.
100 divided by 6 is 16.
1000 divided by 60 is 16.
So 10 divided by 16 is 0.625 – being one 10th of a degree in minutes of arc.
As mentioned earlier, if we divide 480 by 16 we get 30 – being 16 measures of 30 feet.
To anyone who understands this, it would look as if attention is being brought to the ‘arc’ measuring system, but surely this is a coincidence?
Furthermore, 5 x 5184 - relating to the degree angle of the four sides of the GP = 25920.
480 feet divided 16 times is 30.
As we know an English foot is divided into 12 inches.
480 feet divided into inches is 5,760 inches.
5,760 divided by 16 is 360 – the number of degrees in a circle – and the number of days in a year if the earth’s axis were upright so it has been said. Again, 360 inches is 30 feet.
This figure of 5,760 also has some relevance with the Precessional Cycle of 25,920 years (according to Plato and is also the mythical estimate based on multiples of 9, because it was easier to encode).
5,760 divided by 2 = 2,880.
25,920 divided by 2,880 = 9.
As said, the sloping sides of the Great Pyramid are 51.84º – which is a value related to twice the precessional cycle of 25,920 years – 2 x 25,920 = 51,840 years.
Author Scott Creighton pointed out that the square of 5184 = 72 - a significant precessional number, in that it takes roughly 72 years for the sun to move 1 degree in a 360 circle again taking roughly 25,920 years.
Because it sits some 30 degrees from the equator, 30 is indeed a number associated with the Great Pyramid.
If the Great Pyramid were 480 feet high it would have had 16 invisible courses consisting of 30 feet each, and each containing 360 inches - being the number of degrees in a circle and again the number of days in a year if the earth was perfectly upright.
Or, perhaps it would have 60 invisible courses consisting of 8 feet each, with the missing capstone of 8 feet representing 1/60th of 2,880 inches. Again 9 x 2,880 = 25,920 – the number of years in the precessional cycle according to Plato.
As we can see, this 480 measure is a more sacred all-round configuration. And still using the 480 ft measurement, we could go further as we find that there are 64 invisible courses – each course being 7.5 feet in height – the original capstone possibly being 7.5 feet high, and representing the “missing 64th” – thereby connecting an ancient Egyptian concept surrounding the fractions conveyed in the ‘Eye of Horus’ symbol.
However, it could be argued that the above, although it contains much that is significant, is merely coincidental, as the height of the Great Pyramid being 280 Royal Cubits, comes out at 481 feet and 481 feet divided by inches is 5,772 inches.
5,772 divided by 16 is 360.75 – a less meaningful number, which is only interesting because it is almost perfect.
PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION