|
Trinity: Oneness in unity not in number: Yachid vs. Echad
"Hear, O Israel! Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one [Echad]!" Deuteronomy 6:4
|
|
|
|

|
Yachid vs. Echad The most important verse Jews memorized in the Bible was Deut 6:4: "Hear, O Israel! Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one [Echad]!" There are a few words in Hebrew that the Holy Spirit could have used a word the has one exclusive meaning: the numeric, solitary oneness of God ("yachid" or "bad"). |
|
Instead the Holy Spirit chose to use the Hebrew word, "echad" which is used most often as a unified one, and sometimes as numeric oneness. For example, when God said in Genesis 2:24 "the two shall become one [echad] flesh" it is the same word for "one" that was used in Deut 6:4. |

|
|
This is most troubling for Anti-Trinitarians since the word yachid, the main Hebrew word for solitary oneness, is never used in reference to God. Click here for a detailed look at this fascinating word study. |
|
|
|
Introduction:
The debate over the implications of the various usage's of two Hebrew words [Yachid vs. Echad] translated "one" is as intriguing as it is complex.
The etymology of the Hebrew word yachid (one) is derived from echad in the same way that the English word "only" is derived from the word "one". That yachid is from the same root family of words as echad is seen from the similarity of spelling. So "yachid" is to "only", what "echad" is to "one".
About the only fact that all on both sides of the debate agree on, is that yachid indisputably means an absolute numeric one and is never used to describe God. Anti-Trinitarians would naturally expect such a word to be commonly used of God. Having said this, when we cross over to the Greek, in parallel passages that use "yachid", we find a correspondence with the Greek word "mono". We do find "mono" used of God in the New Testament describing his oneness. So while yachid is never used of God’s oneness in the Old Testament, the corresponding word "mono" is used of God’s oneness in the New Testament. But this is exactly what Trinitarians would expect to be the case because there are three persons in the one God.
Hebrew is a very simple language, but Greek is quite complex and specific. Some Trinitarians overemphasize the clear differences between "yachid and echad" in the Hebrew. Yes, "echad" is a unified one, but it is also used of a numeric one as well. Yes, "yachid" is never used in reference to God's oneness, but the word "bad" is used and it is synonymous with numeric oneness to yachid. When we cross over to the Greek, we find a similar blur in the words used of God that mean unified versus numeric oneness. If the Holy Spirit intended to convey Trinity hidden in the Old Testament in the words "yachid and echad", we would expect such a distinction to be even more pronounced in the Greek, since it is a more specific language than Hebrew. But we find exactly the same in the New Testament as we do in the old, namely a combination of words meaning unified versus numeric oneness being employed to describe God's oneness.
Having said all this, perhaps the Holy Spirit did want us to look back at the Old Testament and perceive the differences between "yachid and echad". Add to this plural pronouns like: "let US make man in OUR image" and Trinitarians have irrefutable evidence of the trinity in the Old Testament.
Trinitarians can be confident that such diversity of words like "yachid and echad" used to describe God's oneness is exactly what we would expect to find. Anti-Trinitarians and Unitarians are nervous about the fact that the most direct and important statements in the Old Testament about God's oneness (Deut 6:4) use the unified one [echad] instead of a words that always mean numeric oneness like "yachid" and "bad".
Perhaps one of the strongest arguments the Trinitarian can use in the discussion of the words "echad" and "yachid" is the fact that Jews shortly after the rise of Christianity removed "echad" from Deut 6:4 and added in its place the word "yachid".
Jesus quoted Deut 6:4 in Mk 12:29 and chose the "unified oneness" word "hen" which is the same word used by Jesus in Mt 19:5, "the two shall become one (hen) flesh. It is significant that Jesus did not use "mono" in Mk 12:29. The word "hen" directly corresponds to "echad" which was used in Deut 6:4. Both texts used "unified oneness" words rather than absolute numeric oneness to the exclusion of all others.
| |
|
|
|
ECHAD |
UNIFIED ONE |
HEN |
|
Gen 2:24 |
two become one Man + Woman
|
Matt 19:5 |
|
Deut 6:4 |
God is one Father + Son + Spirit
|
Mk 12:29 |
|

|
ONE
|

|
| |
|
|
A. Jews, after the rise of Christianity, were compelled to change the Hebrew word for "one" in Deut 6:4, from echad to yachid:
Anti-Trinitarian who say the use of echad is insignificant in the Old Testament must be reminded that shortly after the rise of Christianity, the Jews replaced "echad" with "yachid" in Deut 6:4.
If the use of "echad" instead of "yachid" in Deut 6:4 gave no help to the early Christians in proving to the Jews that Yahweh of the Old Testament was a multi-personal God, then Jews would not have felt compelled to change the word. If it is really that insignificant, then they would have told us the argument Christians were using to prove trinity is invalid to native Hebrews who know and speak the language. But instead, the Jews responded by changing the word in Deut 6:4 from the unified oneness (echad) to the numeric oneness (yachid).
The Talmud was written either by Judah the Prince (135-219 A.D.) or as late as the 9th century A.D. The important point, is that the Talmud did not exist before about 200 AD, long after Christian theology had made its impact.
A man named Moses Maimonides who lived in the 12th century AD, was Jewish Rabbi and philosopher who compiled a creed with 13 articles. In this creed, the word yachid is used, instead of echad: "I believe with a perfect faith that the Creator, blessed be His name, is an absolute one [yachid]".
Modern Jewish prayer books use the word "yachid" to describe God.
It must be most troubling for Jews that their word of choice (yachid) to describe God's oneness is never actually used in the Bible. They should give up their 2000 year old rebellious temper tantrum and become Christians! Then they could use Bible words to describe the one true God!
B. Five different words for "one" in the Bible:
|
Word |
Definition/texts |
usage |
|
Echad
OT |
unified one: Gen. 2:24; Deut. 6:4 absolute numeric one: Ezekiel 33:24 |
Used of God’s oneness |
|
Yachid
OT |
Always absolute numeric one: Judges 11:34 |
Never used of God’s oneness |
|
Bad
OT |
Absolute numeric one: Isaiah 37:20 |
Used of God’s oneness |
|
Hen
NT |
Unified one: John 10:30; Matthew 19:5; Mk 12:29 absolute numeric one: Galatians 3:20 |
Used of God’s oneness |
|
Monos
NT |
absolute numeric one: Matthew 24:36; 1 Timothy 1:17 |
Used of God’s oneness |
C. "Echad", denoting a unified one in the OT is translated only "hen" in the NT:
Here are a number of Old Testament passages that are either directly quoted in the New Testament, or contain parallel thoughts.
|
Unified one |
Echad Old Testament |
Hen New Testament |
|
Two shall become one flesh |
Gen 2:24 |
Mt 19:5 |
|
God is one |
Deut 6:4 |
Mk 12:29,32; Jn 10:30; 1 Cor 8:4; Eph 4:6 |
|
one people |
Gen 11:6; 34:16, 22 |
John 11:52; Gal 3:28 |
|
one heart |
2 Chron 30:12; Jer 32:39 |
Acts 4:32; Phil 1:27; 2:2 |
|
Two objects becoming one |
sticks: Ezek. 37:17 |
flocks: Jn 10:16 |
|
assembly as one |
Ezra. 2:64 |
Romans 12:5, 15:6; 1 Cor 12:5,12 |
D. "Echad", denoting an absolute and numeric oneness in the OT is translated both "hen" and "monos" in the NT:
Echad is used to designate a single individual or thing, numerical oneness. In these texts we consider Echad to be synonymous with yachid. Yet we find the parallel passages of thought in the New Testament are translated from two different Greek words: "hen" and "monos". Like "echad", "hen" is used in two different ways: unified one and numeric one. "Monos", however, always means a numeric one. This means we do not find a consistent pattern between the Hebrew and Greek languages.
|
Numerically one and only |
Echad
Old Testament |
Hen & Monos
New Testament |
|
12 gates of Jerusalem |
Ezekiel 48:31-34 [echad] |
Revelation 21:21 [hen] |
|
There is yet one prophet |
1 Kings 22:8: Micaiah [echad] |
Elijah: Romans 11:2 [monos] |
|
One man alone |
Ezekiel: 33:24: Abraham [echad] |
2 Timothy 4:11 Luke [monos] |
|
One of the angels |
Michael: Daniel 10:13 [echad] |
Revelation 17:1 Angel [hen] |
|
Numbering individuals in sequence |
Joshua 12:9-24 31 Canaanite kings [echad] |
Mark 14:19 the disciples [hen] |
E. "Yachid": solitary one and only, numerically one
"He said, "Take now your son, your only [yachid] son, whom you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I will tell you." " Genesis 22:2
"He said, "Do not stretch out your hand against the lad, and do nothing to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only [yachid] son, from Me." " Genesis 22:12
"and said, "By Myself I have sworn, declares Yahweh, because you have done this thing and have not withheld your son, your only [yachid] son, " Genesis 22:16
"Now she was Jephthah’s one and only [yachid] child; besides her he had no son or daughter." Judges 11:34
"When I was a son to my father, Tender and the only son [yachid] in the sight of my mother, " Proverbs 4:3
"Mourn as for an only son [yachid]" Jeremiah 6:26
"And I will make it like a time of mourning for an only son [yachid]" Amos 8:10
"they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son [yachid]" Zechariah 12:10
F. "Bad" corresponds to "Yachid" and "monos"
"You are the God, You alone [bad], of all the kingdoms of the earth." 2 Kings 19:15
"You alone [bad] are Yahweh." Nehemiah 9:6
"You alone [bad], Yahweh, are God." Isaiah 37:20
G. "Mono": solitary one and only, numerically one, directly corresponds to yachid in the New Testament:
You shall worship the Lord your God, and serve Him only [mono]. Matthew 4:10
""But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone [mono]." Matthew 24:36
Who can forgive sins, but God alone [mono]?" Luke 5:21
"My judgment is true; for I am not alone [mono] in it, but I and the Father who sent Me." John 8:16
"This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only [mono] true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent." John 17:3
"to the only [mono] wise God, through Jesus Christ" Romans 16:27
"Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only [mono] God" 1 Timothy 1:17
"who alone [mono] possesses immortality and dwells in unapproachable light" 1 Timothy 6:16
"deny our only [mono] Master and Lord, Jesus Christ. " Jude 4
to the only God [mono] our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord Jude 25
H. "Monogenes" also corresponds to "yachid" only begotten:
Jesus raised an only begotten [monogenes] son: Luke 7:12
Jesus raised an only begotten [monogenes] daughter: Luke 8:42
Jesus cast out a demon from an only begotten [monogenes] son: Luke 9:38
Isaac was the only begotten [monogenes] of Abraham: Hebrews 11:17
Jesus was the only begotten [monogenes] of God: John 1:14; 18; 3:16,18; 1 John 4:9
|
|
Yachid
Old Testament |
Monogenes
New Testament |
|
Isaac the only begotten |
Genesis 22:2 |
Hebrews 11:17 |
|
Jesus the only begotten |
Zechariah 12:10 |
John 1:14; 18; 3:16,18; 1 John 4:9 |
|
Only begotten children of men |
Judges 11:34 |
Luke 7:12; 8:42 |
I. God is one: Echad, bad, hen, monos
"Hear, O Israel! Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one [echad]!" Deuteronomy 6:4
"You are the God, You alone [bad], of all the kingdoms of the earth." 2 Kings 19:15
"You alone [bad] are Yahweh." Nehemiah 9:6
"You alone [bad], Yahweh, are God." Isaiah 37:20
"And Yahweh will be king over all the earth; in that day Yahweh will be the only one [echad], and His name the only one[echad]." Zechariah 14:9
"the two shall become one [hen] flesh" Matthew 19:5
"you do not seek the glory that is from the one and only [monos] God?" John 5:44
"I and the Father are one [hen]." John 10:30
"This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only [monos] true God" John 17:3
"since indeed God is one [hen]" Romans 3:30
"to the only [monos] wise God, Amen." Romans 16:27
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one [hen] in Christ Jesus. " Galatians 3:28
"there is no God but one [hen]" 1 Corinthians 8:4
"yet for us there is but one [hen] God, the Father, from whom are all things and we exist for Him; and one [hen] Lord, Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we exist through Him." 1 Corinthians 8:6
"Now a mediator is not for one party only; whereas God is only one [hen]." Galatians 3:20
"There is one [hen] body and one [hen] Spirit, one [hen] hope, one [hen] Lord, one [hen] faith, one [hen] baptism, one [hen] God and Father of all who is over all and through all and in all." Ephesians 4:4-6
"Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only [monos] God" 1 Timothy 1:17
"which He will bring about at the proper time—He who is the blessed and only [monos] Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords, who alone [monos] possesses immortality and dwells in unapproachable light, whom no man has seen or can see. To Him be honor and eternal dominion! Amen." 1 Timothy 6:16
"For there is one [hen] God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus," 1 Timothy 2:5
"You believe that God is one [hen]. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder." James 2:19
"For certain persons deny our only [monos] Master and Lord, Jesus Christ." Jude 4
"the only [monos] God our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen." Jude 25
Conclusion:
When speaking of God’s oneness, what we see is a mix of words, both in the Hebrew and the Greek. There does not appear to be a clear pattern of usage: In the Old Testament, "echad" is used both as a unified one and numeric oneness and "bad" is also used which means a numeric oneness. Similarly, in the New Testament, "hen" is used both as a unified one and numeric oneness and "monos" is also used which means a numeric oneness.
These facts delight Trinitarians and send Anti-Trinitarians and Unitarians alike scurrying for the shadows. While Trinitarians would expect both kinds of words to be used in reference to God, Anti-Trinitarian are left with their mouths hanging open in bewilderment. To make matters even worse, the word "monos" is not only used of God’s oneness (John 5:44; 17:3), but also Jesus is said to be the "monos Master", "monos Lord" and "monos Sovereign" (1 Timothy 6:16; Jude 4). This proves that Jn 17:3 no more excludes Jesus from being "true God" than 1 Timothy 6:16 and Jude 4 exclude the Father from being Master, Lord and Sovereign. (The official interpretation of 1 Timothy 6:16 the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Watchtower is that 1 Timothy 6:16 is speaking solely of Christ.)
Anti-Trinitarians who reject the fact that "echad" means a unified one between individuals, should always remember that shortly after the rise of Christianity, the Jews replaced "echad" with "yachid" in Deut 6:4. Obviously these Jews who knew the Hebrew language 2000 years ago, saw something modern Unitarians do not.
- So in the end it is a win-win for Trinitarians! It is most devastating to Jews and Anti-Trinitarians that Deut 6:4 uses "echad", the word for a unified one between individuals. This laid the ground work for the Trinity to be revealed in Christ and his apostles who could look back to the most important Jewish Bible verse and show them Jesus was there too! Instead of converting to Christianity, the Jews twisted the word of God and started telling lies about the resurrection of Jesus.
Old Testament Trinity Proof Texts
|
|
|
|
|
Genesis 1:26 |
|
"Let US make man in OUR image": Three plural pronouns, (We, Us, Our) used 6 different times in four different passages: Gen 1:26; 3:22; 11:7; Isa 6:8. The unanimous opinion of the apostolic Fathers was that the Father was talking to Jesus. |
|
|
|
|
|
Genesis 19:24 |

|
"Then Yahweh [on earth in human form] rained on Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from Yahweh [in spirit form in heaven] out of heaven. Genesis 19:24. In this text Abraham is visited by three individuals, one being Yahweh and the other two angels. Here we have God on the earth (Jesus) and God in heaven (father) sending down fire from heaven. This incident when Abraham met with Yahweh God, is what Jesus referred to when he said, "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad." (John 8:56) The unanimous opinion of the apostolic Fathers was that Jesus visited Abraham in Genesis 18 and 19. |
|
|
|
|
|
Isaiah 6 |
|
Isaiah saw the glory of Yahweh, but John says that Isaiah really saw the glory of Christ. This proves Jesus is Yahweh. Combine this with the fact the Yahweh said, "Who will go for US" is a plural pronoun indicating more than one person in the Godhead. |
|
|
|
|
|
Isaiah 40-55 |

|
Jesus echoes the "I AM" statements in Isaiah chapters 40-55. This spectacular link explores over 20 different passages in Isaiah and John. |
|
|
|
|
|
Isaiah 45:23-24 |

|
I have sworn by Myself, The word has gone forth from My mouth in righteousness And will not turn back, That to Me every knee will bow, every tongue will swear allegiance. "They will say of Me, 'Only in the Lord are righteousness and strength.' Men will come to Him, And all who were angry at Him shall be put to shame. |
|
|
|
|
|
Micah 5:2 |

|
But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Too little to be among the clans of Judah, From you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of eternity. |
|
|
|
|
New Testament Trinity Proof Texts
|
|
|
|
|
Mark 2:5-12 |

|
Why does this man speak that way? He is blaspheming; who can forgive sins but God alone? |
|
|
|
|
|
John 1:1 |
 |
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. |
|
|
|
|
|
John 5:18 |
 |
For this cause therefore the Jews were seeking all the more to kill Him, because He not only was breaking the Sabbath, but also was calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God. |
|
|
|
|
|
John 8:58 |
 |
"Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad." The Jews therefore said to Him, "You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?" Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am." Therefore they picked up stones to throw at Him; but Jesus hid Himself, and went out of the temple. |
|
|
|
|
|
John 10:33 |
 |
"I and the Father are one." The Jews took up stones again to stone Him. … Has it not been written in your Law, ‘I said, you are gods’?" |
|
|
|
|
|
John 12:41 + Isaiah 6 |
|
A simple reading of the context of John 12 makes it clear that John is saying that Isaiah saw the glory of Jesus Christ himself in Isaiah 6. This proves Jesus is Yahweh. |
|
|
|
|
|
John 19:7 |
|
The Jews answered him, "We have a law, and by that law He ought to die because He made Himself out to be the Son of God."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Romans 14:11 |

|
For it is written, "As I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bow to Me, And every tongue shall give praise to God." |
|
|
|
|
|
2 Corinthians 13:14
Philippians 2:1-2 |
|
The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit, be with you all. |
|
|
|
|
|
Philippians 2:9-11 |

|
"Therefore also God highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those who are in heaven, and on earth, and under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." |
|
|
|
|
|
Revelation 22:3 |

|
"And there shall no longer be any curse; and the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it, and His bond-servants shall [latreuo] serve Him."
Jesus worshipped in the highest sense of "latreuo" |
|
|
|
|
Refuted!
Refuted!
|
|
|
|

|
Anti-Trinitarians misuse these passages to prove the Holy Spirit is not a person: |
|
|
|
Anti-Trinitarian proof texts refuted
#1 The Holy Spirit is the personification of God's power.
#2 The Holy Spirit is directly called the power of God in Luke 1:35.
#3 The Holy Spirit is neuter gender in scripture proving it is an "it" not a person.
#4 The Bible calls the Holy Spirit an "it". John 1:32; Rom 8:16,26; 1 Pet 1:11
#5 The Holy Spirit was poured out, fell upon, filled men. Acts 2:4
#6 How could the holy spirit fill 120 disciples at the same time?
#7 The Holy Spirit is used to "anoint" people Acts 10:38
#8 Whenever the Holy Spirit speaks in one text, another text says other persons were actually speaking.
#9 The actual Greek "The Spirit the Holy" proves the Holy Spirit is not a person.
#10 The Holy Spirit is always associated with impersonal things which proves He is not a person.
#1 Anti-Trinitarian Proof Text Refuted
|
|
|
|

|
The Holy Spirit is the personification of God's power and is not a person. It is not unusual in the Scriptures for something to be personified. For example, wisdom is said to have "children." (Luke 7:35) Sin and death are spoken of as kings. (Rom 5:14,21) (Reasoning from the Scriptures, Spirit, p380, Jehovah's Witness publication) |
- Personification is "A rhetorical figure of speech in which inanimate objects or abstractions are endowed with human qualities..." (American, p.926)
- Personification is found throughout the Bible with endless examples of mountains clapping and stars singing. But in all these things we know by way of human experience that they are not really persons. Not so with the Holy Spirit. No one can know the Holy Spirit is a thing (and not a person) the way we can know a mountain is not a person from human experience.
- We can prove something is personification by finding a Bible verse that outright states it is not a person but a thing. We can do this with hills, wisdom, stars etc. Anti-Trinitarians are at a loss to find any Bible verse that says the Holy Spirit is a thing and not a person.
- When referenced, the Holy Spirit is always the masculine "HE". Not so with mountains and stars.
- The vast majority of times the Bible refers to things like stars and mountains, they are not personified. Personification is the EXCEPTION to the usage in scripture.
- The problem for anti-Trinitarians is that the Holy Spirit IS ALWAYS PERSONIFIED. Personification is not the exception to the general use, personification is the rule... every time, without exception!
- If anti-Trinitarians are correct, the personification of the Holy Spirit is so complete and extensive in scripture, that we are without a guideline to determine the difference between persons and things. We would have to call into question, for example, the person hood of Abraham as the personification of the father of God's people. The personification of the Holy Spirit is as extensive as the personification of Abraham or many other Bible characters.
- Take Adam for example. Many modernists already dismiss his personal existence as myth. Could Adam be nothing more than the personification of all mankind? A simple reading of Romans 5:12-19 and 1 Cor 15:45 will quickly reveal the problem for Arians. Adam is clearly used as a metaphoric symbol for all of mankind in many places. Could Adam be nothing more than personification?
- The extent of personification of the Holy Spirit equals any Bible character.
- Anti-Trinitarian challenge: what verse shows the Holy Spirit to be a thing or an it? We know of none, therefore we are forced to the conclusion that the Holy Spirit is a person.
#2 Anti-Trinitarian Proof Text Refuted
|
|
|
|

|
The Holy Spirit is directly called the power of God in Luke 1:35
"The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you" Luke 1:35 |
- Only to an anti-Trinitarian does this verse outright call the Holy Spirit God's power. The verse does not say, "The Holy Spirit is the power of God". It uses a paired statement. Notice Luke 1:35 is the closest verse Arians can come up with that might suggest the Holy Spirit is said to be God's power.
- Granted that "Hebrew parallelism" is in fact common in the Bible, there are so many statements like Luke 1:35 that are not "Hebrew parallelisms" that no further really needs to be said. Even still, there are different kinds of "Hebrew parallelisms". Some where two things are intended to be interchangeably synonymous and others where two different things are working together to have a common effect. Arians view Luke 1:35 as two interchangeably synonymous things: Holy Spirit and Power. But there are so many examples where different things are linked to have a common effect, that Arians simply have no firm proof of anything.
- Here is a verse very close to Luke 1:35. God himself and His power are used in a "Hebrew parallelism". "I will also cut off the inhabitant from Ashdod ... I will even unleash My power upon Ekron" Amos 1:8. God is no more mere power in Amos 1:8 than the Holy Spirit is mere power in Luke 1:35.
- The scriptures are even called the power of God in Rom 1:16, but everyone knows that they are not used interchangeably synonymous in this verse but are two distinct things: "You are mistaken, not understanding the Scriptures, or the power of God." Mt 22:29 The scriptures were the source of their doctrinal misunderstandings and God's power would raise all men from the dead at the second coming. To demand that scriptures and God's power are interchangeably synonymous in Mt 22:29 is just as wrong as demanding the Holy Spirit and power are interchangeably synonymous in Luke 1:35.
- Here we have a similar statement where two different things are mentioned. God's power is linked to God's hand. Two different things that are not interchangeably synonymous: "Thou didst redeem by Thy great power and by Thy strong hand" Nehemiah 1:10
- Here the Holy Spirit and power are differentiated: "God anointed Him [Jesus] with the Holy Spirit and with power" Acts 10:38; "demonstration of the Spirit and of power" 1 Cor 2:4. It makes no sense that Jesus was "anointed with power and power".
#3 Anti-Trinitarian Proof Text Refuted
|
|
|
|

|
The Holy Spirit is neuter gender through out the New Testament Greek proving it is an "it" not a person. No if the Holy Spirit was in the masculine, you would have a point. But God deliberately chose to use a neuter gender word to show us the Holy Spirit is a thing not a person. |
- Gender of a word has nothing to do with identity. It has to do with the language. Gender belongs to the language of the word, not to the case of, or the object of the word.
- Infants (Lk 1:41,44; 2:16; 18:15) and children (Mk 5:39-41) are also neuter in the Greek in exactly the same way Holy Spirit is neuter gender.
- Girl is a neuter noun in Mt 9:24, 25; Mk 5:41, 42.
- Angels are neuter pneuma " IT " spirits in Heb 1:14
- Demons are neuter pneuma " IT " spirits over 45 times in scripture.
- The word "Spirit" is feminine in Genesis 1:2: "the
Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters".
- A masculine pronoun ("He" Greek: ekeinos, literal "that One") is applied to the Holy Spirit throughout the New Testament despite the fact that "Spirit" (Greek: pneuma) is neuter. Is God trying to confuse us? Or is God taking special steps to make sure we understand the Holy Spirit is a person?
- The word spirit is frequently "neuter gender"
when it refers to the Father in Jn 4:24, to Jesus in 1Cor 15:45, to baby Jesus, in Mt 2:8, 11, 13, 14, 19-21,
- Such an argument displays a dismal understanding of the Greek language.
#4 Anti-Trinitarian Proof Text Refuted
|
|
|
|

|
The Bible calls the Holy Spirit an "it" 7 times proving He is not a person.
John 1:32; Rom 8:16,26; 1Cor 12:11; Heb 10:15,17; 1 Pet 1:11
Jehovah's Witnesses are major promoters of the lie that persons in the Bible are never referred to as " IT ":
- "But on the other hand, we find Jesus repeatedly using IMPERSONAL pronouns when referring to God's holy spirit, a most DISRESPECTFUL thing to do if the holy spirit were the third person of a trinity, coequal, & cosubstantial with Jehovah God himself.... But if the holy spirit were the third person of the trinity, equal to God & Christ in glory & honor as claimed by the creeds, could we imagine the Scriptures referring to the holy spirit as ' IT '?" (Watchtower July 15, 1957 p.434)
- "If the holy spirit is a person, IT should always be referred to as 'he' in the Bible.
Jesus is a person, & is NEVER referred to as 'it'. Nor is Jehovah God. But at times the Greek word pneuma is in the NEUTER gender. That means that IT is considered as neither masculine nor feminine." (Canadian Bethel WTS , personal letter)
"But nowhere do we read of Jehovah God and Jesus as being referred to by neuter pronouns, which is the case in regard to the holy spirit." (w53 1/1 The Scriptures, Reason & the Trinity, p.24) |
- Jesus is referred to as "IT" 5 times in: Mt 2:8, 11, 13, 14, 20, 21
- John the Baptist is referred to as IT 8 times: Lk1:59, 60, 62, 63, 66, 67
- Humans are called "it": "And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that of all that He has given Me I lose nothing,
but raise it up on the last day. John 6:39 Nothing more needs to be said, after quoting this one verse, but we must address each verse Arians misuse.
- Babies are called "it": We often use it to refer to babies in the same kind of way today: "What did you name it?" Here a baby is called literally "the holy thing begotten": "And Mary said unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man? And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee: wherefore also the holy
thing which is begotten shall be called the Son of God." Luke 1:34-35.
- The men living in the world are called an "its" in John 14:17 " Spirit of the truth, whom
the world cannot receive, because it does not behold Him or know Him"
- The KJV, RSV actually refer to the Holy Spirit as an "it" in these two passages:
Romans 8:16,26 "The Spirit ITSELF beareth witness with our spirit ... The Spirit ITSELF maketh intercession for us with groanings " (KJV, RSV) The fault is not in the original text, but in the translation. Vine says, "The rendering "itself" in Rom. 8:16, 26, due to the Greek gender, is corrected to "Himself" in the R.V. (W. E. Vine, spirit) The word means: "(1) self (emphatic) (2) he, she, it (used for the third pers. pron.) (3) the same" Notice that the word can be translated, he, she or it. To those familiar with the Greek language, the fact the Holy Spirit is called "itself" does nothing to prove the Holy Spirit is not a person.
- Another passage Arians try to use to prove the Holy Spirit is not a person is
John 1:32 "And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and IT abode upon him." (KJV) The NKJV and NASB translate it "and He remained upon Him". The NIV simply translates it, "and remain on him". But even with this using the word it is really not problematic. Since the word IT refers specifically to the "DOVE shape" the Holy Spirit took as a form. Not that the Holy Spirit was a dove, but that he took the form of a dove, hence, using "it" is quite natural even in English. Example: "My son dressed up as a gorilla. It was real scary!"
- A final Arian misused proof text is
1 Peter 1:11 "Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify when IT testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow." Of course it doesn't say "Spirit of God" but "Spirit of Christ". Now for Trinitarians, this is no problem, but for Arians, this is a huge problem. The Holy Spirit is the Father's "energy" not the "created Son's". If it is Jesus' own Spirit, Arians have just proven Jesus is not a person by their own argument of the usage of "it". If it is the Holy Spirit, (God's power) then they have to explain away the fact God's power is called, "the Spirit of Christ". We send Arians skidding into the ditch with this question: Was the Dove that abode on Him the father's Power or his own power? In the end, 1 Pet 1:11 is exactly like Romans 8:16,26 and John 1:32. The usage of the word "it", is just business as usual in the Greek language and those who think it proves the Holy Spirit is not a person are simply misinformed.
- But one final comment on 1 Pet 1:11 and Rom 8:16-26. If is puzzling that if God was trying to show us that the Holy Spirit was not a person in these verses, why would He attach "personality qualities" to the "it"? In 1 Pet 1:11 the "it" is intelligently revealing prophetic information. Persons do this, not things.
|

|
In Rom 8:26, the very verse that the Holy Spirit is called an it the Holy Spirit helps us pray, and intercedes on our behalf: "the Spirit also helps in our weaknesses. For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit Himself makes intercession for us with groaning which cannot be uttered". Wow, that's some machine, one that helps us pray! Perhaps the Buddhists were on to something with their prayer wheels! |
#5 Anti-Trinitarian Proof Text Refuted
|
|
|
|

|
"A comparison of Bible texts that refer to the holy spirit shows that it is spoken of as "filling" people: they are "baptized" with it; and they can be anointed with it. (Luke 1:41; Matt 3:11; Acts 10:38). None of these expressions would be appropriate if the holy spirit were a person." (Reasoning from the Scriptures, Spirit, p380, Jehovah's Witness publication)
Acts 2:1-4 The Holy Spirit was poured out and fell upon Christians, meaning power not a person. You pour out a thing not a person. Things fall upon men not other people. |
This argument illustrates the utter desperation Jehovah's Witnesses are in to try to prove the Holy Spirit is not a person. We notice that they are wrong on every argument because the same kind of language they say cannot be used of persons, IS USED OF PERSONS! Of course beware of the New World Translation which deliberately translates the exact same words in different ways to deceive Jehovah's Witnesses.
|
The Holy Spirit |
Persons |
|
"they were all filled with the Holy Spirit" Acts 2:4 "Be filled with the Spirit" Eph. 5:18 |
"that He [Christ] might fill all things." Eph. 4:10
that you may be filled with all the fullness of God Eph 3:19 |
|
"I will pour forth of My Spirit upon all mankind." Acts 2:17
"He has poured forth this which you both see and hear." Acts 2:33 |
Because He [Christ] poured out Himself to death" Isa 53:12
"I [Paul] am being poured out as a drink offering" Phil. 2:17; 2 Tim. 4:6
David was poured out Psalm 22:14 |
|
"He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire" Matt. 3:11; Luke 3:16 |
"For the Lord your God is a consuming fire, a jealous God." Deut. 4:24
"our God is a consuming fire." Heb. 12:29 |
|
1 Cor 6:19 Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you |
2 Cor 13:5 Or do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you
one God and Father of all who is in all Eph 4:6
greater is He who is in you than he who is in the world 1 Jn 4:4
do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you 2 Cor 13:5
And if Christ is in you Rom 8:10 |
|
2 Cor 1:22 gave the Spirit in our hearts as a pledge |
Eph 3:17 so that Christ may dwell in your hearts |
|
1 Cor 3:16 you are a temple of God...the Spirit of God dwells in you |
2 Cor 6:16 we are the temple of the Father, I will dwell in them |
|
the Holy Spirit fell upon them Acts 11:15; Acts 10:44; Acts 8:16 |
sacrifice to Jehovah our God, lest He fall upon us Ex 5:3
the hand of the Lord God fell upon me there Ezekiel 8:1 (metonymy: God really fell not the hand) |
#6 Anti-Trinitarian Proof Text Refuted
|
|
|
|

|
A "proof" given in the booklet "Should You believe in the Trinity", published by the Watchtower and blindly distributed widely by Jehovah's witnesses, is the caption of a picture on page 41. The picture is of the 120 with "tongues of fire" resting on them (see Acts 2:3f). The caption asks, "How could the holy spirit be a person, when it filled about 120 disciples at the same time?" |
- Jehovah's Witnesses are wrong in Acts 2:1-4 because only the 12 apostles were filled, not the 120. However, with this correction their point is unchanged.
- Jehovah's Witnesses view God too small! What do you expect from a religion who thinks its creator and saviour (Jesus Christ) is nothing more than an elaborate wind up toy designed to die on the cross.
- We ask this question of JW's, How could the Father or Jesus be a person when each fills millions of believers at the same time?
"that He [Christ] might fill all things." Eph. 4:10
"that you may be filled with all the fullness of God" Eph 3:19
#7 Anti-Trinitarian Proof Text Refuted
|
|
|
|

|
"God anointed Him with the Holy Spirit and with power" Acts 10:38
The Holy Spirit is used to "anoint" people like oil, He therefore cannot be a Person. |
- Jesus is used as a door through which we enter, and go in and out, and find pasture. He therefore cannot be a Person? Think not! John 10:9 "I am the door; if anyone enters through Me, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture." Unless the person making the argument is willing to say Jesus is not a Person either because He is a door, this effective nullifies the argument. If Arians understand how a person can be a door that we go in and out of, then they should understand a person can be used to anoint another person.
- Obviously there is a type and antitype that is in play here. Incense in the Old testament is said to be our prayers in the New testament. Rev 5:8. It says the incense is the prayers of the saints. The temple of stone is our bodies in the New Testament.
- God says "the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple" Rev 21:22 Does this mean God is not a person? Notice the antitype of the physical temple is God Himself and Christ!
- Likewise, Holy Spirit is the antitype of the anointing oil of the Old Testament.
#8 Anti-Trinitarian Proof Text Refuted
|
|
|
|

|
"While some texts say that the spirit "spoke," other passages make clear that this was done through angels or humans" (Reasoning from the Scriptures, Spirit, p380, Jehovah's Witness publication) |
- The Watchtower is again up to their deceptive tricks. They know full well that many texts appear that God is talking when other passages make clear that this was done through angels. Does this prove God is not a person? Conversely, angels and men talk when it is clear that God was actually doing the talking. Are angels and men personification? The key is that God ALWAYS talks through another PERSON never electricity!
- Jehovah's Witnesses think it is logical that since the Holy Spirit speaks through people, He can't be a Person Himself. It has escaped their eyes that if the speech going through a person originates with the Holy Spirit, it proves personality and intelligence!
- We are reminded that the revealed primary role of the Holy Spirit is "revelator". If the Holy Spirit were a person, what would change? He would still speak through others!
- While it is true that God once spoke through a donkey to Baalam, this was a special miracle. Further, God was merely facilitating what the donkey was actually thinking, so the miracle is God translating the donkey's actual and real thoughts so a man can understand it. Further, animals have both thoughts and freewill, electricity does not. Where is the passage where God spoke through a thing?
- Jehovah's Witnesses need any example in scripture where God or anyone spoke through a thing. Take the burning bush. It doesn't say, "And the bush said, 'Moses take off your sandals'" but "God called to him from the midst of the bush" Ex 3:4 Arians simply have no verse where anything other than an intelligent person (or being with actual thoughts and free will) talked. This one point alone completely refutes their doctrine!
- It is common for one person to speak through another. In fact, when one person speaks through another, we naturally conclude both are persons and that the originator of the through is where the real intelligence lies. Speech can only originate with a self-conscious, intelligent being.
- But here are a passages where the Holy Spirit does the speaking all by Himself! There is simply no indication anywhere that God was speaking through the Holy Spirit. Acts 13:2 "
the Holy Spirit said, "Set apart for Me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them". 1 Ti 4:1 "The Spirit explicitly says" Heb 9:8 "the Holy Spirit is indicating this."
- But now, lets deal with the Jehovah's Witness view that God is really the one who is speaking through the Holy Spirit as in these verses: Jn 16:13 "Whatever He hears He will
speak" Heb 10:15-17 "And the Holy Spirit also bears witness to us; for after saying, "This is the covenant that I will make with them"". (Quoting Jehovah in Jer 31:33) We can actually turn the Anti-Trinitarian argument on its head by arguing that it really was the Holy Spirit who did the talking in Jeremiah 31:33. This passage doesn't prove that the Holy Spirit is God's personified energy talking. Rather it proves that the Holy Spirit can rightly be called Jehovah, just like the Father and the Son can too! But we ask, why would God go to all the trouble of inventing and personifying what appears on the surface to be a separate entity speaking? Why not just say "God sayeth" every time instead of "the Holy Spirit sayeth"? Look at Jn 16:13, Christ relays a message through the Holy Spirit. If the Holy Spirit is not a person this makes the Holy Spirit nothing more than a tape recorder that replays what is said. There are two problem here, first, Jesus is seen relaying in exactly the same way and second, the Holy Spirit is pictured as an intelligent person who does the relaying, not some machine. There are places where Jesus directly speaks to men. Why confuse the simple matter with the Holy Spirit? The same thing in Heb 10:15f. Why would God say the Holy Spirit said this, if the thought really originated with the Father? Again the Holy Spirit is clearly portrayed as a person saying, witnessing and teaching us. Why would God confuse such a simple matter if the Holy Spirit was nothing more than God's Power?
#9 Anti-Trinitarian Proof Text Refuted
|
|
|
|

|
The actual Greek structure in reference to the Holy Spirit is: "The Spirit the Holy". This construction emphasizes that the Holy Spirit is not a person. |
The Greek construction "The Spirit the Holy" is an exceedingly common and fundamental Greek construction. It's just a common way of associating an adjective and a noun: "The Spirit, the Holy [one]" We might think of these phrases as saying, "the car, the red one..." But it is less cumbersome to simply translate, "the red car" as we did before. So the construction "The Spirit the Holy" certainly does not indicate whether Holy Spirit is a person.
#10 Anti-Trinitarian Proof Text Refuted
|
|
|
|

|
The Holy Spirit used in association with impersonal things, such as water & fire.
Jehovah's Witnesses falsely argue:
- "Further evidence against the idea of personality as regards the holy spirit is the way it is
used in association with other impersonal things, such as water & fire (Matt. 3:11; Mark 1:8), & Christians are spoken of as being baptized 'in holy spirit.' (Acts 1:5; 11:16) Persons are urged to become 'filled with spirit' instead of wine. (Eph. 5:18) So, too, persons are spoken of as being 'filled' with it along with such qualities as wisdom & faith (Acts 6:3, 5; 11:24) or joy (Acts 13:52), & holy spirit is inserted or 'sandwiched in' with a number of such qualities at 2 Corinthians 6:6. It is most unlikely that such expressions would be made if reference were being made to a divine person." (Jehovah's Witnesses, Insight p 1020, & Aid p 1543) |
- This
argument is utterly false, but what do you expect from a cult that can teach its "door to door book salesmen" anything and they will blindly accept it without checking or questioning. Association with other impersonal things doesn't eliminate anyone's personality!
- God is associated with many impersonal things. In fact God is directly called "fire" i two places: "our God is a
consuming fire." Heb. 12:29 and "For the Lord your God is a consuming fire, a jealous God." Deut. 4:24.
- Jesus is associated with impersonal things too. Jesus directly calls himself: The Bread, The Door, The Lamb, The Life, The Light, The Rock, The Stone, The Truth, The Vine, The Way, The Word, The Bread of Life.
The Islamic Jihad
Part#4 Gog
Gog (Gaga)( Ezekiel 38-39
We Must understand that Gog is someone not a Place. Please note that it is Gog, “the chief prince,” who will invade the land of Israel, and that Magog is simply a “land” or of people whose soldiers will be one of the many armies under the direct command and leadership of Gog. In fact, it is also said in this scriptural passage that Gog will be “the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal” Therefore, we must be intellectually honest and distinguish the difference between Gog, a person, and Magog, a geographical land under the rulership of Gog: as well as in the Spiritual- Gog “an Eternal Being” –Magog its Origin.
Gog occurs as the name of the mysterious figure in Eze.38-39. It is a derivation From
Sumerian Gug “Gug”Which means shining “which is also used of angels
Job 38:7 (KJV) When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God
shouted for joy? ko-kawb'; probably from the same as Hebrew 3522 (Kabbown) (in
the sense of rolling) or Hebrew 3554 (kavah) (in the sense of blazing); a star (as round
or as shining); figurative a prince :- star ([-gazer]).
Sumerian Gug “Gug” IS the deity Gaga “Gaga” who is the vizier of Assur. “Assur” Which was the Assyrians father of the gods. “Whom we would call Satan”. Viezer means the Muslims head of state or ruler. When you put this together it reads “ Gog is the Muslims ruler for Satan”. We can as well find the answer who Gog is in Amos 7:1
First we will look at the traditional reading of Amos 7:1 which reads as follows:
Amos 7:1 (KJV) Thus hath the Lord God shewed unto me; and, behold, he formed grasshoppers in the beginning of the shooting up of the latter growth; and, lo, it was the latter growth after the king's mowings. Our English Bibles take there translation from the Masoretic text, a 9th century source. If we go back to an earlier translation of the Old Testament into Greek, known as the Septuagint, It gives us a different rending of Amos 7:1:"Thus the Lord showed me, and behold a swarm of locusts were coming, and behold, one of the young devastating locusts was Gog, the King." Amos 7:1 (LXX) The identification of Gog as the king of the locusts would have profound implications upon our understanding of Eze.38-39 we can read in Proverbs 30:27 (KJV) The locusts have no king, yet go they forth all of them by bands; So this is telling us that the "locusts" of Amos 7 are not intended to be natural locusts, but an idiom for something else. We can find the answer in Revelation chapter 9 The locusts there are described as having a king or a Prince over them , which is clearly demonic in nature.
Rev. 9:3-11 (KJV) And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power. [4] And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree; but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads. [5] And to them it was given that they should not kill them, but that they should be tormented five months: and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion, when he striketh a man.
[6] And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it; and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them. [7] And the shapes of the locusts were like unto horses prepared unto battle; and on their heads were as it were crowns like gold, and their faces were as the faces of men. [8] And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions. [9] And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their wings was as the sound of chariots of many horses running to battle.
[10] And they had tails like unto scorpions, and there were stings in their tails: and their power was to hurt men five months. [11] And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.
Gog is the Principality Apollyon who will Posses the Man Antichrist the Islamic Al Mahadi who then will become the Beast of Rev. 13 coming out of the sea or Abyss and out of the Abyss in Rev.9:3-11 as Apollyon . Apollyon name in Hebrew is Abaddon Abaddon is a Hebrew word signifying:
- ruin, destruction (Job 31:12);
- place of destruction; the Abyss, realm of the dead (Job 26:6; Proverbs 15:11); it occurs personified (Revelation 9:11) as Abaddon and is rendered in Greek by Apollyon, denoting the angel-prince of hell, the minister of death and author of havoc on earth. The Vulgate renders the Greek Apollyon by the Latin Exterminans (that is, "Destroyer"). The identity of Abaddon .
Apollo was the giver and the interpreter of laws. We can read that the beast will try to accomplish this in Daniel 7:25 (KJV) And he shall speak great Words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. Apollo was an orical speaking god or fallen prince. His sanctuary in Delphi became the most influential political and religious center of the world. He was also in control of the wars of the Grecians. The Greek term arche and its equivalent Lat translation principium, carries the basic meaning of primacy in time or rank. It is an abstract term for power and often used with the meaning of “sphere or authority’. This is power that is wielded by someone in a position of political, social or economic authority. Which will be the case with the beast or the prince that controls the antichrist “a man” . Arche can be used as a supernatural power ;good or evil which has control over Mortal human beings such as the antichrist.
Rev. 13:2 (KJV) And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
The Beast Has a Face of A Leopard meaning his head is the Leopard or the Grecian Empire and the Prince of the Grecian Empire. The Prince of Greece is Apollo or Apollyon.
Alexander the Great (Mortal man) is known in history as "The Son of Zeus ”same as- Apollo (immortal Spirit )
This proves 3 things
1st. That Gog (Gaga) is the Beast of Rev. 13 and 17.
2nd.That he is a Human Muslims leader
3rd. That he is the Prince Apollyon.
Which we will see as well in “part 2” - Magog
The Gog of the Future in Eze.38-39 must be a supernatural being in Ezekiel 38 who deceives the Nations at Armageddon and the final battle at the end of the 1,000 yr. reign of Christ when God looses Satan and his Angels to tempt man. Rev. 20:8
After the great flood, Noah and his three sons repopulated the entire earth. Ham, Shem and Japheth. . In Genesis, chapter 10, the Bible list the 70 original tribal groups, this is often referred to by Biblical scholars, as The Table of Nations.
To properly understand Ezekiel 38 and 39, we need to identify Gog, Magog and it's allies. The Bible, is always the best source to understanding and prophecy. So it's from this Table of Nations that we first begin to learn the identity of Gog and Magog. Magog was one of the sons of Japheth. "The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech and Tiras." Genesis 10:2
The Islamic Jihad
Part#5 Magog
Josephus (who lived A.D. 37-96 and wrote a history covering the period from Adam to his own death in A.D. 96) he clearly identifies Magog: "Magog founded the Magogians, thus named after him, but who were by the Greeks called Scythians." and they settled around the Black Sea. He said also that the sons of Japheth settled in the Taurus
mountains of Asia Minor, and then spread to many other lands.
He said furthermore that from Gomer came the Galatians; from Madai came the Medes; from Javan came the Greeks; from Tubal and Meshech came the ancient Iberians and Cappadocians of Asia Minor, or modern Turkey; and from Tiras came the Thracians. It was from these ancient peoples that all of Asia and Europe were inhabited, not Russia alone Another reliable source comes from Herodotus, known as the "Father of History." Herodotus writes of the bizarre and savage practices of the descendents of Magog known as the Scythians. They drank the blood of the first enemy they killed; they carried the heads of the victims to their chiefs; they scalped their enemies and used the scalps as "napkins"; they used the skins of their victims to cover their quivers; they drank from the skulls of their victims; they practiced blood brotherhood by drinking each other's blood mixed with wine. The Scythians. "bathed" in the vapor from heated hemp seeds. When their king died, they sacrificed one of his concubines and several servants. After a year, they commemorated his death by sacrificing fifty servants and fifty horses.. We know that the descendants of Magog by their Greek name, Scythians.. The name Scythian covers a number of nomadic tribes from the Russian steppes, a fertile area of the Ukraine north of the Black Sea. Other related tribes occupied the area to the east of the Caspian Sea. The area encompassed by the Scythians extended from the mid-Volga to the northern Urals and beyond. They colonized Media, Parthia, Persia, Central Asia and as far as the Chinese border. Arab writers confirm that in the Arabic language their name for the Great Wall of China is called "the wall of Al Magog" because the Great Wall was built to keep out the invading armies from Magog. All together an area of about 2,000 square miles. So clearly this was the former Soviet Union, modern day Russia.
So, who then is Gog.? Gog is obviously the leader of Magog, he is the "Prince of Meshech and Tubal."
The Oracle of Apollo, Didyma, Turkey Hidden among rolling hills only a few miles from the scenic coast of southeastern Turkey, the ancient site of Didyma is famous from legendary times. Here was a natural spring where the beautiful Leto is supposed to have spent an hour of love with Zeus, then giving birth to the twins Artemis and Apollo (didymoi in Greek). The most important oracle site in Asia Minor, its pronouncements to Croesus, Alexander the Great and other great kings altered the course of human history.
a.Where is MaGog
Ezekiel 38:1-7 gives 10 names as participants in the invasion of Israel that will follow the re-gathering of the Jews to their homeland. First mentioned, is the land of Magog. The most common identity for Magog is in Central Asia. The Jewish historian Josephus said, "Magog founded the Magogians, called Scythians by the Greeks. Scythians were a nomadic tribe who inhabited the ancient territory from Central Asia across the southern part of ancient Russia." Today this area is inhabited by the former Soviet Republics of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, and possibly northern parts of Afghanistan. All of these nations that make up the land of Magog have one thing in common - Islam. Militant Islam has been on the rise in these countries since the fall of the Soviet Union, when Islam no longer had to be practiced secretly. Radical Islamic groups such as the Islamic Renaissance Party, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, and Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islam are working to reunite central Asian nations and ultimately the entire Muslim world.
Ezekiel's prophecy and Russia's changing demographics. The prophet Ezekiel predicted almost 2,600 years ago that Gog would lead an end time invasion of Israel. The allies of Gog in this invasion are ancient places that today are Central Asia (Magog), Iran (Persia), Libya (Put), Turkey (Meshech, Tubal, Gomer, and Togarmah), and Sudan (Cush.
We will look at Rosh some versions of the Bible translate 'rosh' as an adjective. The argument here is that in the Massoretic text the words 'chief prince' carry the accents Tiphha and Zaqeph-gadol. The Tiphha appears under the resh of the Hebrew word 'rosh'; the Zaqeph-gadol appears on top of the sin of the Hebrew word 'nish'. The Tiphha to the right, underneath the initial consonant of the world 'rosh', or chief, is prepositive and does not mark the tone syllable. The world 'nish' or prince has the accent Zaqeph-gadol which is disjunctive and indicates a pause.
So, verse three would read: "Behold, I am against thee, o Gog, the prince, {pause} chief of Meshech and Tubal" Rather than: "Behold, I am against thee, o Gog, prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal."
Here 'rosh' is translated head or chief as it is 423 other times in the Old Testament. In short, if you believe 'rosh' should be translated as a proper noun you may find the interpretation that Russia will be a part of this coalition more reasonable. If you believe 'rosh' should be an adjective here, you need only concern yourself with who Meshech and Tubal in this paticular scripture . I tend to have a problem with the "it sounds like Russia" theory, and find the translation of rosh as an adjective more believable, but to each his own.I do believe Russia will be involved because the land of Magog consist of much of Russia if not all and Part of Tubal.
Meshech and Tubal in verses 2 and 6, were the names of the 6th and 5th sons of Japheth, the son of Noah (Genesis 10:2). Ezekiel 27:13 also mentions Meshech and Tubal as trading partners with Tyre (Modern Lebanon). It's likely that Meshech and Tubal refer to the ancient Moshi/Mushki and Tubalu/Tibareni who dwelled in the area around, primarily south of, the Black and Caspian Sea in Ezekiel's day. Today these nations would be in the modern country of Turkey, parts of Southern Russia and Northern Iran. All areas with a Muslim majority.
Verse 6 adds Gomer and Beth-Togarmah to the coalition. "Gomer" was the first son of Japheth. The Gomerites were the ancient Cimmerians, expelled in 700 BC from the southern steppes of Russia into what is today Turkey. "Togarmah" is the 3rd son of Gomer and beth at the beginning of the name is the Hebrew word for 'house' or 'place of'. In Ezekiel's time there was a city in Cappodocia (Modern Turkey) known as Tegarma, Tagarma, Til-garimmu, and Takarama.
The possibility that four of the names mentioned in Ezekiel are now in Turkey makes a pretty strong argument for Turkey being a part of the invasion of Israel. Current circumstances in that country also lend this view some credibility. Since the break-up of the Soviet Union, Turkey has been gaining inroads into Central Asia (Magog). It is also linked to Central Asia both ethnically and linguistically, and has a growing number of political parties that support opposition to Israel, establishment of a Turkish Islamic Republic, and the worldwide rule of Islam.
Verse 5 brings three more names into the mix. God tells us that "Persia, Cush and Put will be with them".
Persia is a pretty easy one. In 539 BC the Persians conquered the city of Babylon. You only need look at a map of the ancient Persian Empire to see that it was centered in the nation known today as Iran. In fact Iran was called Persia until 1935 when it was changed to Iran and then to the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979 during the Iranian Revolution. It's no secret that Iran is an archenemy of Israel and the West, and a supporter of the Palestinians. They are actively working to get other Arab countries to change camps in their cooperation with the U.S. and Israel.
The ancient kingdom of Cush in Ezekiel's time was the land just south of Egypt on the Nile River. Today this land is occupied by Sudan. Sudan is home to the National Islamic Front, is ruled by an Islamic military dictatorship, a strong supporter of Iraq, home to Osama bin Laden from 1991-1996, and harbors countless Islamic terrorist groups. Sudan would easily fit into the coalition as it is already close allies with Iran, trading military supplies for docking rights on the Red Sea shipping routes.
Ancient Put was the land just west of Egypt, or what is today Libya. Libya is another sponsor of terrorism, and openly refuses to recognize Israel's right to even exist. When the coalition against Israel is formed, Libya won't have to be asked twice to join.
Verse 6 adds "and many people with you." The nations listed specifically are all somewhat distant from Israel. By adding "and many people with you", God is indicating that many nations and the Kingdoms of the East will join with Gog/Beast.
Rev. 16:12-14 (KJV) And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared. [13] And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. [14] For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.
Other nations that might join the alliance are Iraq, Syria, Jordon, and Egypt. All of them are Islamic nations, and all of them would not hesitate to support the destruction of Israel were the opportunity to join such a vast coalition presented to them.
b. What is MaGog
Magog is Gogs Origion.
Gog is the Fallen Prince Apollyon. / This is not speaking of the Origin of the Human antichrist for he comes from the old Syrian Empire.
MaGog is the Land that he originated from .This is the Land that was given to him by Satan to rule even before Adam.”see the world that then was”
This land along with Meshech and Tubal is where he was first worshipped as a diety under a different name Appaliunas. .
c. When will Gogs armies attack Israel
There are many facts that prove that Gog of Ezek. 38-Ezek 39 (who is the "little horn" of
Dan.7:7-8,23-24;Dan 8:7-8,20-23, "the beast" of Rev. 13- Rev 17)and the Al Mahadi of the Koron does not originate in Russia, but becomes the leader of Russia and all the Kingdoms in the north and east by conquest. He conquers the Kingdoms north and east of the Roman Empire territory, but originates from Syria (Dan. 11:36-45). Therefore, he becomes the scourge of Russia and not her hero and chief son.
At least 13 predictions in Ezekiel identify these chapters as being fulfilled at Armageddon at the second advent, and not at the time of some hypothetical war between Israel and Russia or anyone else happening before the tribulation and the second advent.
The predictions include:
1. Both Israel and many other nations getting to know Eloheem “GOD” from the time of this battle onward (Ezek 38:16; Ezek 39:6-7,21-25,27);This would be the fulfillment of Daniels 70 weeks (Dan 9-24-27)and the end of Israels Tribulation.This would also be the fulfillment of All Israel being saved or redeemed in (Zech. 12:10-13:1; Romans 11:25-29) (Hosea 6:2). Zech. 3:9)
2. No more pollution of Eloheem “GOD”'s name (Ezek 39:7);
3. Eloheem “GOD” glorified by all nations (Ezek 39:13,21);
4. Israel saved from Gentile domination forever (Ezek 39:26-29);same as Luke 21:24 (KJV) And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. ”Times of the Gentiles rule is over/Times of the Gentiles fulfilled
5. Israel completely regathered from all nations (Ezek 39:28);same as(Deut. 30:4; Isaiah 11:11-12) Matthew 24:31 (KJV) And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
6. The Holy Spirit poured out upon Israel (Ezek 39:29); For the fulfillment of Joel2:28
7. Israel never again to be afraid of other nations (Ezek 39:26);
8. Eloheem “GOD” never again to hide His face from Israel (Ezek 39:29);
9. Eloheem “GOD”'s name to be sanctified among the heathen (Ezek 39:7);
10. Men to see Eloheem “GOD” bodily and in person (Ezek 38:18-22; Ezek 39:1-6,17-24);
11. All the heathen to know Eloheem “GOD” from this time forward into all eternity (Ezek 39:23; Rev. 21-Rev 22).
12. Gog and his armies of Ezek. 38- Ezek 39 falling upon the open field to make a great supper for the birds and beasts is exactly the same as in Rev. 14:12-20;Rev 19:11-21; Mt. 24:28,37-42; Lk. 17:34-37 which pictures the battle of Armageddon (Ezek. 38:3-5; Ezek 39:4,17-25).
13. Eloheem “GOD” predicts that the armies of Gog in Ezek. 38:20-22; Ezek 39:6 would become so confused then they would destroy one another. The same is stated of the armies of the Antichrist at Armageddon (Zech. 14:4,10).
d. Why the war with Gog From the Land of MaGog
1. From the Mortal view- Again, it's instructive to view the common motivator as religion, not race. Some years ago, an editorial in the Jerusalem Post outlined the "Arab" plan as being composed of two phases. Phase one was to gain as much as possible through the inexpensive negotiating process while simultaneously weakening Israel and strengthening the Moslem coalition. Phase two, after no more negotiated gain can be made, is to go to war for the rest
2. From the Supernatural View - But the real reason is for Satan and his Fallen Angels to try to become victorious over Gods creation “Man”.
Satan and his Angels will have already been thrown out of Heaven and there battle for Heaven will be over .So this will not be the reason for the Battle but rather that they seek to destroy Gods plan for Man and keep from being thrown in the Lake of fire.
Its all about Legal Authority.
The Islamic Jihad
Part#6 Apollyon Apolluwn
Apollo is a Greek god whose name occurs as a theophoric element in the names Apollwv
(Acts 18:24,var. lect.: Apellhv , Apollwniov { of which Apollo is a dimimutive]; 19:1,var. lect.: Apellhv 1Cor.1:12,3:4-6 ; 16:12 and Titus 3:13, Apellhv ( Rom.16:10 ).Apollwnia (Acts 17:1.var.lect.’ Apollwniv Apolluwn , Rev. 9:11).
1. Apollo's origins (perhaps Magog) aren’t 100% certain ; his name yields no convincing
Greek etymology, although he became the most thoroughly Greek of all gods...Apollo was considerd an intruder ,it was excepted that Apollo was of non Greek
origin.The attempts to locate his origion havent been 100% conclussive but most agree he probably came from the North-East of Eroupe or Asia minor (Guthrie 1950:70-87), The once Hitite god Apulunas is believed to be Apollo. It appears that both Greek and Etruscan Apollo came to the Aegean during the Archaic Period (i.e. from c.1,100 BCE to c.800 BCE) from Anatolia. Homer pictures him on the side of the Trojans, against the Achaeans, during the Trojan War and he has close affiliations with a Luwian deity, Apaliuna, who in turn seems to have traveled west from further east. The Late Bronze Age (from 1,700 BCE - 1,200 BCE) Hittite and Hurrian Aplu,[citation needed] like the Homeric Apollo, was a god of plagues, and resembles the mouse god Apollo Smintheus In Jewish traditions
In terms of extra-biblical Jewish tradition, Gog the "prince" has been explained being one of the 70 national angels – of whom all except one, Michael, the guardian angel of Israel , are fallen angels.[citation needed] According to this interpretation, Gog is the angel of a nation called Magog (literally meaning "of Gog" or "from Gog"). Gog in this view represents an apocalyptic coalition of nations arrayed against Israel. Some Biblical scholars believe that Gyges (Greek Γυγες), king of Lydia (687 BC-652 BC), is meant; in Assyrian letters, Gyges appears as Gu-gu; in which case Magog might be his territory in Anatolia.[citation needed]
Apollo is the Hittite god Appaliunas.
The non-Greek source of Apollo's name had been quite uncertain until the attestation in a Luwian context of Appaliunas. Though Pokorny's IE etymological dictionary (1959) lists one possible IE source for Apollo (IE apelo-, "strength"). IE apelo- cannot be made to correspond with Greek Apóllo:n by any normal rules of conversion known to me; therefore, most investigators had come to the conclusion that the Greek god's name must be borrowed from another language.
No more than a brief look at this bronze Phoebus (Greek Phoîbos) at the right, another name for Apollo which simply means "gleaming (one)", will convince many that we are dealing with a lineal descendant of Appaliunas, who I believe to be represented to the left above. And this archaic Phoebus Apollo even bears the Apollonian epithet, with which we have become familiar: argurótoxos, "(he) of the silver bow", which, by itself in an isolated context, would strongly suggest an identification with the lunar crescent(s).
APOLLON (or Apollo) was the great Olympian god of prophecy and oracles, healing, plague and disease, music, song and poetry, archery, and the protection of the young. He was depicted as a handsome, beardless youth with long hair and various attributes including: a wreath and branch of laurel; bow and quiver; raven; and lyre.
In the epic literature and at Delos and Delphi the gods name is always spelled Apollon. In the Doric dialect we find Apellon and on Cyprus Apeilon, in Thessaly Aploun. At the beginning of the present era the form Apollon had most completely superseded the Doric form of Apellon.
Apollyon is no doubt the correct reading. But the name Apollo (Gk Apollon) was often linked in ancient Greek writings with the verb apollymi or apollyo, "destroy." From this time of Grotius, "Apollyon" has often been taken here to be a play on the name Apollo. The locust was an emblem of this god, who poisoned his victims, and the name "Apollyon" may be used allusively in Revelation to attack the pagan god and so indirectly the Roman emperor Domitian, who liked to be regarded as Apollo incarnate. A remarkable feature of his cult was his characteristic, though not only, way of giving oracles, especially at Delphi, to possess the priestess and speak through her mouth in a way reminiscent of Siberian shamanism. “This is the way he will be with the Human antichrist”
2. Apollo was considered the author of evil as well as the god of law and order .He was also the god of prophecy and the frightning god who brings pestilence.
The attributes of Apollo are the bow and quiver, In Rev.6 we have the 4 riders of the Apocalypse .We need to look at the white horse ridder who will be the antichrist or the beast .
Rev. 6:2-8 (KJV) And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.
Now when we read Rev.13 we can see the reason for his descriptio from his Origin.
Rev. 13:2 (KJV) And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
When we look at the Origins of Apollo/Apollyon we see the reason for the
1. Face of the Leapord Apollo Grecian deity
2. Feet of the Bear Nergal a Persian deity
3. Mouth of a Lion Nergal also a Babylonian deity
It appears that both Greek and Etruscan Apollos came to the Aegean during the Archaic Period (from 1100 BC till 800 BC) from Anatolia. Homer pictures him on the side of the Trojans, not the Achaeans, in the Trojan War and he has close affiliations with Luwian Apaliuna, who in turn seems to have traveled west from further east. Late Bronze Age (from 1700 BC - 1200 BC) Hittite and Hurrian "Aplu", like Homeric Apollo, was a God of the Plague, and resembles the mouse god Apollo SmintheusHurrian Aplu itself seems to be derived from the Babylonian "Aplu" meaning a "son of"—a title that was given to the Babylonian and Persian plague god, Nergal (son of Enlil.The10 kings will be possessed and ruled by the demons under the authority of the Fallen prince of the Roman Empire. This will be in fulfillment of Dan.2:31-45 and Dan 7. This Empire of the 10 kings will be defeated by the beast at this time which will be in the middle of the tribulation Apollon’s demons will posess the antichrist which is a mortal man and the result will be the symbol of the beast coming out of the sea Rev.13 with a face of a leapord.
The defeat of the revised Roman empire and the rise of the Grecian will be the fatal wound that will be healed by the coming of the 8th. Kingdom of Apollon or the beast.
This mortal man will be rulled(possessed ) by the fallen prince of the Greacian Empire in fulfillment of Dan.8. The beast will not be ruled by the prince of the Roman Empire becase it tells us in Rev. 17:11 (KJV) And the beast that was, ( Was on earth befor Johns days “the Grecian prince.” One of the seven which will have to be of the first five kingdoms.)and is not,
(is not during Johns days of the Roman Empire or is not the prince of the Roman Empire. )even he is the eighth, (This will be the last kingdom the mingled kingdom of the feet of part iron and part clay Dan.2:33 ) and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. This means that since he is not on earth during the 6th. And is not the seventh then he has to be of the first five. Since he has the face of a leapord and comes out of the Grecian Empire Territory he will be the fallen Angel who ruled that kingdom which was Apollon.
Apollo was the giver and the interpreter of laws. We can read that the beast will try to accomplish this in Daniel 7:25 (KJV) And he shall speak great Words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. Apollo was an orical speaking god or fallen prince.His sanctuary in Delphi became the most influential political and religious center of the world. He was also in control of the wars of the Grecians. The Greek term arche and its equivalent Lat translation principium, carries the basic meaning of primacy in time or rank. It is an abstract term for power and often used with the meaning of “sphere or authority’.This is power that is wielded by someone in a position of political, social or economic authority.Which will be the case with the beast or the prince that controls the antichrist “a man” . Arche can be used as a supernatural power ;good or evil which has control over Mortal human beings such as the antichrist.
Ezekiel 38:8 (KJV)
After many days thou shalt be visited:
paw-kad'; a primitive root; to visit (with friendly or hostile intent); by analogy to oversee, muster, charge, care for, miss, deposit, etc. :- appoint, × at all, avenge, bestow, (appoint to have the, give a) charge, commit, count, deliver to keep, be empty, enjoin, go see, hurt, do judgment, lack, lay up, look, make, × by any means, miss, number, officer, (make) overseer, have (the) oversight, punish, reckon, (call to) remember (-brance), set (over), sum, × surely, visit, want.
in the latter years thou shalt come into
'el, ale; (but used only in the shortened construction form 'el, el); a primitive particle, properly denoting motion towards, but occasionally used of a quiescent position, i.e. near, with or among; often in general, to :- about, according to, after, against, among, as for, at, because (-fore, -side), both...and, by, concerning, for, from, × hath, in (-to), near, (out) of, over, through, to (-ward), under, unto, upon, whether, with (-in).
the land that is brought back
shoob; a primitive root; to turn back (hence, away) transitive or intransitive, literal or figurative (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point); generally to retreat; often adverb again :- ([break, build, circumcise, dig, do anything, do evil, feed, lay down, lie down, lodge, make, rejoice, send, take, weep]) × again, (cause to) answer (+ again), × in any case (wise), × at all, averse, bring (again, back, home again), call [to mind], carry again (back), cease, × certainly, come again (back) × consider, + continually, convert, deliver (again), + deny, draw back, fetch home again, × fro, get [oneself] (back) again, × give (again), go again (back, home), [go] out, hinder, let, [see] more, × needs, be past, × pay, pervert, pull in again, put (again, up again), recall, recompense, recover, refresh, relieve, render (again), requite, rescue, restore, retrieve, (cause to, make to) return, reverse, reward, + say nay, send back, set again, slide back, still, × surely, take back (off), (cause to, make to) turn (again, self again, away, back, back again, backward, from, off), withdraw.
from the sword, and is gathered out of many people,
am; from Hebrew 6004 (`amam); a people (as a congregated unit); specifically a tribe (as those of Israel); hence (collective) troops or attendants; figurative a flock :- folk, men, nation, people.
against the mountains of Israel, which have been always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall dwell safely all of them. Mountains are the tribes of Israel that are brought forth out of the nations.
Ezekiel 38:17 (KJV) Thus saith the Lord God; Art thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel, which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee against them?
We can see a reference to Gog/Apollyon in
Isaiah 27:1 (KJV)
In that day the Lord with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, This is Satan Himself.
liv-yaw-thawn'; from Hebrew 3867 (lavah); a wreathed animal, i.e. a serpent (especially the crocodile or some other large sea-monster); figurative the constellation of the dragon; also as a symbol of Babylon :- leviathan, mourning.
baw-ree'-akh; or (shortened) bariach, baw-ree'-akh; from Hebrew 1272 (barach); a fugitive, i.e. the serpent (as fleeing), and the constellation by that name :- crooked, noble, piercing
naw-khawsh'; from Hebrew 5172 (nachash); a snake (from its hiss) :- serpent.
even leviathan that crooked serpent; ` This has reference to another powerful fallen Angel(unknown)
ak-al-law-thone'; from Hebrew 6127 (`aqal); tortuous :- crooked.
naw-khawsh'; from Hebrew 5172 (nachash); a snake (from its hiss) :- serpent.
and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea. This has reference Apollyon the Dragon in the Abyss
tan-neen'; or tanniym, tan-neem'; (Ezek. 29:3), intensive from the same as Hebrew 8565 (tan); a marine or land monster, i.e. sea-serpent or jackal :- dragon, sea-monster, serpent, whale.
The word sea here has reference to the abyss same as in
Rev. 13:1 (KJV) And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. Rev. 9:1-2 (KJV) And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star fall from heaven unto the earth: and to him was given the key of the bottomless pit. [2] And he opened the bottomless pit; and there arose a smoke out of the pit, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened by reason of the smoke of the pit. Rev. 9:11 (KJV) And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.
The Islamic Jihad
Part#7 The Four Horseman of the Apokalupsis
The Estomology of Apollyon
Rev. 6:2 (KJV)
And I saw, and (1)behold a white horse: and he that sat on him (2)had a bow; and a (3)crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.
This rider and horse, bright and shining, victorious, crowned with the laurel of the victor rides out confidently "to conquer". The Greek word used for "conquer" is NIKAO - this is about lordship. It means "to subdue, overcome, prevail, get the victory". It is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew BAAL, Lord!
1. Apollo Atepomarus ("the great horseman"").
2. Apollo's most common attributes were the bow and arrow
As a god of archery, Apollo was known as Aphetoros ("god of the bow") and Argurotoxos ("with the silver bow").He is the Archer-god, master of the silver bow, Apollo the Far-Shooter, who can rain down death with his deadly arrows
3. Apollo is usually shown as a manly, beardless youth of great beauty, his head crowned with laurel leaves
· The laurel bay plant was used in expiatory sacrifices and in making the crown of victory in athletic competitions, including the ancient Olympics, and they were symbols of military victory, crowning a successful commander during his triumph.
· Attribute
· Messiah-like Several instances of popular etymology are attested from ancient authors. Thus, Plato in Cratylus connects the name with Aπόλυσις "redeem", with Aπόλουσις "purification",
\
Rev. 6:4 (KJV)
And there went out (4) another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon (5) to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him (6) a great sword.
4. Apollo Atepomarus ("the great horseman"").
5. Apollo was the god of war
6. One of Apollo's most common attributes was the sword..
Rev. 6:5 (KJV)
And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a(7) black horse; and he that sat on him had (8)a pair of balances in his hand.
7. Apollo Atepomarus ("the great horseman"").
8. The Arrow of Apollo, is the symbol of fertility, rain, lightning, war, famine, disease, death is associated with the sun, moon and atmospheric gods. Apollo gave Hercules a solar arrow. Apollo's arrows are the sun's rays.
· Attributes:
· Apollo was the god to avert famine or the one to cause it.
Rev. 6:8 (KJV)
And I looked, and behold (9)a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was (10)Hell and (11)Death, and followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to (12)kill with sword, and (13)with hunger, and with death, and (14)with the beasts of the earth.
9. Apollo Atepomarus ("the great horseman"").
10. Apollo/Apollyon is the King of Hell
11. The Arrow of Apollo is a , symbol of fertility, rain, lightning, war, famine, disease, and death
12. One of Apollo epithet was chrysáoros or chrysáor --meaning "of the Golden Sword" (áor).
13. The Arrow of Apollo is a , symbol of fertility, rain, lightning, war, famine, disease, and death
14. Beast of the field some of Apollo epithet was the wolf and Lion .
To understand this we must look at the horn of Islam.
Hubal and Allah the Moon God?
1. Moon worship has been practiced in Arabia since 2000 BC. The crescent moon is the most common symbol of this pagan moon worship as far back as 2000 BC.
2. In Mecca, there was a god named Hubal who was Lord of the Kabah.
3. This Hubal was a moon god.
4. One Muslim apologist confessed that the idol of moon god Hubal was placed upon the roof of the Kaba about 400 years before Muhammad. This may in fact be the origin of why the crescent moon is on top of every minaret at the Kaba today and the central symbol of Islam atop of every mosque throughout the world:
About four hundred years before the birth of Muhammad one Amr bin Lahyo ... a descendant of Qahtan and king of Hijaz, had put an idol called Hubal on the roof of the Kaba. This was one of the chief deities of the Quraish before Islam.(Muhammad –the holy prophet ) Hafiz Ghulam Sarwar (Pakistan), p 18-19, Muslim)
5. The moon god was also referred to as "al-ilah". This is not a proper name of a single specific god, but a generic reference meaning "the god". Each local pagan Arab tribe would refer to their own local tribal pagan god as "al-ilah".
6. "al-ilah" was later shortened to Allah before Muhammad began promoting his new religion in 610 AD.
7. There is evidence that Hubal was referred to as "Allah".
8. When Muhammad came along, he dropped all references to the name "Hubal" but retained the generic "Allah".
9. Muhammad retained almost all the pagan rituals of the Arabs at the Kaba and redefined them in monotheistic terms.
10. Regardless of the specifics of the facts, it is clear that Islam is derived from paganism that once worshiped a moon-god.
11. Although Islam is today a monotheist religion, its roots are in paganism.
Now we can begin to connect the moon and beast together.
First we must understand that from culture to culture the deities names change but it is still the same deity.
Apparently, at a very early date, a connection was made among the menstrual cycles of women, human fertility, and the moon.
This had, as a consequence, a regular association of the moon and human reproduction in all its aspects. The Egyptian god Min (*mjn) is frequently portrayed as ithyphallic; and his name should be related to IE me:n, "moon".
The familiar moon-goddess of Greece is Selene (S/Helé:ne:) is transparently simply "moon". For the archetypical moon-god, the figure of Silenus (S(e)ile:nós), which I would trace to IE 2. swel- as well ( cf. Greek heíle:/héle:, "warmth of the sun, sunlight").
Silenus is a satyr, a species "fond of wine and women" (Seyffert 1995, p. 559) and "very indecorous" (Seyffert 1995, p. 560), which finds a modern echo in our medical term satyriasis. A connection that should be noticed is Seyffert's (and Perry's: Greek and Roman Sculpture) interpretation "of external marks of his lower nature . . . the pointed ears and arrangement of the hair over the forehead, which is a reminiscence of the budding horns of the goat".
One interesting thing that hares, goats, {“a symbol of Greece and the BeastDan.8” and lions have in common is the slit-iris, which was associated with the crescent quarters of the lunar cycle.
Apollo Greek argurotoxos (he) of the silver bow “ is the sanitized version of this ancient god of male potency; whose name, Apóllo:n, is easily derivable from the attested Luwian Appa-liuna-s, which Is interpreted as "father lion".
Apollo
The acknowledged moon-goddess of Greece is Selene (S/Helé:ne:), which means simply "moon". Her earliest male counterpart will have been Silenus (S(e)ile:nós), who is a satyr and "very indecorous" (Seyffert 1995, p. 560), which is a quaint 19th Century way of expressing that, like Min, he was often ithyphallically portrayed. We have attempted to demonstrate by illustrations that the celestial body associated with animal procreation, which would have a direct connection with turgid portrayals, is the moon.
Apollo A connection between Apollo and Silenus is, at least literarily, present. In the myth of Hermes' theft of the cattle (these are also lunar avatars) of Apollo in the version supplied in a lost satyr-play by Sophocles (Ichneutai or The Trackers)(1), of all the different personages Apollo might have called on for assistance, he calls on Silenus and his satyrs. Who should be more concerned about the theft of the moon's cattle than another avatar of the moon, Silenus, the alter ego of Apollo?
So Apollyon is connected to the beast of the field.
Rev. 6:12 (KJV) And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the (15)sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the
(16) moon became as blood;
15. Apollo, like other Greek deities, had a number of epithets applied to him, reflecting the variety of roles, duties, and aspects ascribed to the god. However, while Apollo has a great number of appellations in Greek myth, only a few occur in Latin literature, chief among them Phoebus ("shining one"),The god of the sun.(God YHWH is cursing one of his epithets the sun.)
16. The crescent moon which is the ancient Arabian moon-god "Sin"Greek Silenus now worshipped under the name "allah".(God YHWH is cursing one of the epithets the moon.)“see pt.14”
Rev. 13:3 (KJV)
And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and (17) his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.]
17. In Apollo's role as healer, his appellations included Akesios and Iatros, meaning "healer". Apollo Cunomaglus ('hound lord'). A title given to Apollo at a shrine in Wiltshire. Apollo Cunomaglus may have been a god of healing.
Rev. 9:7 (KJV)
And the (18)shapes of the locusts were like unto horses prepared unto battle; and on their heads were as it were crowns like gold, and their faces were as the faces of men.
18. Apollyon/Apollo - Romans as Averruncus As a plague god of rats and locusts,
We can as well find the answer of the god of the locust in is in Amos 7:1
First we will look at the traditional reading of Amos 7:1 which reads as follows:
Amos 7:1 (KJV) Thus hath the Lord God shewed unto me; and, behold, he formed grasshoppers in the beginning of the shooting up of the latter growth; and, lo, it was the latter growth after the king's mowings. Our English Bibles take there translation from the Masoretic text, a 9th century source. If we go back to an earlier translation of the Old Testament into Greek, known as the Septuagint, It gives us a different rending of Amos 7:1:"Thus the Lord showed me, and behold a swarm of locusts were coming, and behold, one of the young devastating locusts was Gog, the King." Amos 7:1 (LXX) The identification of Gog / Apollyon as the king of the locusts would have profound implications upon our understanding of Eze.38-39 we can read in Proverbs 30:27 (KJV) The locusts have no king, yet go they forth all of them by bands; So this is telling us that the "locusts" of Amos 7 are not intended to be natural locusts, but an idiom for something else. We can find the answer in Revelation chapter 9 The locusts there are described as having a king or a Prince over them , which is clearly demonic in nature.
Rev. 16:13-14 (KJV)
And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. [14] For they are (19)the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world,(20) to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.
19. In Apollo's role as healer, his appellations included Akesios and Iatros, meaning "healer”
20. The Aπλοaν suggestion is repeated by Plutarch in Moralia in the sense of "unity".[citation needed] Hesychius connects the name Apollo with the Doric απελλα, which means "assembly", so that Apollo would be the god of political life,
Rev. 13:15 (KJV)
And he had power to (21)give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
21. When in the consulship of Appius Claudius, and Marcus Perpenna, Publius Crassus was slain in a battle with Aristonicus, Apollo's statue at Cumae shed tears for four days without intermission. *There is a man, at this day, in the Church of Rome, somewhere on the Continent,
who rejoices in the name of St. Cubertin, who so overflows with Idolatry, that when he engages in his devotions there is no keeping his body down to the ground, but, spite of all the laws of gravity, it rises several feet into the air. So was it also with the renowned St. Francis of Assisi, * Petrus a Martina, * and Francis of Macerata, * some centuries ago. But both St. Cubertin and St. Francis and his fellows are far from being original in this superhuman devotion.
The APOLLO BELVEDERE, a famous marble statue is located in the Vatican .
“See The Islamic Jihad Part#3 The 2nd.Beast”
Further, the Pope, in the plenitude of his power, assumes the right of wielding the lightnings of Jehovah, and of blasting by his "fulminations" whoever offends him. Kings, and whole nations, believing in this power, have trembled and bowed before him, through fear of being scathed by his spiritual thunders.
Daniel 8:22
Now that being broken, whereas four stood up for it, four kingdoms shall stand up out of the nation, (22)but not in his power.
22. Two fold meaning not in the power of Alexander the Great nor in the power of Apollyon who possessed him and was Prince of his Kingdom.
Daniel 8: 23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, (23) a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.
23. Two fold meaning a man and Apollyon
Daniel 8: 24 (24)And his power shall be mighty, (25)but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and (26) shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
24. Witchcraft and miracles Apollyon is the prince of these.
25. not by the power of a mortal man but Apollyon and Satan
26. By Apollyon the destroyer and the mortal man beast.
Abaddon/Apollyon/Apollo is the same "destroyer" of the Passover who slew all the firstborn of man and beast in Egypt. This same "destroyer" passed through the land of Israel and slew the "firstborn" Jews, those of the Old Covenant, while the younger sons, the Jews of the New Covenant were covered by the blood of the Lamb and thus were spared from this judgment.
He will be the same used to pass judgement on man during the tribulation as well.
Daniel 8: 25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: (27)he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
27. Apollyon will be the one who fights against Jesus not the mortal man antichrist .Man cannot fight against Jesus only a Spirit can. But this has refrence .as well To the Beast at Armageddon.
Daniel 7:20 (KJV)
And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more (28) stout than his fellows
28. Apollyon is Chief of the Fallen Angels under Satan
rab; (Chaldee); corresponding to Hebrew 7227 (rab) :- captain, chief, great, lord, master, stout.
Daniel 7:25 (KJV)
And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to (29)change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
29. Apollo was the god of law
|