Illustration
of the fractal nature of the reality
Complex Cognitive
Complex’ Dynamical Diagram
The diagram doesn’t stay really where it seems to stay. As product of the Cognitive Complex, it must be put at the right of itself! Really, the left side represents the 3D version, the actualisation of the diagram, i.e. the “perceptive” brain.
Zoom
on the
Universal
Entailment Dynamical Scheme
Scenario 1
|
|
? 0 ~.Absolute original singularity or eternity
( infinite regression) ~ {}
|
||||||||||
|
>>>> |
|||||||||||
|
|
This right part of the diagram comes first in
the reality and, of course, is the condition of possibility of the expression
of the diagram, in its 3D version, the
conscious brain, and in its self-schematisation, the nest of diagrams, as
illustrated here below
but the representation has the
cognitive-semantic precedence over its model.
The trouble with this representation comes from
the impression that the largest set must contain more elements than the
smallest. But it is the converse that happens, even if counter-intuitive at
first sight.
It is really question of a “dynamical” scheme;
set & subsets in evolution, in temporal perspective!
In set theory, a set cannot miss its subset
while the subset subsists without its complementary part.
In this universal entailment “dynamical”
scheme, the smallest set, which is also the highest stratum, that upon which
exert the stronger conditions, cannot subsist alone, while it is possible for
the oldest strata. If we reversed the representation of the process, we would
miss the “entailment” phenomenon.
w Þ … Þ Beyond consciousness Þ Consciousness Þ Brain Þ Life Þ … a
The effective, spatio-temporal superiority of a
subset is indicated by its Von Neumann number:
{…{{{{{{}}}}}}…} Þ … Þ {{{{{{{}}}}}}}Þ {{{{{}}}}} Þ {{{{}}}} Þ {{{}}} Þ{{}} Þ {}
God entity?
If of
totally different nature, it is “absolutely” outside of the reality, out of the
box, otherwise, included in the nest of sets
As it can
not be of a lower nature, it has to be at the end of the process, infinitely
far in the future; infinite progression. If God exists, time is an illusion.
Because of the simultaneity principle, either time exists, either God
exists (// Time travel paradox)
Unless it
were the process itself, but then…
… God is to
come, God is coming, God is continually coming, God is future
God is
looking for himself
Retrojection
of God
Id-entity =
identity of an entity
scenarios:
In the
first scenario, God infinitely prorogued inside… himself: he tests himself.
God-info takes control of the process from… the future, against the grain! Such
a God seems to be couter-intuitive.
Reverse
Dynamical Pantheism, Auto-reverse Universal Engineering. This is a more
spectacular scenario than the Anthropic principle, pre-established program in
the past.
In the
second scenario, God absolutely outside, out of the box, just a game! No connection of any kind
between God and the whole reality, as it clearly appears.
Zoom
on the
Productive
(at this level) part of the Diagram
|
|
|
Material
input: Disassembly-debugging Organical
computable nanocalculator |
??? |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
▼ ⇓ genotype [intrinsic neural/neuronal speed processing factor (speed) & neural system complexity factor] primary mental abilities |
|
▼ ⇓ g’ ►
phenotype [metabolism + sense] ► Interface 1st filter 1st crystallisation [immediate environment] t1-t4 |
|
⇓
Personality g” ► 2d filter 2d ► crystallisation t1-t4 Environment [non-g + g loaded entities {this functioning diagram ;
fractal ?}] |
|
→ |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Bodily-kinaesthetic |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Intrapersonal |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Naturalist |
G |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
t5 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Callous Corpus Raw
g Dynamical programmation t0-t3 Pre-brain Pre-genetics Pre-program (DNA?) [awarenaess (self-consciousness)] |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||