Turn autoplay off
Turn autoplay on
Please activate cookies in order to turn autoplay off
Jump to content s
Jump to site navigation 0
Jump to search 4
Terms and conditions 8
Edition: UK
US
Sign in Mobile
About us
About us
Contact us
Press office
Guardian Print Centre
Guardian readers' editor
Observer readers' editor
Terms of service
Privacy policy
Advertising guide
Digital archive
Digital edition
Guardian Weekly
Buy Guardian and Observer photos
Subscribe
Today’s paper
The Guardian
G2 features
Comment and debate
Editorials, letters and corrections
Obituaries
Other lives
Sport
SocietyGuardian
Subscribe
Subscribe
Subscribe to the Guardian
iPhone app
iPad edition
Kindle
Extra
Guardian Weekly
Digital edition
All our services
The Guardian home The Observer home
News
Sport
Comment
Culture
Business
Money
Life & style
Travel
Environment
TV
Data
Video
Mobile
Offers
Jobs
News
Technology
Internet
‘Cuckold’ case will test the limits of the internet ===================================================
Plumber whose wife had a 10-year affair was investigated by an elite serious crime unit and faces charges for pursuing his grievances online
Tweet this
reddit this
Jamie Doward
The Observer, Sunday 12 June 2011
Article history
About this article
Close
'Cuckold' case will test the limits of the internet
===================================================
This article appeared on p9 of the Main section section of the
Observer on Sunday 12 June 2011. It was published on
guardian.co.uk at 00.06 BST on Sunday 12 June 2011. It was last
modified at 12.34 BST on Sunday 12 June 2011. It was first
published at 00.07 BST on Sunday 12 June 2011.
Ian PuddickIan Puddick is now reconciled with his wife.
A plumber who used the internet to highlight his wife’s affair with a director of one of the world’s largest financial companies will appear in court on harassment charges. Lawyers believe the case could help define the limits of free expression on the internet.
Ian Puddick, 41, from east London, was incensed after learning that his wife had conducted a 10-year relationship with her boss, a director of Guy Carpenter, a reinsurance company that advises clients on risk management.
Puddick set up a series of websites, a Twitter account and a blog to draw attention to the affair, alleging that the director, who he named, was pursuing an affair with his wife on the company’s time and expenses – a claim rejected by Guy Carpenter. The company maintains Puddick’s actions forced the director to leave his position due to stress.
Puddick’s legal team are expected to use the three-day hearing at Westminster magistrates court to examine the actions of the City of London police, which dispatched its serious crime unit to raid his home and office in search of evidence.
Puddick’s legal team is seeking to summon a number of Guy Carpenter’s executives to appear at his trial, a move that promises unwanted publicity for a company that likes to keep a relatively low profile. Internal Guy Carpenter emails obtained by Puddick’s legal team and seen by the Observer show that the firm employed a subsidiary – Kroll, a global private investigation agency used by many blue chip companies – in its quest to establish that Puddick was waging a harassment campaign.
Kroll briefed Guy Carpenter executives that the police had “offered significant assistance” in dealing with Puddick, whom it believed might be “dangerously unstable”. One Kroll director emailed several Guy Carpenter executives on 23 July 2009, following a meeting with City police. “They … warn that the penalties for harassment are not very severe, unless you reoffend, and that the prosecution will be out of our control once the police and the Criminal Prosecution Service agree there is a case to answer. We should remember Puddick may relish the prospect of a day in court.”
The email continues: “The civil route has the advantage of us being able to cease the prosecution at any stage, and tougher penalties. However, if the police take this on we can avoid being seen to have any role in prosecuting Puddick, which also has advantages. One way to combine the two may be to talk to Puddick post arrest, and warn him of our options in the civil courts to stop him reoffending.”
The case is likely to be watched closely by legal and media experts as the battle to regulate what is disseminated over the internet is waged in the courts. Recent cases involving new media and super-injunctions have also raised questions on whether regulating the net inhibits freedom of speech.
Michael Wolkind QC, representing Puddick, said his client intended to defend his actions. “This case is about Mr Puddick’s right to express his feelings about another person’s immorality. Ian Puddick dared to speak out about his wife’s affair and it has cost the public £1m for the extraordinary investigation carried out by an unusually enthusiastic police alongside an elite security firm.”
Puddick’s legal team say his home has been burgled and files were stolen as well as some valuables. However, following a police investigation, there is nothing to suggest that Guy Carpenter or Kroll were involved in any illegal activity.
Puddick is now reconciled with his wife.
• This article was amended on 12 June 2011
Print thisPrintable version
Send to a friend
Share
Clip
Contact us
larger smaller
Close Recipient’s email address Your first name Your surname Add a note (optional)
Your IP address will be logged
Share
Close Short link for this page: http://gu.com/p/2pm99
StumbleUpon
reddit
Tumblr
Digg
LinkedIn
Google Bookmarks
del.icio.us
livejournal
Facebook
Twitter
Contact us
Close
Contact the Technology editor
tech@guardian.co.uk
Report errors or inaccuracies: reader@observer.co.uk
Letters for publication should be sent to: letters@observer.co.uk
If you need help using the site: userhelp@guardian.co.uk
Call the main Guardian and Observer switchboard:
+44 (0)20 3353 2000
Advertising guide
License/buy our content
Technology
Internet
Law
UK news
More news
Related
15 Jun 2011
Man on trial over Twitter 'affair' claims says case has 'big legal
implications'
23 Feb 2004
Hackers threaten online bookmakers
23 May 2011
Ryan Giggs named as footballer at the centre of privacy row
31 Oct 2011
Who should fight cyberspace's battles?
Print thisPrintable version
Send to a friend
Share
Clip
Contact us
Article history
Close Recipient’s email address Your first name Your surname Add a note (optional)
Your IP address will be logged
Share
Close Short link for this page: http://gu.com/p/2pm99
StumbleUpon
reddit
Tumblr
Digg
LinkedIn
Google Bookmarks
del.icio.us
livejournal
Facebook
Twitter
Contact us
Close
Contact the Technology editor
tech@guardian.co.uk
Report errors or inaccuracies: reader@observer.co.uk
Letters for publication should be sent to: letters@observer.co.uk
If you need help using the site: userhelp@guardian.co.uk
Call the main Guardian and Observer switchboard:
+44 (0)20 3353 2000
Advertising guide
License/buy our content
About this article
Close
‘Cuckold’ case will test the limits of the internet ===================================================
This article appeared on p9 of the Main section section of the Observer on Sunday 12 June 2011. It was published on guardian.co.uk at 00.06 BST on Sunday 12 June 2011. It was last modified at 12.34 BST on Sunday 12 June 2011. It was first published at 00.07 BST on Sunday 12 June 2011.
On Technology
Most viewed
Zeitgeist
Latest
Last 24 hours
1. 1. Google doodle marks 60th anniversary of Stanislaw
Lem's first book
2. 2. Video games are the answer to the New Boring
3. 3. Xbox Live users hit by phishing attacks
4. 4. Modern Warfare 3 reviews: why is this the most hated game on
the web?
5. 5. Chatterbox: Wednesday
6. More most viewed
Last 24 hours
1. Google doodle marks 60th anniversary of Stanislaw Lem's first
book
2. Chatterbox: Wednesday
3. Xbox Live users hit by phishing attacks
4. Video games are the answer to the New Boring
5. Modern Warfare 3 reviews: why is this the most hated game on the
web?
6. More zeitgeist What is Zeigeist?What is Zeitgeist?
Zeitgeist is an experiment in showing trending news, topics and
articles from the Guardian. Find out more in our blog post.
Last 24 hours
1. 1. Apps Rush: Noddy in Toyland, Comet, 360 Panorama,
Dream Zoo, Timelines for Facebook and more
2. 2. Nokia Lumia 800 'set to trail iPhone 4S'
3. 3. Boot up: Apple takes over porn domains, the Facebook phone
that wasn't, and more
4. 4. Chatterbox: Wednesday
5. 5. Google doodle marks 60th anniversary of Stanislaw Lem's first
book
6. All today's stories
Law news on Twitter
Law news and comment from the Guardian’s legal affairs team on Twitter
GdnLaw
GdnLaw: Vince Cable: employment law reforms will not threaten job
security http://t.co/xbCYbG7h
about 40 minutes ago
GdnLaw
GdnLaw: Ken Clarke ditches plan to scrap chief coroner
http://t.co/GirhdKbW
about 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
GdnLaw
GdnLaw: 'They know you are vulnerable' – plight of older people in
home care http://t.co/a45BW03u
about 10 hours ago
• More from the Guardian’s legal affairs team
Guardian Bookshop
This week’s bestsellers
1. 1. I, Steve
£7.99
2. 2. iPad for the Older and Wiser
by Sean McManus £12.99
3. 3. Art of Pixar: 25th Anniversary
by John Lasseter £35.00
4. 4. Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception
£19.99
5. 5. Pokemon Black and White Versions
£14.99
Search the Guardian bookshop
Search
Bestsellers from the Guardian shop
Steepletone Memphis music centre
Steepletone Memphis music centre
Play your cherished vinyl, tapes and CDs, and transfer them to a
digital format, just £149.95. Accessories:
From: £7.95
Shop more reader offers
See all offers and services from the Guardian
Sponsored feature
guardian jobs
Find the latest jobs in your sector:
Arts & heritage
Charities
Education
Environment
Government
Graduate
Health
Marketing & PR
Media
Sales
Senior executive
Social care
Browse all jobs
Junior Developer
Brighton £competitive
MADGEX LTD
Related information
Technology
Internet
Law
UK news
Dominic Grieve
Twitter users who breach injunctions risk legal action, warns attorney general
7 Jun 2011
Users whose tweets breach gagging orders could face fines or even jail for contempt of court. By Tara Conlan
2 Mar 2011
Cyber crime 'threatens UK stockmarket, pensions and businesses'
20 Jul 2009
National interest would dominate Tory foreign policy, says Hague
11 Feb 2007
Police launch probe into Terry Lloyd killing
9 Jul 2008
Woman in 1988 sex attack can sue £7m lottery winner
Twitter faces legal action by footballer over privacy
20 May 2011
Website faces action after users purported to reveal name of player who allegedly had affair with model Imogen Thomas. By Josh Halliday
Hot topics
Steve Jobs
Apple
Technology blog
Games blog
Game reviews
License/buy our content
Privacy policy
Terms & conditions
Advertising guide
Accessibility
A-Z index
Inside the Guardian blog
About us
Work for us
Join our dating site today
© 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated
companies. All rights reserved.
Quantcast
g string herself could same
with the the these same you of does under an yourselves then no
because herself Like, that yours
they g string few that know if while surely such theirs here he all a
at an more hers not out
or g string such out outta sight outta sight yourselves ours g string
for or g string maybe could be! because outta sight again very off too ours under very out her
our these is yours these both
only at nor what were what
me and were g string both both who she before in
when all under or of our only Like, itself
our from but same she down is again
under here over down and further you being surely yourselves
itself same same from with be! the because same are up in
below each against to or under been then has see above herself through their up be
to being themselves or with who
