Shakespeare Class Homepage


Characters in  MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM

A Critical Essay by William Hazlitt

 

An essay by William Hazlitt, on Shakespeare’s characters in

“A Midsummer Night's Dream,” From the book 

Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays By William Hazlitt,

London: Dent & Sons, 1906, 97-103.

 

Bottom the Weaver is a character that has not had justice done him.

He is the most romantic of mechanics. And what a list of companions

he has--Quince the Carpenter, Snug the Joiner, Flute the Bellows-

mender, Snout the Tinker, Starveling the Tailor; and then again,

what a group of fairy attendants, Puck, Peaseblossom, Cobweb, Moth,

and Mustard-seed! It has been observed that Shakespeare's characters

are constructed upon deep physiological principles; and there is

something in this play which looks very like it. Bottom the Weaver,

who takes the lead of

 

     This crew of patches, rude mechanicals,

     That work for bread upon Athenian stalls,

 

follows a sedentary trade, and he is accordingly represented as

conceited, serious, and fantastical. He is ready to undertake

anything and everything, as if it was as much a matter of course as

the motion of his loom and shuttle. He is for playing the tyrant,

the lover, the lady, the lion. 'He will roar that it shall do any

man's heart good to hear him'; and this being objected to as

improper, he still has a resource in his good opinion of himself,

and 'will roar you an 'twere any nightingale'. Snug the Joiner is

the moral man of the piece, who proceeds by measurement and

discretion in all things. You see him with his rule and compasses in

his hand. 'Have you the lion's part written? Pray you, if it be,

give it me, for I am slow of study.'--'You may do it extempore,'

says Quince, 'for it is nothing but roaring.' Starveling the Tailor

keeps the peace, and objects to the lion and the drawn sword. 'I

believe we must leave the killing out when all's done.' Starveling,

however, does not start the objections himself, but seconds them

when made by others, as if he had not spirit to express his fears

without encouragement. It is too much to suppose all this

intentional; but it very luckily falls out so. Nature includes all

that is implied in the most subtle analytical distinctions; and the

same distinctions will be found in Shakespeare. Bottom, who is not

only chief actor, but stage-manager for the occasion, has a device

to obviate the danger of frightening the ladies: 'Write me a

prologue, and let the prologue seem to say, we will do no harm with

our swords, and that Pyramus is not killed indeed; and for better

assurance, tell them that I, Pyramus, am not Pyramus, but Bottom the

Weaver; this will put them out of fear.' Bottom seems to have

understood the subject of dramatic illusion at least as well as any

modern essayist. If our holiday mechanic rules the roast among his

fellows, he is no less at home in his new character of an ass, 'with

amiable cheeks, and fair large ears'. He instinctively acquires a

most learned taste, and grows fastidious in the choice of dried peas

and bottled hay. He is quite familiar with his new attendants, and

assigns them their parts with all due gravity. 'Monsieur Cobweb,

good Monsieur, get your weapon in your hand, and kill me a red-hipt

humble-bee on the top of a thistle, and, good Monsieur, bring me the

honey-bag.' What an exact knowledge is here shown of natural

history!

 

Puck, or Robin Goodfellow, is the leader of the fairy band. He is

the Ariel of the MIDSUMMER'S NIGHT DREAM; and yet as unlike as can

be to the Ariel in THE TEMPEST. No other poet could have made two

such different characters out of the same fanciful materials and

situations. Ariel is a minister of retribution, who is touched with

a sense of pity at the woes he inflicts. Puck is a mad-cap sprite,

full of wantonness and mischief, who laughs at those whom he

misleads--'Lord, what fools these mortals be!' Ariel cleaves the

air, and executes his mission with the zeal of a winged messenger;

Puck is borne along on his fairy errand like the light and

glittering gossamer before the breeze. He is, indeed, a most

Epicurean little gentleman, dealing in quaint devices and faring in

dainty delights. Prospero and his world of spirits are a set of

moralists; but with Oberon and his fairies we are launched at once

into the empire of the butterflies. How beautifully is this race of

beings contrasted with the men and women actors in the scene, by a

single epithet which Titania gives to the latter, 'the human

mortals'! It is astonishing that Shakespeare should be considered,

not only by foreigners, but by many of our own critics, as a gloomy

and heavy writer, who painted nothing but 'gorgons and hydras, and

chimeras dire'. His subtlety exceeds that of all other dramatic

writers, insomuch that a celebrated person of the present day said

that he regarded him rather as a metaphysician than a poet. His

delicacy and sportive gaiety are infinite. In the MIDSUMMER'S NIGHT

DREAM alone, we should imagine, there is more sweetness and beauty

of description than in the whole range of French poetry put

together. What we mean is this, that we will produce out of that

single play ten passages, to which we do not think any ten passages

in the works of the French poets can be opposed, displaying equal

fancy and imagery. Shall we mention the remonstrance of Helena to

Hermia, or Titania's description of her fairy train, or her disputes

with Oberon about the Indian boy, or Puck's account of himself and

his employments, or the Fairy Queen's exhortation to the elves to

pay due attendance upon her favourite, Bottom; or Hippolita's

description of a chace, or Theseus's answer? The two last are as

heroical and spirited as the others are full of luscious tenderness.

The reading of this play is like wandering in a grove by moonlight:

the descriptions breathe a sweetness like odours thrown from beds of

flowers.

 

Titania's exhortation to the fairies to wait upon Bottom, which is

remarkable for a certain cloying sweetness in the repetition of the

rhymes, is as follows:

 

     Be kind and courteous to this gentleman.

     Hop in his walks, and gambol in his eyes,

     Feed him with apricocks and dewberries,

     With purple grapes, green figs and mulberries;

     The honey-bags steal from the humble bees,

     And for night tapers crop their waxen thighs,

     And light them at the fiery glow-worm's eyes,

     To have my love to bed, and to arise:

     And pluck the wings from painted butterflies,

     To fan the moon-beams from his sleeping eyes;

     Nod to him, elves, and do him courtesies.

 

The sounds of the lute and of the trumpet are not more distinct than

the poetry of the foregoing passage, and of the conversation between

Theseus and Hippolita:

 

   Theseus. Go, one of you, find out the forester,

     For now our observation is perform'd;

     And since we have the vaward of the day,

     My love shall hear the music of my hounds.

     Uncouple in the western valley, go,

     Dispatch, I say, and find the forester.

     We will, fair Queen, up to the mountain's top,

     And mark the musical confusion

     Of hounds and echo in conjunction.

 

   Hippolita. I was with Hercules and Cadmus once,

     When in a wood of Crete they bay'd the bear

     With hounds of Sparta; never did I hear

     Such gallant chiding. For besides the groves,

     The skies, the fountains, every region near

     Seena'd all one mutual cry. I never heard

     So musical a discord, such sweet thunder.

 

   Theseus. My hounds are bred out of the Spartan kind,

     So flew'd, so sanded, and their heads are hung

     With ears that sweep away the morning dew;

     Crook-knee'd and dew-lap'd, like Thessalian bulls,

     Slow in pursuit, but matched in mouth like bells,

     Each under each. A cry more tuneable

     Was never halloo'd to, nor cheer'd with hom,

     In Crete, in Sparta, nor in Thessaly:  Judge when you hear.

 

Even Titian never made a hunting-piece of a gusto so fresh and

lusty, and so near the first ages of the world as this.

 

It had been suggested to us, that the MIDSUMMER'S NIGHT DREAM would

do admirably to get up as a Christmas after-piece; and our prompter

proposed that Mr. Kean should play the part of Bottom, as worthy of

his great talents. He might, in the discharge of his duty, offer to

play the lady like any of our actresses that he pleased, the lover

or the tyrant like any of our actors that he pleased, and the lion

like 'the most fearful wild-fowl living'. The carpenter, the tailor,

and joiner, it was thought, would hit the galleries. The young

ladies in love would interest the side-boxes; and Robin Goodfellow

and his companions excite a lively fellow-feeling in the children

from school. There would be two courts, an empire within an empire,

the Athenian and the Fairy King and Queen, with their attendants,

and with all their finery. What an opportunity for processions, for

the sound of trumpets and glittering of spears! What a fluttering of

urchins' painted wings; what a delightful profusion of gauze clouds

and airy spirits floating on them!

 

Alas, the experiment has been tried, and has failed; not through the

fault of Mr. Kean, who did not play the part of Bottom, nor of Mr.

Liston, who did, and who played it well, but from the nature of

things. The Midsummer Night's Dream, when acted, is converted from a

delightful fiction into a dull pantomime. All that is finest in the

play is lost in the representation. The spectacle was grand; but the

spirit was evaporated, the genius was fled.--Poetry and the stage do

not agree well together. The attempt to reconcile them in this

instance fails not only of effect, but of decorum. The IDEAL can

have no place upon the stage, which is a picture without

perspective; everything there is in the foreground. That which was

merely an airy shape, a dream, a passing thought, immediately

becomes an unmanageable reality. Where all is left to the

imagination (as is the case in reading) every circumstance, near or

remote, has an equal chance of being kept in mind, and tells

according to the mixed impression of all that has been suggested.

But the imagination cannot sufficiently qualify the actual

impressions of the senses. Any offence given to the eye is not to be

got rid of by explanation. Thus Bottom's head in the play is a

fantastic illusion, produced by magic spells: on the stage, it is an

ass's head, and nothing more; certainly a very strange costume for a

gentleman to appear in. Fancy cannot be embodied any more than a

simile can be painted; and it is as idle to attempt it as to

personate Wall or Moonshine. Fairies are not incredible, but fairies

six feet high are so. Monsters are not shocking, if they are seen at

a proper distance. When ghosts appear at midday, when apparitions

stalk along Cheapside, then may the MIDSUMMER'S NIGHT DREAM be

represented without injury at Covent Garden or at Drury Lane. The

boards of a theatre and the regions of fancy

__________________________________________________

 

This public domain etext is presented in this format by Librarian

Deborah Cox of Montgomery College Library  in full compliance

with the license provided by Project Gutenberg

 

For full details of this license, go to

http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:The_Project_Gutenberg_License.