| This page is a cont. of Government crimes on the Silicon Rainbow web
site, but switched to my other web site Green Rooster because there is so
many scanned documents there isn't enough memory on anyone. I apologize if
anyone finds it difficult to navigate this information but remember it
wasn't put here for your enjoyment, there are a lot of people being hurt
by government bean counters (neocons) who can't tell the difference between
capitalism and democracy, what's good for them and the right thing to do.
|
| I don't know which I should list first, the document concerning the
law suit against congressperson Brad Sherman or the U.S. attorney's, but
the last is a complaint against a police officer in L.A. Here's the stuff
on Brad Sherman (D-24th distric L.A.) The first is the original lawsuit
(actually you can't sue a congressperson, but the point is Brad Sherman
does know now people have to use force to protect themselfs from gangsters
in the government)Lawsuit
complaint on Brad Sherman, congressperson part 1 Sue
Brad Sherman part 2Now here's where one of my famous government reflex
responses when I do get replies. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
The government lawyers knew a conressperson cannot be sued so they moved
to have the case dismissed. now check out #2 again, line 2: 2.
Line 2 says Brad Sherman only got ONE letter from me, but if you look at
the letter: The
March 1, 2002 letter You can notice I sent a lot of copies out. In
particularly to congressperson Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-33rd). This
congressperson replied not only to this letter but to three of them.Sep
18, 2001 Nature wouldn't let me keep all three replies. Call her at
1-213-628-9230 and ask her about her copies ( email me,
websuspect@pulp-fiction.com, and I'll tell you why.) Did you notice
Roybal-Allard's reply came six months before Brad Sherman got the March 1,
2002 letter. He lied to a federal court. |
| Next part of the plan was to sue the U.S. Attorney for also refusing
to let me complain that I was not being allowed to vote (this is called:
The FBI was refusing to protect my right to vote) Here's the first try:Complaint
U.S. is refusing to protect my right to vote page one:and page
two:Followed
by the Federal courts rejection. As could be expected these two Judges
can't the diffrences between an investigation and a prosecution. Deep in
the bowles of the U.S. Attorney's office (and the U.S Justice Dept.) there
are letters from a couple of years before that I made claim by actions of
the Cal State UC Regents these Judges are not fit to know what their
doing.I made another attempt, something similar to an appeal:2nd
complaint. |
| The complaint against the police demonstrates how the citizens need to
use defence if they are going to be guaranteed Due Process. LAPD
Complaint The comlaind starts out as: when I asked the officer if he
got the id facts about the PR (I don't even know what PR means!) he lied
to me so I shoved him. Anyone interested can check with the Los Angelese
Police using control number: CF# 03-2705
|
| HOME |