Q: What is a class action suit?

A: A class action is a representative action wherein one or more plaintiffs actually named in the complaint, along with their counsel pursue a case for themselves and the defined class against one or more defendants. The claims of the "class representatives" must arise from facts or law common to the class members. Most class actions are called "plaintiff class actions;" however, in limited circumstances a class action can be filed against one or more defendants representing a group of defendants, i.e., a "defendant class" action.

Q: What types of class actions may be filed
A: Most class actions are filed for compensatory (money) damages. Class actions may also be filed to resolve disputes over a "limited fund," where the money available is inadequate to fully compensate all class members. Occasionally, class actions are filed to seek a declaratory judgment. Finally, a class action may seek injunctive relief. For example, a class action may be filed to request the court order the governmental or authorities to discontinue an unconstitutional practice.

Q: Can I be bound by a settlement or judgment of a class action?
A: Yes. If the constitutional and procedural protections required for fairness are met in the underlying action, all absent class members are bound to the judgment or settlement of the case. However, if the action is primarily for compensatory damages, absent class members are entitled to notice and an opportunity to "opt-out" (exclude themselves) from the proceedings. If a person opts-out, he is not bound by any judgment or settlement of the class action. In the event a class action is for declaratory or injunctive relief, notice is not required to bind absent class members and the court may not allow you to opt-out.

Q: How do I join your class action?
A:  There is no requirement for you to “join,” generally, before a court certifies a class action, it must conclude that there are numerous class members for them all to be named as parties in the lawsuit. Technically, class members do not "join" into the litigation, but decide to participate by not "opting-out." It is only in rare instances when a suit is filed as an "opt-in" class action. In those rare instances, a claim form or request to join form may be necessary. Ordinarily, the notice issued to class members in the usual suit for compensatory damages will tell the class if they need to take any action to participate. In a suit for compensatory damages, any class member who does not "opt-out" may be bound by the results of the litigation if it proceeds as a class action. If a class member should determine, however, that he wants to participate in the suit as a named party, he may hire his own lawyer and seek to intervene (participate) in the lawsuit.

Q: If I have a claim, should I file my own lawsuit?
A:  The answer depends on the nature of the suit and individual circumstances. Some class actions seek recovery for a large group of people; however, individual damages may be small. For instance, if a credit card company was improperly charging interest, and as a result every class member paid $100 more than should have been charged, it may not be practical because of the cost of litigation to pursue such a case individually. On the other hand, if a person has substantial damages and a serious claim, a lawyer should be consulted to assist in making the decision. In cases where the damages involved do not amount to several thousand dollars, litigation involving complex issues, due to the cost involved, may result in no recovery after those expenses and costs are deducted.

Q: Who pays the lawyers in a class action lawsuit?
A:  In a class action for money damages, lawyers who represent the class are generally paid out of the recovery, i.e., "common fund" they create for the plaintiff class. In class actions involving declaratory judgments or injunctive relief, lawyers may be paid by the plaintiffs that hired them, or in some cases, by the defendants if the plaintiffs win.
Lawyer’s fee awards are subject to court review and approval. Ordinarily, if an award is made in a common fund case, it will be awarded as a percentage of the fund created for the class. A benchmark award generally accepted by the courts is approximately 25% to 35% although the award may be adjusted higher or lower depending on the specific facts of a case.
Our class action suits are different because I do not charge lawyer’s fees, or any recovery fees. This is because I have my own claims against the defendants. I filed these class action suits with no expectation of gain, either directly or indirectly. The “gain” I expect to receive out of this is the recovery of what I have lost due the defendants’ fraudulent and illegal practice. The law allows a litigant to recover what was lost in the form of damages.

Q: How can I obtain more information on any legal issue regarding your class actions?
A: If you have a question about our class actions or are concerned you may be adversely affected by a pending case, you should consult a lawyer. Or you may contact me at either classaction_cpa@hotmail.com or classproceeding@yahoo.ca. We have added two new e-mail addys: thepeoplevsthebanks@yahoo.com and thepeoplevsthebanks@hotmail.com.

Upon certification of a proposed class proceeding, the law requires that we publish a notice to inform the public regarding all the facts and legal issues and how you might be affected by the class action. Notice will be published in national, regional and local media as well as the internet. This website will be updated from time to time to keep the public aware of what is happening.

For a more detailed info regarding class proceedings in British Columbia, please refer to the Revised Statutes, The Class Proceeding Act R.S.B.C. 1996 c. 50 http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/C/96050_01.htm

You may also sign up as a member of our MSN Groups: http://groups.msn.com/ThePeoplevs-TheBanks or http://groups.msn.com/ThePeoplevsTheBanks

Q:     What is the basis of your class actions against the banks, and why do you say that the banks are engaged in fraudulent and illegal practice?

A:     Our statement of claim explains a lot, however, essentially, when you go to the bank to borrow money, they don't really lend you any money (or not the kind of money that we can see, feel and touch such as gold or legal tender bank notes). Not only do you not receive any money, but the "money" or "credit" that you receive actually comes from you - from the promissory note or commercial instrument which you yourself "validate" by signing the document. The bank takes this instrument which you just created (your own money) from you and the bank deposits this money into their account. They then make a ledger or computer entry into your account and claim they loaned you the money. This is illegal because there is no law in Canada that empowers these corporations to create money out of nothing. Only God can create something out of nothing.

In the above example, the money "loaned" to you by the bank actually came from you. The bank provided no equity in the transaction; the bank never risked anything, nor lost anything and never would have lost anything. The bank was only supposed to keep your money (the promissory note) as collateral, in case you default. But what they do not tell you is that they took your promissory note or commercial instrument and converted it for their own use. They unlawfully enriched themselves, and this is illegal.

Q     Why do you say the money or credit comes from me?

A:     Because that is the truth - the money, or the bank note that we have in circulation today is nothing but a promissory note, it is not real money, but rather a piece of paper, that says the government of Canada (or the U.S.A.) owes us the money, because after they took the gold out of circulation, there is really no money left, and therefore there is nothing to pay our debts with! All we have is the government's promise to pay - worthless IOUs that is not backed with anything other than the government's coercive force which dictates to us that we have to accept this form of "money" or we get nothing for our labour.

The banks have no "credit", the credit comes from us. This credit is backed by our labour, our ability to repay whatever we may borrow. But the banks, the lawyers, the accountants and of course, the bottom feeders - debt collectors do not tell us that. The banks lie to us each time we borrow money because they really do not lend us any money. And whatever money they lend to us is ours to begin with, or at least the money did not come from their vaults as in the case of electronic or digital money.

Q:     Where does the bank get the money to lend to their borrowers?

A:     They use God's money, or money they create out of nothing, out of "thin air," from the sky - they have unlimited sources, made possible by stupid, gullible and trusting people like you and me who are led to believe that they are lending us their own money, or money deposited by their clients in their chequing or savings account. The banks really do not have any money or assets to lend. Money is created each time a borrower signs a promissory note which is then deposited into their account as "cash." Banking regulation does not permit the banks to lend their depositors' money. This cash value is then used by the bank to increase their book asset by the amount that is equivalent to the loan. It is not as though the bank had this money sitting in their vault waiting for someone to come along and borrow that money. The fact is, prior to the loan agreement, when we come to the bank to borrow money, the money did not exist. Therefore the money had to come from somewhere.

In the old days, when banking used to be honest and honorable, only those who have money can engage in the business of lending money. That was when the banking business used to operate just like any other business. If the bank did not have the money, they have to get the money from the central bank or another bank, rent the money at wholesale (low interest) and then lend the money at retail (higher interest) to the borrower. They cannot create unlimited amounts of money like they do now. It is true, banks were allowed to issue debt certificates, or notes, but these are really not intended to be circulated as money.

In recent times, since 1991, banks in Canada are no longer required to have money in order to lend money. You might say: "duh?" But that is true. This is called the zero reserve banking system. This is because there is really no such thing as money. So when you want to borrow money, you just go to one of these banks who does not have any money to lend, and they'll create money right in front of you, just like magic. Just sign a promissory note or loan application form and voila! With one quick computer entry, you now have money sitting in your account! Or the bank issues a cheque payable to you even though these cheques are not backed by any currency or legal tender money.

WARNING: Don't do this at home, do not write cheques without sufficient funds or you will be arrested and charged for the crime of false pretence under the Criminal Code. Only the banks are permitted (not by law) to write cheques with absolutely no funds and yet get away with it and then charge interest on these counterfeit, non-existent monies at criminal interest rates.

You may search for yourself in the Revised Statutes of Canada, Bank Act (1991 c.46) http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/B-1.01/ whether or not you will find any provision that Canadian Banks can lawfully create money of any kind. Banks can only legally do two things - take deposits and make loans. Their corporate charter or power is very limited. Nowhere in the Bank Act or the Canadian Constitution does it say that banks can lawfully or legally create money out of nothing and then lend us this counterfeit, non-existent money and charge us interest for it.

Only the Parliament of Canada (just like the American Congress) can legally create money. http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/const/ See under Part IV Legislative Powers, Section 91.14 - Currency and Coinage; 91.15 - Banking, Incorporation of Banks and the Issue of Paper Money; 91.20 - Legal Tender. So you see folks, only the Parliament can create and issue money, no one else, not even the Central Bank - Bank of Canada is duly authorized by law to create money. Also see: British North America Act 1867 (The BNA). http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/ca_1867.html

For more research materials regarding the Canadian Constitution and other related acts of government clickhere: http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/

Q.     How does the bank really create money?

A:     Simple - they just write a cheque, or they make a book or computer entry. The banks don't even have to have any money of their own, one bank writes a cheque, the other banks have to accept it - according to the Canadian Payments Association clearing rules. This acceptance by the other banks (although they are all realistically one bank) protects the issuing bank from criminal prosecution for false pretence, an indictable crime punishable for up to 5 years. If no one complains, there is no crime. This is how our legal system works. To understand more regarding this subject from the bank's standpoint, please read Modern Money Mechanics published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Remember that the Bank of Canada is considered the "13th Federal Reserve District" and therefore the material applies to the Canadian Banking system as well. http://www.worldnewsstand.net/money/mmm2.html

Download an excellent book by David Healing - "THE INSIDIOUS COIN" http://members.shaw.ca/theinsidiouscoin/index.htm

You may also download the book HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN by Mary Elizabeth: Croft, an excellent book which you can have for free: http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/marysbook.pdf

Click here for more stuff: http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/04/19/canada_class_action_accuses_banks_of_illegal_creation_of_money.htm

Forum for Stable Currency: http://www.monies.cc/  http://www.prosperityuk.com/

We The People Vs The Business Corporations -- Who Is The Sovereign?

by James F. Berry

It could never be clearer than it is today that our society, our government, our nation are greatly injured by the corruption of corporation money. That money is expended in a successful effort to control elections, write legislation, win undeserved subsidies, gain practically free access to water, air, forests, grazing lands, and minerals, subvert officialdom, escape regulation and avoid punishment for harms done. In 1993 a group of Washington DC lawyers, The Alliance for Justice, published a manual entitled JUSTICE FOR SALE, Shortchanging the Public Interest For Private Gain. The Executive Summary concludes that "a powerful coalition of business groups and ideologically -compatible foundations (are) engaged in a multi-faceted, comprehensive, and integrated campaign to elevate corporate profits and private wealth over social justice and individual rights as the cornerstones of our legal process." Clearer than it has ever been before is the fact that the principal results of the work we do, is not to forward the interests of the human community and the Earth process but to augment the wealth and power of the already powerful wealthy. A few amass for themselves what properly is needed for and should be used to sustain many.

Several books and other types of publication listed at the end of this essay reveal the extent to which citizens have lost control over the government to forces threatening its foundations. Our government and the constitution which establishes it assign sovereignty, exercised through democratic processes, to the people. But sovereignty, in fact, is, today, heavily weighted to favor corporations. The fact that corporation money pays election costs and that corporate lobbying succeeds in getting favorable legislation passed is a nationally recognized scandal. In truth, wealth and privilege have always prevailed in this nation. (See Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States). But we have now come to the stage where corporation lawyers sit with congressional committees and lead the writing of proposed legislation. Their drive to render ineffective all efforts to preserve the purity of water and air make it plain that corporate interests are directly pitted against community interests, human and non-human. We are presented with a mystery. Corporate executives are human beings with human concerns about the well-being of their children and the community. But corporations demand the end to clean air and clean water protections anyway. They fight regulations that increase production costs no matter what their purpose. This strategy supports a conclusion that these managers are not really managers at all but simply attendants whose decisions are pre-ordained by the requirement that short term money profit be maximized at all costs. When the bottom line rules from day to day and investors must realize profits immediately, long term good sense must be ignored. Indeed, those activist citizens who ask that society behave in such a way as to protect life and assure the long term prosperity of Earth and its systems are called eco-terrorists and demonized by highly paid sycophants in service to the powerful.

Corporations are the enemy of life. As I have been saying for many years, they are committed to death . What else can be said about forces which propose that we are better off without pure water and air, without rich and fertile soil; without wildness and without trees; without diversity of life, without flourishing oceans; without a healthy Earth. One asks how this situation can be. The explanation lies in the fact that the news media and the entertainment industry, image-makers and opinion-molders, are the property of the same corporations which profit from sales produced by advertising foisted on a curiously innocent and gullible public. Misleading salesmanship pollutes and poisons every channel of communication and tragically reaches even into the classroom. The beautiful people, athletes and movie stars, are nothing more than billboards, money-hungry puppets.

But not only have the corporations bought the media and the entertainment world they have abandoned the presentation of virtue as a guide for living in favor of a materialistic, hedonistic, consuming, constantly shopping life style. It has been truly said that good people are known by the fewness and bad people by the multiplicity of their needs,. Salesmanship, promoting acquisition of unneeded things augments growth in the numbers of bad people. Maybe not so much "bad" people, but people fallen away from the virtues of austerity and simplicity. The outcry against the current does not indict sponsors of and profiteers from those programs but blames them. In line with corporate practice: convict the victim of the crime.

Ecological activists (Earth First! is the best example) who lie down in front of the bulldozers to raise public awareness of the enormous harm being done by the giveaway of the national forests to the timber industry do not meet with appreciation. They are portrayed as terrorists; they are spied upon, harassed and arrested by the FBI. These activists, the finest examples of our youth are the subject of lies; they are called saboteurs, bums, pot-heads, drug pushers. The truth is: no parent could wish for more admirable sons and daughters. ( I am proud to have such a granddaughter.) The timber industry ought to be the objects of our contempt, not these brave young people seeking to preserve the nation's richest heritage. 

The corporation PR effort is directed toward establishing an image of itself as a sort of fairy Godfather, a virtual Santa Claus straining every effort to bring good things into our lives. "We are the good guys" they tell us; "we want you to be happy; we make big sacrifices toward that end." At the same time they tell us that government is corrupt, forcing unneeded regulation on them, that it is run by incompetent and dishonest bureaucracies, contemptuous of ordinary people. Thus corporations plant in the public mind a picture of benign and efficient business battling incompetent government bent on cheating the public. Private enterprise, they lecture, is efficient and trustworthy while public institutions are badly run, wasteful, and uncaring. The truth of the matter is just the opposite. Government bureaucracy, since the long-ago reform of the civil service, is generally pretty well run by honest public servants while private industry has a generous complement of criminals, cheaters, liars and incompetents. Scandal is common, fraud is notorious. Criminal behavior is not uncommon. Consider the ongoing story of Union Carbide; consider catastrophic oil spills; consider tobacco and beer marketing. Who should get off who's back? It's business that rides the backs of our children whose minds we are so foolish as to turn over to them forty hours a week. 

While comparing government performance to that of private industry let us not neglect the question of human rights. An employee of government, local, state and federal, has access to the Bill of Rights; his/her appeals against the boss are listened to; job security is real. One who works for private industry (except for those in strong unions rapidly decreasing in number!) has no rights. If you work for a business enterprise, kiss good-bye to free speech, freedom from search and seizure, freedom of assembly, protection from self-incrimination, freedom from double jeopardy, the right to due process. Industry can discharge any worker, any time for any reason or for no reason. If workers insist on the right to free speech, for instance, in seeking to unionize the work force, they will almost certainly be fired the instant management finds out. And it is not at all unlikely that the courts will support management. 

A corporation is free to move with little thought for its disruption of the local community and the suffering of its employees. Short term money profit is the only consideration management feels obliged to recognize. There is nothing compelling about the ethics of business behavior. After all, business operations are conducted in a "value free" climate, i.e., beyond the reach of morality or ethics. But, if one were to lay out a code to prescribe the proper obligations of the business world, it would have to include something along these lines: The fruits of Earth are owed to the inhabitants of Earth. These fruits are to be taken from Earth by a collaboration of capital, management and labor for which capital, management, labor and Earth earn remuneration in proportions that satisfy the needs of each. But management has control. Too often they refuse labor its fair share and nearly always dismiss as irrelevant the obligation to return anything to Earth. Earth is an "externality" (i.e., free for the taking) in business economics. The principle of reciprocity governs, or ought to govern, all human activity. Give back to Earth what is needed to restore it. 

Long ago this nation decided that private enterprise was the best way through which to actualize the production and distribution of the fruits of the land. And that may well have been the right way to do it when business was local and small. But modern financial business practices of giant international conglomerates are destroying community, robbing pension funds, randomly moving jobs, wiping out the small in favor of the giants; sending thousands into the ranks of the unemployed often without insurance and pensions. Altogether it must be concluded that the business world dominated by major corporations is destroying the economic security of a huge section of our population. Read America: What Went Wrong. 

The core message of this short essay is this: The way business is practiced in the United States by modern industrial, and financial corporations works directly against the long range interests of the people, the animals, and the land. The intention of the chartering and the licensing of corporations is to secure, over the long term, public well-being and the common good. The aim must be wise use of labor and resources for the benefit of the entire community of life. The facts are that labor and resources are used foolishly, even criminally, for the benefit of an elite few. If the corporations are permitted to write our laws, strongly influence our courts, organize and direct our work, dispose of our resources, and if they own and operate our communications media and our entertainment industry, all in pursuit of greater power and riches for themselves, we are lost. 

We, the people, must see to it that government works for the well-being of the life system including all its components; must see to it that our land, our labor and our resources are used wisely in pursuit of the common good. Wisdom is the essential ingredient, wisdom combined with a generous portion of neighborly love, and a sense of community that includes the entire life system. We must disempower the corporations, control our affairs in the interests of the community we belong to on the principle that a thing is right when it supports the integrity, stability and beauty of the life system and its wrong otherwise.   ###
 

How Deep the Rabbit Hole Goes
written by Andy Wachowski & Larry Wachowski

Morpheus: I imagine that right now you're feeling a bit like Alice. Tumbling down the rabbit hole?
Neo: You could say that.
Morpheus: I can see it in your eyes. You have the look of a man who accepts what he sees because he's expecting to wake up. Ironically, this is not far from the truth. Do you believe in fate, Neo?
Neo: No.
Morpheus: Why not?
Neo: 'Cause I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life.
Morpheus: I know exactly what you mean. Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know, you can't explain. But you feel it. You felt it your entire life. That there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is, but it's there. Like a splinter in your mind -- driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me. Do you know what I'm talking about?
Neo: The Matrix?
Morpheus: Do you want to know what it is?
(Neo nods his head.)
Morpheus: The Matrix is everywhere, it is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window, or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, or when go to church or when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Neo: What truth?
Morpheus: That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else, you were born into bondage, born inside a prison that you cannot smell, taste, or touch. A prison for your mind. (long pause, sighs) Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself. This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back.
(In his left hand, Morpheus shows a blue pill.)
Morpheus: You take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. (a red pill is shown in his other hand) You take the red pill and you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes. (Long pause; Neo begins to reach for the red pill) Remember -- all I am offering is the truth, nothing more.
(Neo takes the red pill and swallows it with a glass of water)

Those few humans who were either born into reality, or have successfully taken the red pill, become the focus of the movie's story -- their attempts to destroy the Matrix and liberate the mass of humanity that lives completely encapsulated in their pods and the illusions fed to them by the powers that be -- powers that will go to any length to maintain the illusion.

Extreme, but not much different than our modern system of corporate government and capitalistic socialism. The governing powers need things from us, not the least of which is our consent. To obtain our consent we are fed all manner of benefits. We are programmed from an early age to believe that such benefits are necessary. To obtain these benefits, a number of conduits are attached to each of us. Adhesion contracts like Social Security, a driver's license; voter registration for a pretended choice of social masters, bank accounts where credit is manufactured for our use and other memberships, registrations, licenses, deeds and permits to insure the conduct of our affairs will be confined within the "matrix" of corporate governance.

We are given our own numbered "pod," a social net provided by the government. Educated according to mandates of the state, our belief system is further cultured by corporate media.

There are various forms of "welfare" should we succumb to poverty or disease. If we are threatened or in danger we can call 911. Government's job of "securing" us is made easier by the massive database tracking our movements, our finances, the location of our homes and businesses and our tax records. When old age creeps up, we can rely on government to take care of us.

The corporate/government/financial interface combines to create a massive illusion of benefits -- the American dream. For the price of a promise to indebt our future labors, pay our taxes and play within the system, there are seemingly limitless toys, castles, comforts and consumables for those who believe in this Matrix. For half our productivity taken in taxes (the other half in payments) and the deeds and title to whatever we think we own, government and its private affiliates will take care of us.

To live in this Matrix, all we have to surrender is any genuine sense of independence, personal responsibility and our right to live freely and actually own the fruits of our labors.

And, like in the movie, a contingent of agents are deployed to combat any renegade humans who have a will for freedom from the Matrix which surrounds us.

As Morpheus expiained, "The Matrix is a system Neo, and that system is our enemy. When you are inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters, the very minds we are trying to save. Until we do, these people are part of that system and that makes them our enemies. You have to understand that most of these people are not ready to be unplugged and many are so hopelessly dependent on the system, they'll fight to protect it."

“The few who understand the system will either be so interested from its profits or so dependent on its favors that there will be no opposition from that class." -- Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863

Why will blue pill people fight to protect a Matrix that enslaves them? It's all they know. And all their toys, castles, comforts and consumables will be gone without the Matrix. Their whole illusionary existence will evaporate, leaving them naked and alone.

What won't the blue pill people in our current "real" world look at? They refuse to acknowledge they are they are funding their enslavement to a socialist homeland police state. Last month, a few "red pill" people traveled to D.C. for an eloquent conclusion to Freedom Drive 2002, exposing the fraud of the l6th Amendment, the IRS, and the federal income tax. But the blue pill people remained comfortably in their coma, ever willing to pay a tax they do not owe. They fund Congress and the Nazi/moron president's implementation of America's new Third Reich, so they can feel "secure."

And what greater "matrix" is there, than our current "fiat;' financial system? We "believe" that a piece of paper with the picture of a dead president has the value of the number printed on it and that one dead president is more valuable than another. We don't even consider that the use of this dead president paper is the direct cause of our own enslavement.

Have you ever seen your bank account? It's not there. Only the slight-of-hand practiced by the teller and the accountant behind the scenes makes this illusion look real to the blue pill people.

How deep does the rabbit hole go? Near the end of the movie, the Matrix's agent Smith acclaims the virtues of the Matrix to the captive red pill people's leader Morpheus: "Have you ever stood and stared at it? Marveled at is beauty; its genius? Billions of people, just living out their lives -- oblivious." From the December 2002 Idaho Observer:

We recall how Jesus saw His beloved city of Jerusalem (Luke 19):

⁴¹And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it,

 ⁴²Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes.

 ⁴³For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side,

 ⁴⁴And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation.

 ⁴⁵And he went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold therein, and them that bought;

 ⁴⁶Saying unto them, It is written, My house is the house of prayer: but ye have made it a den of thieves.

 ⁴⁷And he taught daily in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the chief of the people sought to destroy him,

 ⁴⁸And could not find what they might do: for all the people were very attentive to hear him.

Now that you're here, you have no more excuse. You have to make a decision, as to whether you want to take the blue pill or the red pill.

You take the blue pill, you simply close your eyes and nothing happens, your world stays the same, you go to sleep, you wake up, you go to work, you get your pay checks, you pay your debts, you pay your taxes...life goes on as usual, until the day you die.

You take the red pill, your entire world changes, your eyes will be opened, you'll never go back to sleep, your life will never be the same... I cannot tell you what will happen to you, you have to live it, to know it and to understand it. But one thing I can tell you... and I guarantee it, that you will no longer be bound by the powers that be, because the truth will set you free... forever.

:John-Ruiz :Dempsey

June 22, 2005

Start your deprogramming:

http://www.deprogram.us/

If the above link does not open, please copy and paste on url window