Challenge Clan USMC Brothers In Arms Squad by emailing Challenge BIA and your Xbox Live gamertag to unitedbrother@hotmail.co.uk. Through that email we will find suitable dates for Clan Matches and competitions. If we are challenged and then prove victorious will we keep note of our well earned victory and ability to rise to the challenge. Visit Clan USMC HQ at www.freewebs.com/clanusmc

"Its not the size of the Dog that necessarily decides the outcome of the Battle, but the size of the fight in the Dog"

Clan USMC won the Summer Season 05 Leaderboards ending at the very top with number one rank. Thank you to all members, who fought in those few battles that inportantly gained us victory and sucess. We are now moving on to the Brothers In Arms Earned In Blood Leaderboards www.pmsclan.com Email Dog 6 USMC if you want to fight with us, members will be called upon to fight with The Clan.

Number Of Times Challenged and names of Enemy Clans fought:

Clan Forward:Wed Aug 24 10:03:26 2005

Clan Legendary Fighters:Fri Aug 26 09:27:22 2005

Clan Forward:Sat Aug 27 06:18:17 2005

Clan Legendary Fighters:Aug 29 10:23:55 2005

Clan Forward:Tue Aug 30 08:02:35 2005

Name Of Competition and Number Of Times Won/Loss:

Brothers In Arms Ladder  Road to Hill 30 Standings:Summer Season '05' *Won*

Brothers In Arms Earned in Blood: Fall Season '05 Clan Ladder (Still Fighting)

Won:

Clan Forward:Wed Aug 24 10:03:26 2005

Clan Legendary Fighters:Fri Aug 26 09:27:22 2005

Clan Forward:Sat Aug 27 06:18:17 2005

Clan Legendary Fighters:Aug 29 10:23:55 2005

Clan Forward:Tue Aug 30 08:02:35 2005

Loss:

Members/Marines who have served in Competitions:

Dog 6 USMC(General) Brothers In Arms Ladder Standings:Summer Season '05'

Inner Clan Challenges/Brothers In Arms Earned In Blood

Help promote the Clan by climbing the Leaderboards with another Member or individualy, do this by playing co-op missions and proceed through the story together. The better you are the higher you score and proceed when climbing the ranking leaderboards for cooperative and individual players.

*Dog 6 USMC and Red Mountain*

Co-op Challenges taken and members who took challenge:

Members who have once reached the Top Twenty:

1st Leuitenent RedMountain

It would prove useful if Officers under Clan USMC would read and acknowledge the Tactictal development over time below.

The armies that entered WWI ignored many pre-war lessons though WWI armies later developed revolutionary tactical-level advances, scholars claim that this tactical evolution followed an earlier period of intellectual stagnation that caused the stalemate on the Western Front. This stalemate, they claim, could have been avoided by heeding the admonitions of pre-war conflicts and incorporating the effects of technology into military tactics and doctrine. Some fault the military with incompetence and foolishness for not adapting to the requirements of modern war. The Russo-Japanese War showed the necessity for combined arms techniques and fire and maneuver tactics on the modern battlefield. Specifically, the war showed the need for: (1) the adoption of dispersed, irregular (non-linear) formations; (2) the employment of fire and maneuver techniques and small unit-tactics, including base of fire techniques; (3) the transition to indirect-fire artillery support to ensure the survivability of the batteries, and (4) the necessity for combined arms tactics to increase the survivability of assaulting infantry and compensate for the dispersion of infantry firepower. However, concerns over the loss of control on the battlefield and the ability of morale to overcome firepower prevented the realization of advanced combined arms and fire and maneuver tactics. The armies that entered WWI ignored many pre-war lessons though WWI armies later developed revolutionary tactical-level advances, scholars claim that this tactical evolution followed an earlier period of intellectual stagnation that caused the stalemate on the Western Front. This stalemate, they claim, could have been avoided by heeding the admonitions of pre-war conflicts and incorporating the effects of technology into military tactics and doctrine. Some fault the military with incompetence and foolishness for not adapting to the requirements of modern war. The Russo-Japanese War showed the necessity for combined arms techniques and fire and maneuver tactics on the modern battlefield. Specifically, the war showed the need for: (1) the adoption of dispersed, irregular (non-linear) formations; (2) the employment of fire and maneuver techniques and small unit-tactics, including base of fire techniques; (3) the transition to indirect-fire artillery support to ensure the survivability of the batteries, and (4) the necessity for combined arms tactics to increase the survivability of assaulting infantry and compensate for the dispersion of infantry firepower. However, concerns over the loss of control on the battlefield and the ability of morale to overcome firepower prevented the realization of advanced combined arms and fire and maneuver tactics.

Fire team: Made up of soldiers with the M1 Garand and the Browning Automatic Rifle and should be used for fixing the enemy with suppressive fire.

Assault team: Made up of soldiers with the M1 Carbine and the Thompson submachine gun and is good for flanking the enemy while they are pinned down by your fire team.

Both teams are not chosen by the player.

Brothers in Arms is notable for its intuitive command system. Teams and tanks can be order to move, lay suppressive fire, and charge the enemy. The game stresses at multiple points the effectiveness of fire and maneuver tactics, expressed in the game tutorial as "Find him, Fix him, Flank him, Finish him," describing the steps in suppressing and flanking an enemy.