THE CHRISTMAS LIE: It's Bigger Than You Think






THE CHRIST OF CHRIST-MASS   The "Christ" they wish to put "back into" Christmas has been CONFUSED with a CHRIST who was NEVER part of CHRISTMAS to begin with.  Rome did not even intend the REAL CHRIST to be part of CHRIST-MASS.  Rome intended to CREATE an ICON socially and psychologically engineered for the benefit of THE ROMAN EMPIRE, to give Rome absolute power over the hearts and minds of a medieval fascist dictatorship.  These well known but rarely discussed brutal historical facts are shocking to the senses of modern people.  The Christ they wish to "put back" into Christmas is a ROMAN CHRIST, that never existed, and everyone would be much better off without.  So dramatic and diabolical was the deception, Catholic dissident, and later Reformation Theologians warned the worshiping of THIS Christ, could very well even endanger one's eternal destiny.  Not only was this Christ intentionally created to be a FALSE CHRIST to replace the REAL ONE, orders were issued to have every living member of his natural family exterminated to make sure the Roman Icon went unchallenged by pesky matters of reality.  Find out how the REAL CHRIST actually prophesied this Roman Icon desgined from the very beginning to bury him, and warned anyone patronizing this violent and cruel deception would be endangering their salvation.  THE CHRIST OF CHRIST-MASS





Most people today would realize the error of trusting your very soul with the United States government.  Mature adults have lived through Vietnam, Watergate, Nixon, Monica Lewinsky, Hurricane Katrina, the Iraq war, add infinitum.  Trusting the "official statements" of the government can even be dangerous at times, per example as people were fleeing the World Trade Towers on 9-11, the "official statement" on the intercom came on to assure everyone the buildings were "Safe" and they could return to their offices.  Shortly afterwards both towers collapsed killing thousands, many who returned to their offices "trusting" in the "official announcement".

The modern government of the United States, born and designed within the frameworks of modern western democracy, is not even in the same universe as a medieval Roman dictatorship infamous for genocides and mass executions.  The two are not even close by comparison.  Yet Christians will constantly warn how "the government" in America, should not be "trusted", only to turn their "trust" to a government that was a thousand times worse, and offer it their trust not only with their "money" or policy, but with their very eternal souls?  "Choking on a gnat and swallowing a camel" would not even be sufficient to describe this bizarre contradiction.

Rome's "national security", was much more important to it's ancient empire, than anything a Jewish Rabbi may have said or done in 1st Century Israel.  In fact, Rome far from "adopting" the religion of this Rabbi in the government of it's empire, created instead a substitution, basically to nullify the effect of his movement on the Empire.

 At any rate the temples, which had been wellnigh abandoned, are beginning to be frequented again; and the customary services, which had been neglected for a long time, are beginning to be resumed; fodder for the sacrificial animals, too, is beginning to find a sale again, for hitherto it was difficult to find anyone to buy it.  From all this it is easy to judge what a multitude of people can be reclaimed, if an opportunity is granted them to renounce Christianity. Pliny, Epistles x.96., p. 27 F.F.Bruce, Jesus & Christian Origins Outside The New Testament,(c)1974, WM.B.Eerdmans Pub. Co.

The message of THE REAL CHRIST threatened the social structures of the Roman Empire.  Gibbons attributes the spread of "Christianity" in part to the decline and fall of the Empire, which is precisely what it was intended to accomplish.  In order to recuperate from this threat, Rome did what it has always done (and still does to this day), create it's own version of things, prop that version up as the "real" version, discounting and nullifying, everything else.  Rome's Christ is not the one that put's it's temples out of the religion business, but brings everyone back to them, based on it's own lies.  Rome's Christ is not the one that calls it's citizens to forsake the Empires celebration of itself in the "birth of the unconquered sun, but one that is actually "born" on that day.  Rome's Christ is not one that challenges the deification of it's Ceasar or it's Pontiff Maximus, but one that deifies him, "in Christ's name".  It is not that people do not know any better, it is that they do not care any better.  While claiming to "worship" Christ, they actually despise him, and replace him with what is their own.

(Not one)

The "Christ" Rome forged together, was never intended to be the real Christ of the New Testament to begin with.  In fact, Rome went to great lengths after creating this false Roman Christ, to make sure that remnants of the Real Christ did not "get in the way".  Remnants that included his own blood family, and even the writings int he New Testament itself. 

During the age, when governments created and ran religions, as a way to manipulate the psychology of their empires, the Roman Christ was forged with bits and pieces of symbolism from every part of the empire.  The religion was not "Christianity" or "Judaism" or even something from the "New Testament", it was called ROMAN UNIVERSALISM (Latin "Catholic").  Roman Universalism was about Rome from the beginning, everyone and everything else, were simply tools to be used toward that end, including the Jewish Messiah figure found in the New Testament.

Identity Theft is a 50 Billion dollar a year business.  But stealing the Identity of the Messiah is even a bigger business than that. And it's devestation could be eternal in scope.

The way you identify a person, even today, comes down to some basic information about who they are.  Name, Date of Birth, Language or National Origin, Physical Description.  That's it apart from DNA or a social security number.  That information is put on a driver's license for law enforcement.  If the basic information about the person's identity is false, that is called IDENTITY FRAUD, or IDENTITY THEFT.

If one examines the CHRIST of Rome's CHRIST-MASS, one will very quickly see that basic information concerning the person of Christ has been intentionally buried, in favor of a mythological ICON, that is a composite of Rome's previous old state religions.  Rome was not "converted to Christianity", Christianity was "converted to Romanism", the resulting religion is a government sponsored fraud created by a medieval dictatorship that is victimizing the world still to this very day for it's own selfish glorification.

What you will discover in the information on this page below, is that Rome, not only replaced the actual historical Christ of the Bible, but they did so knowingly, intentionally, and purposefully.  And the ICON that they replaced the REAL CHRIST with is a deception which was prophesied in the New Testament with warnings that included unconditional damnation for worshiping it.  Because as you will see, not only is it literally worshiping the Lake Of Fire in the sky, it is even beyond this a deadly betrayal of the REAL CHRIST in the New Testament.  It is a betrayal that is utterly heinous to it's core.



The Icon created to be honored at Christ-mass time is neither the Biblical nor Historical Jewish Messiah figure spoken about in the New Testament writings.  They are in fact unrelated on every major point of identity.



In order to pass this fraud off, a number of excuses are constantly invoked to make the obvious discrepancy seem acceptable.  These excuses will be looked at below and each one considered for it's veracity.  But a quick look at the basic Identity details reveals the person in the New Testament is NOT the person being "born" on Decmeber 25th, and whose "celebration", coinciding with the Sun's Solstice, is observed.  Not only is just the practice of sun-god worship called "Christ-Mass" alien and antithetical to the Scriptures, but even the "Christ" which it worships, is a Fraud, a False Christ, another Jesus, that cannot "save" anything except the Roman Empire.  Not a single aspect of his personal identity was left UNCHANGED! Not ONE.  So by definition, no matter what one may wish to believe, it is not the Christ of the Bible.  And as you will see below, these changes in identity were FULLY INTENTIONAL and malicious.


(and the differences below the surface are even more striking than it's appearance!)

[TOP]       [NEXT]




Most Christians do not realize the New Testament mentions "another Jesus".  The "other Jesus" is not the the Jewish messianic figure who was executed by Rome, and resurrected, as explained in the New Testament or taught by the original Apostles, but even as early as the writing of Paul's second letter to the Corinthians, Paul mentions "this Jesus" was "more popular" among many Gentile converts.

2Co 11:3,4  But I fear lest by any means, as the serpent deceived Eve in his craftiness, so your thoughts should be corrupted from the purity which is due to Christ. For if, indeed, the one coming proclaims another Jesus, whom we have not proclaimed, or if you receive another spirit which you have not received, or another gospel which you never accepted, you might well endure these. 

Paul associates the "Other Jesus" with THE SERPENT in Genesis 3.  The obvious lesson in the text without any historical background (as usually explained by all ) is that the believers in this community were being "seduced" by "knowledge" against what God had already spoken to them.  Some ministers will openly connect this to "gnosticism" in their sermons on this text.  But what most will overlook (or ignore) in their expositions is that this "other Jesus" was making the rounds in the New Testament communities and is found in virtually every major epistle written by Paul to his disciples.  This "other Jesus" as early as the writing of the Pastoral Epistles, was already threatening to over run the New Testament communities, and utterly change the definition of the Jewish messiah being taught in the "Euangelion".

But, what is striking in it's graphic detail is that, as you have seen earlier, the serpent in Genesis 3 was a reference to Pharaoh's serpent of enlightenment involving Egyptian sun-god worship.  

A surprising amount of material is given about this "Other Jesus" in the New Testament.  As one compiles the list of descriptions about this "Other Jesus", one will quickly begin to realize, the "Other Jesus" is the one that most people today, think of as "Christ" as a result of the work of Roman Empire.   Historically, the "other Jesus" was in fact geographically related to Egypt and and has been documented in the discovery of the Nag Hammadi library and is directly linked to the building of Constantine's first Church in Constantinople.  These same "gnostics" who were peddling this "other Jesus" eventually became the personal counselors of Rome's Byzantium Emperors and the defining architects of it's "religion", which named itself "Roman Universalism", but today claims to be the only true inheritor of Apostolic "Christianity".  A claim that is found among it's first proponants, being denounced by still living Apostles in the New Testament.


1.  Is not of Jewish FLESH, and thus also is not Apostolic [1Jn 2:19, 1Jn 4:3, 2Jn 1:7]
2.  Is not anchored to the historical CHRIST but to "traditions" and "myths" [2Co 11:4, Col 2:8, 2Ti 4:3 ]
3.  Is advocated by Religious Authoritarians who speak "as God" Ex Cathedra [2Ti 4:3 ]
4.  Is advocated by a clergy which is celebate [1Ti 4:1-3]
5.  Who will claim Christ's "Paurousia" is found in their "Desert communities" [Mat 24:26 ]
6.  And in their "Sanctuaries" [Mat 24:26, Mat 24:28]
7.  Who will "come in Christ's name", and claim to "be him" [Luk 21:8]
8.  Who will decieve the MAJORITY of those who call him "Lord" [Mat 7:22]
9.  And the whole world  [Rev 12:9]
10. Who will come with miraculous "signs" [Mat 24:24 , Mar 13:22]
11. Specifically Icons/Idols which will "come to life" [Rev 13:15 ]
12. And "Fire which will come from heaven" [Rev 13:13]
13. And will be consolidated under the authority of a man with a name of THREE SIXES [Rev 13:18]
14. And imposed on the world through FORCE [Rev 13:15 ]
15. Is connected to EGYPT [Jud 1:4-5, 2Co 11:3 
16. Is identified by a "doctrine" of THREE FROG SPIRITS [Rev 16:13]
17. Will focus on THE SUN [Rev 9:11]
18. Specifically in the form of a hybrid APOLLO-Christ [Rev 14:9, Mat 7:22-23]
19. Which is born on December 25th [Rev 2:6,15]
20. And it's Idol, which will have LONG HAIR like a woman [Rev 9:8]
20. Marked by the selling and MERCHANDISING religion for money [2Pe 2:3 , Rev 18:11]
21. Which will make "Merchants" wealthy [Rev 18:15]
22. Will reproduce the "Tower of Babel" in it's "ecclesiology [Rev 17:5]
23. And will adopted "Secret society Babelism" or "Mystery Babylon" as it's real religion [Rev 17:1,2,5]
24. Will result in the "delusion" of a "false Christ" [2Th 2:11 ]
25. Where people will think they are "saved" [2Th 2:11-12]
26. But are actually "damned" [Rev 18:7,8, 2Th 2:11-12]
27. Will be anti-semitic in tone and practice [1Jn 2:19, Rom 11:18, 1Jn 2:22]
28. Will have clergy which "claims" to be a "sucession of the Original Apostles" but are lying [Rev 2:2 ]
29. Will teach "doctrines" which have their origin in "Hinduism" or "Egyptian/Roman Polytheism" [1Ti 4:1, Rev 16:13,14 ]
30. Will eventully be headquarted in ROME [Rev 17:9 ]
31. Will be spread through an Empire made up of 10 Kingdoms [Rev 17:12 ]
32. Will spread it's doctrines to the "kings of Europe" [Rev 16:14]
33. Will be marked by the worship of a MOTHER-GODDESS [Rev 17:9, Rev 17:7-9, Rev 17:5]
34. Will be involved in a MASS/EUCHARIST to REPLACE the Lord's Seder [Rev 17:4,Rev 14:10]
35. Will lead it's followers into "Perdition" (Spiritual Ruin) worshiping the "Lake of Fire" [Rev 20:15,Rev 20:10, Mat 13:42, Mat 13:50, Mat 25:41]
36. Will arise from Gentiles [1Pe 4:3,Mat 10:18 ,Mar 10:42,Luk 21:24,Rom 11:25,1Co 10:20,Rom 2:28]
37. Who practice utilitarian Deceit as a method of advancing their religion [1Ti 4:1-3]
38. Who will become guilty of mass murder throughout history future [Rev 13:15]
39. And be involved in controlling all finance and commerce [Rev 13:17,18]
40. And seek to take over "nations", and will reject the REAL CHRIST [Rev 13:7]


1.  Is not of Jewish FLESH, and thus also is not Apostolic, and is "anti-semitic" [1Jn 2:19, 1Jn 4:3, 2Jn 1:7]

1Jn 2:19  They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us. 

1Jn 4:3  And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 

2Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

Eph 2:15  Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; .

2.  Is not anchored to the historical CHRIST but to "traditions" and "myths" [2Co 11:4, Col 2:8, 2Ti 4:3 ]

2Co 11:4  For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him. 

Col 2:8  Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. 

2Ti 4:3  For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 2Ti 4:4  And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables ("muthos", "myths"). 

3.  Is advocated by Religious Authoritarians who speak "as God" Ex Cathedra [2Ti 4:3 ]

2Ti 4:3  For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 2Ti 4:4  And they shall turn away their ears from the truth

2Th 2:4  Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth ("Ex Cathedra", "from THE CHAIR") in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. 

4.  Is advocated by a clergy which is celebate [1Ti 4:1-3]

1Ti 4:1  Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; 1Ti 4:2  Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;  1Ti 4:3  Forbidding to marry,...

5.  Who will claim Christ's "Paurousia" is found in their "Desert communities" [Mat 24:26 ]

Mat 24:26  Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. 

6.  And in their "Sanctuaries" [Mat 24:26, Mat 24:28]

Mat 24:26  Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. - KJV
Mat 24:26  `If therefore they may say to you, Lo, in the wilderness he is, ye may not go forth; lo, in the inner chambers, ye may not believe; - YOUNG'S LITERAL

7.  Who will "come in Christ's name", and claim to "be him" [Luk 21:8]

Luk 21:8  And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my namesaying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them. 

8.  Who will decieve the MAJORITY of those who call him "Lord" [Mat 7:22]

Mat 7:22  Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 
Mat 7:23  And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

"MANY" - πολύς, πολλός, polus, PRON.  polos, pol-oos', Including the forms from the alternate “pollos”; (singular) much (in any respect) or (plural) many; neuter (singular) as adverb largely; neuter (plural) as adverb or noun often, mostly, largely: - abundant, + altogether, common, + far (passed, spent), (+ be of a) great (age, deal, -ly, while), long, many, much, oft (-en [-times]), plenteous, sore, straitly. Compare G4118, G4119. - STRONG'S EX.

9.  And will even deceive the whole world  [Rev 12:9]

Rev 12:9  And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: 
10. Who will come with miraculous "signs" [Mat 24:24 , Mar 13:22]

Mat 24:24  For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. 

11. Specifically Icons/Idols which will "come to life" [Rev 13:15 ]

Rev 13:15  And he had power to give life unto the (icon) of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. 

12. Which [those who call Christ "Lord"] "Christians" will "hear speak" (instead of God) [Rev.13:5, Mat.4:4]

Rev 13:15  And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

Mat 4:4  But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God

12. And "Fire which will come from heaven" [Rev 13:13]

Rev 13:13  And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men

13. And will be consolidated under the authority of a man with a name of THREE SIXES [Rev 13:18]

Rev 13:17  And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name
Rev 13:18  Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. 

14. And imposed on the world through FORCE [Rev 13:15 ]

Rev 13:15  And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed

"IMAGE" - εἰκών, eikōn, i-kone', From G1503; a likeness, that is, (literally) statue, profile, or (figuratively) representation, resemblance: - image.[Literally "ICON"]

15. Is connected to EGYPT [Jud 1:4-5, 2Co 11:3 ]

Jud 1:4,5  For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.

2Co 11:3  But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 

16. Is identified by a "doctrine" of THREE FROG SPIRITS ("Trinitarian")  [Rev 16:13]

Rev 16:13,14  And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world

17. Will focus on THE SUN [Rev 9:11]

Rev 9:11  And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the (abyss), whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. 

REV.9:11 - "Apollyon" is the same with "Apollo", the god of the Heathens, " - JOHN GILL'S EXPOSITION

APOLLYON (APOLLO) - As sun-god and god of light, Apollo was also known by the epithets Aegletes (/əˈɡliːtiːz/ ə-glee-teez; Αἰγλήτης, Aiglētēs, from αἴγλη, "light of the sun"),[13] Helius (/ˈhiːliəs/ hee-lee-əs; Ἥλιος, Helios, literally "sun"),[14] Phanaeus (/fəˈniːəs/ fə-nee-əs; Φαναῖος, Phanaios, literally "giving or bringing light"), and Lyceus (/laɪˈsiːəs/ ly-see-əs; Λύκειος, Lukeios, from Proto-Greek *λύκη, "light"). The meaning of the epithet "Lyceus" later became associated Apollo's mother Leto, who was the patron goddes of Lycia (Λυκία) and who was identified with the wolf (λύκος),[15] earning him the epithets Lycegenes (/laɪˈsɛdʒəniːz/ ly-sej-ə-neez; Λυκηγενής, Lukēgenēs, literally "born of a wolf" or "born of Lycia") and Lycoctonus (/laɪˈkɒktənəs/ ly-kok-tə-nəs; Λυκοκτόνος, Lukoktonos, from λύκος, "wolf", and κτείνειν, "to kill"). As god of the sun, the Romans referred to Apollo as Sol (/ˈsɒl/ sol; literally "sun" in Latin). [13] Apollonius of Rhodes, iv. 1730; Pseudo-Apollodorus, Biblioteca, i. 9. § 26, [14] Álvaro, Jr., Santos, Allan. Simbolismo divino. Allan Álvaro, Jr., Santos. - Apollo,, 6/1/12

QUOTE: In Rome December 25 was made popular by Pope Liberius in 354 and became the rule in the West in 435 when the first "Christ mass" was officiated by POPE SIXTUS III. This coincided with the date of a celebration by the Romans to THEIR PRIMARY GOD, THE SUN, and to Mithras, a popular Persian sun god supposedly born on the same day. The Roman Catholic writer Mario Righetti candidly ADMITS that, "to facilitate the acceptance of the faith by the pagan masses, the Church of Rome found it convenient to institute the 25th of December as the feast of the birth of Christ to divert them from the pagan feast, celebrated on the same day in HONOR of the 'INVINCABLE SUN' Mithras, the conqueror of darkness" END QUOTE - (Manual of Liturgical History, 1955, Vol. 2, p. 67). - AUTHOR 1 Professor. Mario Righetti (docente di Liturgia a Genova, Accademico pontificio, consultore della Congregazione dei Riti e perito conciliare al Vaticano II) fu l’autore della più voluminosa storia della liturgia latina del XX secolo; presentazione in B. Mario Righetti (professor of liturgy in Genoa, Academic pope, consultor of the Congregation of Rites and expert reconcile the Vatican II) was the author of more voluminous history of the Latin liturgy of the twentieth century; presentation B. BAROFFIO, Mons. BAROFFIO, Msgr. Mario Righetti (1882-1975). Mario Righetti (1882-1975). Un'esimia figura del clero e della cultura italiana , in "Rivista Liturgica" LXII (1975), pp. Un'esimia figure of the clergy and of Italian culture, "Liturgical Magazine" LXV (1975), pp. 597-606.

18. Specifically in the form of a hybrid APOLLO-Christ [Rev 14:9, Mat 7:22-23]

Rev 14:9  And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his (ICON), and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, 
Mat 7:23  And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity

19. Which is born on December 25th [Rev 2:6,15, 9:11]

Rev 2:6  But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.
Rev 9:11  And they had a king over them, which...hath his name Apollyon. (Dec.25th) 

20. An Idol/Icon, which will have LONG HAIR like a woman [Rev 9:8]

Rev 9:8  And they had hair as the hair of women,

20. Marked by the selling and MERCHANDISING religion for money [2Pe 2:3 , Rev 18:11]

2Pe 2:3  And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not. 

Rev 18:11  And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:

21. Which will make "Merchants" wealthy [Rev 18:15]

Rev 18:15  The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing, 

22. Will reproduce the "Tower of Babel" in it's "ecclesiology [Rev 17:5]


Gen 11:4  And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a  name (shem/a god)

23. And will have adopted "Secret Society" Babelism or "Mystery Babylon" as it's real religion [Rev 17:1,2,5]

Rev 17:1,2  And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. 

μυστήριον, mustērion,
1) hidden thing, secret, mystery
1a) generally mysteries, religious secrets, confided only to the initiated and not to ordinary mortals
1b) a hidden or secret thing
1c) a hidden purpose or counsel -  Thayer Definition

μυστήριον, mustērion, moos-tay'-ree-on, From a derivative of μύω muō (to shut the mouth); a secret or “mystery” (through the idea of silence imposed by initiation into religious rites): - mystery. - STRONGS

24. Will result in the "delusion" of a "false Christ" [2Th 2:11 ]

2Th 2:11  And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

25. Where people will think they are "saved" [2Th 2:11-12]

2Th 2:11,12  And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 
2Th 2:11,12  and because of this shall God send to them a working of delusion, for their believing the lie, that they may be judged--all who did not believe the truth, but were well pleased in the unrighteousness. - YOUNG'S LITERAL

26. But are actually "damned" [Rev 18:7,8, 2Th 2:11-12]

Rev 18:7,8  `As much as she did glorify herself and did revel, so much torment and sorrow give to her, because in her heart she saith, I sit a queen, and a widow I am not, and sorrow I shall not see; because of this, in one day, shall come her plagues, death, and sorrow, and famine; and in fire she shall be utterly burned, because strong is the Lord God who is judging her;

27. Will be anti-semitic in tone and practice [1Jn 2:19, Rom 11:18, 1Jn 2:22]

1Jn 2:19  They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they 
Rom 11:18,19  Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.
1Jn 2:22  Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 

28. Will have clergy which "claims" to be a "sucession of the Original Apostles" but are lying [Rev 2:2 ]

Rev 2:2  I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars: 

29. Will teach "doctrines" which have their origin in "Hinduism" or "Egyptian/Roman Polytheism" [1Ti 4:1, Rev 16:13,14 ]

1Ti 4:1  Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; (Devas/Devis)
Rev 16:14  For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth 

30. Will be gravitate, target, be headquarted and have it's "seat of power" in ROME [Rev 17:9 ]

Rev 17:9  And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. 

31. Will be spread through an Empire made up of 10 Kingdoms [Rev 17:12 ]

Rev 17:12,13  And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, ...These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast. 

32. Will spread it's doctrines "to" and "through" the "kings of Europe" [Rev 16:14]

Rev 16:14  For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth (monarchies)

33. Will be marked by the worship of a MOTHER-GODDESS [Rev 17:5, 7-9]

Rev 17:5-9  And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.  And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.  And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast thatThe beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is. And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth

34. Will be involved in a MASS/EUCHARIST to REPLACE the Lord's Seder [Rev 17:4,Rev 14:10]

Rev 17:4  And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication
Rev 14:10  The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: 

35. Will lead it's followers into "Perdition" (Spiritual Ruin) worshiping the "Lake of Fire" [Rev 20:15,Rev 20:10, Mat 13:42, Mat 13:50, Mat 25:41]

2Th 2:3  Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; (Apollo)

ἀπώλεια, apōleia, ap-o'-li-a (Root word of "Apollo" [the sun])

Rev 20:10  And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire 
Rev 20:15  And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. 
Mat 13:42  And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 
Mat 13:50  And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 
Mat 25:41  Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: 

36. Will arise from Gentiles [1Pe 4:3,Mat 10:18 ,Mar 10:42,Luk 21:24,Rom 11:25,1Co 10:20,Rom 2:28]

1Pe 4:3  For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:
Mat 10:18  And ye shall be brought before governors and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them and the Gentiles. 
Mar 10:42  But Jesus called them to him, and saith unto them, Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and their great ones exercise authority upon them. 
Luk 21:24  And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. 
Rom 11:25  For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. 

37. Who practice utilitarian Deceit as a method of advancing their religion [1Ti 4:1-3]

1Ti 4:1-3  Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry
38. Who will become guilty of mass murder throughout history future [Rev 13:15]

Rev 13:15  And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. 

39. And be involved in controlling all finance and commerce [Rev 13:17,18]

Rev 13:17  And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 

40. And seek to take over "nations", and will reject the REAL CHRIST [Rev 13:7]

Rev 13:7  And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. 


And while this Christ "cannot save you" because it is a fraud, a deception, a delusion, an "icon" based on "traditions of men" and "myths", it CERTAINLY WILL DAMN YOU, if you "believe in it", or "worship it"!  And it is the very "Christ" whose "birth" is "celebrated" on DECEMBER 25TH in Rome's "CHRIST" MASS.  You are commanded in the Scriptures to get as far away from this "Christ" as you possibly can. You are commanded to "Come out of it" [Rev.18:4] , and "not touch it", [2 Cor.6:17] and "be separate from it" [2 Cor. 6:17].  And those are "commands" [Rev.22:14, 2 Jo.1:6, 1 Jo.5:2,3, 1 Jo.3;24, 1 Jo.2:3,4, Jo 14:15,21] tied directly to the reality of your SALVATION ITSELF, not "requests" or "guidelines" or "suggestions", or "kinda, maybe sorta".  If you want REAL SALVATION you better start following the REAL CHRIST, or you will be just as damned as any full blown Satanist (maybe even more so, at least he rejected this phony fraudulent Christ "Icon" to openly worship the Devil [and his "lake of fire"] in all honesty).

While the above list is only an "example", it is not even exhaustive.  There are even more instances that are not listed here, but the above list is sufficient to show, that there is more than enough information to identify  this "Other Jesus".  Meaning both that THERE WOULD BE ONE, and IT WOULD eventually BECOME THE "MAJORITY".  Along with all it's descriptors, given in the New Testament, it is virtually impossible not to either know or see that not only is THIS CHRIST present in the New Testament, it is also the one that the "MAJORITY" of both People and Clergy have "chosen" to believe in. (despite it's unmistakable description in the New Testament).  Along with the warnings of "damnation" recorded against it.

While on the "surface" ecumenical promotional slogans sound appealing and good, what lies beneath them is rather dark and cynical.  Instead of everyone "getting together" around the REAL CHRIST, it is in reality, a concerted effort at rejection of the REAL CHRIST, for something that is a malicious replacement, and makes appeals to "consensus" to promote the lies and the authoritarianism of a very nasty old Roman Empire, the western world had to vomit out like a stomache virus, to find the freedoms and progress of modern western democracy.  Why it is that when "everyone gets together" it is always around ROME'S EMPIRE, and not the REAL CHRIST known perfectly well from both history and the Bible?  If the intentions of these "ecumenical groups" and their "ministers" who claim to be "following Christ" were really sincere, repentance would come as easy and naturally as breathing. But as you see, nothing of the sort ever happens, because it is not "Christ" they are 'following".  It is an IDOL in Rome, born on December 25th.  An IDOL by the real name of APOLLYON.[Rev.9:11] A golden calf everyone is expected to happily dance around without objection, while the wrath of God smolders in our very midsts.

Luk 3:8  Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, 

[TOP]     [NEXT]


2Th 2:10-12  And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong DELUSION, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 

DELUSION: πλάνη, planē, plan'-ay, objectively FRAUDULENCE;- deceit, to deceive, delusion, error. Feminine of G4108; πλάνος, planos, plan'-os, Of uncertain affinity; ...AN IMPOSTER or MISLEADER: - DECEIVER, seducing.


Rev 9:11 They had as king, over them, the angel of the bottomless pit; whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name Apollyon














(Latin for the number Six)

("Sixth III")

QUOTE: In Rome December 25 was made popular by Pope Liberius in 354 and became the rule in the West in 435 when the first "Christ mass" was officiated byPOPE SIXTUS III. ...

Rev 13:18  Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six (666). 

...This coincided with the date of a celebration by the Romans to THEIR PRIMARY GOD, THE SUN (Apollo), and to Mithras, a popular Persian sun god supposedly born on the same day. The Roman Catholic writer Mario Righetti candidly ADMITS that, "to facilitate the acceptance of the faith by the pagan masses, the Church of Rome found it convenient to institute the 25th of December as the feast of the birth of Christ to divert them from the pagan feast, celebrated on the same day in HONOR of the 'INVINCABLE SUN' Mithras, the conqueror of darkness" (Manual of Liturgical History, 1955, Vol. 2, p. 67).

Rev 9:11  And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon (Apollo) . 

[TOP]          [NEXT]



Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day I observed in the midst of a group of people a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected so great was the difference between Him and those who were listening to Him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance a celestial aspect. He appeared to be about 30 years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between Him and His bearers with their black beards and tawny* complexions!
* "Tawny" - Of a light brown to brownish orange color
Copies are in the Congressional Library in Washington, D.C.

"I asked him to describe this person to me, so that I might know him if I should meet him. He said: 'If you ever meet him you will know him. While he is nothing but a man, there is something about him that distinguishes him from every other man. He is the picture of his mother, only he has not her smooth, round face. His hair is a little more golden than hers, though it is as much from sunburn as anything else. He is tall, and his shoulders are a little drooped; his visage is thin and of a swarthy complexion, though this is from exposure. His eyes are large and a soft blue, and rather dull and heavy....' This Jew is convinced that he is the Messiah of the world. ...this was the same person that was born of the virgin in Bethlehem some twenty-six years before..."
- The Archko Volume, translated by Drs. McIntosh and Twyman of the Antiquarian Lodge, Genoa, Italy, from manuscripts in Constantinople and the records of the Senatorial Docket taken from the Vatican of Rome (1896) 92-93

'I was already Bishop of Hippo, when I went into Ethiopia with some servants of Christ there to preach the Gospel. In this country we saw many men and women without heads, who had two great eyes in their breasts; and in countries still more southly, we saw people who had but one eye in their foreheads.'
- SAINT AUGUSTINE  (Sermon 37; quoted in Taylor, Syntagma, 52; Diegesis, 271; Doane, Bible Myths, 437.)
The above quote attributed to Augustine is now considerd to be "psuedo-Augustine" which means he didn't actually write it, it was just BELIEVED that he wrote it.  But that someone else in the Church of Rome wrote it, and simply "attributed" it to him.  Which makes it "much better"... since he didn't actually say it.  The important thing to note however is that it was BELIEVED for centuries that he did, and possibly even more important, that someone wrote it, and attributed it to him, which has been the case for volumes of alleged "church traditions" and "early church father" writings.  The same "tradition" that attributed this to Augustine, also attributed Rome to Clement 1, Peter to Rome's Papacy, Ignatius to Apostolic succession and a host of other things which fail under critical scrutiny.  What comes away from the discovery of interpolation concerning the Augustinian quote, is not simply that he did not say it, but the attitudes and orientations of an institution which would want to put such words in his mouth to begin with.

 WHY would ROME want it’s CHRIST to have BLONDE HAIR & BLUE EYES?
 [Especially when THEY KNEW that is not what he looked like?]



Then why did they intentionally do it WRONG?

Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. 
This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 

[TOP]       [NEXT]



Statements which reveal facts about his appearance are often over-looked in favor of Iconographic representations that were popularized by the Roman empire. The traditional "thin" looking, pale Christ, with blonde hair is a fictitious hybred caracature with the appearance of Apollo. Christ was accused of being a "glutton" Mat 11:19 The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous. "Phagos" a primary verb ( as in "meaty"(Adj.) [heavyset]

His natural birth reflected "the flesh" he was born into. He was described by the prophets as completely "common" in appearance: Isa 53:2. And this fact, was cited by Tertullian claiming it had been both understood to have been true from tradition, and re-iterated by the claims concerning his physical appearance, made by the Prophets of the Scriptures.

Further however, aside from these references given both by Scripture, and by what Rome itself advanced as "Latin Fathers", forensic reconstructions taken from historical and genetic sources demonstrate the hair of a first century Semitic Israelite was generally (or predominantly) of only two colors. Black in youth, and "white" in old age, just as you find typically among native Palestinian-Jews to this day. In case, one is still wishing to argue with the obvious (demonstrating what a "strong-hold" racism has become in his Roman "Icon" of Apollo now called "Christ"), It should also be noted that this fact is cited by Christ in his own  words, to his own disciples, in his "Teaching" to his disciples, demonstrating they too, were of the same racially characteristic BLACK HAIR (Known to be true of the people of the Bible, during this time and place in history):

Mat 5:36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black. 

(Being in his 30s, his hair would have "black" at the time [perhaps with a few "salt & pepper", grays])
Obviously this would not have been a statement that would have made any sense in a crowd full of young blonde haired Gauls as depicted commonly in Roman iconography.

Once again, another rather noticable trait that intentionally deviates from the known historical record, beyond turning the black Jewish hair of Yehushoa into that of a Germanic bleach blonde, is the noticable change in the length of hair.  Each physical deviation was created with the intent to over-lap the icon of Apollo onto the character of the New Testament writings.  There is nothing intrinsically evil or bad about "long hair" as there were instances where prophets violated the normal customary hair length by taking oaths not to cut their hair, as in the case with Samson.  But this is pointed out here, to show (1) it was a noticable distinguishing characteristic fulfilling a prophecy concerning APOLLO and (2) Rome knew the original hair length in 1st century Israel, and purposely DEVIATED from it to match it with APOLLO.

It will be claimed this deviation was introduced because "Jesus was a Nazarite" and the "Nazerite vow" contained the prohibition not to "cut the hair", but this is simply a cover-story as the reader can see in Rome's own document frauds mentioned above. Not only was the hair made long, it was made BLONDE.  Where is "Blonde hair" in the "Nazarite vow"?

Along with the notable difference in hair color and complexion itself is the rather obvious change in the hair length.  Rome knew perfectly well that the hair length of the era among males in 1st century Israel was cropped short.  There is more than ample historical, artisitic, and arcehological data that clearly shows Rome was not under some kind of innocent miconception about what the hair lenght of the Jewish messiah in the New Testament would have been.  This was not a "syle" of choosing but a medical necessity of the time as lice was no small problem.  Even the busts and images of the day, clearly show that the hair length was cropped, from the poor to the wealthy, the hair style never included long flowing hair that laid over a man's shoulder's and stretched at any length down the back.  This of course, once again, was the signature LOOK of Apollo, mentioned in the very text of Scripture as the ICON OF THE BEAST.

Excuse making about the "nazarite vow" are virtually worthless in this regard as the New Testament also makes it clear that while John the Baptist certainly would have had "long hair" in keeping with the Nazarite vow, (although it would not have been "blonde" as usually depicted), it was openly known no such "vow" was ever taken by Christ, who openly dined with "wine Bibbers", and made the Passover cup (of wine) the central act of his memorial.  The suggestion insults the intelligence of any Biblically literate person.  The plain fact is the Jewish Messiah could have been completely bald like Elisha, and Rome would have still pasted his head with long flowing blonde hair, because it is not the Jewish Messiah found in the New Testament that Rome is celebrating on December 25th as it already fully knows.(And hopes you do not)


Then why did they intentionally do it WRONG?

Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. 
This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 

[TOP]          [NEXT]




 The Jewish religious leader written about in the New Testament is named Yehoshua, which means "God Salvation," or "Yahweh delivers." Yehoshua is normally translated JOSHUA in English.   Yeshua and Yehoshua were often as used equivalent.   Most historical scholars believe that Jesus would have been referred to by the shorter name Yeshua ("Salvation"), at least in Jerusalem and the rest of Judea as a resultof customary usage. A common casual expression of the name Yehoshua indicating intimacy or familiararity used by friends or family is Yeshu.  Yeshua or Yahoshua was translated by the early Christians as Iesous in Greek.  - Dr..James Price  Professor of Hebrew and Old Testament at Temple Baptist Seminary

In English
This became Iesus in Latin, and Jesus in German. The English nameJesus is from the German spelling and pronunciation, neither Greek nor Hebrew oddly enough. German?  -ETYMOLOGY OF JESUS FROM GERMAN by
Think about it. German?  So "Jesus" the black-haired Jew, is really a Blonde-haired GERMAN?  And if you think this was all just an "innocent accident", you are simply in DENIAL. There is someone who was a Germanic (from Gaul), someone you might be very familiar with.  Why? Oh, because HE WAS BORN ON DECEMBER 25TH!?!  WHAT A STRANGE COINCIDENCE!?  IMAGINE THAT!  A GERMANIC BORN ON DECEMBER 25TH! AND "THE NAME" OF "JESUS" IS ACTUALLY GERMAN!  What are the odds of that?
There were well over 30 different languages in Europe at the time.
Rev 9:11 And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

Despite all the "apologetics" to excuse this linguistic anomoly, a bizarre inconsistency FROM LATIN prevented even the translators of the Bible from being able to properly translate the Bible into English.  The English Bible was translated from the Latin Vulgate [both Old and New Testaments].  They had no problem getting this name correct:
 Joshua 4:5  And Joshua said unto them, Pass over before the ark of the LORD your God into the midst of Jordan,
Yet when translating this same reference in the New Testament, from the same Latin Vulgate, from the very same original languages into the same English language, here is what they did:
Act 7:45  Which also our fathers that came after brought in with Jesus* into the possession of the Gentiles, whom God drave out before the face of our fathers, unto the days of David; {* Supposed to be Joshua}
[NOTE: Same translators, same language, same Bible, same word - yet two entirely different names]
This is "explained" as an "innocent" transliteration from Latin into German then into English, as though there were no "ulterior" motives invovled in the "double usage". But that hardly explains the "double name usage" that occurs in THE LATIN VULGATE ITSELF!!!
LATIN:                          Iosue                                Iesus                 TWO NAMES
                                 JOSHUA           JESUS
ENGLISH:                     Joshua                    Jesus                TWO NAMES
SPANISH:                      Josué                               Jesús                TWO NAMES
FRENCH:                       Josué                              Jésus                TWO NAMES
NEDERLAND:               Jozua                              Jezus                TWO NAMES
HUNGARIAN:               Józsuénak                       Jézus                TWO NAMES
ITALIAN:                       Giosuè                           Gesù                 TWO NAMES
MAORI:                         Ihowa                             Ihu                    TWO NAMES
PORTUGESE:               Josué                               Jesus                TWO NAMES
ALBANIAN:                   Jozueu                            Jezusi               TWO NAMES
VIETNAMESE:             Gioâ-sueâ                         Jêsus                TWO NAMES
FACT: The DOUBLE-NAME usage is the result of intentional separation from the Judaism of THE REAL CHRIST.  The Name is intentionally disconnected in translations from the same name translated "Joshua", with Joshua ACTUALLY BEING THE MORE ACCURATE TRANSLATION!!!!!  The attempt to separate THIS ONE NAME, into TWO SEPEARATE NAMES refers back to THE LATIN-ROMAN CHRIST.  While the shadowy etymologies of Je'Sus may be debated with bias, one thing is certain, when given the option to represent the name of THE REAL CHRIST in the New Testament, either in it's original form as would be normally expected, or even in it's translated form AS JOSHUA, the choice was to DO NEITHER. 


Codex Justinianus: The use of the Hebrew language in worship was forbidden. Shema Yisrael, sometimes considered the most important prayer in Judaism ("Hear, O Israel, YHWH our God, YHWH is one") was banned, as a denial of the Trinity. A Jew who converted to Christianity was entitled to inherit his or her father's estate, to the exclusion of the still-Jewish brothers and sisters. The Emperor became an arbiter in internal Jewish affairs. - Wikipedia 1-20-2010

So naturally, the HEBREW NAME of CHRIST, would not be used.  In fact, it would not even be translated properly to intentionally avoid the connection.

The truth of the matter is that because of the bizarre ethical system that Rome adopted from it's "Latin Church Fathers" of using INTENTIONAL DECEIT to advance ROME in "The Name Of Christ", even today, facts about the real history and etymology of the name JE'SUS is not fully known, and if it is, not being admitted.  

Evidence of a clear historical cover-up continue to surface in this regard, and far from being an closed debate, this matter should continue to be examined and investigated for the truth.  If one typed in "Je Sus" into the GOOGLE TRANSLATION pad from French to English in 2009, it would have returned "I, Knew", (i.e., Gnosticism) now it returns "I, Addition", obviously having been "corrected".  The fact is that there has been so much destruction and suppression of information, and intentional replacement, and still continues to be, many scholars are of the opinion, the accurate pronunciation of most names in the Bible are speculative and possibly hopelessly lost, as many evidently wish it to be.

The most damning evidence comes from an unexpected source.  The first 1611 King James Bible itself.  While the use of the name "JE'SUS" is already established in the English text, as would be expected, there is a residual translation which has no appearant explanation, other than what it appears to be.  

The Text clearly shows that ZEUS (The "god" of the Greco-Roman empire) was still being employed as an EQUIVALENT to a SYLLABLE used in the sacred name of God.  That syllable in English is Yah, or in old English Jah. Yah itself, charged by some, supposedly an interpolation into the text, originally referring to the Egyptian moon goddess, the original syllable replaced and lost.

Hebrew names often employed syllables from the Sacred name into personal names.  Such is the case for the Prophet Eli-Jah.  Yet, when one looks at the original translation of the 1611 King James Bible at the name Eli-Jahone will find the residual usage of the name ZEUS as late as the 1600s.


Obviously, since so much intentional replacement of "pagan" names into the Biblical texts have occurred, being motivated by the bizarre desire to have believers in God innocently mouthing the names of esteemed Gentile pagan gods as they pray to the one God they wish to worship, to the amusement of Masonic and Roman Babelists responsible for these tricks, it is fairly certain that whatever name and/or pronunciation we think is correct today, will be subject to future revision as new light continues to surface on the subject.  In the mean time, if you are hoping to be literally "saved" in Jesus name, meaning "The Name Itself", you might need to hire a yourself a really good linguist, and give him a couple of decades to work on it.

The good news is however, that the phrase THE NAME is simply Hebrew idiom for "God", or the "Sacred Name" which was replaced by the use of the phrase"Ha Shem" (The Name).  This expression is used throughout the New Testament, but unfortunately misunderstood and mistranslated theologically as referring to an actual name, and particularly erroneous, THE NAME OF "JESUS", to which it has actually no reference.  "Ha Shem" of "Yeshua" would be "The God of Jesus" or more accurately "Joshua", not the actual word "Jesus".  Of course, that fact ruins a lot of Hymns people like, so why tell anyone? Right? Obviously if you make Hebrew illegal, as was done in the Justinian Codex, not only do you lose the actual knowledge of the Hebrew language, you even lose knowledge of it's phraseology and idiom, much of which occurs in the New Testament even though written in Greek.  

These corruptions, fostered on the unsuspecting general public, serve the amusement of the Roman and Masonic corrupters who enjoy making a mockery out of innocent devotion to God.  But it also explains why once  you dig into the text of the New Testament, you see and understand why the warnings of unconditional damnation for embracing their "Christ" are issued... the one worshiped at "Christ-Mass".  These were not "accidents", they were mockery's, insults, and lies aimed at people who wanted nothing more than a pure and honest faith in the God of the Scriptures.  Something Roman and Masonic Babelists privately fight to this very day.


Then why did they intentionally do it WRONG?

Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. 
This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 




"It was first called "The Big Church" (Megali Eklisia), later being renamed the "THEA SOPHIA". From the 5th Century on, being regarded as a symbol of the Divine Will, it was renamed Hagia Sophia." p. 4, AYASOPHIA, M. Hadi Altay, Director; Aya Sophia Muzeum, Instanbul, Turkey

To understand the significance of the next set of facts, one must be exposed to some obscured details about "Church History".

Rome was not nearly as "Christian" as Rome's front people in American Evangelicalism claim.  In fact, it was from the beginning quite the opposite.  Much of the truth about Rome's past has been hidden, buried, burned, and lied about to cover up (in order to continue), rather than simply repented from.  (Which any real sincerity would dictate to be much easier and actually preferred) One of the most dramatic discoveries in history, was a collection of writings, Rome had long thought it had snuffed out of existence, which threw historical light on the early period of the formation of Roman Universalism (i.e.,Catholicism) under Constantine and shortly thereafter.

It is known as the Nag Hammadi Library, and is the largest discovery of Gnostic literature in the entire world.  Literature that Rome had read, believed, consulted, and eventually embarrassed by, and fell out with.  The literature was part of the library of the origin of Rome's Monastery movement, and was regularly read and recited by the Monks of Saint Pachomius Monastary.

Saint Augustine, unfortunately esteemed even by many Protestant Churches, advised the Roman Ceasar to attend it's sacred idol shrines, and receive psychic readings from their "Prophets of God".  The Bible records, both in the Old and New Testaments,  prophecy in the ancient world to be a common practice, and even among "false prophets" , "true prophecies" can be given, but in the Biblical framework prophecies alone never served as the basis of "truth".  In fact, "Truth" was placed above the Prophecy, and was to serve as it's judge. Not the other way around.

Of course, these gnostic prophets while perhaps good psychics, were syncretists, (not Christian or Jewish prophets which did exist but were being rejected).  The Nag Hammadi "prophets" mixed every form of devil worship in the known universe into a garbage can they ate out of spiritually, ..and simply threw "Christ" in the mix.  Their ramblings sound more like the rants of someone stoned on marijuana (or perhaps as you will see later "sacred mushrooms"), than they do logic, theology or spirituality, mixing God and the devil, Christ and the Antichrist, the Whore of Babylon and the Bride of Christ, and even male and female sexuality together in one glorious glob of meaningless gnostic goo, intended to impress the listener with their empty and perverse imaginary "knowledge".  

This was the theological framework Roman Universalism was founded within, and later as it tried to "clean up it's act", it needed to destroy the evidence.  The only thing is that the Monks at Saint Pachomius monastary did not appreciate the betrayal and consequently did not cooperate willingly with their own demise.  They buried their entire library with the prophecy that it would be discovered in the last days a reveal the truth to the world that Rome had buried, which it has done.  At least they were right about that.  Of course, if you bury something, it is pretty reasonable to assume, someday someone will eventually dig it up, even if it's in your own back yard. And if your "prophecy" is wrong, who would know?

But apparently these kinds of cognitive tricks worked well on the Roman Ceasars for whom we now credit the beginning of the Christian Roman Empire, or "Dark Ages" as it has been rightly called.  The creation of the first official Church ever built from the ground up to be a "Church" by the empire, was actually named after a major concept among the gnostics of Saint Pachomius monastery.  That concept is called "THE SOPHIA OF JESUS CHRIST".  Constantine's first Church was named "THE THEA SOPHIA".  "Thea" of course means "goddess".  The traditional effeminate depictions of "Christ" as almost looking like a "Woman" are not an accident either, anymore than the blonde hair and blue eyes.  The "Christ" of Christ-Mass is NOT EVEN A MALE!


That is why the "Jesus" you always see in the old fashioned CLASSIC JESUS MOVIES, not only always had "Blonde Hair" but was always "Effeminate" as well.  How many "effeminate" middle-eastern Construction workers have you ever seen in your life?

I want you to know that First Man is called Begetter, Self-Perfected Mind.  He reflected with Great Sophia, his consort, and revealed his first begotten, androgynous son.  His male name is designated "First Begetter Son Of God"; his female name, Begettress SOPHIA, Mother Of The Universe". - p. 231, SOPHIA, THE NAG HAMMADI LIBRARY
The perfect Savior said; "Son of Man consented with SOPHIA, his consort, and revealed a great androgynous light" p. 232,
It appeared as androgynous and was named partly male and partly female.  The male is called ASSEMBLY, while the female is called LIFE, that it might be shown that from a female came the life for all aeons. p. 237,
* Main Entry: an·drog·y·nous 
Pronunciation: an-'drä-j&-n&s
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin androgynus hermaphrodite, from Greek androgynos, from andr- + gynE woman -- more at QUEEN
1 : having the characteristics or nature of both male and female
2 a : neither specifically feminine nor masculine <the androgynous pronoun them> b : suitable to or for either sex <androgynous clothing>
3 : having traditional male and female roles obscured or reversed <an androgynous marriage> 
Main Entry: QUEEN
Pronunciation: 'kwEn
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English quene, from Old English cwEn woman, wife, queen; akin to Gothic qens wife, Greek gynE woman, Sanskrit jani
8 often disparaging : a male homosexual; especially : an effeminate one - MERRIAM-WEBSTER ONLINE DICTIONARY

ROME, while always gravitating to PRIDE in it's once held monopoly on religion in the Old Roman Empire, gleefully adopting the devil worship of it's old emperors as it's "theology", at the same time, does not like anyone to look too closely at these very origins they so fondly institute and spread.  In fact, in the past, prior to the dissolution of it's absolute power, even reading about these matters was "forbidden" literally, banned on an "Index of Forbidden books".  Obviously, what should have been "forbidden" were the practices adopted through their own syncretism, that were so embarrassing and shameful, it required censorship and brainwashing of western civilization to maintain.

ROME was ruled by a class of homosexual male elite.  This practice had ancient roots, stretching back to Alexander the Great, who not only set the example for homosexual male elitism, but along with the practices and teachings of the Greek academy in Plato, instituted the practices of Pederasty (Pedophile sex by authority figures with little boys).

Gibbons, in his epic historical work on Rome, which was placed on Rome's "Index of Forbidden Books" records that virtually all of Rome's emperors were active homosexual pedophiles, with no more than perhaps one exception in Emperor Claudius.

Naturally, the Roman Elite, when crafting it's own "Christ", first in Apollo, and later in the fusion between "Christ" and "Apollo", would prefer making it's "god" it's own image, which THE TRADITIONAL CHRIST, actually is.... complete with sexual orientation.  Thus why depictions of THE TRADITIONAL CHRIST are obviously, admittedly, and publicly EFFEMINATE.  

The monopoly of power of the homosexual male elite in Ancient Rome's Academy, which adopted the Greek practice of Pederasty, is noted in the New Testament:

Rom 1:22-28  Professing to be wise, they became foolish and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into a likeness of AN ICON of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed animals, and creeping things. Because of this, God gave them up to impurity in the lusts of their hearts, their bodies to be dishonored among themselves,  who changed the truth of God into the lie, and worshiped and served the created thing more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. Because of this, God gave them up to dishonorable passions, for even their females changed the natural use to that contrary to nature. And likewise, the males also forsaking the natural use of the female burned in their lust toward one another, males with males working out shamefulness, and receiving back within themselves the reward which was fitting for their error. And even as they did not think fit to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up to a reprobate mind, to do the things not right, 

While this text is perhaps one of the more hated texts today in our post-Protestant Latinized society, because it associates the Greek Academy's homosexuality with Reprobation, the real condemnation in the text is not the "symptom", but the "source".  There are a number of other "symptoms" (or consequences) listed as a consequence of the social practices of the Greek Academy in Rome. 

Rom 1:29-31  having been filled with all (1)unrighteousness, (2)fornication, (3)iniquity, (4)covetousness, (5)malice, (6)being full of envy, (7)murder, (8)quarrels, (9)deceit, (10)evil habits, (11)becoming seditionists, (12)slanderers, (13)God-haters, (14)insolent, (15)proud, (16)braggarts, (17)devisers of evil things, (18)disobedient to parents,  (19)without discernment, (20)covenant breakers, (21)without natural affection, (22)unforgiving, (23)unmerciful, 

If you add it to the list of the description in the first text above, (24).  One for virtually every hour of the day.  All of these by-products were "symptomatic" of what Paul was arguing was a "major spiritual mistake" made specifically by ROME:

Rom 1:21  Because knowing God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful. But they became vain in their reasonings, and their undiscerning heart was darkened

In other words, the corruptions came as a result of refusing to submit to God as God, and insisting on taking control of him, and making him a political tool to be manipulated, rather than a creator to be submitted to,  Obviously, the definiton of "God" within a person's psyche affects who they become, that is why things are "worshiped" to begin with.  We become "like" what we "idolize" or "worship".  If one's "definition" of God is a homosexual male elite, it is quite natural, along with the practices of pederastry (pedophilia) that ROME was creating a lot of homosexuality, despite what modern "Apollo-gists" for homosexuality may claim (that it is only totally and completely genetic).  People can be made homosexual according to the scripture.  And one of the primary ways that it can happen, is through ROME'S corruption of "syncretism" and "idolatry",and creating images of worship, that literally generate homosexuality in the psyche.  While ROME today publicly denounces homosexuality and pedphilia, it is still privately advocated and taught by it's priests.  And obviously, with a esoterically homosexual "Christ", that such ideas are secretly prevelant among it's "clergy" should be no surprise to anyone.
But if the "religious-reich" in America, really wanted to take a stand "against homosexuality" it should obviously start with the beam in it's own eye first, not the private lives or civil rights of strangers across the street.  Outlawing homosexuality, but then promoting a secretly homosexual "Christ" born on December 25th, is ultimate in hypocrisy and naturally the first place they should all start, if such sentiments were actually sincere. (which obviously they are not, as the effeminate, adrogynous "Apollo-Christ", born on December 25th is at the top of their "endangered" list to "protect".  So naturally how could it not be that the more THIS CHRIST, from ROME, the same Rome of the Emperor's gay male elite, Pederasty and Pedphilia, would not also create this "spirit" or "consciousness" within people who "ask it to come into their hearts"? And take control of them?  Hypnotists claim behavioral change can be induced through hypnotic (or subliminal) suggestion, and research in psychology, as well as anectdotal experience from Neuro-Linguistic programming, bear these claims out in terms of effect.  While it may be claimed that subliminal suggestion cannot change a person's sexual orientation, it could certianly direct it before one has been formed.  And for any Nicholaitan clergy, liberal or otherwise, to claim that "spirits" (or spiritual entities, be they even just archetypal, or psychological) do not "create", "determine", "influence" or "affect" consciousness, is a virtual repudiation for their own existence as "clergy" to begin with.

It has already been noted above that the very reason, ROME'S Christ-Mass "Jesus" is shown consistently, even in modern American "charismatic" upgrades that like to re-emphesize his masculinity for their RED STATE constituents, still show him will long flowing hair, sometimes like a California hippie, and sometimes like a Country-western Singer, but still with the signature mark of "Apollo" (hair as that of a woman).  This cosmetic feature of having a woman's hair (like Apollo), is an intentional gender-directed feature, and is not even corrected in the cartoonish "Jesus" pictures of the " Red-State Republican Jesus" with his NRA rifle.

Rather than strip Americans of civil rights, why not do as the real Christ actually commanded, (get the beam out of your own eye first) and just repent and stop worshiping Idols? Specifically the androgynous, secretly homosexual one, on December 25th by the name of APOLLYON who is really THE LAKE OF FIRE, and causes REPROBATION in the psyche of "Christians" susceptible to subliminal suggestion?  That is after-all what PAUL, who wrote the text to begin with, actually suggested, NOT passing laws against Romans, in the Roman senate, which do nothing to change a person's heart (i.e.,consciosuness) and the hypnotic subliminal suggestions that come from one's false worship.  

The Anglican Church has re-united with Vatican Rome, and other than purposes of national administration between the Church of England (Anglican) and the Church of Rome, they have essentially no real difference in Apostate religion, one being the original "Mother" of the other.  England's Masonic Babelism was simply the exportation of the esoterica of the ancient Roman "Church's" secret Babelism doctrines, under Constantine, also of York, England.  

While Evangelicals rant and rave over his definition of Jesus as a gay man, no one appears to notice that is how Elton John understood his "Christ" on a very subconscious level, and accurately so.  Bill O'Reilly, mocked the comment claiming on his Fox News Catholic propaganda show, that there was "no evidence" for that.  Well actually, there is quite a bit of evidence for it, but the "evidence" goes under the heading of Rome's false blonde-haired blue-eyed caucasion androgynous Apollo-Christ, not the one in the New Testament.  Elton John was right, at least about the gender of "his Christ".  His only error was mistaking it for the Jewish one that actually existed in the New Testament.

ROME never changed what it worshiped, (other than in name) and consequently ROME'S "clergy" have never changed the problems they still have among themselves, to this very day from what it practices.  Religious leaders and organizations who embrace the "image of the beast" sooner or later find they are having the same problems as Rome, and unkowingly, it is precisely for the same REASON.  In the following link is a whole website, created by a former Roman Catholic,  on this topic alone: SEXUAL DEGRADATION BEHIND STAINED GLASS


Then why did they intentionally do it WRONG?

Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. 
This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 




The Christ of the Bible is described as a carpentar until the age of thirty.  Carpenters in his day, worked very hard (and were all males) and actually, if you do some research on the word "Carpenter" it is a bit misleading because it actually referred to a "construction laborer". He would have had the physique of a typical hard working construction worker, and hardly the soft thin, effeminant depictions you see in Rome's "traditional Christ" pictures. His physique would have been muscular build with muscular mass in the shoulders, arms and legs.  Not any different than a modern Arab construction worker in the Middle East today.

People who made up his "disciples" were also members of the blue-collar, working class, in his society. (Peter, a fisher man, etc.)  With the exception of Matthew (a tax collector [Financial guy]).  None were recognized Rabbis and they had no formal Rabbinical degrees.  ( regular Aramaic Jewish guys )
But on close observation of the Biblical text, you will begin to notice a rather striking departure from Rome's Christ-mass Christ.  Far from being "thin", the REAL CHRIST, was probably a little on the FAT side, and here is the proof.

The amount of body fat burned on a forty day fast can actually be calculated.  If the amount of fat and muscle tissue burned in a fast, is greater than body mass, the body goes into a state of shock and begins to shut down.  That means that his body mass simply could not have been what we would call "thin". Fasting is not recommended by physicians for a number of reasons.  One very important reason, along with the possibility of going into digestive shock, is that it causes permenant changes in your metabolism rate.  it slows it down.  The more you fast, the more your body stores fat.  Consequently people who frequently fast (which Jesus did) have a much slower rate of metabolism and burn calories very slow.  Consequently when they come off their fasts, they experience rapid weight gains, even if their caloric intake is reduced.  This makes for very chubby people.
Many of the monks of the Middle Ages experienced this by product from fasting.  That is why often they would be illustrated as fat, despite the fact they regularly fasted.  Periodical fasting reduces metabolism to lower rates. Jesus fasted. Notice the textual data once again.
Mat 11:19 The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners.
The record is made in Matt. 11, that one of the "accusations" that came against him by the Pharisees, was that he was a "glutton".  You do not accuse skinny people of being "gluttons".
From phagos {fag'-os}
 AV - gluttonous 2; 2
 1) a voracious man, a glutton
 from phago {fag'-o} n m
 a primary verb (used as an alternate of 2068 in certain tenses);;
Translated:  eat 94, meat (noun) 3; 97, as in "meaty"(Adj.)
glut·ton (gl¾t“n) n. 1. A person who eats or consumes immoderate amounts of food and drink. [Middle English glotoun, from Old French gloton, from Latin glutt½, glutt½n-.] (Gulo gulo), having a heavyset body
Psa 92:13,14 Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts of our God. They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and flourishing;
Pro 11:25 The liberal soul shall be made fat: and he that watereth shall be watered also himself.
Pro 28:25 He that is of a proud heart stirreth up strife: but he that putteth his trust in the LORD shall be made fat.
Isa 58:11 And the LORD shall guide thee continually, and satisfy thy soul in drought, and make fat thy bones: and thou shalt be like a watered garden, and like a spring of water, whose waters fail not.


Obviously not the guy they worship at "Christ-Mass"

Given the descriptions of things in the gospels, it would have been possible to "imagine" a great deal about his appearance.  None of these descriptions in the gospels would have led one to see a SKINNY SISSY "ANDROGYNUS" BLONDE with European features.  The blonde hair "androgynous" Caucasion  wonder painted on the walls of the THEA SOPHIA [and in most subsequent Roman Cathedrals throughout history].... was painted EXACTLY the way ROME wanted it PAINTED. It was PAINTED to reflect the SOPHIA OF JESUS CHRIST.  Not the Jewish construction worker from the Middle East, whom Rome had executed for treason.  It is CLEAR and unmistakable to all who do not have some "theological stake" involved in this claim. If you still want a skinny androgynous BLONDE HAIRED BLUE EYED caucasion born on December 25th, you are simply not being honest with yourself. 
UNKOWN to most, the "litmus test" in the New Testament was not that you believe "Christ was God", it was do you admit CHRIST "came in the flesh" [of a Jew].  It is clear the believers in the skinny androngynous blonde haired blue eyed caucasion Apollo-Christ born on December 25th, reject this truth.  They REJECT the REAL CHRIST made of Jewish flesh and blood! It is very easy to SAY you accept that CHRIST CAME IN THE FLESH, if you depict that flesh to be whatever you wish it to be.  In REALITY, rejecting who he IS in the flesh, is the same as rejecting HE CAME IN THE FLESH.  The rest is merely semantics.


Then why did they intentionally do it WRONG?

Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. 
This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 

[TOP]          [NEXT]




MARCH 27, 2005 8:00 PM

QUOTE: "Jesus and his followers were JEWISH. They were bringing a REFORM movement within JUDAISM". END QUOTE

QUOTE: ""Jesus was born a Jew, Lived an observant Jew and Died an observant Jewand ALL his disciples were JEWISH". END QUOTE


In 2005 on the Fox "News" customary broadcast of Vatican religous content, kicking off it's program on the Vatican Easter Mass, it began it's program with two "scholars" talking about what is now known about the historical New Testament "Christ".  The first was a Rabbinical professor who smiled and explained to the Fox News audience that Jesus was actually Jewish and did not start a new religion at all.  The second was an expert "Scholar" and "Professor" on New Testament Studies, who went even further and explained that Jesus was actually a Torah observant Jew from the beginning to the end of his life, repeating the earlier statement that Jesus did not start a new religion, but was Jewish.

The typically clueless Fox host smiled happily and then transitioned to the next scene at Rome to the Opulent Vatican palace, it's procession of clergy dressed up in full Easter regalia and then to the Catacomb tombs in Rome where the narrative quickly changed to talking about all the Roman Christians who along with Saint Peter, hung out in the tombs of dead people, to venerate and pray to the dead and decayed rotting corpses. (with complete obliviousness and disconnect to it's own earlier programmed content offered as commentary in it's own "Vatican special" program) And of course, Fox News while attempting to bridge the bizzare opulance and obvious Non-Jewish nature of the Vatican's royal Roman empire Easter Mass, never bothered to inform it's audience that modern historians consider the traditional explanations previously offered by Vatican historical propagandists, concerning the Roman catacombs, to not even be historically valid conclusions any longer.  Judaism, the religion of the New Testament and it's writers, considered even touching anything dead to be Unclean and certainly mixing it with something "spiritually" would have been considered nothing short of an "abomination".




Most do not realize the term "Christian" was actually an antisemitic term for a Jew who believed Yeshua (or Joshua if you prefer English) was the Messiah, it is not the name which the people of the New Testament called themselves. The term "Christian" is referred to only THREE (3) times in the entire New Testament's 27 books. In all three occurances it is referred to as an "insult" coined by "outsiders" from a very antisemitic area which is modern day Syria [still very antisemitic].

To the contrary, people in the New Testament referred to themselves as "Disciples" [Limmudim] and "Brethren" FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY (450) times. 

 DISCIPLES/BRETHREN                                       CHRISTIANS

             450 ............................................................... 3

                    Usage ratio = 99% to 1%

                 NOTE: You could call yourself a "heifer" and actually be "more Biblical". The term "heifer" occurs 19 times.


'Early Use of the Term. Unlike "Christian," which occurs three times in the NT, THE TERM "CHRISTIANITY" IS NOT USED IN THE BIBLE. IN ITS GREEK FORM IT IS PARALLEL TO "JUDAISM" (the Jews' religion; cf. Gal. 1:13f.; 2 Macc. 2:21). It seems to have been used first by Christians themselves. OUR EARLIEST AUTHORITY IS IGNATIUS OF ANTIOCH [c. 35 - c. 107 [?]], who says [written in Greek] that the glory of the Christian is[?] "['LET US LEARN'] TO LIVE ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANISM [χριστιανισμός]" (Magn. 10 [see The Ante-Nicene Fathers, 1959 (1867-), Vol. I, 59, 63 ("Shorter and Longer Versions")] [see following (The Apostolic Fathers)]). For Christians it is a title of honor. (Cf. also Ign. Rom. 3; Philad. 6.)'  - The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Eerdmans, 1979 (1915), Vol. 1, 658:

The Apostolic Fathers, With an English Translation by Kirsopp Lake, I Clement II Clement Ignatius Polycarp Didache Barnabas, Heinemann, MCMLIX, vol. 1, "Ignatius to the Magnesians", X, 206 Greek—207 English. - Note: the English translation has "Judaism" 3 times, and "Christianity" 2 times.

IGNATIUS: Saint, Bishop of Antioch (born in Syria, c. 50— died rather latitudinously "between 98 and 117" [data from CE (Catholic Encyclopedia), vii, 644])....He [Ignatius] was the subject of very extensive forgeries; fifteen Epistles bear the name of Ignatius, including one to the Virgin Mary, and her reply; two to the apostle John, others to the Philippians, Tarsians, Antiocheans, Ephesians, Magnesians, Trallians, - Forgery in Christianity, A Documented Record of the Foundations of the Christian Religion, By Joseph Wheless, Lately Major, Judge Advocate, U.S.A.; Associate Editor (in Section of Comparative Law) of American Bar Association Journal; Life Member of American Law Institute; etc. [Dedicated to Henry L. Mencken], Knopf, MCMXXX, 133-134:

"CHRISTIANITY" is a ROMAN substitute word for the Jewish religion of the New Testament.... as it's CHRIST is a ROMAN substitute for the Jewish Messiah of the New Testament as well.

Eph 2:12,13  That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.

Earliest Latin reference to "Christianity" occurs as "CHRISTIĀNISMUS": "Tert. adv. Marc. 4, 33 [c. 198 - c. 208]" - A Latin Dictionary, Freund's Latin Dictionary, Charlton T. Lewis, Charles Short, Oxford, 1962 (1879), 328: 


Then why did they intentionally do it WRONG?

Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. 
This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 




Mark 12:29-31  And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:  And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.

Unknown to most Christians, Rome’s doctrine of the “Blessed Trinity” has nothing to do with the “divinity” of Christ, which was accepted within the Jewish paradigm of the Shema for centuries.  The POINT of the "trinity" was to "create" a Roman Icon, which "separated' the people of Christ [both his family and his Jewish disciples] from the confiscated documents now called the "New Testament". By violating the Shema, outlawing the Sabbath and criminalizing the Seder, they thought it would drive a nail in the coffin of the Jewish Christ.
The "doctrine of the Blessed Trinity" came from Egypt's Saint Pachomius Monastery. There it was originally known as the doctrine of the 3 Ogdoads. In this Gnostic doctrine, "Sophia" was called the "mother of God" and identified with Mary. It was also the TITLE of one of the books found;” The Sophia Of Jesus Christ" [and the name of the first "Christian Church" built by Constantine, the great.
What is most "wrong about it" is not what it states, but the intent of the formalizaiton, to be used as a political tool to kill people with. God never describes himself this way in the scriptures to either the Apostles or Prophets, why should we?  Unlike what many "preachers" tell people, it wasn't Christ's deity that was a "test" of the antichrist. It was his "humanity".  Because this is the first thing that must "go", to create a "myth"  that is a lie. [such as December 25th]
1Jo 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist,
That was the "purpose" of the "trinity" doctrine; to deny his Jewish flesh....and more importantly...his Jewish faith.
"The word Trinity is not found in the Bible . . . It did not find a place formally in the theology of the church till the 4th century." -- The Illustrated Bible Dictionary
"In Scripture there is as yet no single term by which the Three Divine Persons are denoted together. The word [tri'as] (of which the Latin trinitas is a translation) is first found in Theophilus of Antioch about A. D. 180 . . . Shortly afterwards it appears in its Latin form of trinitas in Tertullian." However, this is no proof in itself that Tertullian taught the Trinity. The Catholic work Trinitas - A Theological Encyclopedia of the Holy Trinity, for example, notes that some of Tertullian's words were later used by others to describe the Trinity. But then it states: "But hasty conclusions cannot be drawn from usage, for he does not apply the words to Trinitarian theology." - The Catholic Encyclopedia
"Neither the word Trinity nor the explicit doctrine appears in the New Testament."  - The New Encyclopedia Britannica
"To Jesus and Paul the doctrine of the trinity was apparently unknown; . . . they say nothing about it." -- Yale University Professor E. Washburn Hopkins, Origin and Evolution of Religion.
"As early as the 8th century, the Theologian St. John of Damascus frankly admitted what every modern critical scholar of the NT now realizes: that neither the Doctrine of the Trinity nor that of the 2 natures of Jesus Christ is explicitly set out in scripture. In fact, if you take the record as it is and avoid reading back into it the dogmatic definitions of a later age, you cannot find what is traditionally regarded as orthodox Christianity in the Bible at all." -- Tom Harpur, For Christ's Sake.
"Jesus Christ never mentioned such a phenomenon, and nowhere in the New Testament does the word 'Trinity' appear. The idea was only adopted by the Church three hundred years after the death of our Lord." -- Historian Arthur Weigall, The Paganism in Our Christianity
"Neither the word Trinity, nor the explicit doctrine as such, appears in the New Testament, nor did Jesus and his followers intend to contradict the Shema in the Old Testament: 'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord' -- Deut. 6:4  . . . The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies . . . By the end of the 4th century . . . the doctrine of the Trinity took substantially the form it has maintained ever since." -- The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Micropædia, Vol. X, p. 126. (1976)
"The formulation 'one God in three Persons' was not solidly established, certainly not fully assimilated into Christian life and its profession of faith, prior to the end of the 4th century. But it is precisely this formulation that has first claim to the title the Trinitarian dogma. Among the Apostolic Fathers, there had been nothing even remotely approaching such a mentality or perspective." - The New Catholic Encyclopedia ,(1967), Vol. XIV, p. 299.
"Christianity derived from Judaism and Judaism was strictly Unitarian [believing that God is one person]. The road which led from Jerusalem to Nicaea was scarcely a straight one. Fourth century Trinitarianism did not reflect accurately early Christian teaching regarding the nature of God; it was, on the contrary, a deviation from this teaching." -- The Encyclopedia Americana, (1956), Vol. XXVII, p. 294L.
"Christianity did not destroy paganism; it adopted it. . . . From Egypt came the ideas of a divine trinity." And in the book Egyptian Religion, Siegfried Morenz notes: "The trinity was a major preoccupation of Egyptian theologians . . . Three gods are combined and treated as a single being, addressed in the singular. In this way the spiritual force of Egyptian religion shows a direct link with Christian theology." – Historian Will Durant
[Found Among The Nag Hammadi Texts At Saint Pachomius Monastary]
The Gospel of the Egyptians is no longer extant but was mentioned by Hippolytus and Epiphanius. Most of our citations come from Clement of Alexandria, and there is also a reference in the Excerpts of Theodotus. The gospel was apparently used in Egypt in the second and third centuries.
“Despite the paucity of the extant fragments, the theology of the Gospel of the Egyptians is clear: each fragment endorses sexual asceticism as the means of breaking the lethal cycle of birth and of overcoming the alleged sinful differences between male and female, enabling all persons to return to what was understood to be their primordial and androgynous state.” – Ron Cameron, Introduction, The Other Gospels
THREE POWERS came forth from him: they are the Father, the Mother and the Son,from the living silence, what came forth from the incorruptable Father. These came forth from the silence of the UNKOWN FATHER. From that place the three powers came forth, THE THREE OGDOADS that the Father brings forth, in silence with his providence, from his bosom, i.e., the Father, the Mother, and the Son. - p. 209, THE NAG HAMMADI LIBRARY
Rev 16:13 And I saw three UNKOSHER spirits like FROGS [Egypt] come out of the mouth  ...of the false prophet
"Theodosius [A Christian Ceasar] ... sought the advice of John, a servant of God who lived in the desert of Egypt. Popular opinion had it, and he heard, that this man possessed the gift of prophecy. " [Exact monastary containing Nag Hammadi Library] - SAINT AUGUSTINE (Augustine, The City Of God, 5,26)
What are "Ogdoads"?
In Egyptian mythology, the Ogdoad are the eight deities worshipped in Hermopolis. They were arranged in four male-female pairs, with the males associated with frogs, - WIKIPEDIA 2-5-2007
Rev 16:14  For they [the 3 Frog spirits] are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.



Mark 12:29-31  And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:  And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is no other commandment greater than these. [ The Shema ]
THE FIRST OF ALL the commandments ..”
NO OTHER commandment greater ..”

Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord - The REAL CHRIST


Then why did they intentionally do it WRONG?

Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. 
This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 

[TOP]          [NEXT]



Dr. Malachi Martin, eminent theologian, thirty years an Exorcist, expert on the Catholic Church, former Jesuit and professor at the Vatican's Pontifical Biblical Institute, is the author of numerous poignant, illuminating and controversial writings including these national best-selling books: Vatican, The Final Conclave, Hostage to the Devil, The Jesuits, The Keys of This Blood, and Windswept House. Father Martin was trained in theology at Louvain. There he received doctorates in the Semitic Languages, Archeology and Oriental History. Subsequently, he studied at Oxford and at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. From 1958 to 1964 he served the Holy See at the Vatican in Rome. Here, he was a close associate of the renowned Jesuit Cardinal, Augustin Bea, and His Holiness, Pope John XXIII.  - THE LATE FATHER MALACHI MARTIN'S ONLINE WEBSITE

"The Jewish Christians HAD NO PLACE in such A CHURCH STRUCTURE. They managed to survive until the first decades of the 5th century....Most of them die by the sword(Roman garrisons hunted them down as outlaws) The rest died of STARVATION not being able to purchase food." The COMPLETE and UNIVERSAL execution of every blood relative of Christ known to ROME was accomplished by the seventh century, along with all known JEWISH believers. - Malachi Martin, former Jesuit Priest, p. 44, The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Church, 

If you think that the changes in every single catagorey of basic personal information and relgious belief of the REAL CHRIST recorded in the New Testament were simply accidents of ignorance, you would be mistaken.  Not only were these deviations intentionally employed, but to protect them from criticism and rejection, Rome actually issued orders to EXTERMINATE any remaining vestiges of Christ's own personal family.

The sucessors of Jesus the Nazarene and Paul of the party of the Nazarenes were the "Heretical" Nazarenes DENOUNCED BY EPIPHANIUS - THE EARLY CHRISTIAN WORLD, Philip Esler, p. 159 

The historical anomaly of having a figure supposedly "worshiped" for which orders are issued to have his entire family exterminated seem beyond the comprehension of normal rational thought processes, but such are the ways of an ancient Roman dictatorship, the most amazing part of this history, is that after exterminating him and his family, they then have the mind-blowing nerve to claim his identity, as the "Vicar of Christ" on earth?

And this leads us to our next section.  A study not on the IDOL Rome created to be worshipped for it's "Christ-Mass" by the Roman religious dictator on whose behalf everyone was commanded to worship it for, but the office and the man behind the institutionalization of the idol, serving as a symbolic proxy to recieve  the worship of the entire empire in the annual affirmation of Papal self-deification. The REAL "Christ" of "Christ-Mass" is none other than the spiritual head of the Roman empire itself, the Pope of Rome.


Then why did they intentionally EXTERMINATE THEM?

Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. 
This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 



Maybe even at "Christmas"?



Rev 13:15  And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, 
and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. 


- Tertullian

The Minervalia are as much Minerva’s, as the Saturnalia Saturn’s; Saturn’s, which must necessarily be celebrated even by little slaves at the time of the Saturnalia. New-year’s gifts likewise must be caught at, and the Septimontium kept; and all the presents of Midwinter and the feast of Dear Kinsmanship must be exacted; the schools must be wreathed with flowers; the flamens’ wives and the aediles sacrifice; the school is honoured on the appointed holy-days. The same thing takes place on an idol’s birthday; every pomp of the devil is frequented. Who will think that these things are befitting to a Christian…? (Tertullian. On Idolatry, Chapter X. Translated by S. Thelwall. Excerpted from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 3. Edited by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson. American Edition, 1885. Online Edition Copyright © 2004 by K. Knight).




(And YOU never knew ME)

Think about your own personal identity information?  You have (1) a Name, (2) a Birthdate (3) a Race or Ethnicity (4) a Language (5) a Religion (6) A physical description (Hair, eyes, weight, height, gender, etc)

How many of these identifiers would have to be changed, before it was actually another person being described?  Now abviously, if someone doesn't really know you very well, then it might be expected that they might get some of these basic facts wrong about who you are, because after all, they don't care who you are anyway.  But obvioulsy if they claimed to "worship you", and be obsessed with you, and then intentionally, not accidently but intentionally, change that basic information about who you are AS A PERSON, then you know you would be looking at a liar... and probably a liar in the middle of a pretty awful scam.

Whether you want to believe this or not, that is precisely what the New Testament actually RECORDS the REAL CHRIST predicting THE MAJORITY of people who "call him Lord" would be involved with.  Obviously, since Christ prophesied this, and if you claim to believe in that same Christ, you have to acknowledge something exists that is giving people a FALSE CHRIST to believe in.  That SOMETHING is what THE MAJORITY of people who call themselves "Christians" all over the world, have been made the victim of, or perhaps willingly participate in.  This FALSE CHRIST was made the law of the Empire in 440 AD under Pope Sixth III...AT CHRIST-MASS !!

This Christ, is Rome's sun-god AS "Christ".  Not "Christ" as he was fully known to Rome (or anyone else with a Bible), to have really been.  Christians who embrace this Roman Idol claim there is nothing that says in the Bible they cannot "worship Christ" on December 25th.  That of course, is true, but there is also nothing in the Bible that says this False Christ they worship on December 25th, is going to save them, and it most certainly IS a FALSE CHRIST.  A brief survey of basic features and characteristics show that the person worshiped on December 25th is not even him.  Not only is it NOT CHRIST, the Real Christ, as you will see later, would more probably beat you with a whip over the practices of Christmas which include everything from Idolatry to Making his father's house a den of Merchants.  Not to mention the fact, that the REAL CHRIST called the Synagogue leaders "Satan worshipers" for mixing Solar symbolism and ritual with Judaism.  That would be the REAL CHRIST you actually find described on the pages of your Bible, which is openly and willfully rejected on December 25th.





Mat 7:21-26  Not everyone who says to Me, Lord, Lord, will enter into the kingdom of Heaven, but the ones who do the will of My Father in Heaven.  MANY will say to Me in that day, Lord, Lord, did we not preach in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name do many wonderful deeds? And THEN I WILL DELCARE TO THEMI NEVER KNEW YOU; "depart from Me, those working lawlessness!"  Then everyone who hears these Words from Me, and does them, I will compare him to a wise man who built his house on the rock; ...And everyone who hears these Words of Mine, and who does not do them, he shall be compared to a foolish man who built his house on the sand; 

MANY - G4183, ðïëýò, ðïëëüò, polus  polos, pol-oos', Including the forms from the alternate “pollos”; (singular) much (in any respect) or (plural) many; neuter (singular) as adverb LARGELY; neuter (plural) as adverb or noun often, MOSTLY, LARGELY: - abundant, + altogether, COMMON, + far (passed, spent), (+ be of a) great (age, deal, - [THE MAJORITY]

RASSMUSSEN POLL (DEC. 2009) - Sixty-four percent (64%) will celebrate Christmas as a religious holiday honoring the birth of THEIR Christ.

LAWLESSNESS - ἀíïìßá, anomia, an-om-ee'-ah From G459; illegality, that is, VIOLATION OF LAW [i.e., TORAH] or (generally) wickedness: 


'Nay, indeed, the law does not permit us to make festivals at the births of our children' 

-(Flavius Josephus, Against Apion, Book II, section 26).









Main Entry: syn·cre·tism 
Pronunciation: \ˈsiŋ-krə-ˌti-zəm, ˈsin-\
Function: noun
Etymology: New Latin syncretismus, from Greek synkrētismos federation of Cretan cities, from syn- + Krēt-, Krēs Cretan
Date: 1618

1 : the combination of different forms of belief or practice
2 : the fusion of two or more originally different inflectional forms



BDB Definition:

Babel or Babylon = “confusion (by mixing)”

1) Babel or Babylon, the ancient site and/or capital of Babylonia (modern Hillah) situated on the Euphrates

What happens when you mix arsenic with a vitamin? Do you get something new which is neither? Or do you just get a vitamin with arsenic in it? 
That will kill you just as fast as if you took the arsenic alone?

When you MIX God and Satan together, all you are left with, is Satan.
Because God withdraws himself from your formula.

1Co 10:20  But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. 

1Co 10:21  Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils. 

2Co 6:15,16  And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?  And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 

As you will note in the above illustrations, (1) LEFT: Picture, Peter "hears the voice of Jesus" speaking to him, but you will notice it is THE SUN, in THE TREE.  He is holding a "Shepherd's Staff", but it is not the normal simple "hook staff" usually seen in use by "Shepherds".  It is the Serpentine staff, with the raised end. (2) CENTER: This medieval drawing shows Christ and the Serpent Tree as ONE.  To the left of the tree is "Eve" (Mother of all living) and to the right of the Tree is "The Virgin Mary" (Mother of God), what you may miss is that a grape cluster is over "Eve's" vagina (nowhere in the Bible, but reflective of the Dionysian mysteries) and over The Virgin Mary's vagine, you will see A SUN DISC.  This imagery is found in exact duplicate in Egypt where the goddess NUT, has the SUN beaming from her vagina over the world. (3) RIGHT: The famous Latin-Italian painter Giovanni da Modena, entitles his painting "Restitution of the Mystic Apple to the Tree of Knowledge"  Also fusing CHRIST and SATAN as the SAME TREE.

As you will see in the section entitled THE TREE, the very CHRIST-MASS TREE is literally the Solar-Serpent Tree DAMNED and CURSED in Genesis 3/  Rome is celebrating NOT the Biblical "Tree of Life", but the ancient TREE OF KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL, in a yearly SATANIC RITUAL.(Mixed with God, but of course, that would require God's cooperation which he does not give)

The IDENTITY of ROME'S CHRIST, is called out in the New Testament BY NAME.  And said to be the worship of THE DEVIL/ (as it in fact actually is!)

Rev 9:11  And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. (Born December 25th)


Protestants who have "compromised" and embraced THIS CHRIST are endangering their eternity, 
and are in reality worshiping the Devil.


Mat 4:8  Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.  Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. 

The MASONS have had many disagreements with Rome over the centuries, since their excommunication during the middle-ages, but one thing both ROME and the MASONS have always agreed on was the worship of LUCIFER as God.  Things have changed since their reunificaiton with the Vatican through the York Rite and the Church of England.  After completing their efforts of sabotage of the Communist regime in eastern Europe, they have turned their attention on creating enforcement of their Lucifer worship through law here in America.  

From ROME'S earliest Egyptian gnostic syncretists who equated God and the Devil. the Tower of Babel and "Church", Christ and Antichrist, the Whore of Babylon and the Bride of Christ, to the Freemason's syncretism of even the very name of God itself, with the ancient Solar-devil-god of Babylon, Egypt and Tyre, both have agreed on rejecting the God of the Bible, for the serpent-god of sophistry, gnosticism and secret satanism.  Now they want to make their their worship of Satan mandatory on all Americans, and they are using Protestant stooges who should know much better, and have no excuse for this collaboration, especially given the centuries of warnings from their own founding fathers, both of their country and their faiths.  

Rome and the Masons have always worshiped the Biblical devil, and will always continue to do so, and will always issue denials, in the midsts of their practices.  The idol is not really an idol, the devil is not really the devil, the lie is not really a lie, etc.,, etc., This has been going on for hundreds of years.  But Protestants (not to mentioned those of the other monotheistic faiths, Judaism and Islam) should find this encroachment on American freedom and liberty, detestable and unacceptable.  Self-described "Constitutionalists" who like to frequent "tea-party" rallies, should be as equally willing to point their guns at these frauds, as they are at "government programs", since obviously there is no more sacred freedom on earth, nor protected by guarantees of our own Constitution, than the freedom of self-determination in matters of religious faith.  An no violation of this same constitution greater than it's "suspension' or "removal" to literally enforce the worship of "Lucifer".

The Mormons, having incorporated Masonry into an actual "Church" through Joseph Smith, are the third player in the RELIGIOUS-REICH's jihad to create compulsory worship of the Icon of December 25th (the beast), that is literally seeking to over-throw the government of the United States for a Theocratic kingdom, centered around THE THIRD REICH of the ROMAN EMPIRE. (Literally Hitler's vision for the world) with Vatican Rome as it's benefactor.  These theologies reject not only the God of the Bible, but the Christ that actually exists within the pages of the New Testament, for the veiled worship of Satan, a/k/a APOLLO, called out literally by name in Revelation 9:11 as the very deity worshped by those with "the mark of the Beast".

Rev 9:11  And they had a (Christ) king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon (Dec 25th)

1 Co 10:20  But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils

The bizarre idea that one can be a worshiper of the Devil, worship the very substitute "Christ" that the real Christ's family was literally slaughtered over to inaugurate in his stead, and somehow still be a "Christian" and "go to heaven" is really beyond the realm of the word stupid to describe.  The Biblical word is "delusion".  And "Christians" who wish to have the "pleasure" of their "delusion", and simultaneously enjoy the label "Christian" unchallenged by those who know better, are nothing more than spoiled brats who are destroying themselves with their tantrums in rejecting their own spiritual parents, and the warnings and admonitions, of what is in most cases, the founders of their own faiths.

Protestants who know the truth, have the responsibility, not only to live it, but speak it, and teach it.  And whenever the subject is brought up by demands from these spiritual brats who hate their own spiritual parents from their own theological traditions, in whatever context that is socially appropriate with tact and discretion, that label needs to be clearly revoked, so that repentence can come... and REAL "evangelism" following the teaching of the REAL Christ, can REALLY take place.

A nation full of "Christian" right-wing apostates, is no better than a nation full of nazis, who will in the end gravitate spiritually and socially to precisely the same places as their Roman, Spanish and German predecessors, who worshiped this same false Christ and insisted on the very same demands of compulsion to enforce it.  From the inquistions, to the genocidal crusades, to the horrors of the holocaust.  If you keep doing the same thing, you will keep getting the same result.  That is simply an unavoidable fact of life.  Not to mention the spiritual consequence to the deceived individual this "delusion" is actually spreading in the earth.  This is "not" evangelism, it is deceit.  It is literally spreading Rome's original "inoculation" against the real God of Judaism found in the scriptures, and it's real Christ found in the New Testament, fully intended to "nullify" the REAL kingdom of God, both within the heart, mind and will of the believer, and it's social, economic and political, effect on their own selfish self-centered Empire.

America was once a nation filled with REAL evangelical fevor, but the "Christ" these evangelicals were following was one they found in the pages of their Bibles, not on Talking-points memos from politicized organizations serving Vatican Rome, and openly worshiping it's old Roman devil, made genocidal law by a man with literally the name of three sixes, POPE SIXTUS III.  And any "Christian" who thinks this abomination should be turned into a legal compulsion, truly does not demonstrate the basic evidence of any REAL salvation, of any REAL kind.  And it is time every one of these "Christian leaders" (who like to secretly call themselves "Lucifer" by night, and preach in Churches by day), start hearing it.  Whether you are a Mason or a Roman or just a poor deceived and deluded Protestant, the victim of some worthless Jesuit prop, religious TV scam artist,  Devil worship and "salvation" do not mix, and the scripture promises if you drink the cup of THAT mixture, you will also and unconditionally drink the cup of his wrath, "unmixed" for doing it.

Rev 14:10  The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: 



Jer 16:19  O LORD, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit. 

Aside from the fact that you saw virtually every detail of Christ's real identity was INTENTIONALLY changed, and aside from the fact that you saw they went to the extent of actually exterminating his own family to hide the truth about those changes, is the fact that to this very day, rather than 'repentence" over discovering these things, this is STILL continued deceit.  And the deceit is not restricted to the real identity of the real Christ, either.  it actually extends all the way to the very definition of the ANTICHRIST itself, which is the very core of all the deceit from 440 AD., up unto our own day.


By now hopefully you have realized that you have been told some lies about "Christ-Mass".  You have already seen in the example of the Pilgrims, you have even been told some lies about history, to make the lies about "Christ-Mass" look better.  But this is perhaps the hardest part of this discussion to have with Evangelicals and Protestants in America.  The part that is the hardest for them to break away from and return to historic Protestant truth, is actually the first part that they should be willing to give up the easiest.  Because it is among the biggest lies, and the one most easily proven.  Yet it is the most difficult.  And that discrepancy is purely the result of something "spiritual".

"Christians" who know these truths and have been speaking them for decades, know how hard it is to get past the Pavlovian "conditioning" that is used on people to manipulate their consciousness,  But when you begin to demolish these lies one by one, once the truth is laid bare the lies were told to hide, the "strong-hold" shows it's real face,  That stronghold is over the lies told about "The Antichrist".  There has been such a con job on this issue, and so much intentional disinformation on Evangelical/Protestants in America, they cannot fathom any possibility other than the one they have been "programmed" to have in their head? And this by the same people they know have been lying to them about all the rest of it.  That is because while "Christmas" is probably 90% of the lie, that last remaining 10% is what the 90% has been engineered to "protect" and "hide", thus why that last remaining stronghold is the strongest held, and the hardest to shake.


Naturally, religious leaders that have been lying to you about Christ, lying to you about history, lying to you about Christmas, would be expected to lie to you about "The Antichrist".  But what is perhaps not expected is that after people realize they have been lied to in all these other areas, they will still take the word of their favorite liar on the issue of "The Antichrist", thinking this last area is still at least true.  But unfortunately it is not.  And the lie told here, has been told on behalf of the real Antichrist to keep you from seeing him in history, in fact, even in your own Church.

Now the people lying to you about the Antichrist, as has already been mentioned, are often involved with secret societies that link themselves back to the old Roman Empire.  These secret societies pass out indoctrination wherever they show up, and if it happens to be in the pulpit of your Church, so be it.  If it happens to be at your Denomination's most esteemed seminary, they will be there too.  Their job is to keep you hood-winked over what and who the "Antichrist" really is.  And this is not some sort of speculative suspicion or accusation, but a demonstrable, though admittedly strange, fact which will be illustrated for the reader in the examples of Norman Geisler and John Hagee. 

There is but one message spread all over America concerning the Antichrist.  It is spread from Churches, from hollywood movies, from books, from radio, from TV, from entertainment, movies, songs, Christian "leaders" and even heavy metal bands.  Everyone is in perfect agreement and the message is patently monolithic in tone.  The ANTICHRIST is COMING!!!!


You'll see everything from Arnold Swartzenager in horror movies, to "conservative" talk show hosts on CNN like Glenn Beck, to book stores filled with exciting fictional stories all about the COMING of the Antichrist.  And the reason there is such unanimity all across our society, from the Churches to the Saturday night multi-million dollar blockbuster movies, that the Antichrist is COMING, is because that is the only message they allow anyone to ever hear.  The other information on the subject is censored. It's not published, not reported, not discussed, not taught, not written about in fictions, not discussed on the radio, not even taught in Churches.

Now think about this for one minute.  Knowing how the Solstice-cult missionaries have manipulated societies from their histories to their religions, would you really expect these same sophistry devil-worshipers from ancient Babel that work at infiltrating and running everything from your Churches to your history departments at universities, and even governments, would let you hear the truth about the Antichrist?  Really? Wouldn't it be more far more realistic to expect in reality, that if the Antichrist were in fact coming, you would probably not be allowed to have any information about it, or any idea, such were the case by these same people.  In fact, this is exactly the information that would get "censored" from mainstream sources. Wouldn't it?  You know this is true.

In all of these "Antichrist movies" you will see generated for public consumption, you will see on consistent theme.  The Roman Catholic priest is always the good guy fighting the "Antichrist", and the "Antichrist" is always a politician, not a religious leader.  That claim is patently untrue on both counts.  Even Tim LaHaye's "LEFT BEHIND" series has the Pope being "raptured".(The same guy that named himself 666, calls himself equal to God, and actually Jesus Christ, and was responsible for slaughtering his family)  The reason of course, is that it is to a large extent, Roman Catholics who buy his pulp-fiction books, and he's actually working politically, to bring Vatican rule over the U.S..  And when you look at the actors and the studios which produce these "Antichrist" movies, you will always find the same money behind them.  Rome.  The OMEN for example is produced by 20th Century FOX, the same people who run the virtual Catholic news station FOX NEWS.  Gregory Peck was it main actor, also born and raised Catholic.  The END OF DAYS starred Arnold Swartzenager, the son of a Nazi SS officer, married to a Kennedy, and co-starred Robin Tunney, an Irish-Catholic.  It was produced by a Jewish producer, but ironically the same one responsible for 2010, one of the chapters of which in the book is entitled "Lucifer Rising".  The point is that when you start looking under the covers, you find Rome's indirect involvement and influence, in most of these productions. Not surprisingly.

If you look at what get's censored, it's NOT that the Antchrist is COMING.   They want that message so loud it drowns out everything else, precisely because he's not.  I can promise you with an open Bible, the Antichrist is NOT coming.  And the reason he is not coming will astound you, but it is absolutely verifiable from the texts of Scripture, that the Antichrist IS NOT COMING.  Why else do you think, you are constantly being told he is?

But the problem is, will you look to see the truth? Will you really look at it? Really?  And consider the possibility this too could be a lie, designed to HIDE something much more sinister than THE ANTICHRIST IS COMING.

What could possibly be more "sinister" than that? You ask? Well easy, that he is ALREADY HERE, and is telling you what to think about THE ANTICHRIST, which is precisely what is happening,  The reason it is happening is that THE ANTICHRIST doesn't want you to know who he is, despite the fact the Bible promises he would be revealed and known by the entire world, and it would only come down to whether or not you really LOVED THE TRUTH or not, as to whether you would fail to realize that is who it was.  And that is precisely the case, as it is today.  But the ANTICHRIST is actually the one you have been listening to you give you all those exciting "prophecy updates" about "prophecy in the news".  That's exciting isn't it to hear all these "prophecies" coming true.  Well there are some that are "coming true" today, and there will be even more tomorrow, but despite all these exciting news flashes you may be feeding your brain with, rather than reading your Bible, they are all designed for the sole purpose of deceiving you.  

Now it is realized that this is a rather harsh, and possibly an extreme sounding statement on the surface, but this will be demonstrated factually to you as well. And the facts are what they are. You are being LIED TO.  Not accidently told something untrue, but openly patently and intentionally LIED TO.  And the people behind telling you this LIE, even know full well they are telling you a LIE.  Because they "intentionally" HIDE the TRUTH.  So that would mean intent is in fact involved.  It is premeditated lying.




Main Entry: cen·sor·ship (Websters)
Pronunciation: \ˈsen(t)-sər-ˌship\
Function: noun
Date: circa 1591

1 a : the institution, system, or practice of censoring b : the actions or practices of censorsespecially : censorial control exercised repressively
2 : the office, power, or term of a Roman censor

Of course, did you really expect these ministers openly connected to supporting the Vatican, and it's restoration of the 3rd Reich, who are members of secret societies and churches, that extol the virtues of Babel's devil worship, to be telling you the truth? About anything?  And certainly not something as important as THE ANTICHRIST!  If you did, you are not a thoughtful person. 

Exactly what do you think they would tell you? The architect for their "real" (secret) religion is Nimrod and he was the prototype of the Antichrist? And that is who they really serve?  Few, if none, of the things you are reading on this website, have you heard from these kinds of ministers, because it is a message they cannot give.  They cannot even tell you the truth about your own founding Pilgrim fathers of your own America, much less anything about "The Antichrist".

That is not their mission (to keep you honestly informed).  In fact, wherever they are in charge, if anyone under them EVEN ACCIDENTLY leaks the truth to you, that person is FIRED, or at the very least THREATENED into silence.  Seriously.  That is really what happens.  They are hiding information from you, and ANYONE WHO LEAKS that information will be punished.  

Look at the picture above you. It is Exhibit A, that they are in fact intentionally lying to  you and you can see it publicly.
John Hagee "Apologized" for content in the Bible. How exactly do  you do that? "I'm sorry I told anybody what's in the Bible?" 

Here is the obvious fact that should be jumping out at you right now.  Fi John Hagee really taught what was actually in the Bible, it is nothing he  can really "Apologize" for, now can he?

So that means, when he does, he admits publicly that what he is teaching REALLY ISN'T IN THE BIBLE, and he was just being mean to Roman Catholics, or..... (and this is what really happened).... He apologized for TELLING ANYONE, what is in the Bible IN HIS OWN CHURCH, i.e., LEAKING INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC.

And that is precisely WHAT HE DID.  He APOLOGIZED for TELLING ANYONE what is really in the SCRIPTURES. (As a minister) in his own Church.

Now if he is Apologizing for telling you (for leaking) one of the most obvious facts in Scripture and history, which is Rome is the "Whore of Babylon" (And remember this is what Roman Theologians CALLED IT THEMSELVES, thinking IT WAS A GOOD THING?  What do  you think you will EVER HEAR about THE ANTICHRIST from such ministers?  Seriously?  Do you think a minister that "Apologizes" for telling you what Rome said itself? And is rather blatantly recorded in the Bible, is going to tell  you that the Antichrist is ROMAN?  If you believe that, then all that can be said is, God help you.

He "apologized", to placate Will Donahue and his "Catholic League" so John McCain would not have a fight on his hands in the middle of an election.  Will Donahue was more than willing to sink the Republican party, and it's nominee to obtain a public retraction from John Hagee over content in the Bible.  John Hagee subsequently provided the apology.  

What John Hagee taught in one of his own Church's private sessions, was historic Protestant doctrine that has been taught for 500 years.  And it was taught that way for 500 years because that is what you will actually find written.  So John Hagee not only bowed his knee to Satan, and sold out the real Christ, he publicly lied.  And he publicly lied over the issue of ROME.  When he LIED to the public by apologizing for content that is actually in the Bible, that no one really has any control over, other than to teach what is there, he also demonstrated that his political goals were more important to him, than telling the truth about what is in the Bible, and in particular when it comes to ROME.

So you saw a wonderfully educational public instance of deceit for ROME from a Protestant minister.  It is also no surprise John Hagee, as a good "foot-soldier" for the Religious-Reich, supports the enforcement of Christ-Mass on all Americans.  These two things are related.  Because they have to do, not with "Christ", but ROME.  AND John Hagee knows this too.  But, as he is doing over the identification of the "Whore of Babylon", so too is he doing about THE ANTICHRIST.  Why would a "Minister" lie about these kinds of things?  You saw the motivation on public display in John Hagee during the presidential elections.  The Bible calls ministers like this "Apostates" who "loved the world" more than Christ.  Of course, the Christmas Christ is not really all that much to love.


There are so many problems with the "science-fiction" accounts of the "Anti-Christ" presented by Populist Chiliasts (now called "Premillenialists") like Tim LaHaye and others, that it is laughable.  But their "flocks" will never expose themselves to it because they have "accepted Jezus into their heart" rather than "Repented".  So they are not even accustomed to doing their own thinking anymore. Identical now, in their own consciousness, to the Roman doctrine of censorship which led to the DARK AGES, They do not even think they are supposed to?  

These ministers will fall all over themselves to be complimentary to the Roman Papacy (primarily for the sake of "book sales" to Catholic audiences, and votes from Catholics at election time) whose only use for them is to tolerate them long enough to take over their country, and run them out of "Dodge" as quickly as possible.  That observation not a charge, but actually a brag which has been publicly stated by Catholic officials in the US for decades, which leaves you wondering what kind of people these "evangelicals" really are?  That would have no problem conspiring with such an anti-American political agenda, not to mention anti-Protestant, or anti-Biblical or even really "anti-evangelical" for that matter. 

The really amazing thing in terms of "hypocrisy" is that while they call for "Civil War style" state successionist movements, and the over-throw of the US Constitution, and killing Americans over their polical veiws, they wrap themselves in flags and call themselves "patriotic".  With this bizzare definition, we need to apologize to Benedict Arnold and John Wilkes Boothe.  The hypocrisy is no less virulant when it comes to the scriptures, which they profusely thump from pulpits and then proceed to god-like demands for a political agenda which is literally virtually absent in the Bible!!!  From Jihads againt JEWS and any other relgious minorities, OVER CHRIST-MASS, to demands that the federal government provide TAX FUNDING for thier own PRIVATE (I.E., CATHOLIC) SCHOOLS!!! 

Of course, to the faithfully indoctrinated shelling out their coins and dollars for the latest best-selling fiction, it really doesn't matter.  Their Pastors have filled their heads with exciting imaginary details (none coming from a faithful reading of Biblical texts) about the "coming Anti-Christ" who will be someone they all already hate for some reason or another, and would never "deceive" a single one of them because they always pick convenient political villains like "atheists" or "new agers" or "liberals" or Muslims or Jews.  Really? The Antichrist deceives "Christians".  That eliminates 99.9% of every candidate they ever suggest.

But if you look at the "celebrity leaders" in America, most responsible for Popularizing THE SAME MESSAGE, ROME ITSELF PUTS OUT in American Pop-culture media, you will discover some amazing things.  Almost the entire roster of the "rich and famous" who have been promoting these things the loudest in America, have been publicly discovered to be frauds, or at least questionable to such a degree, the prospect is not beyond a reasonable possibility.

Their theology, was actually invented by Jesuits, Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, and Francisco Ribera, to counter the Reformation.  It's importation into Protestant circles, or at the very least, it's financing and promotion, has served much like a computer virus to shut down a processing system, and wipe out memory.

Hal Lindsey, one of it's most populist advocates, who appears nightly on "Christian TV" to give his "spin" on "prophecy updates", is on his 4th marriage, and has his children all in Catholic schools. Not to mention the fact (really now get this) the book that made him "famous" (The Late Great Planet Earth) is a complete lie, a total lie. 

He didn't even write the book! It was actually entirely written by someone else they never revealed to the public, and simply stuck his name on the cover (like most of these frauds actually really do) .  The book was actually written by a woman by the name of Carla Carlson, (whom you never see on anyone's "Prophecy Update programs") not the Late Great Hal Lindsey.  

Many of Pat Robertson's books were secretly actually written by a homosexual minister, while he gets on stage in front of his TV camera, and pretends he has some "great concern" over "the gay agenda" in America?!? YES, WROTE HIS BOOKS!!! - THE SCANDAL OF "CHRISTIAN GHOST-WRITERS"

The "Christian"(sic) TV station mogul who shows up every night, in your living room dressed like Elvis, the largest in Amerca, or perhaps the world, run by a man (Paul Crouch) who was outed by his gay lover, after paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in "hush money".  His wife has pink and blue hair BTW, depending on the wig, and begs unemployed poor people on daytime TV (when no one is looking), to send in their kid's grocery money. 

The closet homosexual Paul Crouch, (who condemns "the gay agenda" to manipulate voters) has stated he was going to "eradicate Protestant" from even his vocabulary.  "Eradicate".  He also likes to broadcast total lies on his programs about how "Christian" ROME really was.  I don't really mean natural bias for a given position of course, I am referring to total and blatant deceit.  The kind you exercise when you go on national TV and whip up voters over the "threat" of "gay rights" (to manipulate their votes) and then walk off the stage to go meet your gay lover in the hotel, waiting naked for you.  

And the people who show up on his "Television show", you really should write off your "Christian list".  Really, you really should without hesitation or concern.  They are nothing more than the line-up of deciet and scam artists to steal from the poor, and give to the rich, and lie for Rome, not matter how much you may like one or two in the middle.  That is the truth.  

Whose conscience could possibly be around this kind of corruption, and be perfectly "fine" with it?  Never confront it, nor make it "mad" in any way? A fraud, a total and complete fraud, that is who.  So if you see your favorite "Christian" idol show up on his TV station, you simply need to ask God for forgiveness for idolizing people, turn it off, and go read your Bible.

Paul Crouch has been "eradicated" from the kingdom of heaven a long time ago.  "Jack Van Impe" a supposed "fundemtnalist" who, despite claiming to be a "fundementalist" ingores the prohibtion that no one would ever know the day or the hour, and "predicts" the "day or the hour of the end of the world and the return of Christ every 2 or 3 years and obviously has missed every time (perhaps giving up by now?), which for some reason, never bothered his brain dead followers?  There is obviously no point in going through the entire list.  You can see it to the above left and see for yourself what has been promoting Rome's cover story (the Antichrist Is "Coming") among Protestants.  They are virtually all known frauds and liars with ties directly to the Rome's Vatican.


You would think if Jesuit Rome was going to create Protestant "front men" in America to deceive us and steal the money from our poor, to over-throw our Constitutional government for the Vatican's Reich, they would at least give us someone likable? You know like a movie star type with nice hair, who is actually at the very least a heterosexual? ( I mean after-all since they like to whip up the public over the "gay agenda", while they sleep with them in hotels, buy drugs from them, and have them write their 'books"?)  Come on, how hypocritical can this possibly get? This is what Rome has always done, and it's imposters among "evangelicals" can't shake who they really are, any more than the ROME they serve.

The really nice thing about an Antichrist that never comes, is that you can always "pick" your "villians".  And the ones they always pick have no legitamite basis in the Bible whatsoever to ever be cited as an "antichrist", to fill the shoes of what clearly fits the feet of the Papacy?  It is by no means coincidental.  Not if you understand what is going on in the American "religious-Reich" movement which most of these phony "evangelical" leaders are deeply involved with. If ROME wants to stop a senate bill, they just whip up the word "Antichrist" around it on Paul Crouch "Xtn" TV, and every unemployed hill-billy in Texas and Tennessee get their guns out and start shooting. (The same ones that sent their grocery money in to the lady with the Pink wig!)

Remember Ralph Reed? Remember Jack Abramoff?  Remember the financial scam Ralph Reed was caught red-handed pulling? The scandal that was literally disgusting to the point of nausea?  This was Ralph Reed just before it happened.

QUOTE: Noll observes that the more thoughtfulevangelicals today are taking their political philosophy and moral theology from Catholic social thought. Reed does not develop his theological ideas in the present book, but what he does say tends to confirm Noll’s observation. This may suggest fascinating possibilities for the future of the Christian Coalition as it develops the Catholic connection through its new affiliate, the Catholic Alliance. Some of those most closely connected with the Coalition, including Pat Robertson himself, are also strong supporters of the initiative “Evangelicals and Catholics Together” (which appeared in First Things, May 1994). END QUOTE RAPH REEDS REAL AGENDA, First Things, October 1996

See? If you are a Protestant, it is time you wake up and realize who these people really are, and what they are really up to, and it is time real Protestant ministers start making enough noise about it that ROME cannot stick their finger in one leak and keep on going.  It is time you as a Protestant minister draw a line in the sand for your faith, your heritage, and your country.  It is time you come to the "marriage supper of the Lamb" and let the buzzards feast on the flesh of these supposed "great men" who are no better spiritually, and often even physically, than the nastiest street whore on 4th and main.(Sincere apologies to any Prostitute who might be reading this, diseased or otherwise, you are actually much better, as you already know, but they think you are not)

If you are a REAL Protestant minister (if any actually still exist out there, and you are reading this) you need to (1) get yourself a lawyer, and (2) make yourself famous denouncing these people, and unApollo-getically "poaching" the "Church" membership of every "Christian"in any congregation in your town that supports them.  You ought to make that your mission in life.  You will be "saving souls" in the very real and truest Biblical sense of the word, and simultaneously defending your country's freedom and soveriegnty.  And no one who hears your message will be able to logically defeat it.  You will enjoy a full harvest of "souls" and God's blessing for doing it (but keep your attorney on retainer because they will try to shut you down with all kinds of illegal and unethical stuff)  After all, you are dealing with people who openly admit they believe in lying as part of their "religion", and they will tell whatever lie that will work for them to keep from losing their human dinner.  Anyone who would scam some poor person's last bit of grocery money, living in more opulence than Nero, or target gays for political speeches only to leave the stage and go to a hotel to indulge yourself in the same manner, obviously has no conscience left about anything. And they really don't.  They are devil worshipers and it should be no surprise to anyone when they eventually act like one.

Roman and Masonic Babelists know they cannot possibly win this argument with truth and logic, so they by-pass both and depend on deceit through social and legal manipulation (as you actually would expect secret devil worshipers to actually do).  Your entire family should be completely informed, every member, even your cousins, (even if they don't want to be) who these people are, and what they are really up to, and especially and particularly anyone who would criticize you.  Then you should do the same with every friend you have who you are on intimate terms with.  Everyone along your social path in life, who challenges your decision not to participate in or support "Rome's Christ-mass", should likewise be imposed upon to hear the truth, if they wish to make an issue of it.  They obviously didn't mind taking the time and trouble to insult you, so obviously they should be imposed upon to hear why the insult is not valid.  And whoever else they wish to voice their criticism to, you should follow with a full explanation of why you don't.  

1Pe 3:15  But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: 

There are many issues involved in navigating these waters, and that will be explained more fully in the section entitled THE LAW  It is important that while you do these things, you use the utmost wisdom and discretion in how, where, and to whom you communicate, because, as mentioned earlier, these people do not either work through, or respect, truth (of any kind).  There will be no change of "heart" because of some "truth" you discovered.  They made the decision ot reject "truth" a long time ago.  Nor do they care about what is "right", and they don't care about your country or it's laws.

If you are politically active you should make it a point to challenge anyone's claim that anything in America involving religion should be compulsory.  That is Rome's pet project and it should be challenged wherever it appears.  Religion through compulsion is not New Testament Christianity, and the United States is not Old Testament Israel, if it were, there would have been no need for a New Testament, just a boat  That is exactly how Roman fascism has always advanced itself, and always resulting in great tragedy for everyone involved, even Catholics who often suffer as much as any. This is tragedy America does not need. Rome already rules the world from the Swiss Bank to the international monetary fund, to your own Supreme court, it does not need your personal freedom or your child, too.


While these Christian leaders will attack Jehovah Witnessess and any other relgious minority that doesn't suite their purposes of promoing SHAMASH devil worship denouncing them with every degrogaory term avialable including "cult", they will extol and defend the "virtues" of Mormonism and Catholicism without even conscience or conflict.  

Why?  Because these are their political allies (Both "Christ-Mass" jihadists) and both advocates of Theological Babelism, plain and simple.  

To the objecive observer, with any astuteness in Biblical theology whatsoever, this blatent double-standard is more than telling.  It makes what they are up more than obvious to anyone with either two eyes or simply a healthy functional imagination left in their head.

Jehovah Witnesses were exerminaed along wih Jews during Hitler's Third Reich, Mormons on the other hand enjoyed full participation because of their racist "Aryan theology" (and it is extremely rotten and racist to the core).  The last Mormon president spent much of his time going around the world apologizing for it, and making excuses to try and regain some public good will for his Mormon missionaries.  Mormons will always keep Christ-Mass because they are Apollo worshipers just as the Masons and the Romans are.  None of these three groups have any choice in the matter as these perversions are legislated through their doctrines and hierarchies.  An individual Mormon who realizes what Christ-Mass really is and prefers not to embrace it anymore, will find out he can no longer be a "Mormon".  The same is true with the Roman Catholic, though in Catholicism, there is a much greater historical argument to be made on behalf of the writings of the "Church Fathers", none of whom acknowledged this mutation of apostasy in their writings as legitimate.  Home Catholics are making attempts at personal repentance within the paradigm of early traditional Catholicism, and ROME has not seen fit just yet to cut them off entirely as "Catholics", though obviously if their numbers began to swell, such action would be inevitable.

Joseph Smith made a Church out of the teachings of the Masons, that is why they fell out originally, with such hostility.  The murder of Joseph Smith and his brother while awaiting trial has been speculated as having been connected to Joseph Smith's violation of his Masonic oath of secrecy. That's why in Mormonism you end up with Lucifer and Jesus as old pals, and brothers.  The Masonic Luciferian doctrines are present in Mormonism, just as they are in Masonry and Rome.  That is why they found themselves in each other's arms in Germany, though the Masons, being English, at that moment in history, found themselves the odd Luciferian man out.  But researchers have discovered that THE MASONS were involved in Hitler's early RISE TO POWER.  Hitler obviously somewhere on the line turned on the MASONS, obviously his planned military conflict with ENGLAND had to play a role in his posture toward THE MASONS.  But that situation has been rectified in the Church of England's reunification with the Vatican.  The Church of England is practically the "Mother Church" of Masonry because it split with ROME "before" the REFORMATION was really underway, and had uncovered many of the truths from Scripture it began to address. Wherever the Church of England goes, the Masons will be sure to follow, or vica versa.  

Of course, the fourth leg in the stool, not mentioned above is the KKK in the South, which was Valladolid Catholicism, and which pretty much thought it could be it's own Rome, with it's own Pope (called the Grand Dragon).  The Klan of course, so discredited now, that only it's residual affect among southerners remains, but that is precisely why SOME southerners are found in the midsts of this overt betrayal to America and her many Protestant faiths.

Rome, the Masons, the Klan and the Mormons are the Antichrist 'base' in America, and all four groups want the over-throw of American Constitutional government for a fascist state, and the destruction of evangelical Protestantism which stands in their way.  The facist state, which of course in their vain and misled imaginations, they get to "run". Of course, the Masons, the Klan, and the Mormons are too stupid to realize they are really being played, and as soon as Rome is done using them they will have to find fellowship with previously used toilet tissue found in the same place it normally gathers.  After all, people who would betray God in heaven, would obviously have not the slighest conscience about betraying each other as soon as the situation becomes profitable to do so.  This 'fascist" state of course, would be a 'good' fascist antichrist state of course, like you saw in the video above, Lucifer says he's totally "pure" and "innocent" and "good" (which of course is a blatant lie) and as the pathological liar he is, is in reality none of the above, as everyone eventually and unfortunately discovers, often after it is too late.  Ironically, not without notice, is the fact, they ALL promote the same LIE about the Antichrist. THE ANTICHRIST IS COMING!!! (Don't DARE say it is ROME!)  in fact, that is the THE ONLY THING, you cannot claim is the Antichrist in these circles.  Literally, the ONLY THING YOU CANNOT SAY!  Hello?  That should be all the more reason it should be said and re-said until someone decides to quite telling that lie, and just come on out into the light with who they are.

Note on picture: Yes, the Vatican does admit there is global warming, but it always plays both sides of an issue, and because it had no choice to do so in order to "save face", but virtually all of the Vatican's political activists in America, tell the public it does not exist.. including it's very own News agency, Fox News. That is the REAL position it is secretly spreading TO HIDE ITSELF from PROPHECY in the BIBLE.  Global Warming is a JUDGEMENT ON THE ANTICHRIST.

Today these three have formed a political alliance in the United States, the Masons, the Mormons, and Rome, and have converged to create America's "Relgious-Reich", and their real purpose has nothing to do with theology.  Which you can easily see, if you are honest.  The double standards employed by the "Antichrist is coming" crowd, are beyond logical and in no way consistent.

"Christians" are even aware this is really going on, and should be up in arms over it, but won't even talk about it.  And, to make matters worse,  Christmas Christians are perfectly fine with their suppression of information, control of American government, and even calls to nullify the US Constitution, because they have told them to be fine with it, so they are.  If they had told them to be upset with it, they would be upset.  They do whatever they are told because they have "accepted Jee-zus" in their "heart" and have nothing in their head anymore including a Bible they can read,  or a conscience. Which was the point of it to begin with, rather than "Repent", which requires both a thought and some truth.

Real Christians will easily look at the cartoon prophecy preachers on TV with their wives and the pink and blue wigs.  The gaudy sets, the Elivs costumes many of these preachers wear, that look like they belong more in Vegas, the incessant talk about money and the goofy tricks they pull out of the hat to get it, and easily sense they are looking at frauds.  

But most people are not real Christians, thus it is very hard for them to realize they are being "scammed" by con-artists, liars, and devil worshipers who masquerade on the TVs in their own living rooms, as "Christians". And unfortunately some who are real Christians are poor, uneducated, and elderly and are taking the endorsement of the "Christian community" to embrace these scam artists.  And part of the problem is that those who  may be really real Christians rarely if ever make any noise about it.  In fact, they embrace these liars too, and they are liars. Yes, it's harsh to have to say that, but that is simply what is happening, and the proof is in your history book and in your face on a daily basis. All you have to do is turn on the TV and take a look.


You see there are some basic differences between just being inaccurate, and telling a lie, and the differences are very easy to spot.  People who are "inaccurate" generally appreciate a correction because, it helps them achieve their own goal, of being "accurate".  And they are neither threatened or even mind an exchange of information, even of opposing veiw-points, because information is precisely what they are looking for.  Since their goal is simply more "truth", they do not even mind how where or who that information comes from, as long as it is really true.  The truth is always self-validating, your house is on fire or it's not. You can easily verify it yourself once you hear the warning that brings it to  your attention.  It might even be the dog that alerts you to the truth, for which you pat him on the head and tell him how thankful you are, though he is nothing more than a dog.  

That is behavior that is very different, than what you will see with a liar.  For the liar, they will even argue with and seek to discredit the fireman there to put it out, because he's not the "Cheif of the fire department". The entire universe must be in perfect alignment and the source of the information must be pedigreed like a horse, and then they will still find another excuse, and no matter how bizzare the excuses eventually become, they will never run out of one, or cease making them. Because they do not actually care what the truth is.  That is not what they are doing.   They are not interested in any information other than what gets published by their own liar's club and if that were not enough, want you to insulate yourself from the entire universe, to make sure they are the only source of information you will ever hear... about anything.  

But people seeking to learn the truth, are not like that when it comes to what they treasure.  Anymore than the way a business would treat their love for money and gold.  People who love and value the truth, when they see or hear it, they are thankful for it, even if it is just the dog who barks it.   They will even respond to corrections when they are occasionally wrong, differently than the liar. Often corrections of factually inaccurate information from people actually seeking the truth, will be greeted with a very polite and sincere "Thank-you", because after all, you have helped them to be more accurate with information they did not previously have.  Thus assisting them in helping them reach their goal.  

But liars, don't "appreciate a correction", and they go one step farther than even this, they CENSOR.  They destroy the evidence.  They discredit the source.  They hide the facts.  (All "tricks" used to keep people deceived and controlled) Because their goal has nothing to do with truth, it is bottom-line pure manipulation, control, power over your mind and thus your behavior.  They will tell you whatever lie needs to be told to get there.  And whenever information surfaces that threatens that result, it gets destroyed, no matter what it is... immediantly, without conscience.  Such is what the people who are involved screaming at you THE ANTICHRIST IS COMING, have been doing in America for many years now.  And far from these "prophecy updates" telling you the truth, they are actually designed to manipulate you and mitigate the damages of whatever actual prophecies that are in fact being fulfilled.  In other words, they do not want you to put 2 + 2 together, in a way they are not "in control of" in your conclusions.  They don't you to reach any "logical" conclusions (from an unbridled Biblical perspective) as a result of what you are seeing daily in the news. Because all of the things you are seeing in those supposed "prophecy updates" in the scripture, point to one undeniable fact, the Antichrist simply must, by definition, already be here.

2Th 2:3  Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 

Paul PROMISES YOU, unconditionally, THE DAY WILL NOT COME....UNLESS, UNTIL, EXCEPT, the MAN OF SIN be revealed.  So, in other words, if you are seeing "that day" approaching, and being fulfilled in your daily news, that means either all your information is a lie, or "THAT MAN" has ALREADY been REVEALED, and there are "Christians" today in DENIAL, who refuse THE LOVE OF THE TRUTH, and are already involved in his "Delusion".



Joseph McCabe [1867 - 1955]:

 former monk of the Franciscan Order ("Father Antony"); 

author of "30" translations, "200" books, (delivered) "2,000" lectures

[published 1929 (14th edition)] the Westminster Catholic Federation, which corresponds to the Catholic Welfare organization in America, made this boast in its annual report:

The revision to the Encyclopedia Britannica was undertaken with a view to eliminate matter which was objectionable from a Catholic point of view and to insert what was accurate [sic!] and unbiased [sic!]. The whole of the 28 volumes were examined, objectionable parts noted, and the reasons for their deletion or amendment given. There is every reason to hope that the new edition of the Britannica will be found very much more accurate [sic!] and impartial [sic!] than its predecessors."'

"Castrating the Encyclopedia

It will be useful to give first the outcome of a somewhat cursory survey, page by page, of the first few volumes of the Encyclopedia. More importantin theirbearing on the Churcharticles in later volumes commonly have the initial X at the close, which seems to be the cloak of the CATHOLIC ADULTERATOR. This will enable any reader to compare for himself passages in the 11TH [1911] AND THE 14TH EDITIONS [1929— (with revisions, etc.)1973], but the conspirator shows his hand even in large numbers of short unsigned, especially biographical, notices. It is, of course, understood that the work had to be considerably abbreviated to accommodate new developments of science and life, in the 14th edition, but when you find that the curtailing consists in suppressing an unpleasant judgment or a fact about a Pope while unimportant statements of fact are untouched, and when you find the life of a saintly man or the flattering appreciation of his work little affected while the life or work of a heretic is sacrificed, you have a just suspicion." 

'The undisputed truth is that BY 350 A.D., BEFORE CHRISTIANITY WAS ESTABLISHED BY FORCE, there were free primary and secondary schools everywhere, and by 450 A.D. they had all perished: that in 350 the majority of the workers was literate, and by 450and for centuries afterwardprobably not 1 percent of them could read. Of course it is all put down to the barbarians. "Most of the public schools disappeared, and such light of learning as there was was kept burning in the monasteries and was confined to priests and monks." The monks were, as I have repeatedly shown from Christian writers from Augustine [354 - 430 (St.)] to Benedict [c. 480 - c. 550 (St.)], mostly an idle, loose, and vagrant class, and the few regular houses later established were interested only in religious education. Pope Gregory I [c. 540 - 604] forbade the clergy to open secular schools.' 

'The fine eight-page article on Gibbon [Edward Gibbon 1737 - 1794] by the learned Professor Bury [John Bagnell Bury 1861 - 1927] in the earlier edition could not expect to escape. Space must be saved; though one would hardly realize this when one finds 60 pages devoted to Geometry, which no one ever learns from an encyclopedia. The reviser condenses the six and a half pages of Gibbon's life and character to one page and then sublimely adds his X to Bury's initials as the joint authors of the article. You can guess how much of Gibbon's greatness is left.

On the other hand the notice of Pope "St." Gregory I [c. 540 - 604], the Pope who forbade the opening of schools and made the Papacy the richest landowner and slave-owner in Europe by persuading the rich that the end of the world was at hand and they had better pass on their property to the church, remains as fragrant as ever in the new edition [14th].' 

"I cannot go phrase by phrase through this Catholic rubbish. In spite of all its sophistry and suppressions it leaves the Inquisition the most scandalous quasi-judicial procedure that ever disgraced civilization, yet it is not the full truth. It is true that it does not tell the lie that American apologists now do—that the Roman Inquisition never executed men—and it does not even mention, much less challenge, the definite figure of 341,042 victims of the Spanish Inquisition which Llorente, secretary of theInquisition, canon of the church, and Knight of the Caroline Order, compiled from its archives...."

'The article "Libraries" is the next on which X employs his subtle art. I have explained, I think, that X is not one encyclopedic Catholic writer who does all this marvellous work. The explanation given of the X in the first volume of the 14th edition is that it is "the initial used for anonymous writers"just as the lady whosesins are not to be disclosed in the court is called by the police Mlle X. In all earlier encyclopedias anonymous writers, who do the great body of the hackwork of the encyclopedia, did not need any monogram. But, of course, this was a special arrangement with the Catholic body. It assumes that Committees of Catholics on both sides of the Atlantic were appointed to scrutinize all articles bearing upon Catholic myths and to cut out and modify, no matter on what authority it rested, any statement that the Catholic clergy do not like. Whether any other sort of anonymous critics were allowed to do similar work and wear the mask I do not know. I have not noticed an X anywhere except where truth has been slain or mutilated by a Catholic sword.' 

'Father Taunton [11th edition)] ["Jesuit Father Taunton...more liberal than a good Jesuit ought to be" (36)]—once more in agreement with our historians—says thatTorquemada [1420 - 1498 (Dominican ("The Hounds of Hell"!))] burned 10,000 victims of the Inquisition in 18 years ["while"] the reviser inserts "but modern research reduces the list of those burned to 2,000." As no signature is subjoined while Taunton's initials are suppressed, the reader is given to understand that this correction ofLlorente's [(see 378) Juan Antonio Llorente 1756 - 1823, Spanish priest and historian (see: Cambridge BioDict., 1990, 905)] figures is given on the authority of the Britannica. As a matter of fact, what the writer means is that one or two Catholic priests like Father Gams have been juggling with the figures so as to bring down enormously Llorente's figure of the total victims of the Spanish Inquisition. Their work is ridiculous. Llorente was not only for years in high clerical dignity and esteem in Spain, but, as its secretary, he had the archives of the Inquisition and copied from them. But this is one of the new tricks of Catholic writers. Saying that "recent research" or "recent authorities" have corrected some statement about their church they give a few names of priests, knowing that the reader never heard of them and suppressing the "Rev." or "Father." A priest can become an expert on a section of history as well as any man but he will never tell the whole truth about it and he will strain or twist the facts at any time in the interest of his church.'

"any attempt to whitewash the Middle Ages is up against the notorious fact that cruelty and torture, both judicial and extra-judicial, prescribed in codes of law or practiced by individual rulers (of states or cities) or owners of serfs, knights, and even 'ladies,' were more common and more horrible, especially in what is called the brighter (later) part of the Middle Ages (to the 18th century) than in any other period of civilized history except, perhaps in China and in certain ages in Persia."

"Three things are today certain. [1] The Vatican and its national branches are red to the shoulders with the blood that was shed ['"World War II"']. From the outbreak of Franco's rebellion—the curtain-raiser of the war—and the trouble in Czecho-Slovakia to the year when Russia turned the tide against the Germans and an Allied victory seemed at least probable the Roman Church, in its own interest, acted in the closest co-operation with the thugs. One can quote even Catholic writers (Teeling, etc.) for that. [2] The second is, that the Japanese religion, Shinto and Buddhism alike, were similarly, in fact openly, working with the blood-drunk Japanese leaders. This was emphasized at a World Congress of Religions in Chicago several years before the war broke out. [3] Thirdly, the Protestant churches in America enfeebled the warning against Japan, in the interest of their missions, the Lutheran Church in Germany bowed servilely to the Nazis except when Hitler interfered with its doctrines, and the British churches were equally guilty in the pre-war period. This attitude of the organized religions was of vital use to the aggressors. But we couldn't tell that, the editors of the Encyclopedia will protest. And that is just one of the grounds of these criticisms. The Encyclopedia Britannica does not tell the reader factsand truths if the clergy do not like them, and that covers a considerable territory in regard to history, science, and contemporary lifeThe 14th edition not only does not tell them but suppresses them if earlier editions told them, and even allows untruths to be inserted."

Give a priest an inch and he will take an ell [sic] of a lot. He does not learn casuistry for nothing. Under cover of the need of abbreviation he has deleted whole paragraphs, even columns of facts which were offensive to him because they flatly contradicted what he said or wrote, and then, possibly fearing that he had cut out too much, he inserted sentences or paragraphs which "put the Catholic point of view." He has taken phrases or paragraphs of the original writers of the articles and, while r[e]taining their initials, he has repeatedly turned them inside out or has said that "recent research" (the gymnastic of some other Catholic apologist) has corrected his statements.

And I say that for an encyclopedia to allow this and not candidly explain it to the public but even try to prevent the Catholics disclosing it is a piece of deception. The writers who did the work had not the decency—or were they forbidden?—to give their names, as other contributors do. It is therefore possible that the plea may be urged that various groups of folk were engaged in the work of correcting errors in the 11th edition and it was thought best to lump all these little men together as Mlle. X. We are, however, intrigued by the fact that all these alterations, suppressions, and additions that I have examined uniformly SERVE THE INTERESTS OF CATHOLICPROPAGANDA AND ARE GENERALLY CHARACTERIZED BY THE FAMILIAR CHIEF FEATURE OF THAT PROPAGANDAUNTRUTHFULNESS.' 

'When the Catholic objects that "historians" dispute a point he generally means that it is disputed by historians of his own church: the men who say that Peter was buried at Rome and Torquemada burned only 2,000 heretics, that the Dark Age was bright with culture and virtue and the Age of Chivalry and the Crusaders irradiated the entire world, that the church was just tainted a little by a wicked world at one time but it soon purified itself by a Counter-Reformation, that there was horrible butchery at the French, Russian and Spanish Revolutions, that the Christian church abolished slavery and gave the world schools, hospitals, democracy, art, and science, and a thousand other fantastic things. If encyclopedias propose to embody these SELF-INTERESTED ANTICS OF CATHOLIC PROPAGANDISTS the public ought to know it.' 


I do not in the least say that it is the only work of public reference that has been so used. The new Encyclopedia Americana betrays a lamentable degree of Catholic influence, and even the more scholarly Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics has curried favor with Catholics by entrusting a number of important articles ("Inquisition," etc.) to Catholic writers, with the usual disastrous results; while manuals of European, especially medieval, history by some American professors strain or suppress evidence scandalously to suit Catholic authorities. I HAVE HERE MERELY GIVEN THE DEFINITE EVIDENCE IN ONE FIELD THAT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH USES ITS ENORMOUS WEALTH AND VOTING POWER TO POISON THE WELLS OF TRUTH AND TO CONCEAL FROM THE PUBLIC THE FACTS OF HISTORY WHICH MAKE A MOCKERY OF THE FANTASTIC CLAIMS IT ADVANCES TODAY.' 

"Who wants in a modern encyclopedia the mass of stuff about saints and martyrs, which are to a great extent pure FICTION". 

French EncyclopédieDenis Diderot's Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné dessciences, des arts et des métiers—for which the first prospectus appeared in 1750....Ostensibly the Encyclopédie was a reference work; but its main purpose, from the very first volumes in 1751 and 1752, was to bend its readers to rational and scientific points of view rather than merely to impart knowledge and information. Rousseau[1712 - 1778] and Voltaire [1694 - 1778] were among its contributors, and throughout the thousands of pages in the twenty-eight volumes into which the encyclopaedia finally grew there were strong notes of skepticism, firm emphasis on subjects of positive knowledge, science, and technology rather than on theology and religion, and sly criticism of existing conditions in France and other parts of Europe.

The first two volumes were suppressed as injurious to royal authority and to religion, and the police tried to seize all copies and the manuscript of the next volumes....Diderot [1713 - 1784] was harassed by official interference, this time by a decree stopping the sale and an order to burn all copies. From this point on until completion of the massive work in 1765, Diderot was forced to work in secret, but he succeeded in completing his tremendous undertaking with the occasional connivance of friendly French authorities. For his important work, Diderot was said to have received a meager sum, while the publishers of the Encyclopédie amassed fortunes." 

from: The Myth of the Britannica, Harvey Einbinder, Grove, 1964.

"The practice of rewriting religious material to meet the approval of different groups was sharply criticized by the Watch Tower Society, the official spokesman of Jehovah's Witnesses. It declared in its magazine Awake! (November 22, 1962) that in the conflict between Truth and "Tolerance" the Britannica has sacrificed the truth to avoid making enemies. To support this charge, it compared a number of entries in the eleventh [1911] and 1959 [14th edition] editions.




Zec 7:11,12 But they refused to hearken, and pulled away the shoulder, and stopped their ears, that they might not hear. Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone, lest they should hear the law, and the words which Jehovah of hosts had sent by his Spirit by the former prophets: therefore there came great wrath from Jehovah of hosts.


Act 7:57 But they cried out with a loud voice, and stopped their ears,







  1948 - The last public edition was in 1948 [3 years after WW2]


  1966 - Cardinal Ottaviani, head of the Sacred Congregation of the Faith, declared  there would be no further editions of the Index.  [It had become a public embarrassment to Rome]


  2007 - "This does not mean, however, that whatever has been contained on the Index is now automatically permitted reading for all Catholics." – New Catholic Encyclopedia









500 pages in length.


The TEXT is kept in Latin. The Intoduction in Italian.


Contains two forms of Prohibitive CENSORSHIP. (1)  “Authors” which summarily “forbid” viewing of anything produced by the “person mentioned” and individual (2) “works”.


The topical range is so inclusive it must be organized by catagorey.



        Theology   (the greatest number of works fall into this category)


        Philosophy ( including economics, political and social sciences )




        Literary works: novels and romances


        Travelogues (especially concerning Rome)


        Women authors


        Protestant & Jewish writers


All TRANSLATIONS of the BIBLE were on the list at one time. Personal Possession of a Bible was considered illegal contraband.




  John Huss


  John Calvin


  John Wycliff




  Francis Bacon


  Henri Bergson - three works


  Auguste Comte


  Immanuel Kant - "Critique of Pure Reason"



John Locke - "An Essay on Human Understanding"


Blaise Pascal - "The Provinical Letters" and "Pensées" (only the edition with notes by Voltaire)


Jean-Jacques Rousseau - "The Social Contract" and "Emile"


Michel Montaigne - Essays


John Stuart Mill - "Principles of Political Economy"


Diderot and d'Alembert - French encyclopedists


Charles Louis de Montesquieu - "The Spirit of the Laws" (a work that greatly influenced Jefferson, Hamilton and John Jay)


Virginia Paganini - "Moral and Practical Guide for a Mother of the People" (1891)


Edward Gibbon - "History of the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire"


Pierre Larousse -  17 volume "Grand  Dictionnaire Universel du 19ème Siècle"


Charles Maurras - "Action Française"


Dr. Auge-Louis Hesnard


Daniel Defoe - "Political History of the Devil"


Oliver Goldsmith -  "History of England"


Rafaele Ciocci - "A Narrative of the Iniquities and Barbarities Practiced in Rome in the 19 th Century" (1845)


Luigi Pianciani -  "Rome of the Popes" (1860)


Mathilda Marchot - "Truth on the Condition at Loigny in the Diocese of Chartres" (1890)


Heinrick Heine - works


Gustave Flaubert - "Madame Bovary"


Victor Hugo -  "Les Misérables" "The Hunchback of Notre Dame"


Stendhal - all love stories


Honoré Balzac - all love stories


Amantine Lucille Aurore Dudevant (George Sand) - all love stories


Alexandre Dumas (father and son) - all love stories


Jean de Lafontaine - tales, fables, verses, etc.


Gabriel Rosetti - four works


Lady Morgan Sydney -  "Italy - a Journal of a Residence in That Country Exhibiting a View of the State of Society, etc." 1822


Charlotte Ann Waldie -  "Rome in the 19 th Century in a Series of Letters Written During a  Residence in Rome 1817-1818."


Michael Hobart Seymour - "A Pilgrimage to Rome"  (1851)


Other authors summarily CENSORED


        Author                                             Year condemned


René Descartes ………………………..1663


Thomas Hobbes ………………………..1703


François Voltaire……………………….1804


David Hume ……………………………..1827


Emile Zola ………………………….…… 1898


Maurice Maeterlinck ………….…… .1914


Anatole France………………….………1922


Jean-Paul Sartre……………….……….1948


Alberto Moravia……………….………..1952


André Gide ………………….……………1922


Jansenius    -     "Augustinus" ……….1654


Antoine Arnauld  (father and son) …1655 (20 works)


The Book of Common Prayer ………..1714


Alfred Loisy - six works ………………..1932


Abbé Lamennais  ………………………. New Testament with commentary.


James Duggan ……………………………1898 "Steps Toward Reunion" [A work on Ecumenicalism]


Princess Carolyn-Elizabeth Sayn-Wittgenstein - two of her 24-volume "Causes Intérieuresde la Faiblesse Extérieure de l'Eglise en 1870." 






 Adolph Hitler - Mein Kampf [An Anti-semitic “Manifesto” ]


 Sergius Nilus - The Protocols of Zion [A forgery by the Russian Orthodox priests claiming to be written by a Jew, explaining Satan’s plan to take over the world by Jews]


 Henry Ford - The International Jew [ Jewish Conspiracy Theory used by Hitler ]


 W.D.Griffith - Birth Of A Nation [ glorified the KKK ]


 Hienrich Himmler – Propagandist for promotion of Nazi Holocaust doctrine [Son of Roman Catholic schoolmaster]








Claimed to be from Constantine Pope Sylvester I (314-35). Constantine confers on the pope and his successors primacy over all other bishops in the world, senatorial privileges for it’s clergy, imperial palaces and regalia, the city of Rome itself, and it’s empire!


Actually ..fraudulently composed by the Pope Paul I (757-67) while his brother Stephen II (752-57) sat on the papal throne.






Over 100 fake letters containing decrees attributed to pontiffs from Clement (88-97) to Gregory I (590-604).


Actually… fraudulently composed by 'Isodore Mercator', a ninth century master document forger and papal aide. Like the Donation, the Decretals conferred rights and privileges on the papacy [of course].






Letter from the emperor to the Senate.  Marcus forbids persecution of Christians because in a battle with the Quadi in 174, prayers from Christian soldiers brought a thunderstorm which saved  the Romans from thirst drove away the barbarian army. The emperor accorded the Twelfth Legion the suffix fulminata or fulminea, 'thundering' because of this.


Actually… traced to Tertullian (c.160 - c.230), north African theologian. The twelfth legion had had the suffix legio fulminata from the time of Augustus. The stoic Marcus Aurelius actually hated Christians.






Forth century Bishop Eusebius (Ecclesiastic History, IV, 13). In these “letters”, Eusebius has this 2nd century pagan forbidding 'tumults against the Christians.' Most historians concede them to be frauds, probably composed by Eusebius himself.






20 entire volumes of “religious romance” (Catholic Encyclopedia), offered by the Church claiming to be from the first century Roman Pontiff Clement I.


Actually… written in the fourth century, to serve as a “historical proof” to bolster Rome's claim to be the primary see.  It includes the now admittedly phoney Clement to James' which originated the fantasy that St. Peter was the first Bishop of Rome, perpetuated all over the world and for centuries as history.






A set of letters offered as correspondence written in the first century between the famous Roman Seneca the Younger and the Apostle Paul alluding to the fires in Rome and persecution of Christians and Jews. 


Actually… a 4th century composition. Authorship unknown. The scheme came unraveled when it was realized that “according to tradition” [the deceptive little Roman phrase], Gallio had sent Paul’s writings to Seneca which so impressed him, this correspondence ensued.  Only problem was that at the time this allegedly happened, Paul had only penned two letters… neither of which from Rome, …as he had not even ARRIVED YET.


Most of the language is patently absurd and self-serving, apparently intended to flatter both Paul, Ceasar and Seneca. [making Seneca one of Paul’s admirers]






Offered by Eusebius as an allusion to Josephus, a contemporary Jewish historian who “testifies”  that Jews realized Jesus was the messiah [implying of course, they were just too wicked to accept it]. Recognized by nearly all historians now as a fraudulent interpolation [and entirely missing in eastern versions of Josephus]






Offered up as having been written from the governor of Judea before Pontius Pilate, "Publius Lentulus".  He writes to the Roman Senate, reporting Christ's "raising of the dead". Describes Jesus as " His hair is of the colour of the ripe hazel-nut [blonde], straight down to the ears, but below the ears wavy and curled, with a bluish and bright reflection, flowing over his shoulders. "  Historians now realize no one ever existed by the name of Lentulus as a predecessor of Pontius Pilate. It was a fraud.


First printed in the "Life of Christ" by Ludolph the Carthusian (Cologne, 1474). Scholars now believe it was probably composed in 13th century.


Report of Pilate to Caesar – mentioned earlier


 (Tertullian Apol. xxi and Anti-Nicene Fathers, iii, 35)






Offered up as having been written by Jesus himself to a king. [Scholars now believe composed by Eusebius]






Recently canonized in 2002, Saint Juan Diego, a 16th century Mexican Indian who had the Virgin Mary’s image miraculously appear on his cloak.  Historians note the event is not mentioned for 100 years after the alleged event.  No record of it’s occurrence whatever for 100 years.  The “miraculous image” that “miraculously appeared” on his “cloak”, apparently came from a very unmiraculous brush with common paint on it.


Professor of Mexican History at Cambridge University: 'When the Pope canonizes Juan Diego, he will have elevated to sainthood the hero of a religious work of fiction.'  Proff. David Brading, (The Times, 31 June 2002)






In the 8th century, it was decided James went to Span. On the banks of the Ebro river had a vision of the Virgin Mary and was told to build a Roman Cathedral. He then returned to Jerusalem to be martyred, to keep the story consistent [Acts 12:2].  His remains were then carried back to Spain, as a result of being carried by a rudderless boat which miraculously drifted at sea and accidentally shipwrecked on the north of Spain and was buried in the palace tomb of a Spanish queen.  A Spanish monk guided by a light in the sky discovered the bones of Saint James and inspired by this new discovery of Santiago Matamoros (Saint James the Moor killer) the Spanish defeated the Moors.






During the middle ages, the “head of John the Baptist” was venerated in scores of different Churches, along with knuckles, cross splinters from the real cross and a number of silly paraphernalia which was often sold to Church tourists. All “vouched for” by Rome as “Authentic”.





[Miraculously Preserved from Jesus’ Circumcision]


Exclusively possessed and authentically enshrined at the following locations:


·       Antwerp

·       Coulombs

·       Chartres

·       Charroux

·       Metz

·       Conques

·       Langres

·       Anvers

·       Fécamp

·       Puy-en-Velay

·       Auvergne

·       Hildesheim

·       Santiago de Compostela

·       Calcata


Saint Bridget was said to have received the Holy Prepuce from an angel, and would experience "orgasm-like sensations" when she would place bits of it on her tongue.[6]


During the late 17th century, Catholic scholar and theologian Leo Allatius in De Praeputio Domini Nostri Jesu Christi Diatriba ("Discussion concerning the Prepuce of our Lord Jesus Christ") speculated that the Holy Foreskin may have ascended into Heaven at the same time as Jesus himself and might have become the rings of Saturn, then only recently observed by telescope- SEE HOLY PREPUCE, Wikipedia , 2-16-2007






[Miraculously preserved from the Virgin Mary’s birth to Jesus]


There were 3.






There were 3.













 - SEE Caslon Analytics Profile, Forgery Fraud and Forensics






Saint Peter’s tomb was excavated. Instead of the skeleton of a man, they found three leg bones each belonging to different people, one of which was female, along with various small bones from barn animals including chickens and pigs.


This list of course, is virtually endless if one has the time and effort to track it all down.  There have been hundreds and hundreds of phoney saints canonized by ROME.  Some of which never even existed at all.







With a few additional comments from the Pope.


The following are KNOWN INTERPOLATIONS put INTO the text of the New Testament by Rome.  They are FOOTNOTED in almost all "study Bibles" as "not found in oldest manuscripts".


Scribble, scribble, scribble:


1Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

1Jo 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.


Added To Support This –


Three powers came forth from him: they are the Father, the Mother and the Son,from the living silence, what came forth from the incorruptable Father.  These came forth from the silence of the UNKOWN FATHER. – Gospel Of The Egyptians


Scribble, scribble, scribble:


Mar 16:18 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.

Mar 16:19 So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.


Added To Support This –


"But her son is the begotten one who is lord - afterward the authorities called him "the beast" - in order to lead their molded bodies astray.  The interpretation of "the beast" is "the instructor".  For he  was found to be wiser than all of them {THE SERPENT}". (p.171)



Scribble, scribble, scribble:


Joh 8:3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,

Joh 8:4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.

Joh 8:5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?

Joh 8:6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.

Joh 8:7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.



Added To Support This –


I am the honored one and the scorned one

I am the whore and the holy one

I am the wife and the virgin


I am she whose wedding is great,

And I have not taken a husband


P. 297,  Thunder Perfect Mind, Nag Hammadi Library




 What kind of person would "write" fraudulent insertions not only into history texts, not only COMPOSE entirely fraudulent legal documents to "steal kingdoms" , but even compose fraudulent texts and insert them into what itself calls "The Sacred Word Of God"? 





A Hypocritical liar who has seared their own conscience as with a "hot iron"





"Christians" who have "accepted Jesus into their Heart" and "think they are saved", are dying and going to hell.  Why?

If what you have been told by the Christmas Christ ministers is true, this obviously should not be happening.  According to the Christmas Christ minister, all you have to do is say the magic prayer and "accept Jesus into your heart", and presto chango, you are saved forevermore.  It doesn't even matter what the "Jesus" you accept is, as long as it is called "Jesus".  But the fact is, many of these kinds of Christmas Christians are going to hell.  And the reason it happens is explained in the Bible.  But the Christmas Christ ministers have made this warning null and void to all "Christians" by teaching an imaginary doctrine that literally has not a single verse of evidence in the scripture to support it.  How? By placing it outside of their experience at the end of an imaginary prophecy scheme, that is completely false and without warrant.   The results are devastating the eternities of countless "Christians" who are being deceived by these lies.  And that is actually an observation made not by a theologian, but an emergency room nurse.

2Th 2:10-12  And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong DELUSION, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 

DELUSION: πλάνη, planē, plan'-ay, objectively FRAUDULENCE;- deceit, to deceive, delusion, error. Feminine of G4108; πλάνος, planos, plan'-os, Of uncertain affinity; ...AN IMPOSTER or MISLEADER: - DECEIVER, seducing.



Her answer surprised me. "I'm a surgical nurse at a hospital in Phoenix, Arizona. We have lots of near-death cases there, and almost all of them are the negative kind. You know what I mean --people who wind up in hell!" - (from the Spring '92 Journal of Near-Death Studies Vol.10, No.3) P.M.H.Atwater, L.H.D., Ph.D. 

In 2000, the Phoenix metro area's religious composition was reported as 45% Catholic, 37% members of Protestant denominations or unaffiliated, 13% LDS (concentrated heavily in the suburb of Mesa) and 5% Jewish. The remaining .[38] - Religion demographic data from The Association of Religion Data Archives: Wikipedia.



2Th 2:10-12  And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong DELUSION, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 

DELUSION: πλάνη, planē, plan'-ay, objectively FRAUDULENCE;- deceit, to deceive, delusion, error. Feminine of G4108; πλάνος, planos, plan'-os, Of uncertain affinity; ...AN IMPOSTER or MISLEADER: - DECEIVER, seducing.



if you worship the lake of fire in the sky,

that is where  you go when  you die.



Judaism has an ancient history, and long before there were even writings to confiscate and sew together as the "New Testament", there already was a Jewish Bible with TWO TESTAMENTS in it.  It was called THE LAW AND THE PROPHETS.  

Mat 7:12  Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is THE LAW AND THE PROPHETS.

Mat 22:40  On these two commandments hang all THE LAW AND THE PROPHETS.

Act 13:15  And after the reading of THE LAW AND THE PROPHETS the rulers of the synagogue sent unto them, saying, Ye men and brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation for the people, say on.   

One of the things that the religion of Biblical Judaism (which was later exterminated by Rome) had already done, along with a two-fold divsion of scripture, was develope not only a fairly extensive volume of prophecy concerning the MESSIAH, but his antithesis, the ANTI-MESSIAH.  Yes, the Jews already had been teaching on THE ANTICHRIST, before Yeshua was ever even born.

And one thing that BIBLICAL JEWS had already determined about the ANTI-MESSIAH, was that HE WOULD BE A ROMAN!!!  Some Jews who practice Biblical Judaism still to this day, still refer to Roman sabotage and persecution of their faith as Armilus, rather than "antichrist", because while Christians can claim the "antichrist" is anybody they do not like, Armilus is and has always been known to be, distinctively, historically, and without equivocation.... A ROMAN.  This is however, the same exact teaching that was carried forward by the REAL APOSTLES of the REAL CHRIST, and is found REPEATED in the pages of the New Testament concerning THE ANTICHRIST!  But the Protestant imposters who work as "actors" pretending to be "ministers" on the payroll of Rome, prefer to never discuss, nor even tell their congregations, this undeniable damning historical fact.

In Jewish tradition, Armilus was always identified from the beginning as a Roman.  This concept is reflected even in the New Testament (or Tehudah) because the people who wrote the New Testament writings were Jewish.  Their concept of the anti-christ is found echoed in these early 1st century writings long before the Christian Church had come into being. SEE THE JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIAAntichrist was also called Armilus, a Jewish rendering of Romulus; thus, in Pseudo-Methodius, "Romulus qui est Armilus" (compare W. Bousset, "Antichrist," pp. 33, 67). Owing to the identification of Rome's angel with Samael [Prince Of Satan], chief of the evil spirits, Armilus in the course of time was identified with ROMULUS {Founder Of Rome} (see Bousset's "Antichrist," pp. 66, 67). The name given to Armainyush in other Jewish eschatologies was Belial (Beliar, II Cor. vi. 14; Sibylline Books, ii. 6, 15, iii. 63; Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs, Dan. v.), the same as "spirit of hell" (see Ps. xviii. 5 and Bäthgen's Comm.), hence the "son of perdition" (II Thess. ii. 3) and the "man of sin," that is, rasha', "the Wicked" (Isa. xi. 4). Thus the Serpent is spoken of as Harasha', "the Wicked One," in Gen. R. xx., Bek. 8a (compare Targ. Yer. Gen. iii. 13); and Rome as the wicked kingdom, Malkut ha-resha'ah (Gen. R. lxxvi.).  By : Erik Stave Kaufmann KohlerWHO IS 666? ARMILUS IS THE ANTICHRIST, Tehudah Reformed Karaite Judaism Online Articles and Research


2Co 6:15, 16  And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?  And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? 

And NOTE he directly connects to SYNCRETISM WITH IDOLATRY!!!



´li-albēl´yal (בּליּעלbelīya‛alΒελίαρBelíar): This name, occurring very frequently in the Old Testament, has the sense of “worthlessness” (compare 2Sa_23:6margin); accordingly in such phrases as “sons of Belial” (Jdg_20:131Sa_10:27, etc.), “men of Belial” (1Sa_30:221Ki_21:13, etc.), which the English Revised Version usually retains, the American Standard Revised Version more correctly renders, “base fellows” (so “daughter of Belial” 1Sa_1:16, “wicked woman”). There is here no suggestion a proper name. Afterward, however, “Belial” became a proper name for Satan, or for Antichrist (Thus frequently in the Jewish Apocalyptic writings, e.g. in XII the Priestly Code (P), Book Jubilees, Asc Isa, Sib Or). In this sense Paul used the word in 2Co_6:15, “What concord hath Christ with Belial?” (Beliar). Bousset thinks that Paul's “man of sin” in 2Th_2:3, where some authorities read “man of lawlessness,” is a translation of this term. The sense at least is similar. See ANTICHRIST; MAN OF SIN.

Do you see the sheepish admission at the end of the article citation in the INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BIBLE ENCYCLOPEDIA?  The sense at least is similar  They really do not want to admit this connection because the connection pre-identifies THE ANTICHRIST in no uncertain terms, as A ROMAN connected to IDOLATRY using "Christ" to do it. 

That's not what you hear from the Jesuit puppet frauds masquerading as "evangelicals" in America now is it? Of course not !!!  You will never hear this come out of their mouths, even though it was written literally before Christ was ever born!!!  THE ANTICHRIST IS ROMAN! CONNECTED WITH IDOLATRY!! BY THE NAME OF THREE SIXES!!!  

BELIAL is THE ANTICHRIST, ARMILUS, and HIS IDOL is The "Angel" of Rome, Samael. In Egypt, the earliest Roman Catholic (Gnostic) monks of Saint Pachomius monastery connected Samael to YALDA*BAOTH.  This is a very strange connection but one that creates an amazing discovery concerning what Jews may have been identifying as "Belial" before even the birth of Christ in the first century!  The Hebrew word "Sa*baoth" (transliterated from Hebrew in the KJV) is related to the word to "Baoth".  YALDA (means Child, Birth, Nativity, Infant), and BAOTH?  Well take a look!

Jas 5:4  Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of sabaoth

Rom 9:29  And as Esaias said before, Except the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we had been as Sodoma, and been made like unto Gomorrha. 

SA*BAOTH: σαβαώθ, sabaōth, pron. sab-ah-owth', Of Hebrew origin ([H6635] in feminine plural); צבאה    צבא, tsâbâ'  tsebâ'âh, tsaw-baw', tseb-aw-aw', a MASS of persons (or figurative things), especially, From H6633;  א tsâbâ', tsaw-baw', A primitive root; to MASS

"SAMAEL" (Angel of Rome's wicked "kingdom") is the future prophesied "god" of ARMILUS (The Antichrist) and is actually connected to YALDA (Birth, Child, Nativity) BAOTH (Mass)... the "solar-serpent god" of a NATIVITY MASS!!!  THE "YALDA" TREE IS IT'S PRACTICE.

SA*BAOTH: σαβαώθ, sabaōth, pron. sab-ah-owth', Of Hebrew origin ([H6635] in feminine plural); צבאה    צבא, tsâbâ'  tsebâ'âh, tsaw-baw', tseb-aw-aw', a MASS of persons (or figurative things), especially, From H6633;  א tsâbâ', tsaw-baw', A primitive root; to MASS

...The very one "Christians" are in actuality WORSHIPING on DECEMBER 25TH without even knowing it!!! the Jewish view, great tribulations were to precede the Messiah's coming. The Jews would seem to have expected an evil Messiah, an Anti-christ; consequently, the teaching of THE NEW TESTAMENT in this direction DOES NOT IMPLY ANYTHING NEW. This Antichrist is, moreover, to be, on the hypotheses of several writers, nothing else than AN INCARNATION OF THE DEVIL himself. In consequence of the hatred of the Jews toward Rome, even after it had accepted Christianity, this Antichrist was also called ARMILUS, A JEWISH RENDERING OF ROMULUS; thus, in Pseudo-Methodius, "Romulus qui est Armilus" (compare W. Bousset, "Antichrist," pp. 33, 67). Bibliography: E. Stave, Einfluss d. Parsismus auf das Judentum, 1898; W. Bousset, Der Antichrist, 1895; Sieffert, Antichrist, in A. Hauck's Realencyklopädic für Protest-antische Theologie u. Kirche;  J. Darmesteter, Ormuzd et Ahriman, Paris, 1877; Jackson, Dualism, in Geiger and Kuhne, Grundriss der Iranischen Philologie, ii. 626-631.E. S.

PROPHECY: Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

QUOTE: In Rome December 25 was made popular by Pope Liberius in 354 and became the rule in the West in 435 when the first "Christ mass" was officiated byPOPE SIXTUS IIIThis coincided with the date of a celebration by the Romans to THEIR PRIMARY GOD, THE SUN, and to Mithras, a popular Persian sun god supposedly born on the same day. The Roman Catholic writer Mario Righetti candidly ADMITS that, "to facilitate the acceptance of the faith by the pagan masses, the Church of Rome found it convenient to institute the 25th of December as the feast of the birth of Christ to divert them from the pagan feast, celebrated on the same day in HONOR of the 'INVINCABLE SUN' Mithras, the conqueror of darkness" (Manual of Liturgical History, 1955, Vol. 2, p. 67).


There are literally SCORES of things in Revelation that make it's interpetation rather unmistakable in a knowledgable open karaite believing Jewish mind.  The indication of Sixtus III is verified by the template given, the coronation of Sixtus III which occured in July 432 AD. and should be accompanied by THE RISING of the BEAST IN THE SEA.

Rev 13:1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.

On July 31, 432 AD, the precise date of Sixth III's Papal coronation, HYDRA, (The Sea Beast with SEVEN HEADS) was directly on the Eastern Horizon AT EXACTLY 90o EAST, as was indicated in John's prophecy.


Rev 17:11  And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition

PERDITION: ἀπώλεια,  


ruin or loss (physical, spiritual or eternal): - damnable (-nation), destruction, die, perdition, X perish, pernicious ways, waste  

From a presumed derivative of G622; 




From G575 and the base of G3639; to destroy fully (reflexively to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively: - destroy, die, lose, mar, perish.




a destroyer (that is, Satan): - Apollyon. 

Active participle of G622; 




From G575 and the base of G3639; to destroy fully (reflexively to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively: - destroy, die, lose, mar, perish.


Sixtus III was the 8TH Pope after the FIRST formal OFFICAL AUTHORITATIVE establishment of THE ROMAN PAPACY-

Ursinus, who had been a rival to Damasus (366), was alive and still maintained his claims. However, the EMPEROR VALENTINIAN III, in a letter to Pinian (February 23, 385), GAVE HIS CONSENT to the election that had been held and praised the piety of the newly-elected bishop;

Pope Siricius - ...SIRICUIS answered this letter on FEBRUARY 10, 385, and gave the decisions as to the matters in question, exercising with FULL CONSCIOUSNESS OF HIS SUPREME POWER OF AUTHORITY in the Church (Coustant, "Epist. Rom. Pont.", 625 sq.). This letter of Siricius is of SPECIAL IMPORTANCE because it is THE OLDEST COMPLETELY PRESERVED PAPAL DECRETAL (edict for the authoritative decision of questions of discipline and canon law).


1. Siricius (384-99) 
2. Anastasius I (399-401) 
3. Innocent I (401-17) 
4. Zozimus (417-18) 
5. Boniface I (418-22) 
6. Eulalius ((418-19) 
7. Celestine I (422-32) 
8. Sixtus III (432-40) <=== 8TH 

PROPHECY: He will be preceded by seven kings. He will be the eighth. Revelation 17:10-11.

1. Siricius (384-99)
2. Anastasius I (399-401)
3. Innocent I (401-17)
4. Zozimus (417-18)
5. Boniface I (418-22)
6. Eulalius ((418-19)
7. Celestine I (422-32)
8. Sixtus III (432-40) <=== 8TH


It is commonly claimed in Chiliast escatology schemes that three and one-half years after the confirming of the covenant, the Antichrist will sit in the rebuilt Jewish temple claiming to be God. Daniel 9:27, 11:31, 12:11, Matthew 24:15-21, II Thessalonians 2:3-4.

However, there is nothing in the text about a JEWISH temple in the prophecy concerning Antichrist (2 Ths 2)

There is no parallel to "ex cathedra" in a JEWISH TEMPLE.  So barring a completely radical redefinition of Judaism as a religion, this would not be "fulfilled" in or a through any kind of "Jewish Temple", and if it actually ever were, such a Temple would not actually be "Jewish" by definition.  The Jewish Temple was sacerdotal only and permitted no one into the Holy of Holies but the high priest of the nation.

However, the odd fact is that after approximately 3 & 1/2 years (435 AD) , an agreement to honor the respective traditions of Judaism among people now identified historically as "heretics" or "Judaizers" (the Jewish community responsible for writing the New Testament documents, which inlcuded blood relatives of Christ) was abrogated in the compilation of the Theodosian II Codex.  A punitive oppressive legal code that criminalized the observance of any religion other than state-sponsored Roman Catholicism in the empire, and only under certain restrictive conditions, RABBINICAL JUDAISM, as a crime against the state.  Thus Jewish communities with traditons outside the Papal approved version of Rabbinical Judiasm were targeted for extermination.

At this same approximate time-frame Sixth III presided over the first official "Christmas" in Rome held at the shrine of the wolf.  It was attended with the innovation of Idols made in the likeness of Jesus, Joseph and Mary, which of course are strictly forbidden under Jewish law.  The Jesus Icon created by Sixth III was conspiciously absent any hint of Jewish flesh, much less Jewish religion.  It was literally a re-make of the statuary honoring the sun-god of the Romans, Apollo (a/k/a Sol Invictus), the unconquered Sun. Jewish family members of Christ, keeping the New Testament tradition of reformed karaism, were subsequently exterminated (at least as far as Rome was concerned).

Approximately, 3 & 1/2 years later, Sixtus (Sixth) III, was "struck-down" by a sudden and unexpected death with no appearant cause.  This "mystery death" has been "doctored" by Roman historians, but occassionally you will find an undoctored reference to his "unexpected" and "inexplicable" demise.  This is precisely the pattern chiliasts claim will occur with their own version of antichrist eschatology! (despite the fact no such pattern is actually required strictly from the texts!)

PROPHECY: Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.



PERDITION: ἀπώλεια,  


ruin or loss (physical, spiritual or eternal): - damnable (-nation), destruction, die, perdition, X perish, pernicious ways, waste  

From a presumed derivative of G622; 




From G575 and the base of G3639; to destroy fully (reflexively to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively: - destroy, die, lose, mar, perish.




a destroyer (that is, Satan): - Apollyon. 

Active participle of G622; 




From G575 and the base of G3639; to destroy fully (reflexively to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively: - destroy, die, lose, mar, perish.

QUOTE: In Rome December 25 was made popular by Pope Liberius in 354 and became the rule in the West in 435 when the first "Christ mass" was officiated byPOPE SIXTUS IIIThis coincided with the date of a celebration by the Romans to THEIR PRIMARY GOD, THE SUN, and to Mithras, a popular Persian sun god supposedly born on the same day. The Roman Catholic writer Mario Righetti candidly ADMITS that, "to facilitate the acceptance of the faith by the pagan masses, the Church of Rome found it convenient to institute the 25th of December as the feast of the birth of Christ to divert them from the pagan feast, celebrated on the same day in HONOR of the 'INVINCABLE SUN' (APOLLO) Mithras, the conqueror of darkness" (Manual of Liturgical History, 1955, Vol. 2, p. 67).


"...I scoff at the notion that anyone other
than a POPE could be THE ANTICHRIST."

--W.F. Strojie, conservative Roman Catholic scholar,
Last Days of the Catholic Church, 1978, p. 3,

Whether you WANT to admit the identity of the ANTICHRIST or not, that identity has been objectively defined by texts written thousands of years ago by the original Apostles.  Prior to the writing of the original Apostles, there was the known teaching among the Jews, from which the New Testament teaching of the ANTICHRIST reflected.

There are many things that simply cannot be avoided when looking at a composite profile of texts in the Scriptures.  LIARS do not care who the ANTICHRIST really is, anymore than they care who THE REAL CHRIST was.  Now if you are admittedly sitting under the ministry of a "minister" who openly shows he has absolutely NO CONCERN over who THE REAL CHRIST was, from his date of Birth to his physical description, to even his actual name, how on earth, can you POSSIBLY expect such a minister, to tell you THE TRUTH about THE ANTICHRIST.   He's already shown he has no conscience over lying about 


THE IDENTITY of the REAL CHRIST! How much less would he be concerned about the Antichrist?

This website will pay you $100 to come up with 1 example of a world ruler in the entire history of humanity with the name of 3 sixes.  This offer has been publicly given for years.  Do you know how many responses have come in?  Despite approaching nearly 5000 readers, many of whom have been ministers, not a single instance can be produced.  Not one.  Now that offer is being made because the record of history has already been searched for such another instance, and not a single one can be found, not by this site, nor by it's critics.  Not one.

Yet, despite this astounding fact, the Masonic "Christmas Ministers' who have taken over "Evangelical Protestantism" in America, and masquerade as "Christians", despite the fact they are secret SHAMASH devil worshipers, will have the nerve to claim "it doesn't mean anything", and their poor victimized "flock" (many of whom are headed unkowingly for THE LAKE OF FIRE because they have been taught to worship a false Christ) will have the utter cluelessness, to believe it.  What amount of "proof" would it take to persuade a "Shamash devil worshiper" and their POOR deluded followers, who are lovers of pleasure more than truth?  The fact is, there is no amount of proof on the earth, that could do that.  And that is simply the truth.  Because if you are willing to worship what you KNOW the Bible calls Satan, and dishonestly and cowardly call it "Christ", there is not too much sincerity left about "Christ" anywhere within you, period.  The eye can not see, what the mind has already chosen to reject.

But for someone who actually "loves" the truth, who is seeking and asking, and learning what it might be, for those who are sincere about their Christian faith, and believe in the Scriptures, and know their Protestant heritage, there is no way to honestly miss the fact, that the Pope is the Antichrist.  Revealed by name, with over 40 descriptions that fit no one else on earth, not a single other individual, other than the Papacy.

In fact, the prophecies that identitify the Papacy as the Antichrist are MORE specific than even those that identify the coming of Christ. MORE SPECIFIC.  Now as a "Christian" you are probably aware of how you have seen those lists of "prophecies" about Christ that make his identity not reasonable to reject as having been the 1st century Messiah.  You probably even get frustrated when you produce them, and people just look at you with a blank stare unmoved.

Apollo-gists will often boast to Jews and Atheists "Just 10 of these prophecies fulfilled in anyone else on earth is like taking the state of Texas and covering it with silver half dollars 2 inches thick, then marking one of those coins and throwing it back into the pile.  The odds you would randomly pick up that same coin, would be the same if just 10 of these prophecies were fulfilled in anyone else on earth"!

Anyone familiar with TBN's Josh McDowell and the standard Christian "Apollo-getics" heard anywhere, will recall this very frequently used speech.

Well that is certainly impressive,  Just 10 PROPHECIES!  But what if the same Apollo-gist stares at 40 Prophecies in the face, that mention the Antichrist literally by NAME (something that was not even done with the coming of Christ), along with scores of prophecies that clearly and without debate put him IN ROME, and IN CHARGE OF THE MAJORITY OF CHRISTIANITY ON EARTH.... and what if these same Apollo-gists offer the same blank stare also unmoved?  What's the difference?

If you simply refuse to admit the truth about something, you will refuse to admit the truth about it, no matter what the facts might be, and this is precisely what the Masonic or Roman Babelist, (secret Shamash devil worshiper) minister does every day, and not only does he do it, he teaches his own congregation to be "insulated" from such shocking facts, so as not to be "moved" by their obvious implications when they see it.

One Presbyterian minister wrote a whole sermon and posted it online defending Christmas, and the conclusion to his whole entire empty argument,( which consisted of "appeals" to all the things they do at his Presbyterian Church that are not "Biblical" so it does not matter if this is not "Biblical" TOO!, ...was concluded with the intellectualistic appeal that "what we need today is a THEOLOGY for CHRISTMAS"?  In other words, admitting there is none. But rather than urging his congregation to "repent" he simply urged them to IGNORE ("ignore-ance") that fact until someone "comes up with a Theology" for doing it.  How utterly amazing.  And there are actually educated people sitting in his Church? (Who have not thrown him out?)  Are they getting what they deserve? (2 Thss 2)

Recovery begins with "repentance", not "assayup Jee'zus into your hart" like a good Hindu to "fire up" your "solar chakra", and suspend your brain, your will, and your thoughts.  The REAL CHRIST calls you to LOVE GOD with all your heart, your mind, your soul and your strength,i.e., your entire being, not just"yo hart".  Which means also they ALL are USED.  The "command" to LOVE GOD is willful, intentional, thoughtful, active and aggressive, ...not passive and emotional.  It is a CHOICE, an ACTION, and a DECISION, that falls squarely on the shoulders of the person charged to DO the command (not the "option") but the "command".  This is the meaning of REPENT.  You DO IT or suffer the consequence.  

Personal "emotions" are almost irrelevant, and your "heart is deceitfully wicked above all things, who can know it"?. Jer 17:9  Jonah's emotions obviously were disagreeable when he "repented" but he did anyway.  Ask yourself this honest question: Do you honestly think people who claim to have "accepted Jesus into their heart", who display such a passive-agressive hostility, that they will not even speak his real name? Have "accepted him"? What precisely do you think they 'accepted"? His religion? No, he was a Jew? His name? No, they won't even speak it? His birth date? Of course not that one? His hair color? Blonde? Not really. His hair length (hair as a woman? Rev 9:8 ) No, not even that.  What that he "died on a cross"? No not really, they give the credit for that to someone else in Rome, born on December 25th.  So what exactly did they "accept" when it came to the "Christ" (of the Scriptures) NOTHING!!!  They have "accepted" NOTHING.

Do they even know what exactly have they "accepted" about him "in their wicked little deceitful hearts that no one can know"? Oh yes, they accepted he was (born, celebrated, remembered, whatever) on Christmas, and the minister tells them what to think now. Don't kid yourself for one minute, there is not ONE THING, about this FRAUD that is "accepting Jesus into your heart". Not one.  And furthermore any "heart" that settles for all these lies, demonstrates enough subconscious "passive-agressive" hostility toward the "truth" (that Christ is mocked AND they slaughtered his entire FAMILY) that Paul said you fully deserve the deception, ...AND it's consequence of damnation. Oh of course, no one REALLY goes to hell over religion (since none of it is true anyway)... all those people in Phoenix thinking they were in hell, they were just hallucinating.  Sort of like how you are hallucinating now, thinking you are looking at a web page (it's not really here either) You are hallucinating.  And tonight you will hallucinate the sun will set and the moon will rise. You are hallucinating.  And tomorrow morning you will hallucinate that you are waking up and getting out of bed. Get it? You are hallucinating.

The real Christ (the one they DON'T ACCEPT in their "hearts") says REPENT from making IDOLS and worshiping devils,(Rev 9:20 ) ...which is precisely what is being done at CHRISTMAS, thus why in REALITY they have NEVER accepted the REAL CHRIST into anything within them, not their mind, not their strength and not their soul, much less their wicked little Idolatrous passive-aggressive hearts. And until they repent of their blasphemy, and their worship of the LAKE OF FIRE in the sky, that is where they will justly go when they die.  That is what they chose and no one forced them to do it. That is why no one should be "embracing" the Antichrist and worshiping his Image.  And make no mistake about it, no matter what kind of "eschatology" you may claim to have, only DELUSION will dismiss these connections, because the Scriptures make it very clear, there are MANY ANTICHRISTS, not just one.  And the one that started "Christmas", is the only one in history that fits the description of what an Antichrist is, with the name of literally 3 Sixes. HE IS THE ONLY ONE.



There is not much that can be said about evangelicals willing to adopt things which are blatant lies and call them "Theology".  In these cases you might as well get it from graffiti on a bathroom wall.  This kind of cavalier attitude toward the actual hard facts of the text of the Scripture is inexplicable in allegedly "Evangelical" circles, who used to fill their ranks with stories of men who burned alive in history to give the privilege to read it.

The texts of Scripture make it undeniably clear THE ANTICHRIST IS ALREADY HERE.

2Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 



THIS IS.  Present tense.  The ANTICHRIST was already present, (because there are many) and John identifies specifically who he is talking about.  The liars, who are actually themselves the theological descendants of who "THIS IS" is referring to, are allowed by Protestant Christians to offer every lie known to man, some so patently absurd to be laughable.  Yet no one calls these liars out.  Well here we shall diverge from the general practice,  The ANTICHRIST is unmistakable in the Scripture, and there is is absolutely no reason to mistake it for anyone or anything else, other than the shear desire to do so.

(1) THE ANTICHRIST (Singular) - There is ONE which would become the "head", someday over the rainbow.

(2) THE "SPIRIT" OF THE ANTICHRIST - Is already present and working

(3) THERE ARE MANY ANTICHRIST - The thing that is "at work" already was/is easily and clearly understood from this text despite the intentional obfuscations, generally offered by (THE ANTICHRIST), in defense of it's "SPIRIT".

(4) THIS IS - A specific reference to a specific thing.  Not ambiguous. Not generalized. But SPECIFIC... THIS IS.  This that John is pointing too in the text of this very letter with his own finger. THIS IS.  Not something else, but THIS.  Not anything else, but THIS. THIS IS. If it is not THIS IS, then it is not what the term "THE ANTICHRIST" refers to plain and simple because John, (who coins the term itself) says THIS IS (The Antichrist).  


THIS IS, unkown to the general public, something that is perfectly well known.  THIS IS something which has an unbroken linage throughout history and THIS IS something that "Academic theologians" and "Apollo-gists" know perfectly well what it refers to, and hide and lie about it, to make what THIS IS referring to, mean something, actually anything else, they can manage.  Because THIS IS referring to the very thing "Apollo-gists" defend.  THIS IS referring to the very linage of their theology.  THIS IS referring to the very institution for which they work, and from whom they get their pay checks.  THIS IS not ambigious, and THIS IS not confusing, and THIS IS not some ethereal obscure strange and mysteriously hidden thing.  

THIS IS referring to what these people either admit, or hide.  But THIS IS not a mystery.  THIS IS something John was pointing his finger at in Ephesus, something that was also addressed in another writing attributed to his authorship, the book of Revelation, where THIS IS explained in even greater detail and more specificity, and adds to the volume of information once again, to the same thing the New Testament warns about in scores of passages beginning with it's very first gospel, and mentioned by Christ himself.  THIS IS no mystery.

THIS IS in Ephesus and the DOCTRINE that THIS IS referring to, adding to the already volumous amount of material already given, THIS IS once again pointing out a distinct characteristic about the group of people and their teaching that THIS IS unambiguously referring to.  The "doctrine" that THIS IS referring to is a hallmark of a particular group of ideologues WHO CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN SUCCESSORS OF THE ORIGINAL APOSTLES, AND USED INTENTIONAL LYING TO PROMOTE THEIR RELIGION.  

Rev 2:2  I know your works, and your labor, and your patience, and that you cannot bear (the) evil ones; and you tried those pretending to be APOSTLES and are not, and found them to be LIARS

The central aspect of this doctrine pointed to here, is that YESHUA was not "human".  He was a "symbol" or a "spirit" not to be understood literally and historically. Not a "real person".  

2Jn 1:7  For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 

This text does not refer to "skeptics"  who simply question whether or not there ever was a YESHUA, and it does not refer to ATHIESTS who do not believe there is a God.  THIS IS referring to a specific group of relgious ideologues who moved among circles of "Christians" (if you prefer to use the term) or New Testament communities spreading their teaching.  They were in and among "Christians".  They adopted the language, the doctrines, the message and the social community of believers, disciples, "christians", New Testament Jewish converts, ... AND they added some very specific extra things.  They changed the message slightly so that it ended up being something exactly opposite of Christ. Anti-... Christ.  THIS IS referring to a group of idealouges who practiced UTILITARIAN DECIET:

Rev 2:2... 

pretending to be APOSTLES and are not, and found them to be LIARS

This does not refer to JEWS or A JEW, who does not "accept Jesus into their heart", because JEWS are said to have been intentionally "blinded" so precisely for the very reason that in the end they WOULD BE SAVED!  

Rom 11:25,26  For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

How can that be? SAVED BY REJECTING "JESUS"?  Because the writers of the New Testament knew THE "JESUS" THEY WOULD BE CALLING "LORD" WOULD NOT BE HIM:

Mat 7:22,23  Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 

And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. 

And JEWS would BE SAVED from this DELUSION.  How do you "get saved" and reject ROME'S CHRIST-MASS CHRIST "JESUS" IDOL? At the same time? By "accepting THE BLOOD and flesh OF CHRIST" even though you are BLIND to the fact you are doing it!  While those under THE DELUSION REJECT IT, THEY REJECT HIS VERY BLOOD AND FLESH! (even though they SAY they "accept Christ")  That is how.

THIS PASSOVER - Luke 22:13,15, Mtt.26:19
THIS DO - Luke 22:19,1 Co.11:24,25 
THIS IS my body - Luke 22:19, Mtt.26:26, 1 Co.11:24,25
THIS IS my blood - Luke 22:20, Mtt.26:28, 1 Co.11:24,25

Catholics are right. It really is THE BLOOD AND FLESH OF CHRIST.  And THEY have REJECTED IT... In "Christ-Mass" (Institued by 666 Literally) and have "accepted" the worship of his Idol, an "Image" who is in REALITY APOLLYON. NOT CHRIST.  And EVERY "CHRISTIAN" Protesant or Catholic who "Embraces" that Idol and worships it, damns themselves by "drinking from the cup of God's wrath", rather than THE SEDER, which is is FLESH AND BLOOD. (now whether you wish to argue that literal or symbolic, is beside the point, because you reject what he told you to do, in favor of ROME'S "CHRIST-MASS", and it's Idol of Apollyon (Which is not Christ and cannot save given to you by Pope SIXTUS III, literally 666). Of which it is more than clear, those who do this will be "damned" to the very "lake of fire" they are worshiping. You will not be able to find a SINGLE "Apollo-gist" for the Antichrist that can explain how REJECTING CHRIST causes you to BE SAVED as a JEW! NOT ONE! They stumble all over themselves trying to explain this blatant violation of their own theological claims.  Here it is. It is explained. And it is found right in front of your own eyes in the very texts of the New Testament itself.

100% of the proposed "Antichrists"  in the world, that are proposed by the people THIS IS actually referring to, are subsitute "Antichrists" to serve in their OWN PLACE.  They volunteer Muslims, Jews, Atheists, Liberals and anyone else they can find to point the finger at and accuse of being "THE ANTICHRIST", none of whom THIS IS referring to specifically, historically and literally right here in this text in EPHESUS.



What is in Ephesus? THIS IS in Ephesus. THE ANTICHRIST.  Would that be Muslim? No. Would that be Atheists? No. Would that be an American Democrat? or a "Liberal" or a Marxist? No, no, no. THIS IS the Antichrist and THIS IS in Ephesus in 100 AD, to whom this letter was written.  THIS IS in their own midsts, moving around among them as "Christians".  THIS IS something John rebuked again in Revelation again IN EPHESUS.  THIS IS known from history to be called "CHRISTIAN" today.  THIS IS something known from history to have been instituted AS ROMAN LAW by a man BY THE NAME OF THREE SIXES.  THIS IS referring to the same thing the "mystery of Satan", the "doctrine of Balaam" and THE NICHOLAITANS all referred to exaclty and precisely IN EPHESUS.  THIS IS is doctrine which DENIES THE FLESH OF CHRIST, that he CAME IN THE FLESH, that he was A REAL PERSON, and not simply an ICON, AN IMAGE, AN IDOL.  THIS IS referring to the same thing that was predicted to BECOME THE MAJORITY, not the "minority". THIS IS referring to the same thing that would be headed by a man who calls himself GOD.  THIS IS THE SAME THING, and THIS IS IN EPHESUS WHEN THIS LETTER WAS WRITTEN.  AND THIS IS THE ANTICHRIST! Nothing else. Absolutely NOTHING else. Because John said THIS IS the Antichrist. AND that there would be both MANY throughout history, and ONE who would be it's absolute head, at the same time. ONE and MANY.  Ruling over the MAJORITY of people who would call Christ "Lord", but in reality, would be worshiping something else entirely, AN "IMAGE" WHICH IS NOT HIM.  Now where would we find something like that? IN EPHESUS!

It was in Ephesus that the First (Original) "Lord's Seder" was being "forsaken" 

Rev 2:4  Nevertheless I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love. 

"Love" and the phrase "thy first love" has been obfuscated intentionally by translators to hide the meaning of the text.  The phrase  is "Thy first Agape'".  The "Agape" meal was the passover Seder that was instituted by Christ in the gospels.  It was instituted by him, because at the time the Jewish rabbis did not practice a domestic passover, and did not do so according to their own sources for another 40-50 years until after the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem.  But followers of the Jewish Christ had already been keeping a domestic passover, as instructed by Moses himself, to be kept in the home, for an "everlasting ordinance" decades BEFORE Jewish Rabbis instituted the practice (that they now claim to be offended over when they hear that a "Christian" keeps it?)  This strange twist of history is once again the work of Rome's finger-twisting on history.


The Bible could simply not be more clear: THIS IS Antichtist (2 John 1:7)  What SPECIFICALLY THIS IS,
will astound and amaze you.  

"There are also those who heard from him that John, the disciple of the Lord, going to bathe at Ephesus, and perceiving Cerinthus within, rushed out of the bath-house without bathing, exclaiming, “Let us fly, lest even the bath-house fall down, because Cerinthus, the enemy of the truth, is within.” (Irenaeus. Adversus Haeres. Book III, Chapter 3, Verse 4).

According to this text attributed to Irenaeus, "Cerinthus" was a heretic who the Apostle John publicly denounced towards the end of the first century. Notice that Irenaeus wrote that John detested Cerinthus so much that he would not even take a bath in the same building as him.

This is an amazing tid-bit of historical information (true or otherwise) .  Why? Because it is ...



The "Christmas Ministers" have it all figured out for you, there is one thing you are sure about THE ANTICHRIST IS COMING, these are the END TIMES, need to watch out for that computer CHIP, that TATOO, those Mulsims, that POLITICIAN, yep, keep and eye out because the DAYS ARE SHORT !  You can see THE PROPHECIES all coming to past !!! It's definitely SOON! Yep that Antichrist is probably being born in Jerusalem right NOW!! He's probably real close to taking over the world!  He's going to be revealed any day now! They just have to rebuild the TEMPLE in Jerusalem, and then he's sit right in it< and of course, that will all happen after all the good Christians like the Pope and Mother Theresa are Raptured, and fly through the sky! And then after that, after we are all gone, then finally, there is will be an "Antichrist", but no "Christian" will ever have to worry, because he won't be around until ALL OF US, are gone! Poof! Like magic! No problem. What? Me Worry?

But if you want to figure out the name of the Antichrist, all you have to do is multiply this by the ancient Chaldee, subtract it by the ancient Greek alphabet, convert it to the Latin, and then take the Hebrew anagram, and multiply and add it by the secret codes found in the Bible-Code, and then compute the digital equivalents....



While you are doing all this nonsense, ROME is hiding a name from  you.  You may not know what the name of the Antichrist is, because you have been taking your theology from a Jesuit, but that JESUIT knows what that name is, because HE IS INTENTIONALLY HIDNG IT FROM YOU.

Now if there is nothing to this, there would be NO REASON for ROME to hide this name,  But obviously ROME feels there is something about this name that is quite embarrassing. Something about this name that is quite problematic.  So while you sit around and play number games with anagrams, and ignore the very text of the Bible, ROME hides the exact name, that was prophesied 300 YEARS before it happened.  The EXACT NAME.  And it is THE EXACT NAME, that ROME ITSELF HIDES FROM YOU.  The EXACT NAME.

And furthermore, it is THE EXACT NAME, your "Christmas Minister" will NEVER MENTION.  Not even when talking about "Christmas" even though THIS IS THE EXACT MAN, who OFFICIATE THE VERY FIRST OFFICAL CHRISTMAS AT THE VATICAN! THE EXACT MAN, WITH THE EXACT NAME.  And what he was instituting was the EXACT IDOL born on the EXACT DAY, that the EXACT SUNGOD prophesied in the Scripture, WAS BORN.  THE EXACT DAY.

So while you might be stupid enough not to realize there is anything to this, and while you might be a deluded decieved Protestant who has been brainwashed by one of ROME's front-men masqerading in America as an "Evangelical Minister" ROME KNOWS EXACTLY who it is AND WHAT HIS NAME IS...BECAUSE THAT IS THE VERY NAME.... THEY HIDE.




SEE: Meaning Of The Name SIXTUS, by

440 AD POPE SIXTUS III [666]  establishes Roman Pontifical Authority as state law. Perpetual Virgin Mary declared Mother of God and modern Christ-Mass takes final form as mandatory state law.


POPE SIXTH III (666) was Pope from July 31, 432 to August 18, 440.

Cause Of Death: Unkown.

 Died instantly, suddenly and mysteriously in office after only 7-8 years (attributed to "natural causes").

2Th 2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealedwhom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his PRESENCE {Parousia}:

During his pontificate the construction of Santa Maria Maggiore, was dedicated to Mary as the MOTHER OF GOD reflecting his promotion of the Ecumenical council of Ephesus in 431. Culminated in State Laws against the historical Jewish Christ.







POPE SIXth III Created along with the Roman Ceasar Theodosius II, a CODEX which enforced the ROMAN CHRIST – MASS as STATE LAW.  Dissenters were declared “legally Insane”! {Read Below}


QUOTE: The face of the Apostle Peter included in the Mosaic is that of Pope Sixtus III.  Another inscription on this "Church" reads "omnium ecclesiarum Urbis et Orbis mater et caput" which translated reads:"MOTHER and HEAD of ALL CHURCHES in the city and in the WORLD" END QUOTE - P. 60, Atlas Of the Early Christian World




- Pope SIXth III



"The Pope takes the place of Jesus Christ on earth…by divine right the Pope has supreme and full power in faith, in morals over each and every pastor and his flock. He is the true vicar, the head of the entire church, the father and teacher of all Christians. He is the infallible ruler, the founder of dogmas, the author of and the judge of councils; the universal ruler of truththe arbiter of the world, the supreme judge of heaven and earththe judge of all, being judged by no oneGod himself on earth." – The New York Catechism, Roman Catholicism by Lorraine Boettner, Th.M,Th.D.H Princeton Theological Seminary (See footnote on Roman Apollo-gists against this quote)




PROPHECY: Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

QUOTE: In Rome December 25 was made popular by Pope Liberius in 354 and became the rule in the West in 435 when the first "Christ mass" was officiated byPOPE SIXTUS IIIThis coincided with the date of a celebration by the Romans to THEIR PRIMARY GOD, THE SUN, and to Mithras, a popular Persian sun god supposedly born on the same day. The Roman Catholic writer Mario Righetti candidly ADMITS that, "to facilitate the acceptance of the faith by the pagan masses, the Church of Rome found it convenient to institute the 25th of December as the feast of the birth of Christ to divert them from the pagan feast, celebrated on the same day in HONOR of the 'INVINCABLE SUN' Mithras, the conqueror of darkness" (Manual of Liturgical History, 1955, Vol. 2, p. 67).

Manual of Liturgical History, 1955, Vol. 2 [Added Vol 2]


(In Honor Of The Invincable Sun [Apollo])



So you go right ahead and keep telling yourself all the LIES you've been told by Ministers who sneak around as Masons and aspiring Roman Babelists, Political Prostitutes who would sell the soul of their own grandmother to be "in power", much less have not the slightest problem telling you a bold faced lie, to you and your Momma.  You go ahead and keep believing those LIES, told to you by SHAMASH devil worshipers, who do not even really care WHO Christ was, when he was born, what his faith really was, or even what his name was. Who would happily worship three frogs from Egypt, or an Idol in Rome when it comes to advancing their money, their careers, their positions of esteem.  You go ahead and keep "trusting" that what they are telling you is true, and do not bother to ever read a Bible for yourself.  You go right ahead and believe those lies, because one day you WILL find out the truth.  It will just be a question of whether you FIND OUT before or AFTER it is TOO LATE.  But you WILL find out.

And let's face it, anyone who would side with the people who would slaughter MILLIONS of innocent people, and even exterminate the very blood family of Christ to pull such lies, to seduce even innocent children in devil worship, (and you are so deluded that you think thist same "Christ" is actually going to "save you" when YOU KNOW he actually beat people with a whip for merchandising religion) you just keep right on believing in those rediculous inexcusable heinous lies that damn the soul to an eternity in a LAKE OF FIRE (That is worshiped on this day), you go right ahead... because as far as THIS CHRIST is concerned, you deserve to go to hell.  You fully deserve to be deceived, and receive what is coming to you.  You probably deserve it (at least that is what the Bible says anyway)

2Th 2:12  That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 

After all, "Christmas" is "a lot of fun" isn't it.

And "having fun" is what it's all about as a "Christian" isn't it! (in America)




ROME has attempted to pin Cerinthus with the "Ebionites".  Ebionites were a sect that taught Jewish legalism, not hardly the kind of theology that would syncretize it's ideology with Rome's polytheistic sun-god worship.  What is interesting about "interpolations" is that they leave a trail of ROME'S deceit.  So by paying attention to what they were actually inserting into documents, you see (1) what they were trying to lie about, and (2) what changes they were actually trying to "FABRICATE" an historical record for.

In this case, we once again find the finger of ROME in the middle of  a DOCUMENT FRAUD to concoct a phony "history".  
The first mention of "Ebionites" is to be found in some manuscripts of Ignatius' letter to the Philadelphians mentions "Ebionite", but this has been shown to be a later addition (older versions of the letter do not have them):

"if any one says there is one God, and also confesses Christ Jesus, but thinks the Lord to be a mere man, and not the only-begotten God, and Wisdom, and the Word of God, and deems Him to consist merely of a soul and body, such an one is a serpent, that preaches deceit and error for the destruction of men. And such a man is poor in understanding, even as by name he is an Ebionite." - Ignatius' letter to the Philadelphians  

Thus it is "claimed" that Its origin is "obscure" and most scholars date them to the late second century. It was erroneously said by early Christian writers that the sect was founded by a certain Ebion. The early accounts about them were subject to much debate.  The FACT is that what is asserted about CERINTHUS in the CATHOLIC ENYCLOPEDIA is simply another example of ROME"S historical fraud,  ROME's doctored "paper-work" makes opposite contradictory claims about CERINTHUS and EBIONITES, which mutually eliminate each other as possibilities.  Why the "Doctoring" on CERINTHUS?

(1) CERINTHUS was admittedly from EGYPT (Location of the Nag Hammadi library)
(2) CERINTHUS was admittedly a GNOSTIC (The Nag Hammadi library was gnostic)
(3) CERINTHUS was the originator of the "syncretism" with the "sun-god" seen in the Solar-Solstice "Christ-Mass" (Also found in Nag Hammadi documents)
(4) CERINTHUS was admittedly a VEGETARIAN (Nag Hammadi community were gnostic vegetarians)


Ananias of Shirak, circa 600 A.D., wrote:

The Festival of the holy Birth of Christ, on the 12th day before the feast of the Baptism, was not appointed by the holy apostles, nor by their successors either, as is clear from the canons of the holy apostles…which is 6th of January, according to the Romans.  
But many years after their fixing the canons, this festival was invented, as some say, by the disciples of the heretic Cerinthus; and was accepted by the Greeks, because they were truly fond of festivals and most fervent in piety; and by them it was spread and diffused all over the world. 
But in the days of the holy Constantine, in the holy Council of Nice, this festival was not received by the holy fathers (Ananias of Shirak, On Christmas, The Expositor, 5th series vol. 4 (1896) Translation. pp.323-337, as reported by ccel).

his festival was invented, as some say, by the disciples of the heretic Cerinthus


Cerinthus A Gnostic-Ebionite hereticcontemporary with St. JohnCerinthus was an Egyptian, and if not by race a Jew…Cerinthus’s doctrines were a strange mixture of Gnosticism, Judaism, Chiliasm, and Ebionitism (Arendzen J.P. Transcribed by William D. Neville. The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume III. Published 1908. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Nihil Obstat, November 1, 1908. Remy Lafort, S.T.D., Censor. Imprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York).

Cerinthus was an Egyptian *NAG HAMMADI LIBRARY, along with Saint Pachomius monastary were in Egypt.  




“John, the disciple of the Lord, preaches this faith (the deity of Christ), and seeks, by the proclamation of the Gospel, to remove that error which by Cerinthus had been disseminated among men, and a long time previously by those termed Nicolaitans, who are an offset of that “knowledge” falsely so called, that he might confound them, and persuade them that there is but one God, who made all things by His Word” (Irenaeus Against Heresies iii 11.  1; ANF vol. 1, p. 426) 





(2 JOHN 2:7)


Whether perhaps by divine providence, or by strange coincidence IT WAS AT ROME'S OWN VERY COUNCIL OF EPHESUS, that Eutychus (Pope Sixtus III's PERSONAL THEOLOGIAN) actually WENT ON RECORD LITERALLY DENYING THE FLESH OF CHRIST.  It created one of the biggest scandals in the History of the Roman Church!  THIS WAS DONE AT EPHESUS!  Sixtus III of course, being the exact person who officiated the first official Christ-Mass at the Vatican.

And it was here at Ephesus that the RISEN CHRIST reminded the converts that HE was the ONE who WALKED IN THE MIDST OF THE MENORAH.  The Menorah being the symbol of Biblical Judaism, in DIRECT CONTRAST to THE NICHOLAITANS!  Obviously push-back on the anti-semitism being advocated in these same communities by the NICHOLAITANS, those who DENIED THE JEWISH FLESH OF CHRIST.  More will be discussed about these facts in the section entitled THE MASS. 

1Jn 4:3  And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; andeven now already is it in the world. 

And it was at the COUNCIL OF EPHESUS that MARY was declared the "Mother of God" at title that has always resonated with blasphemy to Protestants despite all the shady sophistry employed by Rome to twist and turn the obvious to make it sound "Biblical", and endow it with the "air" evangelicalism it obviously does not deserve.

The Antichrist is someone who recieves worship as God.  His name is Six Six Six.  He is head a "Mystery Babylon" who is headquartered in Rome.  They deny the "Flesh" of Christ, his historicity, his Jewishness, all of the above, and they were known in 100 AD by the name of NICHOLAITANS. and taught the "Mystery of Satan". the "Doctrine of Balaam" and the "Doctrine of the Nicolaitans".  If you really think you have to "guess" who this describes, you are being simply dishonest with yourself.  




While the Scriptures make it perfectly clear there is more than ONE antichrist.  The Scriptures also make it clear there is ONE "MAN OF SIN", who would be unmistakable.  He would head the world's majority of "Christians".  But THE MAN OF SIN, while being "an antichrist" himself, like many others, is unique because he holds a position of authority that is unique on earth, in the world, and in history.  His identity is UNMISTAKABLE.

2Th 2:3-4  

Let no man deceive you by any means: (1)for that day shall not come, (2)except there come a falling away first,(3)and that man of sin be revealed, (4)the son of perdition; (5)


Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; (6)so that he as God sitteth (7)in the SANCTUARY of God, (8)shewing himself that he is God. 

1.  MUST COME BEFORE "THAT DAY" ("That day" being the "return of Christ" 2 Ths 2:1,2)








defection from truth (properly the state), (“apostasy”): - falling away, forsake.

Rev 2:2  I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars: 
Rev 2:4  Nevertheless I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first AGAPE
Rev 2:5  Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent. 
Rev 2:6  But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate. 

The “breaking of bread” practiced by the primitive community in Jerusalem according to Act_2:42, Act_2:46 must certainly be interpreted in the light of Pauline usage (1Co_10:16; 1Co_11:24) as referring to the ceremonial act of the Lord's Supper. - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

THIS PASSOVER - Luke 22:13,15, Mtt.26:19
THIS DO - Luke 22:19,1 Co.11:24,25 
THIS IS my body - Luke 22:19, Mtt.26:26, 1 Co.11:24,25
THIS IS my blood - Luke 22:20, Mtt.26:28, 1 Co.11:24,25

(as in "Christ-Mass")





It is unbecoming beyond measure that on this holiest of festivals we should follow the customs of the Jews. Henceforth let us have nothing in common with this odious people...We ought not, therefore, to have anything in common with the Jews...our worship follows a...more convenient course...we desire dearest brethren, toseparate ourselves from the detestable company of the Jews...How, then, could we follow these Jews

1Jn 2:19  They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest 


Play on words:

MAN (Adam)  


SIN (The Fall)  

As you have seen earlier, Adam's "Fall" was directly connected to the SOLAR-SERPENT religion of Pharaoh that Moses was attempting to counter in the minds and hearts of the Israelites who had been subjected to the type of mental conditioning "slaves" are always subjected to in dominant cultures.

The phrase "MAN OF SIN" is a direct opposite to the title "VICAR OF CHRIST".  Not an exalted  "Vicar of Christ" but a common "Man of Sin".  Not "Christ on earth", but simply "fallen humanity".  The reference to Adam at the fall, reminds the reader Adam's sin was in his desire to "become as God", so likewise will the "MAN OF SIN" seek to deify himself in disobedience to God's word, and his voice.


Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped)

The Roman Catholic Church is the largest government on earth.  It is also the most wealthy.  The "Church" in America owns 1/10th of the TOTAL LAND MASS of the UNITED STATES.  What other position of global power, also incidently claims to be ABOVE ALL and JUDGED BY NO ONE, and ANOTHER GOD ON EARTH?  NONE
(Nothing ELSE, comes even close by comparison.)



PERDITION: ἀπώλεια,  


ruin or loss (physical, spiritual or eternal): - damnable (-nation), destruction, die, perdition, X perish, pernicious ways, waste  

From a presumed derivative of G622; 




From G575 and the base of G3639; to destroy fully (reflexively to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively: - destroy, die, lose, mar, perish.




a destroyer (that is, Satan): - Apollyon.