Blind Eye

Home

Shaun Sanders

Case Facts

Houston Police Officers

Harris County Crime lab

Danny Easterling

Terrence Windham

Latoya Hill

Windeon Sanders

Judge Mark Kent Ellis

Roland Moore

Recorded Meetings

State Bar of Texas Houston

Gina Sanders

Contact Us

BEST TIP Petition

Disclaimer

Eyewitness Testimony

Criminal Injustice

Police Corruption

Guestbook

Calendar
 

Justice IS Indeed Blind   


A Rubber Stamp Answer?

There was a charge of judicial misconduct filed against attorney Easterling to the State Bar of Texas -- Houston Region.  It was declined and there was the option of resubmitting additional information.  More information was submitted.  However, they return the exact same denial letter with a difference only in reference number and investigator.                   

 





1st Response Letter

 STATE BAR OF TEXAS

Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel

March 13, 2001

Shaun Sanders 

P. O. Box 9200 New Boston, Texas 75570

Re: H002015139 Shaun Sanders  -Danny K. Easterling

Dear Mr. Sanders:

The disciplinary system of the State Bar of Texas serves one purpose:  To investigate claims of professional misconduct committed by Texas Lawyers. A lawyer is guilty of professional misconduct only if he or she is in violation of the Texas Code of Professional Responsibility or the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct effective January 1, 1990.  These are the rules that regulate the conduct of Texas lawyers. The Code is printed in Vernon’s Texas Codes Annotated, Volume 3 of the Government Code, Title 2, Subtitle G-Appendix A, Article X, Section 9 which can be found in your county law library. If an attorney has  violated the Code, the Grievance Committee may discipline the attorney through a reprimand, suspension, or disbarment. 

 After  carefully reviewing this grievance, it has been determined that the Information provided does not allege professional misconduct as defined in the Code.  The rules allow for an appeal of this decision to the Board of Disciplinary Appeals. An appeal must be submitted in writing, within thirty (30) days after the date of this letter using the form enclosed.

In lieu of an appeal of this decision, pursuant to Rule 2.09, the complaint may be amended and re – filed with additional information one time only.

Please be reminded that pursuant to Rule 2.15 of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure, all information, proceedings, hearing transcripts, and statements, coming to the attention of the Investigatory Panel of the Grievance Committee must remain confidential and may not be disclosed to any person or entity (except the Chief Disciplinary Counsel) unless disclosure is ordered by the Court. However, it shall not constitute a breach of confidentiality to consult with an attorney.

Sincerely,

Robert S. Mapes

Investigator

Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel

State Bar of Texas

Pdg

CFI – 9. PRI

 





2nd Response Letter

STATE BAR OF TEXAS 

Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel

June 19, 2001

Shaun Bicari Sanders 

P. O. Box 9200  New Boston, Texas 75570

Re: H0040125667 Shaun Bicari Sanders  - Danny Karl Easterling

Dear Mr. Sanders:

The disciplinary system of the State Bar of Texas serves one purpose:  To investigate claims of professional misconduct committed by Texas Lawyers. A lawyer is guilty of professional misconduct only if he or she is in violation of the Texas Code of Professional Responsibility or the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct effective January 1, 1990.  These are the rules that regulate the conduct of Texas lawyers. The Code is printed in Vernon’s Texas Codes Annotated, Volume 3 of the Government Code, Title 2, Subtitle G-Appendix A, Article X, Section 9 which can be found in your county law library. If an attorney has  violated the Code, the Grievance Committee may discipline the attorney through a reprimand, suspension, or disbarment. 

 After  carefully reviewing this grievance, it has been determined that the Information provided does not allege professional misconduct as defined in the Code.  The rules allow for an appeal of this decision to the Board of Disciplinary Appeals. An appeal must be submitted in writing, within thirty (30) days after the date of this letter using the form enclosed.

In lieu of an appeal of this decision, pursuant to Rule 2.09, the complaint may be amended and re – filed with additional information one time only.

Please be reminded that pursuant to Rule 2.15 of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure, all information, proceedings, hearing transcripts, and statements, coming to the attention of the Investigatory Panel of the Grievance Committee must remain confidential and may not be disclosed to any person or entity (except the Chief Disciplinary Counsel) unless disclosure is ordered by the Court. However, it shall not constitute a breach of confidentiality to consult with an attorney.

Sincerely,

Santos E. Ibarra

Investigator

Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel

State Bar of Texas

Srn

CFI 9 . PRI





 
© 2003 Blindeye   

Create a free website at Webs.com