Phase three: After D.A. Call
Question 24:
Did Shaun state where he was when the gun went off?
Statements:
PT\Direct by Windham\p121 Waters: 11A Well, in between denials of pointing a gun at anybody, he indicated that apparently there was a struggle between Windeon and Miss Shelby and she had grabbed Windeon’s wrist and that’s when he heard a couple of pops. He heard the gun go off. And that’s when he shot her. 19Q Did he tell you that he saw that or that he heard-- 21A The inference was that he was there in the room when he saw--because he describes her grabbing Windeon’s wrist and that that’s when the gun went off. 25 But he didn’t specifically say that he saw that?
T\Direct by Windham\p13 Waters Q Did he indicate to you what his location was in the house at the moment of the shooting? 21A He was in the bedroom with Windeon and the girls and Miss Shelby. P12Q Did he say he saw the shooting? 13A Yes.
T\Cross by Easterling\p64 Waters: Q Mr. Windeon (sic) asked you, "Did he tell you that he saw the shooting?" And your answer under oath was, "yes" 8A yes. Q He didn’t say, "I saw that with my own P65 2A Not in those words, no. Q3 He didn’t say where he was when the shot went off, did he? 8A Not in those words, no. 6Q He didn’t tell you he was in the bedroom when the shot went off, did he? 8A Not in those words, no.
PT\Direct by Windham\p122 Waters: 17Q Did he tell you how many times Windeon shot Phyllis? 21A I do not recall Shaun being specific as to the number of times the weapon was fired--
Issue:
The evidence shows inconsistency/malingering as to what Shaun Sanders said.
Question 25:
Did Shaun say what mess with KiKi Shelby meant or did Windeon?
Statements:
Shaun Sanders’ written statement
Shaun: We got to the house and I was checking the area out and Windeon said, "Let’s go to the back...", And I was like let’s go to the front door and see if Kiki is at home so that we can confront him.
T\Redirect by Windham\p91 Waters: 11Q Now, did you form that opinion based upon not only what he told you but everything you’ve learned-- 15Q --even what Windeon told you? 16A. Yes. 20Q --it appeared, to you, just using common sense, that that’s what he meant-- they were going to do some physical harm to KiKi Sanders (sic) 24 A Absolutely.
PT\Direct by Windham\ p106 Waters: 20 He was --I was asking him some questions then. I think he had finished his rendition of what he was talking about that--the night of the homicide, and he was--at that point I’m asking him some just general questions about what he was doing and who he P107 was with, had he come in contact with anyone that night that was related--that we knew was related to the homicide. 5A and he told me at that point that Windeon had been pestering him, basically, about going to KiKi Shelby’s house to take care of some personal business between KiKi and, I guess, some other--another brother.
PT\Direct by Windham\p116 Waters: 4A Well, at this point Shaun is now telling me he was in the house. 14Q Now,at this time is he saying anything about wanting to mess with KiKi because of any problem he‘d had with his brother. 17A. Not at this point. I don’t recall any discussion. 19Q That story has changed to something else? 20A Now, it’s changed.
T\Cross by Easterling\p53 Waters: 12 Mr. Windham asked you did he tell you what "mess with KiKi Shelby" meant. And you testified "to hurt him physically." A. yes. 19Q Is that your interpretation of what "mess with KiKi Shelby" means, or is that Shaun Sanders’ words? 22A Those were not his specific words. 23Q So, that’s your opinion of what "mess with KiKi Shelby" means, correct? 25A yes.
Issue:
The evidence shows inconsistency/malingering as to what Shaun Sanders said. Waters testifies that he used information based upon what Windeon said. This should have been pursued because how much of Shaun’s alleged "oral statement" came from Windeon.
Question 26:
How many times did Shaun indicated there was a switching of guns?
Statements:
T\Direct by Windham\p11 Waters: 9A He indicated that he and Windeon exchanged weapons two or three times.
T\Direct by Windham\p 6220 Q That’s not what he said, is it? What he said was they switched a couple of times; isn’t it correct? A Which would indicate twice.
Issue:
The evidence shows inconsistency/malingering as to what Shaun Sanders said.
Question 27:
What did Shaun say happened afterwards?
Statements:
PT\Direct\p123 Waters: 7Q Did he tell you where they went when they left? 9A They went back to the apartment, apparently, where they had had a party.
PT\Direct\p123 Waters: 15Q Did he tell you anything about what he did after they--you know, after leaving the Shelby’s house and giving the black gun back to Windeon? 20A Well, he said he walked around and then returned to the apartment and then went to the store for his girlfriend.
Issue:
The evidence shows inconsistency/malingering as to what Shaun Sanders said. This is one of the most blatant, evil of lies. I believe it shows what he is capable of in assisting a person guilt. Do note the reference and how close he change one from statement to the other.
Question 28:
Why was his rights not read?
Statements:
PT\Direct\p18 Swaim: 12Q By the way, did you read him his rights at that time? 14 A No. He wasn’t under arrest. 16Q Is that why you didn’t read him his rights? 17A correct. 18Q. --you didn’t have him in custody, you weren’t trying to take a custodial statement from him? 21A No.
T\Direct\p15 Waters: 3Q Now, after you placed him under arrest, did you have any desire to try to memorialize what he had told you in some form? A Yes, I did. 7Q What did you do in regards to that? 8A I asked him if he wanted to make a formal statement and gave him three methods by which he could do that.
PT\Direct\p127 Waters: 1Q Now, do you want to try to memorialize everything he’s said in a memorialized statement? 4A In a formal statement of some kind, yes 5Q Statement of person in custody? 6A Correct.
Issue:
The evidence shows the officers did not read him his rights initially because they were not trying to take a custodial statement from , however there comes a point they are trying to get that custodial statement and his rights still were not read.
Question 29:
When was Shaun arrested\custody?
PT\Direct by Windham\p36 Swaim: 6A I went back in the office and waited for Waters to-- 9A -- get through talking to Shaun. And he did. 17 I stayed out. 18Q how much longer were they in there talking before you saw either one or both of them again? 21A Probably about--somewhere around 6:30, 7:00 ‘clock. Had you taken Windeon back to the jail? P3710 I really don’t remember. 11Q So, you say you took them both back. At some point in time, you did take Shaun Sanders to jail? 14A Right. 15Q But it’s not at this point in time. At this point in time he’s not in custody. 18. Correct.
PT\Direct by Windham\p39 Swaim: 21 Of course, he wanted to see us. He had asked us, "Come see me tomorrow." So, we went down there to check him out of jail. P40 1Q At this point in time, he had been arrested and placed in custody? 3A He was arrested prior to him going to jail, about 6:10 on the 14th. 13Q But he’s still not in custody at that time. It was-- he wasn’t under arrest at that time. 16A He wasn’t under arrest until 6:10 p.m.
Issue:
The evidence shows inconsistency/malingering as to if/when Shaun was in custody. He testifies that as late as 7:00 he was not in custody. He comes back to say he was arrested at 6:10. This totally confused the prosecutor who tried to "clear this up" but could not.
Question 30:
Was Swaim present when Shaun was arrested?
Statements:
PT\Direct by Windham\p35 Swaim: 1A. Well, at that point I --Waters went in and 2 talked to Shaun about what he wanted to say. 3Q. Okay. 4A. I didn't go back in there. I stayed out. P36 6A I went back in the office and waited for Waters to-- 9A --get through talking to Shaun. And he did. 11Q Did you ever go back in-- 16 A. No, sir. I stayed outside.
PT\Direct by Windham\p125Waters: 22Q Did you at some point in time, however, decide to arrest him? 24A Yes we did.
T\Direct by Windham\p134 Swaim: 1Q. And after he was arrested did you give him a card or something? A. I did.Q. Why did you do that? A. He said he wanted to talk to us tomorrow morning, requested that we come get him.
T\Direct by Windham\p16 Waters: 9A I gave him one more opportunity to make a formal statement. 13A He said, "I won’t do it right now." "Come and get me in the morning, and I’ll give you one then." 18A I agreed to that plan and told him that that’s what we would do. 21Sergeant Swaim at that point entered the discussions and gave Shaun one of his business cards.
PT\Direct by Windham\p37 Swaim: 19A Now, did you have any further contact-- 23A. Other than taking him back to jail and --he asked for a business card, and I gave him a business card that day.
Issue:
The evidence will show inconsistency/malingering as to if Swaim was in that room. Their statement is "no" but their testimonies are consistently what "we did...".
Question 31:
When did Swaim see Shaun and Waters again, once he began his "oral confession"?
Statements:
PT\Direct by Windham\p36 Swaim: 18A And how much longer were they in there talking before you saw either one or both of them again? 21A Probably around--somewhere around--probably 6:30, 7:00 o’clock.
PT\Cross by Easterling\p81 Swaim: 8A He asked for a business card and said, "Come back and get me tomorrow, and I‘ll give you guys a statement." 11Q About what time is this, now? 12A This is probably somewhere around--I want to say probably 7:00, 7:00 o’clock, 7:00p.m.., somewhere in that area--7:30.
T\Direct by Windham\p15,16 Waters: 3Q Now, after you placed him under arrest, did you have any desire to try to memorialize what he had told you in some form? 6A Yes, I did. 7Q And what did you do in regards to that? 8A I asked him if he wanted to make a formal statement and gave him three methods by which he could do that. 21A He kind of balked at that suggestion and told me that he had told me the story and that that should be good enough. P16 8Q Did he say anything more to you? 9A I gave him one more opportunity to make a formal statement. 13A He said, "I won’t do it right now." He said, come and get me in the morning, and I’ll give you one then." 16Q Okay. And after he told you that, what did you do with him? 18A I agreed to that plan and told him that that’s what we would do. 20Q And then what did you do? 21A Sergeant Swaim at that point entered the discussion and gave Shaun one of his business cards.
Issue:
The evidence shows inconsistency/malingering as to previous testimonies. (Ex. How could Swaim have entered the discussion giving him a card when he should not have been in that room.) Particularly note the time variance.
Question 32:
Did Swaim read Waters report or have second hand knowledge as to what occurred during the "oral confession"?
Statements:
PT\Cross by Easterling\p87 Swaim: 18A I don’t know what he told Investigator Waters I wasn’t in there. And I haven’t read that portion of the report--23A about his oral statement; so, I’m not real sure what it says.
PT\Cross by Easterling\p81 Swaim: 19A I wasn’t in the room when Waters arrested him; but after reading the report as documented, it was that Waters arrested him at 6:10.
PT\Direct by Windham\p126 Waters: 15 Did you tell him all this? 16A oh, yeah. I had gone out and talked to Sergeant Swaim and --19Q You told him all this stuff that Shaun had said? 21A Gave him all the information. Sure.
T\Cross by Easterling \p155 Swaim: 1A. I don't believe I was in the room when he said that. No. Waters relayed that to me. Q Okay you came up a little bit later than that? A. I was sitting out at my desk while Waters was speaking with him.
Issue:
The evidence will show that Swaim is inconsistent/malingering as to what he knew/should have known regarding what occurred in the last meeting.
Question 33:
What was discussed with Shaun regarding charges?
Statements:
PT\Redirect by Windham\p90 Swaim: 10Q You never talked to him about the different kinds of charges that might be filed on him did you? 13A No. 17Q You never even told him that you had probable cause to arrest him for capital murder, did you? 20A No.
T\Cross by Easterling\p7011 Q What did you tell him he was under arrest for? 13A capital murder. 20Q And that was your opinion, right? 25A Well, he had not yet been charged. P71 2A The charge we were discussing with him was capital murder.
T\Cross by Easterling\p72 73 Waters: 25Q Now, at this point you told him that-- or you and Sergeant Swaim told him something to the effect that, " We’ve got to go to the district Attorney’s office, where they’re going to make a decision on the charge, " correct? 6A. That may have been discussed with him. Yes. 14Q That’s when he started discussing with you, "Am I going to be charged with capital murder; or am I going to be charged with burglary or robbery, which is what I really did?" Do you remember that discussion? 20A I don’t recall discussing specific charges with Mr. Sanders.
T\Cross by Easterling\p75, 76 Waters: 22Q He wanted to know what the decisions was about the reduced charge isn’t that correct? P76 1A No, that is not correct. 2Q Why do you say that? 3ABecause that’s not what he wanted to do. 4Q Oh, he didn’t want the reduced charge? 5A No. He wanted to make the statement. We didn’t discuss charges. In fact, at no point did we discuss charges.
T\Cross by Easterling\p77 Waters: The only time that a charge was discussed was when he was placed under arrest, and he was advised that he was being placed in jail under capital murder.
T\Redirect by Windham\p92 Waters: 25 Did the defendant ever articulate P93 any concern to you about any type of charges? 3A At no time.
PT\Cross by Windham\p150 Waters: 19 I don’t recall any discussion about lesser charges. 21Q You don’t recall, or it didn’t happen? 22 I don’t believe it happened. But I don’t recall that.
T\ Redirect by Windham\p92 Waters: 19Q He didn’t say anything to indicate to you that he was concerned about Windeon telling you that he was the actual shooter, did he? 22 No.
T\Cross by Easterling\p56 Waters: 10 It was a reasonable deduction from Shaun’s attitude, his demeanor, his description of everything that happened that he wanted to come down and make sure that nobody was swearing or giving a statement that he had murdered Phyllis Shelby or shot her. 17A I think that’s accurate, yes.
Issue:
The evidence will show inconsistency/malingering as to what was discussed with him. Particularly note, the answers to who was asking the question. Note how one evasive answer contradicts with other testimonies.
Question 34:
Was Shaun given his Miranda warnings for the "oral confession"?
Statements:
T\Direct by Windham\p15,16 Waters: 3Q Now, after you placed him under arrest, did you have any desire to try to memorialize what he had told you in some form? 6A Yes, I did. 7Q And what did you do in regards to that? 8A I asked him if he wanted to make a formal statement and gave him three methods by which he could do that. 21AHe kind of balked at that suggestion and told me that he had told me the story and that that should be good enough. P16 8Q Did he say anything more to you? 9A I gave him one more opportunity to make a formal statement. 13A He said, "I won’t do it right now." He said, come and get me in the morning, and I’ll give you one then." 16Q Okay. And after he told you that, what did you do with him? 18A I agreed to that plan and told him that that’s what we would do. 20Q And then what did you do? 21A Sergeant Swaim at that point entered the discussion and gave Shaun one of his business cards.
T\Redirect by Windham\p98, 99 Waters: 1Q I believe you told Mr. Easterling that you told him, "That’s -- and when he said, No. I’ve told you everything" you said, "That’s not good enough." P9910Q Is that what you were trying to explain to Shaun Sanders--that if you want your story told, you need to memorialize it: -- 14A Correct. 15A That’s the requirement of the law? 16A Those are the three options he was given. 17Q And at that point he wanted to tell his story, didn’t he? 19A Yes. 20 And would it be fair to say that you allowed him to do that? 22A Yes. 23 You gave him his warnings, following the law. You gave him his Miranda warnings, --made sure that he understood them P100 and that he waived them freely, voluntarily, and intelligently--didn’t you? 3A That’s correct.
Issue:
The evidence shows a consistent testimony to Windham as to "what happened next" and Waters does not testify he was given his rights the first day. However, the prosecutor redirects and tells him "You did this..." and Waters agrees with all of that--based upon what he testified to with Easterling. The problem is Windham, is on a roll, purposely/or not combines the events for Mon. and Tues. while asking Waters what he did and Waters agrees to it all. Therefore you are either inconsistent or malingering.
Question 35:
The "not good enough statement", was it coercion?
Statements:
PT\Cross by Easterling\p148 Waters: 17Q What did you mean by telling him that? 18A That wasn’t going to be good enough as far as filling a charge on him. 20Q All right. So, you wanted him to give you a statement that you could file a charge on him, correct? 23 Absolutely.
T\Direct by Windham\p72 Waters: 23A It wouldn’t be a documented statement in the courtroom.
Issue:
The evidence shows there was admitted coercion?
Question 36:
Was Swaim present when Shaun made the final statements regarding not wanting to memorialize his "statement"?
Statements:
PT\Direct by Windham\p35 Swaim: 11Q Did you ever go back in-- 16 A. No, sir. I stayed outside.
PT\Cross by Easterling\p80 Swaim: I believe it was in the presence of officer Waters only. Of course, Waters told me that when he came out. I don’t recall him ever--the defendant ever actually telling me that--18 A --about, you know, not wanting to do it right then.
PT\Cross by Easterling\p81 Swaim: 8A He asked for a business card and said, "Come back and get me tomorrow, and I‘ll give you guys a statement." 11Q About what time is this, now? 12A This is probably somewhere around--I want to say probably 7:00, 7:00 o’clock, 7:00p.m.., somewhere in that area--7:30.
PT\Direct by Windham\P134 Swaim: 11Q. Do you recall Officer Waters wanting to get a formalized statement from him, an in custody statement now? A. Yes. Q. Do you recall how he responded to that? A. He responded by basically saying that he was not ready to give a statement that day, that he would do it tomorrow --if we would come get him tomorrow he would give us a statement.
T\Cross\P155 Swaim: 8Q. All right, eventually Shaun told both of you--all that, "I don’t want to do that now. I want to wait. Come and get me in the morning." Right?" 16A I think he had told that to Waters before; but then he repeated it, I believe, as we were escorting him to jail. Yes.
PT\Direct\p126 Waters: 10A At that point we asked Shaun if he wished to make a formal statement of some kind regarding the story that he had just told us. 13 When you say "we" asked him, do you mean you personally or you and Swaim? Did you tell Swaim all this? 16A Oh yeah.
PT\Direct\p37 Swaim: 19A Now, did you have any further contact-- 23A. Other than taking him back to jail and --he asked for a business card, and I gave him a business card that day.
PT\Direct by Windham\ p128 Waters: 2A I gave him another opportunity to again to make a statement and-- 8 Well, his response was that he wouldn’t do it right then but that if we would come an get him in the morning he would give us a statement at that time. 12Q And then what did you do, after he gave you that response? 14A Well, at that point we acknowledged to him that we would certainly do that. And Sergeant Swaim gave Shaun one of his business cards. And we then placed him in the southeast jail about twenty-- about 8:00 o’clock that night.
PT\Direct by Windham\ p131 Waters: 6A Once again, we gave him his choice of the type of vehicle he wished to use to make that statement.
Issue:
The evidence shows inconsistency/malingering as to what Swaim heard, when and where. Evidence shows that Waters asked once, and another last time, and a card was given (all in that room), then he was placed in jail.
Question 37:
What did Shaun say regarding making a statement?
Statements:
Monday evening:
PT\Direct\p127 & 128 Waters: 18A. His response to that was, "I’ve given you the story, I’ve told you what happened, and that ought to be good enough." P128 2A I gave him another opportunity to make a statement and -- 8 Well, his response was that he wouldn’t do it right then but that if we would come and get him in the morning he would give us a statement at that time.
PT\Direct by Windham\p39 Swaim: 2A It’s my understanding that Waters asked if he wanted to give a statement and his response was, "Well, I’ll talk to you tomorrow. If you’ll come see me tomorrow, I’ll talk to you and give you a statement; but I don’t want to do it today".
PT\Cross by Easterling\p80 Swaim: I believe it was in the presence of officer Waters only. Of course, Waters told me that when he came out. I don’t recall him ever--the defendant ever actually telling me that--18 A --about, you know, not wanting to do it right then.
Tuesday morning:
PT\Direct by Windham\p41 Swaim: 22A --And he didn’t remember my name but, you know, he was happy to see us; that he wanted to give his side of the story now; and he wanted to memorialize it, he wanted to give a statement.
PT\Direct by Windham\p129 Waters: 19A He said, "Man, I’m glad you guys are here. I was just going to have them call you but I couldn’t remember your name and they put that card in my property." 23Q He said that to you and Sergeant Swaim? 24A Correct. 25Q Did you-all check him out of the southeast jail? P130 2A Yes, we did. 6 He had made another statement prior to that. I can quote him on that one, too. 8Q Wait a minute, now.
Issue:
The evidence shows what the officers indicated --that Shaun consistently says I’ll talk to you tomorrow. Waters quotes of Shaun Sanders were that he "made some type of oral admission".(While he and Shaun were suppose to be alone.) that gave him reason to arrest him. Pretrial, Swaim testifies that clearly Shaun stated he would orally and physically give a statement(The following day, after he had been detained.). Swaim did not testify during the trial. Particularly note, during Waters trial testimony, how the prosecutor stops him from testifying. It would certainly explain why Swaim removed himself from that room and would prove that Shaun Sanders was not rightfully incarcerated or free to leave.
|