Baltimore Lawyer
Baltimore Lawyer
For helpful tips finding Baltimore Lawyer please see our guide to choose a lawyer in the right column. For your convenience we have included resources for you to continue your search below.
Maryland Constitution Excerpts
ArtArticle 1. That all Government of right originates from the People, is founded in compact only, and instituted solely for the good of the whole; and they have, at all times, the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their Form of Government in such manner as they may deem expedient.
Art. 5. (a) That the Inhabitants of Maryland are entitled to the Common Law of England, and the trial by Jury, according to the course of that Law, and to the benefit of such of the English statutes as existed on the Fourth day of July, seventeen hundred and seventy-six; and which, by experience, have been found applicable to their local and other circumstances, and have been introduced, used and practiced by the Courts of Law or Equity; and also of all Acts of Assembly in force on the first day of June, eighteen hundred and sixty-seven; except such as may have since expired, or may be inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution; subject, nevertheless, to the revision of, and amendment or repeal by, the Legislature of this State. And the Inhabitants of Maryland are also entitled to all property derived to them from, or under the Charter granted by His Majesty Charles the First to Caecilius Calvert, Baron of Baltimore.
(b) The parties to any civil proceeding in which the right to a jury trial is preserved are entitled to a trial by jury of at least 6 jurors.
(c) That notwithstanding the Common Law of England, nothing in this Constitution prohibits trial by jury of less than 12 jurors in any civil proceeding in which the right to a jury trial is preserved (amended by Chapters 203, 204, Acts of 1992, ratified Nov. 3, 1992).
Art. 6. That all persons invested with the Legislative or Executive powers of Government are the Trustees of the Public, and, as such, accountable for their conduct: Wherefore, whenever the ends of Government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the People may, and of right ought, to reform the old, or establish a new Government; the doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
Art. 16. That sanguinary Laws ought to be avoided as far as it is consistent with the safety of the State; and no Law to inflict cruel and unusual pains and penalties ought to be made in any case, or at any time, hereafter.
Art. 17. That retrospective Laws, punishing acts committed before the existence of such Laws, and by them only declared criminal are oppressive, unjust and incompatible with liberty; wherefore, no ex post facto Law ought to be made; nor any retrospective oath or restriction be imposed, or required.
Art. 18. That no Law to attaint particular persons of treason or felony, ought to be made in any case, or at any time, hereafter.
Art. 19. That every man, for any injury done to him in his person or property, ought to have remedy by the course of the Law of the Land, and ought to have justice and right, freely without sale, fully without any denial, and speedily without delay, according to the Law of the Land.
Art. 20. That the trial of facts, where they arise, is one of the greatest securities of the lives, liberties and estate of the People.
Art. 21. That in all criminal prosecutions, every man hath a right to be informed of the accusation against him; to have a copy of the Indictment, or charge, in due time (if required) to prepare for his defence; to be allowed counsel; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have process for his witnesses; to examine the witnesses for and against him on oath; and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury, without whose unanimous consent he ought not to be found guilty.
Art. 22. That no man ought to be compelled to give evidence against himself in a criminal case.
Art. 23. In the trial of all criminal cases, the Jury shall be the Judges of Law, as well as of fact, except that the Court may pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction.
The right of trial by Jury of all issues of fact in civil proceedings in the several Courts of Law in this State, where the amount in controversy exceeds the sum of $10,000, shall be inviolably preserved..
Art. 24. That no man ought to be taken or imprisoned or disseized of his freehold, liberties or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or, in any manner, destroyed, or deprived of his life, liberty or property, but by the judgment of his peers, or by the Law of the land (amended by Chapter 681, Acts of 1977, ratified Nov. 7, 1978).
Art. 25. That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel or unusual punishment inflicted, by the Courts of Law.
Art. 26. That all warrants, without oath or affirmation, to search suspected places, or to seize any person or property, are grievous and oppressive; and all general warrants to search suspected places, or to apprehend suspected persons, without naming or describing the place, or the person in special, are illegal, and ought not to be granted.
Art. 27. That no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.
Source: Maryland Archives
Choosing a Lawyer
Do I really need to hire a lawyer in Baltimore? This is the first question you need to ask yourself. In many cases you may be able to handle the situation without hiring a lawyer. If it is a small problem that can be managed without the consultation of a professional you may be able to save a considerable amount of money. If it is a serious situatuion than it is important that you speak with a good lawyer as soon as possible to avoid any long term problems..
Where can I find the best Baltimore lawyers? There are many ways to find a great lawyer online that is local to your area. You can search in directories online where a great deal of information is available about each law firm and partner. You can also check with local associations for referrals and recommendations. While every issue is important there is one final question you should ask yourself before hiring a lawyer in Baltimore. Are you comfortable with that lawyer and are you confident in their abilities? If the answer is anything other than a resounding "yes " you should keep looking for the lawyer that is right for you.
Lawyers typically specialize in the following fields:
- Administrative Law
- Agriculture Law
- Antitrust & Trade Regulation
- Banking Law
- Bankruptcy Law
- Civil Rights
- Commercial Law
- Communications Law
- Constitutional Law
- Construction Law
- Contracts
- Corporation & Enterprise Law
- Criminal Law
- Dispute Resolution & Arbitration
- Divorce Law
- Education Law
- Entertainment & Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Gaming Law
- Health Law
- Immigration Law
- Injury and Tort Law
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Labor & Employment Law
- Litigation
- Military Law
- Personal Injury Law
- Probate, Trusts & Estates
- Property Law & Real Estate
- Securities Law
- Tax Law
- Transportation Law
Find another lawyer :
- Seattle lawyer
- Charlotte lawyer
- Chicago lawyer
- Las Vegas lawyer
- Los Angeles lawyer
- Austin lawyer
- philadelphia lawyer
- phoenix lawyer
- detroit lawyer
- indianopolis lawyer
- columbus lawyer
- baltimore lawyer
- milwaukee lawyer
- boston lawyer
- denver lawyer
- portland lawyer
- oklahoma city lawyer
- atlanta lawyer
- honolulu lawyer
- kansas city lawyer
- new orleans lawyer
- omaha lawyer
- st louis lawyer
- virginia beach lawyer
- hartford lawyer
- Albuquerque lawyer
- trenton lawyer