NIST's 2005 WTC Enquiry : LACK OF ANSWERS' MYSTERY DEEPENS !

"AllTheTruth"'s reply to NIST's call for Public's input on WTC Inquiry :

- NIST Enquiry confirms AllTheTruth's Questions,
but deepens 9/11 Mystery by an astonishing lack of Answers !
      
 => Criminal Responsibilities for WTC Collapse, destruction of Evidence, and trapped Victims ?
------------------------------------

     4 to 5 August, 2005

    By Blas Mirco and Maltes' Friends

   

    ------------------------------

    NIST can -and must - do like NASA : Rectify Errors before landing !

>>> NASA's Shuttle proves, these Hours, that ERRORS CAN and must BE RECTIFIED, Damages can and must be Repaired, gaps can be filed, even during a Space-Flight of only a few Days !  

=> Why Not NIST, during a WTC Enquiry of many Years ?

    ---------------------------------------

    The Draft Reports of NIST's Enquiry on WTC confirm the crucial importance of certain critical Questions raised by "AllTheTruth".

    But NIST's findings, and their limits, deepen, also, the Mystery of lack of Answers !  Which becomes astonishing, even after Years of technical Enquiry, and millions of Federal Funds...

    Various Converging Indications raise the question even of Criminal Responsibilities eventually involved.

    All this highlights the regrettably Narrow limits inside which NIST's Technical Enquiry is closed, to the detriment of the vital need to find all the Truth on 9/11 Barbarities. (See :"AllTheTruth" :" NIST on WTC : 9/11 "Out of Scope" ? ", in : http://www.freewebs.com/allthetruth/nist911outofscope.htm ).
    -----------------
    
    To put it in a nutshell :  

    - NIST's detailed tests and arguments confirmed that neither Airplanes' Impact, NOT EVEN FIRES, aren't the cause of WTC's collapse : Buildings were able to withstand such strains.

But dislodging of Fireproof protection and/or other factors led to the drama.

    - However, NIST appears unable to give a full and convincing explanation about what really caused that.

    It leaves, also, without any convincing explanation, the crucial question why WTC's top, after leaning, at first, and "tilting" aside,

suddenly changed direction and, instead of toppling over, leaving the rest of the building intact,

on the contrary "changed" its movement "downwards", to a "vertical, total collapse", too similar to "controlled demolitions", (as AllTheTruth observed from the start).

    + Moreover, NIST indicates that Fireproof dislodging might, eventually, have "Malicious" causes.

    It's also obvious that the scandalous "disappearance" and loss of WTC's Steel (vainly denounced since 2001 by Sally Regenhard and "AllTheTruth"), leaving less than 1%, stands behind many "lacks of Information" denounced by NIST, (including on Fireproofing, WTC Columns, Fire Alarms, etc.).

    This is added to the confirmation that most People killed were trapped inside WTC by the absence of Helicopter Rescue and blocked doors towards Towers' Roof, as it had been decided by NYPD, which was, then, directed by ex-Mayor Giuliani's pal, Mr. Kerik.

    His department was also involved in the strange, but critical dysfunction of Radio-transmitters, which hindered Rescuers a.o. from knowing on Time what was going on.
    
    And in the Violent "clashes", imprisonment and threats against heroic NY Fire-Fighters and Victims' Families' access to WTC's Ground Zero : Suddenly blocked on October 2001, after "AllTheTruth" launched a call to search for clues on WTC's strange, vertical collapse, too similar to "controlled demolitions", by examining the debris.

    Today, after Mr. Kerik's personal links even to Steel recycling' "Mafia" at New Jersey were revealed in 2004, the Question becomes inevitable :

    - Both in his and others' cases : Are there any Criminal Responsibilities involved in WTC's strange, vertical and excessively deadly collapse ?

------------------

    In Particular :

    - The most solid, well-documented NIST's finding is that Fires were not the real cause of WTC's collapse, nor Airplanes' impact :

- "Fires did not cause Collapse" : WTC "Towers did not collapse under Aircraft Impact and Fires" alone, repeatedly stresses NIST.

    This conclusion seems proved by a long series of Tests, Documentary evidence, Calculations, Logic Arguments, etc.

    It confirms "AllTheTruth"'s criticism of ASCE's preliminary draft, back in 2002, which had pushed mainstream Media, like New York Times, AP, etc. to erroneously claim that it was simply the strength of the Fires which bended WTC's steel structure, causing its total destruction.

    - According to NIST, it should be a "widely dislodged Fireproofing", and/or other "Structural damage", which caused WTC's collapse.

    But NIST is unable to find enough proof on the real situation of WTC's Fireproofing, or even of its Columns...

    - Curiously, NIST claims that, despite the huge and controversial disappearance of WTC's Steel, nevertheless, the remaining pieces would provide "sufficient" evidence.

    However, this is blatantly contradicted by the Fact that, as it acknowledges, only .. less than 1% of WTC's steel remains : Only 0,25 % !

    Moreover, NIST denounces, elsewhere, that there is few or "No Information" available on WTC's exterior and mainly "core Columns", Floors' Trusses, etc., mainly on the crucial question of the level of Fireproofing and thermal Insulation damage, among many other Evidence which lacks : Left without Material proof, it is obliged to "guess" and make "assumptions" on WTC's Steel structure, only by ... "Photos and Videos" !

    NIST also observes that WTC's "Fire Alarms", which, normally, could "collect Valuable Information" for "Fires in a Building", were "not used" during 9/11, and, even today, have "No Information" to provide.

    Despite the importance of Water Sprinklers and other Fire protection systems which appeared damaged, NIST doesn't even raise any question on what might have happened, a few days before 9/11, during intrusions in WTC's Fire protection mechanisms by shady individuals reportedly involved in an ID-card Fraud and a Murder of witness in Memphis.

    NIST notes, nevertheless, that a crucial dislodging of Fireproofing might have been done "Maliciously".  

    But, once again, it doesn't even ask to extend Enquiries to eventual Criminal interferences in WTC.


    + On the main point : WTC's Collapse, NIST observes that, at first, the Towers' "Upper Section" had started to "Tilt" "towards the Side", and "Rotate" at its Top Part, ready to fall aside and leave the greater part of the building standing.

    But, afterwards, suddenly, something happened, and it "changed direction", after strange (and unexplained) "Dust puffs" and a "Dust Cloud" covered the scene : Instead, WTC's upper section, subsequently, "fell Downwards", "Vertically", followed by a "Total, Global Collapse" of all WTC in its entirety, from Top to the Basis.

    => Precisely, this is the most Important Fact on which "AllTheTruth"s critical questions on WTC have focused since 2001 :

It seems natural that the smaller, Top part, hit by Airplanes, would have fallen aside, leaving the longer part of WTC intact, to remain standing, and save many Human Lives.

But, on the contrary, here, an exceptional, never seen before, Vertical and Total Collapse occurred, for unknown reasons, concentrating all WTC's debris at its feet, almost as it occurs in the images of "Controlled Demolitions" (See "AllTheTruth"'s abundant publications and Documentation on that point).

Astonishingly, NIST has NOTHING serious to say in order to explain this paradox :

In 10.000 pages, it adds only one (1 !) short sentence, claiming (WITHOUT ANY PROOF) that "the fall of the (smaller) upper Section above the impact", "exceeded the energy which could be withstand by WTC's Structure in its (much larger) remaining portion". Thus, it's simply .."Gravity" which provoked WTC's "Global Collapse"...   
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
Without any Fact, Nor any Argument, or other Proof, at all : Only an unbelievably Short and Empty Claim !

Despite the fact that this controversial claim on WTC's collapse has been largely discussed, analyzed and refuted earlier, including by our own counter-arguments,

nevertheless, NIST behaves as if it hadn't'' ever heard anything, and/or didn't have anything to reply ...

=> It says NOTHING at all on the Controversy. Not even a word !

WTC's "vertical", total collapse, too similar to "controlled demolitions", and, plus particularly, the hollow claim about .. "Gravity", has been strongly criticized and refuted, with many arguments and facts, already Years ago :

F. ex. in "AllTheTruth"'s March 2002 Publication, titled : - "NEWTON DID IT, NOT ME !", about Dr Astaneh's claim and "US Congress 1st Hearing on 9/11-WTC" (See : http://www.freewebz.com/allthetruth/newtondiditnotmeafterusc.htm ).

Even if 911 Victims' Families and Friends, Experts, Officials, NGOs, involved Citizens, etc., (even ... U.S. Congress !) have already largely heard and debated about this Controversy about WTC's "vertical, total collapse" and the pseudo - "Gravity" claim,

nevertheless, NIST, after 3 Years of "Enquiry", astonishingly, makes as if it didn't know nothing about all that...

Despite admitting "substantial Uncertainties" on WTC's "Probable" collapse "sequence", which is condemned to remain highly hypothetical, and not convincing at all...

-----------------------------

+ Another Important point, concerns WTC's Emergency EVACUATION operations :

- NIST's Data confirm that greatest part among the People who were killed, had been "trapped" in WTC's upper floors, over Aircraft's impact.

=> Most of them died because there was no possibility for Helicopter Rescue from the Top Floor, NIST observes.

This was "one of the few Options available" to those People, NIST rightfully notes.

Moreover, "1968 NYC Code required Access to Roofs", Reports denounce.

- But, Roof Helicopter Evacuation was rejected by NYPD on 9/11, (directed then by ex-Mayor Giuliani's pal, Mr. Kerik), and People were shut off WTC's Top, since Doors had been "Blocked" by a so-called (in)"Security" service, which "trapped" them until an atrocious death...

The Deadly Scandal appears even bigger, since NIST notes that WTC inhabitants had NOT even been WARNED that Doors towards the Top had been "blocked", so that 9/11 Victims would tragically try to go upstairs, provoking even more atrocious deaths..

However, when it comes, precisely, to the Controversy about whether Helicopter Rescue from the Top, could and should, or not, have been carried out, things become surprisingly Nasty :

- NIST simply observes that NYPD (i.e. Mr. Kerik) had "refused" Helicopter Evacuation, and that NY-New Jersey Port Authority had "blocked Doors", without even warning People..

On this crucial, Life or Death, point, NIST only notes that, according to NYPD, an Helicopter had tried to land on WTC's roof at the beginning of Aircraft's Fires, but abandoned any other attempt after facing Heat and Smoke, because of a blatant Refusal and Interdiction ordered by NYPD (that is to say Mr. Kerik, then).

"Helicopter Rescue" from WTC's Top Floors "was NEVER CONSIDERED" by NYPD and NYNJPA, NIST reveals.

- WHY ? - Because someone found "too much Smoke to land", at an "early stage", at the beginning of Aircraft's initial Fire-balls, and because, "only a few" might have been rescued, in such conditions, NIST claims.

But it says Nothing about the period AFTER Aircraft's initial Fires had diminished and even ceased, which was much longer...

And, NIST never explains why "only a few" might have been rescued from the Top of the flat-roofed WTC Towers, and not many : Astonishingly, NIST limits itself only into a 1 sentence Claim, without Proofs, nor arguments, Not any Debate, nothing to convince...

Moreover, Helicopter Rescue from the Building's Top WINDOWS, technically possible, is NOT EVEN CITED, while People were notoriously abandoned and obliged to jump out of WTC's Windows to atrocious Deaths !

At least Technicians might have been able to penetrate at WTC's Roof and repair the Building's Water Supply system for Fire-Sprinklers, which had been reportedly dislodged after Aircrafts' impacts, according to NIST.

But any kind of use of WTC's Flat roofed Tops by Helicopters, had been scandalously "EXCLUDED by NYPD", (that is to say ex-NY Mayor Giuliani's partner, Mr. Kerik).

=> Given the crucial Importance of the matter (most Deaths resulting from People "trapped" by the blockade of WTC's top), NIST should, at least, Seriously Examine all the existing Possibilities, and make a full Enquiry on whether Helicopter Rescue could and should have been used to save Human Lives.

On the contrary, NIST's Drafts astonishingly are Empty on this important point, limited only into copying a NYPD's Controversial claim, and a superficial sentence, without any real proof....

==============

=> NIST Enquiry's Scope was already too narrow :

Nothing about Airplanes' "Hijacking" ; Nor about Political and other stakes for choosing 11 September's Date, among 365 possible per Year ; Nothing on WTC's New York context : Old WTC buildings, out-passed by New Skyscrapers prepared f.ex. at Times Square, where ex-NY Mayor Giuliani chose for his office ; NY-NJ Port Authority's wish to build a New, Bigger "Transport Hub" at WTC's area (as it was proved true these Days) ; etc.

=> It should not become even more restricted, this time by what appears to be at least, among some of NIST's technicians, an astonishing narrow-mindness (See above) ...

People should not be flooded by 10.000 pages of Technical Data, only to find out that, after Years of an Enquiry using millions of Federal Funds, many main, crucial Questions of substance have been hastily and superficially abandoned without any real, serious reply..

NIST should raise and pursue all important issues : Including Criminal and other Responsibilities of some for Hiding or Destroying Material Evidence (f.ex. WTC's Steel, Fire Alarms, etc).

And it's not possible to stress the crucial importance of "dislodged Fireproofing", while remaining, at the same time, Indifferent on Facts indicating that sly Individuals, involved in ID cards Fraud and Murder of eye-Witness, had access to WTC's core, a few days before 9/11, including on Sprinklers, etc.

=> Some well-placed and efficient Enquiries could become "Ariadne's threads" towards unmasking those who are really responsible for 9/11 deadly Barbary...
-----------------------------------------------------

[ Brutalities and Harassment delay AllTheTruth's reply => NIST's WTC Enquiry kept in the Dark ?

=> No Bureaucratic Pretexts to Obstruct Critical Observations on so Serious issues as 9/11 !
---
Surprisingly, AllTheTruth was brutally hindered to present its observations according to NIST's invitation, until 4 August 5.pm. Deadline, and was obliged to do so shortly afterwards.

Some of its main, leading and long-standing members suddenly faced scandalous and unprecedented Brutal or sly Obstruction and/or Harassment, delaying and canceling crucial meetings scheduled to prepare "AllTheTruth"'s reply to NIST's call during the previous week-end.

Thus, the only possibility was to present, the week-end of NIST's Deadline, at least a brief, incomplete, but substantial critical Note on AllTheTruth's main observations.

AllTheTruth's members were First to call for an Investigation on WTC strange, vertical collapse, (too similar to "controlled demolitions"), and struggled since October 2001, together with Victims' Families and Friends, (mainly Sally Regenhard, NY Firefighters, Experts, and others), to push until the need for a serious Enquiry was acknowledged by U.S. Authorities. This struggle, accompanied by WTC-focused critical observations of rare depth continued for Many Years, 2004 included.

=> Therefore, No Formal, Bureaucratic Pretexts could be convincing as a hollow attempt to Exclude and Ignore "AllTheTruth"s Critical Observations, just for a few Hours/Day, in such a crucial Enquiry spreading along Many YEARS :

Considering also the Importance of the Human, Social and Political Issues at stake, this would be tantamount to excessive formalism and Scandalous Abuse. Everybody would assume its Responsibilities in front of People and History.

A fortiori, when those who brutally and/or slyly obstructed and harassed AllTheTruth's members, in an obvious attempt to destroy Time just at the eve of NIST's deadline,

are astonishingly close (geographically and socio-politically) to certain Circles which have been, since long, suspected and denounced by "AllTheTruth" as probably involved in a trans-national sly Criminal Network which may hide behind 9/11 Barbarities.

=> Who would dare become Accomplice of Brutal and/or sly Aggressors, only in order to skip Critical Observations from People who asked and struggled among the first, since 2001, for a WTC Enquiry ?

NIST's WTC Enquiry should be kept "Clean", crystal-clear, and beyond any suspicion,
without being Stained by Negative Incidents.

As NIST's new Director, Hratch Semerjian, stressed : -"We need to hear from the public" : Until then, "Our job is not done".
"We will finalize our reports ..after receiving public comments.".

(NDLR : This has Nothing to do with U.S. President GWBush,
contrary to what some Manipulative Provocations claimed elsewhere :
On the contrary, some of "AllTheTruth"s long-standing members, after careful analysis, have actively supported his reElection in 2004 for a fresh, New mandate.

Moreover, AllTheTruth has published the view of most of its members that 911 and a series of other incidents may form a series of attempts to push U.S. President GWBush into a "sly trap", in order to exploit it politically afterwards, for reasons extending to issues of paramount importance for all Humankind).]
_____________________________________________________