IN SEARCH OF THE PERFECT CHURCH

 

How many times have you heard someone say they’re looking for "the perfect church"? How many times have you wanted to pack it all in and find a church that is above all the petty in-fighting, a church that is scrupulously on guard against the pollutions of the secular world, a church that is thriving and dynamic in its relationship with God? How many times have you heard the cry - or cried out yourself - "Oh, if only the Church today could be the way it was in the first century, when the apostles were still alive!"?

Once upon a time there was a young church. It started with the best of intentions - it wanted to know God through Jesus, and to make Jesus known to the rest of the world. And it seemed to have everything going for it - dynamic leaders in tune with the Holy Spirit, a thriving missions program, an eagerness to minister to the poor, and a fast-growing membership in whom the gifts of the Spirit were active on a regular basis.

Yet within the first year of that church’s existence serious problems erupted. The leaders caught members in false financial claims. Those who were charged with ministering to the poor were accused of racial and social bias. Doctrinal questions threatened to divide and destroy the church from the inside. The membership placed the brunt of the burdens on their leaders, and then judged them harshly for not adhering to the Scriptures, as they understood them. Top leaders argued bitterly over the qualifications of missionary candidates and wound up not speaking to each other, and one of the original founders of the church had to be publicly chastised for hypocrisy when he tried to play both sides of a major doctrinal schism.

This original "parent" church founded other churches, which in turn exhibited problems. Some were divided on political grounds, while some discriminated between their members on economic and social grounds. Some were accused of permitting their congregations to indulge in selfishness and licentious behaviour right in the middle of their services. Some congregations were in such turmoil that the members were suing each other. And at least one church was discovered to be condoning an incestuous sexual relationship.

By the standards that we often use to judge our own churches, this church and its offspring were a hopeless mess. It would seem that God couldn’t possibly use these churches. Many of us, if we found ourselves in one of these churches, would likely depart in horror, declaring that the Holy Spirit couldn’t possibly be at work there. Or else we would calmly launch our own reform programs, with or without the sanction of the leadership (and most likely without, declaring the leaders to be the ones most at fault), thereby becoming just one more faction ourselves.

This was not, however, what happened in our example. Remember what I said - the parent church wanted only to know God through Jesus and to make Jesus known to the rest of the world. The leaders recognized their humanity and permitted God to change their hearts. The congregation understood that people make mistakes and that their ultimate Head was not some man, but Jesus, and they forgave their leaders, and supported them. And the original congregation and the congregations of the offshoot churches acknowledge the authority of their leaders and looked beyond their flaws and saw God and His Spirit and willingly accepted correction.

Of course, they had little choice - where most Christians today have hundreds of alternatives within easy driving distance, the Christians of those churches were stuck with what they had. After all, they were the only game in town - they were the first century Church, based in Jerusalem, and most of their leaders were men who had literally walked with Christ and heard the gospel from His own lips. They had nowhere else to run to, so they had to face the sometimes excruciatingly difficult task of working out their own problems. They may not have always been successful, since as humans they could never quite achieve the perfection for which they strove, but they overcame their limitations to the point that these weak, sinful, seemingly self-destructive congregations reached their goal. They changed the face of the entire world.

I think there’s a lesson in there somewhere.

…………………………………

"It is a serious thing to live in a society of possible gods and goddesses, to remember that the dullest and most uninteresting person you talk to may one day be a creature which, if you saw it now, you would be strongly tempted to worship, or else a horror and a corruption such as you now meet, if at all, only in a nightmare…. There are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal…. But it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub, and exploit - immortal horrors or everlasting splendours…. Next to the Blessed Sacrament itself, your neighbour is the holiest object presented to your senses."

C.S. Lewis

The Weight of Glory (1941)

…………………………………

Here are the references I used for my description of the early church:

The Jerusalem church:

  • Financial dishonesty - Ananias and Sapphira - Acts 5:1-10
  • Favoritism - the Greek and Hebrew widow - Acts 6:1
  • Divisions - Circumcision party - Acts 15:1, 2
  • Leaders burdened - Acts 6:2-4
  • Leaders judged - Peter judged for visiting Cornelius - Acts 11:2, 3
  • Leadership disagreements - Paul and Barnabas argue over John Mark - Acts 15:36-40
  • Hypocritical leadership - Peter compromises with the Judaizers - Galations 2:11-13

Offshoot churches:

  • Political divisions - I Corinthians 1:10-12
  • Socio-economic divisions - James 2:1-4
  • Selfishness/licentiousness during communion - I Corinthians 11:20, 21
  • Lawsuits - I Corinthians 6:5, 6
  • Sexual immorality condoned - I Corinthians 5:1